This £6.75 product from The Ordinary is my summer pedicure must-have
The craze first came to my attention when TikToker Elle McNamara appeared on my FYP, pointing out the sub-£10 product as the key to quick, exfoliated feet. As someone who's spent many an evening pre-holiday with pumice stones, foot files and sugar scrubs in hand, I was naturally intrigued.
In the video, McNamara says, 'This is the most underrated hygiene product. Apply glycolic acid onto a cotton pad onto damp feet. It eats away your dead skin. Follow with a layer of vaseline, put some socks on and thank me later.'
With my glycolic, cotton pads, Vaseline and socks ready to go, I thought to myself: 'It can't be this easy. Can it?' Keep reading to see how I got on.
How I tested The Ordinary glycolic acid 7% exfoliating toner:
With an aim to use the product over the course of three nights, I applied The Ordinary's glycolic acid to the soles of my feet using a cotton pad, saturating it generously. I then rubbed a pea-sized amount of Vaseline onto each foot and quickly slipped on some cotton socks to lock in the moisture and left the duo of products on my feet through the night. During and after testing, I recorded the following details:
Efficacy: As someone often pressed for time, I was keen to see if this unique use for TO's glycolic would present instant results, or require repeat, consistent use.
Value for money: This toner is very affordable, but if I need to use a third of a bottle every time I use it, that 'budget buy' is quickly going to rack up a serious expense. Likewise, if I need to use it 10 times as much as a pumice stone, it likely won't prove as cost effective.
Long-term results: The real clincher – how long will this toner leave my feet looking smooth (if at all)?
Why you can trust IndyBest reviews
Lucy Smith is a skincare expert and has been reviewing the industry's newest and most popular products for more than five years. For IndyBest, she's demonstrated her exfoliating know-how with expert-led pieces on salicylic acid and, after speaking with Kate Somerville, the benefits of lactic acid. She's tested several of The Ordinary's best-sellers, from its multi-active delivery essence to its SPF serum.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Star Fred: I won't let prostate cancer diagnosis get me down
Scots comedian Fred MacAulay has revealed he has been diagnosed with prostate cancer. The 68-year-old stand-up comic said he 'took the hint' and began getting regular tests after his father and brother were both diagnosed with the disease. But despite not having any symptoms, doctors recently told him the devastating news that he also has it. His diagnosis comes just months after six-time Olympic cycling gold medallist Sir Chris Hoy revealed his prostate cancer was terminal, having also had 'zero symptoms'. The comedian and radio presenter will now join Sir Chris's charity cycle in September to raise awareness, as he vowed not to let the illness stand in his way. He said: 'I'm determined not to let a prostate cancer diagnosis get me down. I've even managed to stay away from the internet because I'd just scare myself to death. 'Instead, I'm putting my trust in my doctors, and comforting myself in the knowledge that I've been diagnosed very early which means I should have the best chance for a good outcome.' And the father-of-three urged other men to 'get checked out' after admitting it was not until his father and older brother were diagnosed he 'actively decided I'd better do something to explore whether I was also at risk'. Mr MacAulay's father, also Fred, died at the age of 73 in 2002 after years of battling prostate cancer and mesothelioma. The comedian said: 'It was the mesothelioma which got Dad in the end, he worked on the railways and was exposed to asbestos and all kinds of nasty stuff before he became a policeman until he retired. 'But when my brother Duncan, who is 72 now, was diagnosed with prostate cancer eight years ago, I thought it was about time I took the hint and got checked out. 'When it became clear I'm more at risk because of the prevalence of prostate cancer in my family, I've been getting tested every couple of years.' It was only after his last tests a few weeks ago that doctors contacted him to advise him that further action was needed. He told the Sunday Post: 'Although I've not had any symptoms, the final tests came back positive just a few days ago and I am waiting to see what the medical team advise is my next step.' Mr MacAulay has been forced to cancel his Edinburgh Fringe shows and tour, but he still plans to join Sir Chris at the Tour De 4 in Glasgow, for the 56-mile bike ride on September 7 to raise awareness for Prostate Cancer UK at the Sir Chris Hoy Velodrome. He said: 'I hope by speaking up this will encourage other men to get checked out too. It could save their lives. 'It's always been a scary thing to talk about, but with all the progress in medicine the best thing to do is be aware, get tested and catch it quickly as it gives you the best possible chance of beating it.' He hailed Sir Chris, who has dedicated his time to raising awareness of the disease, as 'such an inspirational figure in the fight against prostate cancer' and described him as 'a true hero.' The cycling great announced last year that he was given between two and four years to live after being told his cancer had spread to his bones. He sparked a massive campaign to encourage men to get checked for the condition, partnering with the charity Prostate Cancer UK to provide an online risk-checker. Since then, more than 180,000 men have used it and following tests more than 1,000 have been diagnosed with prostate cancer and are receiving treatment.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on mitochondrial donation: IVF innovation leads to a cautious genetic triumph
