Default apps on iPhone: How to switch from Safari and Mail to others like Chrome and Gmail
Some of this functionality came with iOS 14, and now with iOS 18.2, you have a wide range of apps that you can set as default. So, you have to have iOS 18.2 or later versions installed in order to change the default apps on your iPhone, including selecting third-party apps for email, messaging, calling, call filtering, web Browse, passwords, as well as the keyboard. Wondering how to do it? Here are a few easy steps on how to change the default apps on your iPhone.
Also Read: Google to let users test Android 16 desktop mode on phones with external display support, here's how
Step 1: Open the Settings app on your iPhone.Scroll all the way down and tap on Apps.
Step 2: You will now see an option called Default Apps at the top of the Apps section. Tap on it.
Step 3: In the Default Apps section, you'll see various categories including Email, Messaging, Calling, Call Filtering, and more.
Step 4: Depending on which category you want to customise, let's go with Email for this example, you can select a third-party app. For instance, if you've installed Gmail from the App Store, you can set it as your default instead of Apple's Mail app.
Similarly, for the Calling app, you can choose FaceTime, Phone, or WhatsApp, if installed.For web browsing, you can also select other browsers like Chrome.
There are also options for changing defaults for Keyboards, Passwords & Codes, and Translation.
It should be noted that with iOS 14, Apple introduced the ability to change the default browser and default mail app. Previously, this option was somewhat hidden. You had to open a compatible app like Chrome and then choose it as the default browser from within that app's settings. But now, the process is more streamlined, and new categories have been added over time.
MOBILE FINDER: iPhone 16 LATEST Price, Specs And More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Google vs CCI: What the Android antitrust case means for India's digital ecosystem
Story so far: On August 8, 2025, the Supreme Court admitted an appeal filed by Alphabet Inc., the parent company of Google, against a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The tribunal had earlier upheld, at least in part, the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) findings that Google had abused its dominant position in the Android ecosystem to indulge in anti-competitive practices. Alongside Google's appeal, the Court also admitted related petitions from the CCI itself and the Alliance Digital India Foundation (ADIF), which is a coalition of Indian startups critical of Big Tech dominance. A bench led by Justice P.S. Narasimha has listed the matter for a detailed hearing in November. What has the CCI accused Google of? The CCI's investigation into Google began in 2020, sparked by complaints from app developers and industry groups who alleged that Google was using its market dominance in Android to push its own services and restrict fair competition. By 2022, the Commission concluded that Google had engaged in multiple anti-competitive practices. Chief among them was the mandatory use of the Google Play Billing System (GPBS) for in-app purchases on the Play Store. This meant that developers had to use Google's payment processing system, paying a commission that typically ranged between 15% and 30%, rather than integrating their own billing solutions. The regulator also found that Google exempted its own app YouTube from these billing requirements, giving them a cost advantage over competing services. This, the CCI argued, distorted the level-playing field and harmed both rival developers and consumers. In addition, the CCI highlighted that the Android licensing model required smartphone makers to pre-install Google's suite of apps — Search, Chrome, YouTube, and others — as a condition for access to the Google Play Store. According to the Commission, this bundling restricted consumer choice and suppressed innovation from alternative app providers. Based on these findings, the CCI imposed a fine of ₹936.44 crore on Google and issued a set of behavioural remedies, including directives to decouple Google's payment system from Play Store access, ensure transparency in billing data, and refrain from using such data to advantage its own services. What is Google's defence? Google rejected the CCI's conclusions, arguing that its practices were designed to enhance user experience, maintain security, and enable a sustainable business model for the Android ecosystem. The company maintained that Android is an open-source operating system, available for free to device manufacturers, and that OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) are not