logo
Bush helicopter pilot to front reality TV star's trial

Bush helicopter pilot to front reality TV star's trial

Perth Now8 hours ago
A jury in the trial of reality TV star Matt Wright is set to hear from a bush pilot who was first at the scene of a helicopter crash that killed Outback Wrangler co-star Chris "Willow" Wilson.
Wright is being tried in the Supreme Court in Darwin on three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice following the February 2022 crash in a remote part of Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory.
The crown case is that Wright did not properly record helicopter flying hours and was concerned crash investigators would uncover the issue, triggering possible charges against him and his company.
Crown prosecutor Jason Gullaci SC told the jury the charges did not relate to the cause of the accident and it was not alleged Wright was responsible for the crash or the death.
Mr Wilson was in a sling under the helicopter on a crocodile egg collecting mission when it plunged to the ground, killing him and critically injuring pilot Sebastian Robinson, who is now a paraplegic.
The jury on Friday is set to hear from bush helicopter pilot Michael Burbidge who was first onto the crash scene in a paperbark swamp after contact was lost with Mr Robinson's chopper.
Wright flew to the scene in his own helicopter with off-duty police officer Neil Mellon.
Mr Mellon told the jury on Thursday he removed a handgun and phone from Mr Wilson's body and told others at the scene he would put him in a body bag for transport by Careflight chopper to Darwin.
The jury heard a recording of a statutory declaration made by Wright to police days after the crash, saying crocodile egg collection using helicopters had its "inherent risks".
But he said his Helibrook company continued to work with the Civil Aviation Safety Authority to minimise risk and make the job as safe as possible.
"Usually it's the crocodiles that's the danger," he said, with collectors dropped onto croc nests to collect the eggs.
"As much as the lads see it as a fun adventurous day, it's also a serious operation that we're doing."
Wright said in his statutory declaration he had no problem releasing maintenance documents to aviation safety authorities.
Everyone who flew into the crash scene was distraught and "pretty well shell-shocked" at the loss of Mr Wilson, whose body had been covered with a tarp, he said.
Crown prosecutor Jason Gullaci has told the jury Wright failed to give aviation authorities the crashed chopper's maintenance release and ordered an associate "to just torch it".
It was also the crown case that Wright visited Mr Robinson in Royal Brisbane Hospital days after the crash and was "putting the hard word on him" to falsify helicopter flying hours, which he refused to do.
But defence senior counsel David Edwardson KC said his client "emphatically denied" trying to get Mr Robinson to falsify flight records or telling an associate to find and destroy the maintenance release.
The Darwin trial before acting Justice Allan Blow is expected to take up to five weeks.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former army major Graeme Davidson, accused of murdering wife on Qld kayaking trip, granted bail
Former army major Graeme Davidson, accused of murdering wife on Qld kayaking trip, granted bail

News.com.au

time31 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Former army major Graeme Davidson, accused of murdering wife on Qld kayaking trip, granted bail