Eight babies have been born free of a disease that can lead to terrible suffering and early death, thanks to pioneering scientists in the UK employing a form of genetic engineering that is banned in some countries, including the US and France. Ten years ago, when the government and regulators were considering whether to allow mitochondrial transfer technology, critics warned of 'Frankenstein meddling' that would lead to three-parent children. It's hard now to justify such hostility in the face of the painstaking work carried out by the scientific and medical teams at Newcastle, resulting in these healthy babies and ecstatic families. Mitochondria, like tiny battery packs, supply energy to every cell of the body. Their DNA is handed down in the egg from mother to child. In rare instances, there are genetic mutations, which means the baby may develop mitochondrial disease. About one in 5,000 people is affected by it, making it one of the most common inherited disorders. As the cell batteries fail in various organs, the child can experience a range of symptoms, from muscle weakness to epilepsy, encephalopathy, blindness, hearing loss and diabetes. In severe cases, they die young. There is no cure yet, so the aim is prevention. Women who have some damaged and some healthy mitochondria can have IVF and pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) to select embryos that are clear of mutations or only slightly affected. The options for women with 100% mutated mitochondria used to be limited to donated eggs or adoption – until parliament changed the rules to allow the technology in 2015 and the Newcastle Fertility Centre was granted a licence by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority to use it in 2017. The process does indeed involve three people. The would-be mother's egg and a donor egg are both fertilised by the man's sperm. The nucleus of the donated egg is removed and replaced by the nucleus of the woman's egg, but its healthy mitochondria remain. This composite egg is inserted into the woman's uterus. The resulting baby's DNA will be 99.9% from the parents and only 0.1% from the donor. Hardly a three-parent child. Yet there are controversies. Some countries will not permit use of the technology because of concerns over human germline genetic modification. The lab-mixed DNA will be passed to future generations, with who knows what consequences. And a question hangs over something called reversal, or reversion. The results of the Newcastle research published in the New England Journal of Medicine show that some of the embryos with healthy donated mitochondria developed mutations somewhere along the line. Mutations formed in 12% of one baby's mitochondria and 16% in another's. That was not enough to affect the babies, who were healthy, but previous work by other scientists has suggested that mutations can increase with time, and nobody yet understands why. The Newcastle scientists and medics have been highly praised for their slow and methodical work. They have brought joy to some families and hope to others. But this is still experimental technology and caution is absolutely valid. And inevitably there are cost issues. People who can afford it will no doubt pay, but the NHS is unlikely to be able to help the rest. Nonetheless, this groundbreaking research must surely be allowed to continue, albeit only in the same careful fashion.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Nurse 'nearly burns to death' in her own garden after firepit catastrophe
A nurse has issued a stark warning about the dangers of firepits and barbecues after she was almost burned alive in a garden accident that left her skin 'melting' off. Emma Colwell, 45, from Cheshire, England, had been sitting outside with her husband Andrew and a friend when the group decided to light the firepit. Having used it safely all summer, and knowing to keep her distance from flames, Colwell stood several metres away as her husband poured lighter fuel into the bowl. The mother-of-two turned to pull on her cardigan - just as a sudden gust of wind blew the flammable liquid towards her, igniting her clothes in an instant. She said: 'I just panicked and ran into the house - I was literally on fire. 'I was ripping all my clothes off, and then my nursing head kicked in. I jumped on the couch and started rubbing my back. 'My husband kept turning me over, trying to put the flames out.' Eventually, the flames subsided enough for Andrew to carry his wife upstairs to the shower as the house began to fill with smoke. She said: 'I looked down and saw skin all over the bath. I was in a state of shock.' But just moments later the nurse was roused from her shock-induced state as her husband came back to rescue her from their quickly burning home. She went on: 'I thought I was standing at the end of the drive shouting for help, but afterwards people told me nothing was coming out. 'They said my skin was melting off and the reality hit me: my life was never going to be the same again.' Colwell was then rushed to Whiston Hospital where she was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with third-degree burns to her back, legs, and arms. At this stage, all three layers of skin - epidermis, dermis and subcutis - are damaged, leaving tissue exposed. Almost 30 per cent of the nurse's body had been damaged by the fire, leaving her in excruciating pain. She remembers speaking to her friends and family who told her that it was really 'touch and go'. 'We didn't know if Emma was going to make it,' her husband added. After undergoing ten skin grafts over the course of a month, Ms Colwell was finally discharged from hospital but unable to return home given the extensive fire damage. 'We lost everything', she said. 'But I just knew I couldn't let it beat me. Now I have good days and bad days where I worry about further surgeries. 'I never thought anything like this would happen to me. It happened in the click of a finger and I could have died. So now I live every day like it's my last. 'It made me aware of who and what's important in my life not taking anything for granted.' Now the nurse - who has since fitted her home with fire extinguishers - is urging people to stay vigilant around fires and barbecues especially as the weather gets warmer. She said: 'If you're going to get a fire pit, get a log burners or one that's enclosed.' However, some experts disagree that wood-burning stoves are the safer option. Earlier this week experts warned that log-burners could be behind a host of serious health conditions. These included heart disease, lung cancer and even damage to the kidneys, liver, brain, and nervous system. This is because log-burners release pollutants such as ultrafine particles, fine particulate matter, black carbon, and carbon monoxide. It is estimated that 3.2 million people die prematurely each year globally due to household air pollution due to incomplete fuel combustion - including 237,000 children under the age of five.
