
Amazon Prime Day sales off 41% first day, brand adviser says
Some of the preliminary results are grim, raising the stakes for the event's remaining days.
Momentum Commerce, which manages online sales for 50 brands in a variety of product categories and price points, said its Amazon sales plunged 41% on Tuesday when compared with the start of Prime Day last year.
The prolonged event has encouraged shoppers to do more 'treasure hunting,' said John Shea, Momentum's founder and chief executive officer. Consumers are browsing and loading up shopping carts, but postponing pulling the trigger in case better deals emerge. Shorter Prime Day sales generated more urgency because shoppers worried they'd miss the discounts, he said.
Momentum Commerce sales over the four days could still increase 9.1% compared with last year's two-day event if more browsers make purchases in the final days, Shea said. Momentum manages sales on behalf of brands like Crocs, Beats and Therabody massagers and generates about $7 billion in annual sales on Amazon, giving the company a broad view of Prime Day results so far.
'It all hinges on this four-day strategy being a success,' Shea said. 'Amazon sacrificed a lot on Day 1. It's a wildly unpredictable and uncertain year.'
'They extended Prime Day from two days to four days, so it's unclear that there really is a dropoff in activity,' said Gil Luria, an analyst at D.A. Davidson & Co. 'We'll find out some when they report the quarter. But it's very hard to pin down how well Prime Day has gone.'
After Bloomberg published this story, Amazon emailed a statement saying: 'Typical of statements made by third-party consultancies that don't have access to the actual data, these numbers are highly inaccurate.' The company declined to say how the numbers are inaccurate.
The annual event has emerged as a bellwether of consumer sentiment since President Donald Trump's trade war clouded the economic outlook. Tariffs as high as 145% on foreign imports were threatened and then delayed to allow time for negotiations, making it difficult to determine where prices will settle.
Amazon doubled the length of the annual sale because shoppers indicated they wanted more time to navigate the deals, Prime chief Jamil Ghani said Wednesday in an interview on Bloomberg Television. Shoppers gravitated toward 'everyday essentials' like teeth-whitening strips, which is the fastest-growing category on Amazon, he said, adding that the company was 'pleased by the engagement' and that it's 'very early.'
Shoppers focused on low-cost items on the first day, snatching up deals on dish soap, protein shakes and other pantry staples rather than splurging on televisions and gaming consoles. Almost two-thirds of items purchased on Prime Day cost less than $20, while just 3% cost more than $100 on the first day of the four-day sale, according to Numerator, which tracked more than 7,000 orders from 3,855 households.
'Consumers appear to be purchasing a greater number of items at a lower price point this Prime Day, with the average price per item slightly lower,' Numerator analyst Amanda Schoenbauer said. 'However, with this year's sale extended to four days, there is potential for Prime Day 2025 to break previous records.'
US shoppers spent $7.9 billion online across all retailers on Tuesday, up 9.9% from July 16, 2024, last year's first day of Prime Day, according to Adobe Inc., which expects spending over the four-day period to hit $23.8 billion. The Amazon sale overlaps with multiday sales offered by Walmart Inc. and Target Corp., creating an online shopping frenzy.
'The halo effect of Prime Day this year on other retailers is more significant,' Momentum Commerce's Shea said.
