Singapore startup BeeX takes the sting out of maritime inspection costs with underwater drones
The company designs, builds and operates submarine drones – also known as autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) – that provide maritime inspection services.
Named after the Malay term for anchovies, its A.Ikanbilis drone cuts the cost and time of underwater inspections by as much as 50 per cent and slashes emissions by up to 95 per cent compared to larger remotely-operated vehicles (ROVs).
The fundamental 'innovation dilemma' with AUVs, said BeeX co-founder and CEO Grace Chia, is that they 'disrupt the profits of the best-performing subsea companies'.
Large subsea companies 'can charge their customers millions to use vessels with ROVs', she said. With simpler AUVs, companies cannot charge such high rates – and thus do not have an incentive to develop them.
After the success of its first drone, BeeX is developing an AUV that is larger and therefore can perform a wider range of inspection jobs – while still retaining an edge over ROVs.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 8.30 am SGSME
Get updates on Singapore's SME community, along with profiles, news and tips.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Sea change
BeeX has its origins in Bumblebee, a National University of Singapore (NUS) autonomous robotics club that Chia started as a student in 2012. There, she met schoolmate Goh Eng Wei, who would later become the company's co-founder and chief technical officer.
In 2013, Chia and Goh's team won the Best New Entry award in RoboSub, an international student AUV competition in San Diego, US.
The next year, she graduated and started working for a Singapore-based company that specialised in conventional maritime inspections – where she realised the role that AUVs could play.
Maritime inspections involve examining structures that are on or under water, which can include oil rigs, offshore wind and solar farms, ship hulls, foundations or construction piles.
Chia realised that while AUVs cannot do repairs or additions, they can perform inspection jobs faster and cheaper than ROVs.
'ROVs can do anything and everything, but need a lot of resources,' said Chia. 'You need to have big ships and well-trained personnel.'
ROVs are tethered to a mothership, where human pilots operate them. These motherships are purpose-built and tend to be large, as they need to provide piloting facilities, power and communications to the ROVs.
'If you want the cost of subsea inspection and data collection to drop, the only way is if you drop all these other things – but it goes against the business model of the conventional incumbents.'
That is where a startup could come in. Chia and Goh founded BeeX in 2018 with their own money and initial funding from the NUS Graduate Research Innovation Programme.
Bee agile
A.Ikanbilis, BeeX's autonomous underwater drone, uses numerous sensors including sonar to map its environment in two and three dimensions in real time. PHOTO: DERRYN WONG, BT
In 2020, BeeX got a boost when it won first prize in Port Innovation Ecosystem Reimagined at Block71's (Pier71) Smart Port Challenge for the application of AUVs to maritime inspections.
Pier71 is a joint startup incubator and accelerator by NUS Enterprise and the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore.
The win helped the company gain exposure to maritime corporates and investors, said Chia.
'Being plugged into the ecosystem enabled us to explore new opportunities for growth. We gained attention from diving companies who were more open to using robots to support their work.'
After receiving Enterprise Singapore's Startup SG Tech grant of S$500,000 in 2019, BeeX began developing A.Ikanbilis in 2020, with the drone's first operations in 2023.
While ROVs can be as large as a minivan and weigh more than 3 tonnes, A.Ikanbilis is less than a metre long and weighs 70 kg. It has various sensors, including a camera, sonar, lasers and an electromagnetic probe that detects the thickness of materials.
Without the need for a tether or pilot, it can be launched from a wide range of smaller vessels or from the infrastructure it is inspecting.
A.Ikanbilis also reduces manpower costs. There is no need for a specialised mothership, and training a drone supervisor takes just six months, compared to five to seven years for an ROV pilot.
Furthermore, the drone can navigate more quickly than an ROV, as it uses sonar and other sensors to 'see' beyond human sight. Unlike ROVs, A.Ikanbilis's performance is not dependent on pilot skill.
'With real-time sensors, the drone knows exactly where it is at all times, while the computer calculates the exact path to take. On average, an AUV can be 50 per cent faster than human-controlled flight,' said Chia.
'Our 'brain' is more intelligent and tested across more locations compared to ROVs, and our system is a lot more scalable,' she added, referring to the drones' autonomous navigation and surveying capabilities.
BeeX's drones will get smarter as more data is gathered. 'Our core advantage is that we have 14 years of underwater data to help our vehicles to learn.'
Sink to swim
The A.Ikanbilis drone inspecting a pile at sea. PHOTO: BEEX
BeeX has now grown to a team of 28 people. It last raised funds in a bridging round in 2023, with S$2 million from investors co-led by Earth Venture Capital and ShipsFocus Ventures.
'We're currently in pre-Series A, so we are building the groundwork for scaling,' said Chia.
The company has served 20 clients so far this year, up from 11 in all of 2024, in locations ranging from Singapore, Malaysia and Taiwan to the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom.
With its operating model established, BeeX will expand its fleet – doubling from four A.Ikanbilis drones to eight by year-end – and develop a bigger drone that can operate in more challenging environments.
Clients who adopted A.Ikanbilis are demanding more, said Chia. 'Now they start to ask us: 'Can your vehicle work for longer? Can it go deeper?' So that gave birth to the second variant, Betta.'
Betta is 1.5 m long and weighs 300 kg – much heavier than A.Ikanbilis but still smaller than most ROVs. Scheduled to begin operations later this year, Betta can work longer and deal with harsher weather and higher currents than its predecessor.
Its development is supported by the Enterprise Singapore-Innovate UK grant, which was awarded in 2023 to a consortium formed by BeeX, offshore survey services contractor Sulmara and the University of Strathclyde.