A former army major charged with the murder of his wife while the pair were kayaking on a lake has been granted bail in a bombshell court decision. Graeme Davidson's case has been in and out of the Supreme Court in Brisbane over the past week as his legal team fought for his release on bail, following the police arrest in May this year. Mr Davidson — an ex-Australian Army major who also held the rank of Captain in the British Army — is charged with the murder of his wife Jacqueline in November 2020. The pair were kayaking on Lake Samsonvale in Petrie on November 27 that year when Jacqueline drowned and could not be revived. Police allege Mr Davidson was involved in his wife's death. He is also charged with fraud and attempted fraud, relating to allegations he fraudulently collected a life insurance payout worth $200,000, before attempting to claim another $950,000. Mr Davidson has not entered a plea to the charges. A bail application in the Supreme Court which began on July 31 has spread over four hearing days. Craig Eberhardt KC, Mr Davidson's defence barrister, has spent much of the application alleging inconsistencies and weaknesses in the Crown's case against his client. On Friday, Justice Thomas Sullivan said the Crown had accepted their case 'could not be described as strong'. 'I have decided to treat the case in a neutral way,' he said. 'I have otherwise formed the view... the identified statutory risks can be ameliorated by appropriate conditions.' Justice Sullivan said Mr Davidson had remarried and started a new family in Thailand - only returning twice to Australia in the years since Jacqueline's death. A surety of $250,000 had been offered for Mr Davidson's release on bail. Justice Davidson said there was a low risk of Mr Davidson attempting to interfere with witnesses, as the court was told both of Mr Davidson's daughters had provided written statements to the Crown and had 'co-operated' at all times with the investigation. Justice Davidson also said there were no charges related to domestic violence against Mr Davidson, including alleged instances in January 2020 and another in 2001 or 2002. Mr Eberhardt had argued during the bail application there was no evidence to either of these allegations. The court was told some of the bail conditions required Mr Davidson to report to police every day, abiding by a curfew and not approaching a number of Queensland airports. Throughout the bail application, the court was told the case against Mr Davidson was 'circumstantial' – which has led to clashing submissions by Mr Eberhardt and crown prosecutor Caroline Marco. Ms Marco reiterated Justice Sullivan did not need to rule on the strength of the case — which was still in its early stages — and only determine if Mr Davidson had shown cause as to why his detention in pre-trial custody was unjustified. On Wednesday, she said Mr Davidson had allegedly given inconsistencies in statements following his wife's death. Some include allegedly telling witnesses that she 'jumped, or dived' into the water from the kayak and that she was still 'alive', 'conscious' when she was pulled to shore. Mr Davidson's phone allegedly 'ceased to exist on the network' at 11.14am – an hour after the couple set off on their kayaks. Ms Marco said the device had never been recovered and there was 'inexplicable evidence' of its disconnection from the network. 'There had to be a reason why it could not be used to render assistance to Jacqueline, and therefore to justify the course that was taken of walking her two kilometres back to the boat ramp,' she told the court. Texts between Mr Davidson and other witnesses both before and after Jacqueline's death have also been explored in court. The court has previously been told Ms Davidson discovered her husband was having an affair with a woman in Papua New Guinea in 2019, leading to a strain in their marriage. It is alleged three years after the drowning, Mr Davidson texted a friend where he described himself as a 'cliche' because he was an 'older man married to a younger woman'. It was allegedly followed by the comment: 'There are lots of western divorcees out here because are no de facto rules and you can't lose 50 per cent of your s--t'. Ms Marco said this exchange went to allegations that Mr Davidson expressed concerns about 'dividing assets' in the event of a failed relationship. Another exchange at the centre of the application allegedly involved Mr Davidson telling a friend, known as Chesty, that he would kill his wife and move to Thailand if she ever 'sought a divorce and made a claim to his military pension'. Mr Eberhardt said this was nothing more than a 'quip' – in the context of the pair discussing how Chesty's wife had announced she was leaving him and moving to Thailand, taking half his assets with him. But Ms Marco said this was not supported by evidence as Chesty was allegedly 'shocked'. The court was told there was no evidence Jacqueline had been 'violently assaulted' and the couple's marriage had never been marked with violence. Minor bruises found on Jacqueline's body were consistent with CPR attempts and Mr Davidson's attempts to recover his wife's body from the water, Mr Eberhardt said. Through an affidavit filed to the court, Mr Davidson described how he and his wife were '10m apart' on the water when he attempted to 'show off' by standing up on his kayak. 'Jacqueline became distressed about that and used the 'safe word' … designed to let him know that she was concerned about what he was doing,' Mr Eberhardt read from the court document. Mr Davidson allegedly saw his wife 'fall off the kayak' and he went into the water to find her – but could not see because it was 'murky' and full of grass weeds. According to Mr Davidson's statement, the pair were not wearing life jackets because they had been 'eaten by rats' at their house in Bondi before they moved back to Queensland. 'There's evidence to that effect in a statement of (a woman) … she had been told prior to the death that the life jackets had been eaten by rats,' Mr Eberhardt said.

New details after killer mushroom cook Erin Patterson fails with legal secrecy bid
New details after killer mushroom cook Erin Patterson fails with legal secrecy bid

9 News

timean hour ago

  • 9 News

New details after killer mushroom cook Erin Patterson fails with legal secrecy bid

Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Death cap mushroom killer Erin Patterson's bid to keep pre-trial evidence a secret until her appeal has failed after a judge found open justice is "fundamental". The ruling means that evidence, including information about the alleged attempted poisonings of her husband, Simon Patterson, can now be reported. Patterson, 50, wore a black top and glasses as she faced Melbourne's Supreme Court on Friday morning by video link from prison for a brief hearing. Erin Patterson's legal team has lost a bid to keep pre-trial evidence a secret. (Martin Keep AFP) Justice Christopher Beale set down two days for Patterson's plea hearing, which prosecutors said would include "a lot" of victim impact statements. The hearing will take place on August 25 and 26 at the court in Melbourne and not Morwell, where the near-three-month trial was held, due to maintenance issues. The ruling means that evidence, including information about the alleged attempted poisonings of her husband, Simon Patterson, can now be reported. (Jason South) Prosecutor Jane Warren confirmed the first day of the hearing would be taken up with statements from victims, including family and friends of the three people she murdered: Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and Heather Wilkinson, 66. The sole survivor of the deadly July 2023 lunch, Ian Wilkinson, is also likely to give the court his statement. After firming up court dates, Justice Beale overturned an application by Patterson's legal team to keep all pre-trial evidence secret to preserve her appeal rights. Two court exhibits from Erin Patterson's murder trial, showing leftovers from the Beef Wellingtons and Patterson disposing of a food dehydrator. (Supplied) Patterson cannot lodge an appeal until after she is sentenced. Her defence team had argued pre-trial evidence should not be released to media due to "unprecedented" reporting, with several podcasts, documentaries and a mini-series in development. Defence barrister Colin Mandy SC claimed releasing the evidence could leave an indelible impression on a jury if she successfully appealed and faced a retrial. However, media argued against the claim, saying it was "speculative" she would face another trial and that jurors would be directed not to engage with the evidence. An example of deadly toxic amanita phalloides mushrooms, known colloquially as "deathcaps". (Getty Images/iStockphoto) Justice Beale found that it was "unlikely" an appeal of Patterson's conviction would succeed, but that - and the possibility of a retrial - could not be excluded. He ultimately ruled in favour of the media and did not make a suppression order over the evidence. "Open justice is a fundamental concern of our criminal justice jurisdiction," he said. The judge also approved release of Patterson's police interview. The Baptist church that mushroom murder victims of Don Patterson, Gail Patterson, and Heather Wilkinson were members of for over 20 years has released a message after Erin Patterson was found guilty of their murder. (Nine) Patterson was found guilty of three murders and one attempted murder over the July 29, 2023, lunch at her home in Leongatha. The mother-of-two deliberately served up a death cap mushroom-laced beef Wellington to Don, Gail, Heather and Ian. She pleaded not guilty and denied all charges, included over the alleged attempted murder of Simon. Those charges were dropped at the beginning of her trial in April. Patterson spent eight days in the witness box during her regional Victorian trial, where she admitted a series of lies and said she may have accidentally included foraged mushrooms in the beef Wellington. This included lies to police about her interest in wild mushrooms, and lies about owning a food dehydrator which she dumped at a local tip. The trial became a media circus, involving 252 media outlets including 15 international, making it the biggest matter the Supreme Court has managed in recent history. Patterson will have 28 days to lodge an appeal after she is sentenced. Sign up here to receive our daily newsletters and breaking news alerts, sent straight to your inbox. Erin Patterson Victoria Victoria Police Australia CONTACT US