Soper writes for Bloomberg.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Verge
9 minutes ago
- The Verge
I asked Alexa Plus to tackle my to-do list — it mostly failed
One of the best features of Amazon's new Alexa Plus is that I don't have to 'speak Alexa' anymore. I've been testing the voice assistant for about a week now, and it understands what I say, regardless of how I say it — there's no more need for precise phrasing to get Alexa to do what I want. This big shift underpins another headline feature of the revamped generative AI-powered assistant that I've been testing: agentic AI. But this one needs work. The idea is I can talk to Alexa Plus as I would to a real personal assistant and ask it to do tasks, such as reserving a restaurant for my friend's birthday, finding an electrician to fix my broken sprinkler pump, or booking tickets to a Chris Isaak concert. The assistant can then act as an 'AI agent' and navigate online services on my behalf to book everything for me. Combined with better calendar management and the ability to remember things you tell it, Alexa's agentic AI has the potential to make the assistant much more useful. Alexa's AI agent features are neither broad enough nor seamless enough to replace my real-life personal assistant: me At least in theory. In reality, it's too limited. Alexa Plus relies on partnerships with specific services; it can't just roam the web and do my bidding. As of now, that includes Ticketmaster, OpenTable, Uber, and Thumbtack. While impressively, Alexa did manage to complete several steps, overall, the AI agent's current features are neither broad enough nor seamless enough to replace my real-life personal assistant: me. Alexa Plus is still in an Early Access beta phase, and Amazon says more integrations are coming soon. These include ordering groceries by voice (via 'several grocery providers in the US'), delivery through Grubhub, and booking spa visits through Vagaro. These may be more useful to me, especially grocery ordering. I already use Alexa for my shopping list, but I then have to put everything into my Harris Teeter shopping app for pickup or delivery. If Alexa could take that list and add it to a service like Instacart, it would cut out a chunk of work for me. Of the three agentic experiences I tested, the best was booking a ticket to an event through Ticketmaster. After a dodgy start — when I asked about sports events and was told about a youth basketball training session — I tried again. 'What events are there in Charleston next month that you can buy me tickets for?' Alexa produced a list of about 10 local sports events and concerts on the Echo Show 15 I was using (Alexa Plus is much more useful on a screened device). It told me, 'You've got music shows like Blackberry Smoke and Mike Campbell on August 5th and Collective Soul on August 6th. There's also a Cure tribute band on August 2nd. Anything catch your interest?' I spotted a Chris Isaak concert in the list (I love a good Wicked Game) and told it to book me tickets. It found balcony seats for $98.15 each and asked how many I wanted, while also showing me more expensive options. I selected the cheap seats, and it walked me through each step as it added them to my cart, ending with a checkout button where my credit card details were pre-populated. (I'd linked my Ticketmaster account in the Alexa app when I first set up Alexa Plus.) I canceled before purchasing, because I don't love a Wicked Game $200 much, and Alexa confirmed that the tickets were released. However, alarmingly, later that day, a pop-up in the Alexa app told me that anyone with access to my Alexa devices can order tickets. Amazon: I'll take a PIN option here, please. Next, I asked Alexa to 'book a dinner for two in downtown Charleston for tomorrow night at 7PM.' It returned three options, which is just sad — Charleston has a hopping foodie scene. I picked a French spot I'd been to before and changed it up, asking Alexa to 'make it for two weeks on Friday.' Unfazed, Alexa understood, pivoted and confirmed availability for Friday, July 31st, at 7PM, then asked if I wanted to book. After I confirmed, it said it would also add the reservation to my linked Gmail calendar. Handy! Alexa had messed up the date Or so I thought. I then received a text message from OpenTable, confirming my reservation for Thursday, July 31st. Alexa had messed up the date. I told Alexa to switch the reservation to Friday, August 1st, and it did, also updating my calendar. While it eventually booked the table, Alexa took longer to do it and was less accurate than if I'd just opened the OpenTable app on my phone (or more realistically, the Resy app that most restaurants in Charleston use) and done it myself. Finally, I had Alexa tackle a chore I've been putting off for two years: finding an electrician. I've been meaning to get the circuit for my sprinkler pump fixed for ages. It's on the same one as my internet router, so when the pump kicks in, it trips the circuit — and down goes my Wi-Fi. The big difference is that I did all of this hands-free I told Alexa I needed an electrician to fix the sprinkler system, and asked if it could book one. It pulled a list of several 'highly rated electricians' in my area via Thumbtack, highlighting the top three. I picked one and asked it to schedule a visit for a week from now. Alexa asked several follow-up questions about my house and the specific issue — it felt a bit like filling out a webform with my voice. Alexa, then said it was working on sending the request through the Thumbtack website, and that I'd get updates soon. A few hours later, still no word from Alexa. But I received an email from Thumbtack (the first of many…) and a text message from the electrician asking me to call or text to schedule an appointment. Not exactly the seamless set-it-and-forget-it experience I'd hoped for. Still, the big difference is that I did all of this hands-free. I could be setting up dinner dates and finding electricians while cooking dinner or folding laundry. As a working mother of two, anything that helps with multitasking so I can complete my to-do list faster is welcome. But while the tech is impressive, the lack of depth and the failures I experienced in two out of my three tests mean I don't plan to rely on Alexa to do these tasks for me just yet. Photography by Jennifer Pattison Tuohy / The Verge
