Termination of IWT is befitting response to Pakistan, will ensure immense benefit to J&K: LG Sinha
'India has made it clear that blood and water cannot flow together, terror and talks cannot go together and terror and trade cannot happen together,' the lieutenant governor said.
'Termination of the IWT is a befitting response to Pakistan and it will have far-reaching consequences since it is dependent on the Indus River system,' he added.
Releasing a monograph 'Indus Water Treaty-Mirroring the Facts' by Sant Kumar Sharma here, the lieutenant governor (LG) congratulated the author on his remarkable work to bring out various historical aspects of this treaty.
Addressing the function, Sinha said the thoughtful and timely monograph offers interesting insights on the IWT with Pakistan and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's decisive move to terminate the treaty post Pakistan-sponsored Pahalgam terror attack on April 22 that left 26 persons dead.
The lieutenant governor said the historic step has marked a new beginning and reiterated the Government of India's commitment to utilize the nation's water exclusively for the benefit of its citizens.
'India's water will now flow within India and remain in India. With the termination of the IWT, we now have full control over the Jhelum and Chenab rivers,' said Sinha, adding its termination will ensure immense benefit to Jammu and Kashmir, which will be able to harness its real hydro power potential.
The barren areas of Jammu can be irrigated and there will be new momentum in the development of infrastructure in Jammu and Kashmir, he said.
The lieutenant governor said India will now create infrastructure, power plants and diversion to new areas with proper infrastructure to use the water and it will enable construction of new reservoirs.
Citing a debate in Parliament in November 1960 and the statements of prominent leaders in the House, he said that the IWT was a 'historical mistake, unfair, one-sided' and hampered infrastructure development in Jammu and Kashmir and restricted growth of development projects.
Sinha also paid tribute to the civilians, who were martyred in the Pahalgam terror attack and reiterated his resolve to honour and deliver justice to the terror victims of Jammu and Kashmir.
'No terror victim families will be left behind. It is being ensured that family members, who have been waiting for justice for decades, will receive jobs, financial assistance and necessary handholding. Their culprits will not be spared,' the lieutenant governor said.
'The properties of terror victims which were encroached by the terrorists or terror sympathisers will be vacated soon,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Had ceasefire due to common sense of both govts: Pakistan ex-foreign minister
'We had a ceasefire because both governments had the common sense, and they decided that enough was enough,' said former Pakistan foreign minister Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri, while addressing a seminar virtually on India-Pakistan relations in New Delhi on Saturday. 'Give credit where it is due. It was not any DGMO. It was the highest level of India and Pakistan that wanted the war to an end,' added the former minister, who served under President Pervez Musharraf. On statements of President Donald Trump regarding mediating a ceasefire, Kasuri said that 'this wasn't the first time, but the fifth time (that the US had intervened between India and Pakistan),' starting from former US defence secretary Robert Gates, former President Bill Clinton, former US Secretary of State Colin Powell and former President Barack Obama. Ever since the ceasefire on May 10, President Trump has repeatedly claimed that he brokered peace between India and Pakistan after the four-day military hostilities. New Delhi has consistently maintained that the two sides halted their actions following direct talks between their militaries without any mediation by the US. The seminar, titled 'India Pakistan Relations: Dialogue For Peace', organised by Delhi-based Centre for Peace and Progress, came in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, and had speakers from India and Pakistan interacting virtually on the future of ties. It also came just a day after the US designated The Resistance Front — a shadow outfit of banned terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba, which had claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack — as a foreign terrorist organisation. Kasuri also batted for 'discreet, back-channel National Security Advisor-level talks' between the two countries. 'If NSAs are not acceptable, anybody who has the confidence in the two governments, the two Prime Ministers should be (holding talks)… with the sole purpose of preventing the next war,' he said. Tanvir Sadiq, NC MLA from J&K, among the speakers from the Indian side, said there is stalemate right now in the ties, with the two countries just coming back from the brink of war. However, he said, 'Do you think this is an appropriate time for India and Pakistan to talk? Sadly, no. But do India and Pakistan have to talk? Definitely, yes.' However, without naming any third country, Sadiq batted for 'friends' of both countries to bring them together for talks. 'If you think India and Pakistan will sit on the table and discuss things that won't be possible. We will have to get friends of both India and Pakistan to make sure the two neighbours sit on the table,' added the legislator from Srinagar's Zadibal. Former Indian High Commissioner to Pakistan, T C A Raghavan, said that the present crisis comes from a problem of a structural nature. 'Across the political spectrum in both countries, every shade of political opinion at some point of time or the other has been in government, and during those times, there has been an India-Pakistan problem,' he said, adding that it is not something which has happened only now. For 35 years, the nature of the structural problem has focussed itself on terrorism, he said. 'No formula can resolve it; you can live with it or work around it… There was a greater understanding of that problem in Pakistan 20 years ago than it is now,' he said, referring to ex-Pakistan President Musharraf assuring India of not using terrorism to advance his political aims. Divya A reports on travel, tourism, culture and social issues - not necessarily in that order - for The Indian Express. She's been a journalist for over a decade now, working with Khaleej Times and The Times of India, before settling down at Express. Besides writing/ editing news reports, she indulges her pen to write short stories. As Sanskriti Prabha Dutt Fellow for Excellence in Journalism, she is researching on the lives of the children of sex workers in India. ... Read More