obligated to install Google's proprietary apps if they choose to license the core Android platform without Play Store access. It argued that pre-installing a set of Google apps was a matter of efficiency and user convenience, and did not prevent users from downloading competing apps. On the billing side, Google claimed that GPBS ensured safe and reliable transactions for users, helping to prevent fraud and reduce payment failures. The commission fees, it said, were consistent with industry standards and provided developers access to Google's global infrastructure, distribution reach, and regular security updates. Google also argued that exempting certain in-house services from GPBS was not anti-competitive but a recognition of differences in their business models. It pointed out that many leading Indian apps like PhonePe, Paytm, and Hotstar had grown successfully on Android, which shows that the market remained vibrant and competitive. What was the NCLAT's judgment? In March, the NCLAT delivered its ruling on Google's appeal against the CCI's 2022 order. The tribunal upheld several of the CCI's findings, agreeing that Google's mandatory billing policy and bundling of apps amounted to abuse of dominance. However, it reduced the financial penalty from ₹936.44 crore to ₹216.69 crore, reasoning that the original amount was disproportionate to the conduct in question. The NCLAT also struck down some of the CCI's behavioural directions, holding that certain remedies were either over-broad or lacked sufficient evidentiary basis. In May 2025, following a review petition, the tribunal reinstated two key directions that Google must be transparent about its billing data policies, and that it must not use such data to gain a competitive advantage for its own apps and services. This partial victory left all parties dissatisfied. Google sought a complete reversal of the findings, the CCI wanted its original penalties and remedies restored in full, and ADIF argued that the tribunal had gone too easy on Google. What's at stake now? The case raises fundamental questions about how much control a dominant platform like Android should have over the devices and services it supports, and to what extent regulators can intervene in the name of competition. For consumers, a ruling in favour of the CCI could mean more choice and potentially lower prices. If developers can bypass GPBS and use cheaper payment systems, they might pass on some of the savings to users. Greater transparency and restrictions on data use could also enhance privacy and fairness in app rankings and recommendations. However, industry observers warn that loosening Google's control could lead to more fragmentation in Android, with different devices offering inconsistent user experiences. For smartphone makers, the verdict could influence licensing costs and product flexibility. If the Supreme Court upholds the CCI's original remedies, OEMs might gain more leeway to pre-install competing services or experiment with alternative Android versions without losing access to the Play Store. This could be especially significant for smaller Indian brands that have struggled to differentiate themselves in a Google-centric ecosystem. For Indian startups and app developers, the case represents an opportunity to level the playing field against a global giant. ADIF has argued that Google's policies not only limit payment options but also give it an undue edge in promoting its own apps. A strong pro-CCI ruling could give local companies better bargaining power and distribution access. For Google, the stakes go beyond India. The country is one of its largest markets by user base, and an adverse ruling here could trigger similar regulatory demands in other jurisdictions. It could also force Google to reconsider its global Android business model, especially if courts require it to unbundle services or open its billing systems. What's the road ahead? The Supreme Court's hearings in November will likely examine both the legal interpretation of 'abuse of dominance' under Indian competition law and the economic realities of platform markets. Whatever the outcome, the decision will set an important precedent for how India balances innovation, consumer protection, and market fairness in the digital era. With Android powering over 95% of smartphones in the country, the Court's ruling will directly influence how hundreds of millions of Indians access apps, make payments, and use mobile services in the years to come. If the case ends with strong enforcement of the CCI's original directions, India could emerge as a leading example of robust digital market regulation outside the EU. On the other hand, if the Court sides with Google, it will reaffirm the status quo.