Without Betta's development costs, BeeX would be profit-making, said Chia.
But to go further in the AUV field, developing a more capable model was essential, she said. 'I think it's important to invest in development to ensure that the company has an up-sized chance of success in the long-term future.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
On The Red Dot: Hustle In My HDB
23:00 Min Edward and Nareeza run home salons in their HDB flats. With young kids at home, they juggle regulations, personal boundaries, and business dreams—all from home. How do they make it all work?


CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Are we paying too much for convenience these days?
How much does a bottle of water cost? At the supermarket, it's around S$0.60. At the provision shop downstairs, it's probably at least a dollar. But at a vending machine or the airport? The same bottle can cost you four to five times more, easily. Why do we willingly pay more in one context but not the other? This isn't a conversation about product quality. After all, we're not talking about artisanal spring water infused with ionised minerals. It is just that when we are feeling hot, thirsty or in a rush, we quickly become willing to trade more money for immediate relief. This is the convenience premium: We pay a higher price not for a better product, but simply a faster, easier way to get the same thing. And the dangerous part is, we're doing it more often than ever. THE CONVENIENCE PREMIUM Not too long ago, grabbing a meal meant either cooking it at home or taking a short walk over to the nearest hawker centre. Today, we get our food delivered with a few quick taps on our phone, paying at least 20 to 30 per cent more just to save the effort of cooking, walking or queuing. In a 2022 survey by food delivery company Deliveroo, more than 60 per cent of Singaporeans said that they used food delivery services more regularly, compared to the time before COVID-19. Singaporeans were also spending more on such services: S$108 a month, a 62 per cent increase from S$67.54 in 2019. Convenience has become increasingly monetised in Singapore. It is now packaged and priced into nearly every aspect of our daily lives, with merchants and service providers bundling their offerings in strategic ways to charge us more. We see it in ride-hailing applications with premium surcharges during peak hours and same-day courier services. Pay more for "express delivery" or wait longer, perhaps hours. No one likes to make that frustrating decision. The rise of a convenience culture means that we are often paying not for a better product or service, but simply for faster, easier access to the same thing. This has quietly shifted our spending habits. We're no longer evaluating the prices of products and services based on their quality or value – we're simply measuring how quickly or effortlessly we can get what we want. As more services capitalise on this mindset, the cost of living inevitably creeps up not just through inflation, but through the silent premium of convenience. THE REAL COST OF CONVENIENCE First of all, do we really know how much we are spending on convenience? On its own, a S$3 food delivery fee here and a S$10 ride-hailing surcharge there might seem insignificant. But these add up, perhaps quicker than we think. Check your favourite food delivery or ride-hailing apps and tally up your total over the last three months – does the figure surprise or shock you? Or do you feel it is still a worthy expense? Look closer at each individual charge. Ask yourself: Did I really need or want this one delivery or that one ride? Or did I pay for them out of impulse or habit? This is the paradox of paying for modern convenience. It feels efficient in the moment but over time, it quietly erodes our financial discipline and diligence. When everything is available on demand, our self-sufficiency also suffers. Young adults of today are rapidly losing basic skills like preparing our meals or fixing a leaky tap at home. Why bother learning to do either when we can simply pay someone else to do it for us? THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAP OF JUSTIFICATION Singaporeans are a notoriously busy, overworked group. After a long day, it may feel like a direct ride home or having a meal delivered is worth the S$20 we are paying. In the moment, the cost appears minor in comparison to the immediate relief it provides. We think: "I deserve this." Behavioural economists call this "justification bias" – the emotional reasoning we soothe ourselves with on trade-offs that do not make much logical sense. There is nothing wrong with this. The problem is when we start relying on it too frequently. What starts as a one-time indulgence can quietly turn into an ongoing expense. Before we know it, spending on convenience has become the default mode of living, and it is difficult for us to go back to more inconvenient times. Now, convenience in itself is not an evil. Paying a little more to save time can be a smart trade – if you are using that time wisely. For instance, I'm willing to fork out for a private ride so I can take a quick nap to recharge or make urgent calls in a quiet space. But if I spend that ride so that I may watch a drama or mindlessly scroll through social media instead, I'm not really buying myself time. I'm buying comfort and that's a very different equation. DON'T LET CONVENIENCE CONTROL YOU The busier we are, the easier it becomes to justify spending on convenience. Although convenience has become the currency of modern life, it shouldn't cost us control over our finances. As with all spending, convenience is worth paying for when the occasional need arises, but certainly not on a daily basis and not at the cost of long-term financial freedom. So if you find that you are spending a cool four to five digits each year on convenience, it might be time to think about whether cutting down makes more sense. The next time you are tempted to pay a little more for ease, pause and ask: Is this purchase making my life better in the long run or just easier in the moment? Are we outsourcing tasks to free up time for meaningful work, rest or relationships? Or are we making a habit out of draining emptying our wallets just to avoid minor hassles and discomfort instead of taking a few minutes to plan ahead? The price of convenience can be one worth paying – as long as we are aware of what we are truly getting in return.


CNA
5 hours ago
- CNA
Money Mind 2025/2026 - Millionaire Baby?
23:01 Min How to give your child a million dollar headstart. Digital nomads in search of their dream lifestyle – what ticks the right boxes? Plus – meet the Chinese writer who pens stories of ordinary lifetimes. Money Mind 2025/2026 About the show: Money Mind tells you how to make the most of your money with tips for investors, business ideas for businessmen and analysis of the economy, companies, markets, financial products and trends.