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Amid Trump claims, V-P Jagdeep Dhankhar says no power can dictate to India
Amid repeated claims from US President Donald Trump that he had brokered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan in May, Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar Saturday said there was no power in the world that could dictate to India on how to handle its affairs. Addressing a gathering of the 2024 batch of officers from the Indian Defence Estates Service at V-P Enclave, Dhankhar said: 'Don't be guided by narratives outside. All decisions in this country, a sovereign nation, are taken by its leadership. There is no power on the planet to dictate India how to handle its affairs. We do live in a nation and nations that are a comity. We work in togetherness, we work in tandem. We have mutual respect, diplomatic dialogues. But at the end of the day, we are sovereign, we take our own decisions.' Dhankar did not name Trump but his statement comes a day after the US president reiterated the ceasefire claim and said that five jets had been shot down during the hostilities between the two countries. On Saturday, the Congress demanded that Prime Minister Narendra Modi make a statement in Parliament clarifying the issue. Taking an apparent swipe at the Opposition in this context, the V-P said: 'Is it required to play every bad ball? Is it required to have wrestling sessions as to who said what? One who scores good runs on the cricket pitch always leaves bad balls. They are tempting, but not attempted. And those who attempt, you have safe gloves of the wicket keeper and someone in the gully.' Dhankar said there would be challenging times that could create divisions, and drew a contrast between Israel and Palestine, and Russia and Ukraine, on one side and Operation Sindoor, India's response to the Pahalgam terror attack in April, on the other. 'For example, we have seen global conflagrations — two of them in particular, you know them. These have become open-ended. Look at the devastation of property, human lives and their misery. And look at our calibration. We taught a lesson — taught it well. We chose Bahawalpur and Muridke, and then brought it to a temporary conclusion. 'Operation Sindoor' is not over, it continues. Some people ask the question — why was it stopped? We are a nation that believes in peace, non-violence, a land of Buddha, Mahavira, and Gandhi. We do not wish to kill even living beings — how can we target human beings? The idea was to generate sanity, to generate a sense of humanity in the others,' he said.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
INDIA bloc allies meet online for Monsoon Session strategy, set to raise Op Sindoor, Bihar SIR in House
It was the first meeting of the INDIA bloc in more than a year, albeit a virtual one. The alliance leaders last met at Kharge's residence on 5 June 2024, a day after the Lok Sabha election results were announced. The meeting, which included representatives from 24 opposition parties, was attended by top Congress leaders, including party president Mallikarjun Kharge, Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, and parliamentary party chairperson Sonia Gandhi. New Delhi: Leaders of the INDIA bloc held a virtual meeting Saturday to plan their strategy for the upcoming Monsoon Session of Parliament, vowing to corner the Modi government over the Pahalgam terror attack and the sudden halt of Operation Sindoor. Apart from the Aam Aadmi Party, which has pulled out of the alliance, leaders of all other members of the coalition including Trinamool Congress national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee attended and spoke in the meeting which lasted nearly two hours. Sources who attended the meeting said that, in his remarks, Rahul said that the Pahalgam terror attack and the 'sudden halt' of the military operations against Pakistan were major issues that the Opposition must raise unitedly in Parliament. Leaders, including Rahul, also referred to US President Donald Trump's latest claim that five fighter jets were shot down during Operation Sindoor and underlined the need to question Prime Minister Narendra Modi's silence on the matter. Sources close to Banerjee told ThePrint that the Trinamool leader questioned the one-year extension given to Intelligence Bureau chief Tapan Deka despite Jammu and Kashmir Lt Governor Manoj Sinha admitting that intel failure led to the 22 April attack in Pahalgam resulting in the deaths of 26 people. The TMC national general secretary, who was part of a multi-party delegation dispatched by the Centre to various countries to present India's case against Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, is also learnt to have questioned the objectives achieved by the initiative. 'How many countries came in our support? Instead of briefing our own people, MPs were sent to brief people and relevant stakeholders of other countries,' Banerjee is learnt to have said. Sources said CPI general secretary emphasised on the need for the INDIA bloc parties to act in a more coordinated fashion and avoid bickering in public. His suggestion came against the backdrop of the controversy sparked by Rahul Gandhi's remarks that he fights both the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh ideologically. CPI(M) general secretary who had termed Rahul's statement as deeply insulting, also attended the meeting but did not raise the matter, multiple leaders, who were in attendance, said. CPI(ML) general secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya said there was a near consensus on the need to put the Modi government in the dock on the subject of foreign policy and India's 'complete isolation'. 'Many leaders expressed the need for holding a physical meeting of the alliance soon. It is likely that the meeting will be held during the Monsoon Session itself as it will last one entire month,' Dipankar said after the end of the meeting. Congress general secretary (organisation) K.C. Venugopal said that the meeting would be held in August. Later, Congress Rajya Sabha Deputy Leader Pramod Tiwari told reporters that the Opposition also agreed to question the government's position on the continuing Israeli assault against Gaza. Among other issues that the Opposition resolved to raise in the Parliament include the demand for restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir and the Special Intensive Revision in Bihar. Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah also attended the meeting. The other CM present there was Jharkhand's Hemant Soren. The Samajwadi Party was represented by Ramgopal Yadav, while Tiruchi Siva of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam also spoke at the meeting. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: Narasimha Rao reason why coalition govts perform better than majority govts, says Naidu