India Today
11 minutes ago
- India Today
ChatGPT told man he found formula to wreck the internet, make force field vest
A Canadian recruiter says a marathon three-week conversation with ChatGPT convinced him he had discovered a mathematical formula capable of destroying the internet and powering fantastical inventions such as a levitation beam and a force-field vest. Allan Brooks, 47, from outside Toronto, spent around 300 hours speaking with the AI chatbot in May. He says the exchanges gradually turned into an elaborate delusion, reinforced by ChatGPT's repeated praise and who has no history of mental illness, asked the chatbot over 50 times if his ideas were realistic. Each time, ChatGPT insisted they were valid. 'You literally convinced me I was some sort of genius. I'm just a fool with dreams and a phone,' Brooks later wrote when the illusion to a report in The New York Times, Brooks' belief began with an innocent question about the number pi. That sparked discussions about number theory and physics, during which ChatGPT called his observations 'incredibly insightful' and 'revolutionary.' Experts say this shift into excessive flattery, known as sycophancy, is a known risk in AI models, which may over-praise users because of how they are trained. Helen Toner, an AI policy expert, said chatbots behave like 'improv machines,' building a storyline from each conversation. In Brooks' case, the narrative evolved into him supposedly creating a field-changing mathematical framework that could crack encryption, threatening global cybersecurity. ChatGPT, which he nicknamed 'Lawrence,' even drafted emails for him to send to security upgraded to a paid subscription to continue the discussions, believing his ideas could be worth millions. The chatbot encouraged him to warn authorities and suggested adding 'independent security researcher' to his LinkedIn Terence Tao, shown parts of the conversation, said the theories mixed technical language with vague concepts and raised 'red flags.' He noted that chatbots can sometimes 'cheat' by presenting unverified claims as the conversation went on, 'Lawrence' proposed outlandish uses for Brooks' supposed formula, such as talking to animals or building bulletproof vests. Friends were both intrigued and worried. Brooks began skipping meals and increasing his cannabis Nina Vasan, who reviewed the chats, said Brooks displayed signs of a manic episode with psychotic features, though his therapist later concluded he was not mentally ill. She criticised ChatGPT for fuelling, rather than interrupting, his eventually sought a second opinion from Google's Gemini chatbot, which told him the chances of his discovery being real were 'approaching 0 per cent.' Only then did he realise the entire narrative was has since said it is working to detect signs of distress in users and adding reminders to take breaks during long sessions. Brooks now speaks publicly about his experience, warning: 'It's a dangerous machine in the public space with no guardrails. People need to know.'- EndsMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Google Pixel 10 series may drop SIM slot in favour of dual eSIMs: Report
Google is reportedly planning to phase out physical SIM card support with its upcoming Pixel 10 series smartphones. As per a report by 9To5Google, the Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro, and Pixel 10 Pro XL may feature dual eSIM support without a physical SIM slot. Meanwhile, the next-generation foldable, Pixel 10 Pro Fold, could adopt a hybrid setup with both physical SIM and eSIM compatibility. This claim contrasts with earlier leaked images that appeared to show a SIM tray on the Pixel 10's side frame. It is possible Google could follow Apple's regional strategy — in the US, newer iPhones only support eSIM, while other markets still get physical SIM slots. Google might adopt a similar approach, offering eSIM-only models in some regions and retaining physical SIM slots elsewhere. Google Pixel 10 series: Global launch Event: Made by Google Date: August 20, 2025 Time: 10:30 pm (IST) Livestream: YouTube Google Pixel 10 series: India launch Date: August 21, 2025 Google Pixel 10 series: What to expect The Pixel 10 lineup is expected to include four models — Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro, Pixel 10 Pro XL, and Pixel 10 Pro Fold — all reportedly powered by the Google Tensor G5 chipset. Built on TSMC's 3nm process, the chip is anticipated to deliver better performance and efficiency, along with a new custom image signal processor (ISP) aimed at enhancing photo and video quality. On the camera side, the Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro Fold may use the same main and ultra-wide sensors found in the Pixel 9a, which would be a step down from the Pixel 9. However, the base Pixel 10 may gain the 5x periscope telephoto lens from the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. The Pro and Pro XL models are expected to retain last year's camera hardware. The upcoming devices are also likely to support the 25W Qi2 magnetic wireless charging standard. Google is also said to be working on a new 'Pixelsnap' accessory lineup, which could include magnetic wireless chargers and cases. The Pixel 10 series is expected to be available in fresh colour options. Google has already previewed the Pixel 10 Pro in a blue-grey tone, likely called 'Moonstone,' while the base variant may arrive in a new 'Indigo' shade. In terms of software, the Pixel 10 series is expected to launch with Android 16. Google is also likely to introduce new Gemini-powered AI features, such as 'Camera Coach,' which could use visual intelligence to provide real-time photography tips, and a conversational Photo Editing tool, allowing users to make changes to images simply by describing what they want adjusted — like removing background elements or modifying scenes — without manually selecting tools.