Bombshell decision in kayak murder case
Bombshell decision in kayak murder case

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

Bombshell decision in kayak murder case

A former army major charged with the murder of his wife while the pair were kayaking on a lake has been granted bail in a bombshell court decision. Graeme Davidson's case has been in and out of the Supreme Court in Brisbane over the past week as his legal team fought for his release on bail, following the police arrest in May this year. Graeme Davidson is charged with the murder of his wife Jacqueline, after she drowned while the couple were kayaking in Petrie in 2020. Supplied Credit: Supplied Mr Davidson — an ex-Australian Army major who also held the rank of Captain in the British Army — is charged with the murder of his wife Jacqueline in November 2020. The pair were kayaking on Lake Samsonvale in Petrie on November 27 that year when Jacqueline drowned and could not be revived. Police allege Mr Davidson was involved in his wife's death. He is also charged with fraud and attempted fraud, relating to allegations he fraudulently collected a life insurance payout worth $200,000, before attempting to claim another $950,000. Mr Davidson has not entered a plea to the charges. A bail application in the Supreme Court which began on July 31 has spread over four hearing days. Craig Eberhardt KC, Mr Davidson's defence barrister, has spent much of the application alleging inconsistencies and weaknesses in the Crown's case against his client. On Friday, Justice Thomas Sullivan said the Crown had accepted their case 'could not be described as strong'. 'I have decided to treat the case in a neutral way,' he said. Ms Davidson could not be revived after she was pulled from the waters of Lake Samsonvale in 2020. Supplied Credit: Supplied 'I have otherwise formed the view... the identified statutory risks can be ameliorated by appropriate conditions.' Justice Sullivan said Mr Davidson had remarried and started a new family in Thailand - only returning twice to Australia in the years since Jacqueline's death. A surety of $250,000 had been offered for Mr Davidson's release on bail. Justice Davidson said there was a low risk of Mr Davidson attempting to interfere with witnesses, as the court was told both of Mr Davidson's daughters had provided written statements to the Crown and had 'co-operated' at all times with the investigation. Justice Davidson also said there were no charges related to domestic violence against Mr Davidson, including alleged instances in January 2020 and another in 2001 or 2002. Mr Eberhardt had argued during the bail application there was no evidence to either of these allegations. The court was told some of the bail conditions required Mr Davidson to report to police every day, abiding by a curfew and not approaching a number of Queensland airports. Throughout the bail application, the court was told the case against Mr Davidson was 'circumstantial' – which has led to clashing submissions by Mr Eberhardt and crown prosecutor Caroline Marco. Ms Marco reiterated Justice Sullivan did not need to rule on the strength of the case — which was still in its early stages — and only determine if Mr Davidson had shown cause as to why his detention in pre-trial custody was unjustified. On Wednesday, she said Mr Davidson had allegedly given inconsistencies in statements following his wife's death. Some include allegedly telling witnesses that she 'jumped, or dived' into the water from the kayak and that she was still 'alive', 'conscious' when she was pulled to shore. Mr Davidson is alleged to have texted a friend about divorce in Thailand in 2023. Queensland Police Service Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Davidson's phone allegedly 'ceased to exist on the network' at 11.14am – an hour after the couple set off on their kayaks. Ms Marco said the device had never been recovered and there was 'inexplicable evidence' of its disconnection from the network. 'There had to be a reason why it could not be used to render assistance to Jacqueline, and therefore to justify the course that was taken of walking her two kilometres back to the boat ramp,' she told the court. Texts between Mr Davidson and other witnesses both before and after Jacqueline's death have also been explored in court. The court has previously been told Ms Davidson discovered her husband was having an affair with a woman in Papua New Guinea in 2019, leading to a strain in their marriage. It is alleged three years after the drowning, Mr Davidson texted a friend where he described himself as a 'cliche' because he was an 'older man married to a younger woman'. Crown Prosecutor Caroline Marco said Mr Davidson posed an 'unacceptable risk' if released on bail. NewsWire / John Gass Credit: News Corp Australia Craig Eberhardt KC, who is representing Mr Davidson. NewsWire / John Gass Credit: News Corp Australia It was allegedly followed by the comment: 'There are lots of western divorcees out here because are no de facto rules and you can't lose 50 per cent of your s--t'. Ms Marco said this exchange went to allegations that Mr Davidson expressed concerns about 'dividing assets' in the event of a failed relationship. Another exchange at the centre of the application allegedly involved Mr Davidson telling a friend, known as Chesty, that he would kill his wife and move to Thailand if she ever 'sought a divorce and made a claim to his military pension'. Mr Eberhardt said this was nothing more than a 'quip' – in the context of the pair discussing how Chesty's wife had announced she was leaving him and moving to Thailand, taking half his assets with him. But Ms Marco said this was not supported by evidence as Chesty was allegedly 'shocked'. The court was told there was no evidence Jacqueline had been 'violently assaulted' and the couple's marriage had never been marked with violence. The court was told Mr Davidson's phone had not been recovered and allegedly 'ceased to exist on the network' an hour before the kayaking trip. Supplied / Channel 9 Credit: Supplied Minor bruises found on Jacqueline's body were consistent with CPR attempts and Mr Davidson's attempts to recover his wife's body from the water, Mr Eberhardt said. Through an affidavit filed to the court, Mr Davidson described how he and his wife were '10m apart' on the water when he attempted to 'show off' by standing up on his kayak. 'Jacqueline became distressed about that and used the 'safe word' … designed to let him know that she was concerned about what he was doing,' Mr Eberhardt read from the court document. Mr Davidson allegedly saw his wife 'fall off the kayak' and he went into the water to find her – but could not see because it was 'murky' and full of grass weeds. According to Mr Davidson's statement, the pair were not wearing life jackets because they had been 'eaten by rats' at their house in Bondi before they moved back to Queensland. 'There's evidence to that effect in a statement of (a woman) … she had been told prior to the death that the life jackets had been eaten by rats,' Mr Eberhardt said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store