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
For the first time since COVID, more than half of Fortune 100 companies have mandated workers fully return to work as hybrid options wither
Fortune 100 employees may need to prepare their good-byes to hybrid work. For the first time since the onset of COVID, more than half of Fortune 100 companies have fully in-office policies, according to new data from real estate company Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. In 2023, only 5% of those firms were completely RTO. While larger firms may be leading the RTO charge, most companies, particularly smaller ones, are likely to still favor flexible work options. The age of remote work is coming to a close for the Fortune 100. For the first time since the pandemic, the majority of Fortune 100 companies now have a fully in-office policy for their employees, according to a new report from real estate company Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. (JLL). Compared to two years ago, when 78% of Fortune 100 companies were hybrid and 5% were fully in-office, those firms are now 41% hybrid and 54% fully in-office. The stark shift comes as the companies require workers in the office an average of 3.8 days a week compared to 2.6 days in 2023, per the report. Return-to-office mandates have continued to shake up workplace culture, with Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol requiring more corporate employees this week to relocate to the coffee chain's Seattle office and to show up in-person four days a week. Google and Amazon are among other corporate giants pushing employees back to the office, citing in-person work as a boon to productivity, particularly in the AI race. Despite evidence that RTO mandates haven't always translated to increased office attendance, JLL reported a 1.3% year-over-year increase in office attendance in the first two months of 2025's second quarter. Busier offices have coincided with record-high rents for high-end offices, primarily 'trophy buildings across Miami, New York City, San Francisco and other markets,' the report said. Office vacancies, however, continue to persist, hovering above 22%. Inventory declined by 700,000 square feet in the last quarter, indicating demolitions or mixed-use and residential conversions are outpacing office construction. The Fortune 100's different RTO reality Though the U.S.'s largest 100 companies by revenue are reveling in bustling office spaces swelling with workers, the story of the rest of the country's return-to-office push is much less dramatic. Compared to the Fortune 100's mass shift to full-time RTO, U.S. employees with remote-capable jobs have largely maintained the hybrid work status quo over the last two years, with 51% working hybrid in 2025 compared to 52% in May 2023, 28% working exclusively remote compared to 29% in May 2023; and 21% working completely in-person compared to 20% in May 2023, according to recent Gallup Poll data. According to Mark Ma, associate professor of business administration at the University of Pittsburgh, Fortune 100 companies are leading the RTO push simply because they can afford to do so. 'Amazon can lose 1,000 talented IT workers with no problem,' he told Fortune. 'There is still a lineup of young college graduates from maybe Carnegie Mellon or other excellent universities who still want to work for Amazon because that's the Magnificent Seven. 'But the smaller firms, it is harder for them to do it because once they lose some important employees, maybe no one else in their firm can do the job,' he continued. 'It's a completely different story for smaller firms.' While massive tech companies like Amazon may be employing RTO even as a means to push employees out, small firms have to be more careful with managing their workforce, who continue to prefer hybrid over in-person (or entirely remote) work. It figures, then, that smaller firms would also be less interested in coughing up rent for an office employees are less interested in frequenting and that present a potential liability, should the company need to look to cut costs in times of economic hardship. Cities like Pittsburgh, where the office vacancy rate is about 20%, are seeing high demand for luxury office buildings with slick amenities—likely favored by larger employers who can afford to offer RTO perks—while older buildings continue to languish. The future of hybrid work For the U.S. workforce outside the Fortune 100, the phenomenon of hybrid work is unlikely to disappear anytime soon, Ma argued. He has found that CEOs of companies with RTO policies skew older and more male than the average for executives of U.S. public firms. Younger, scrappier companies, conversely, have executives with the same traits and are more likely to lead remote-friendly workplaces, both because of a generational shift in work attitudes, but also because of the practical advantages of smaller businesses having fewer overhead costs. 'In the long term, with the younger generation taking over, I think the CEOs will be willing to [give more] flexibility,' Ma said. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Teradyne (TER) Tapped by Amazon as Warehouse Robot Supplier
Teradyne, Inc. (NASDAQ:TER) is one of the Best Industrial Automation Stocks to Buy for the Next Decade. Teradyne's Universal Robots division has been identified as the supplier of robotic arms for Amazon's newly unveiled warehouse robot, Vulcan, according to a report from Hunterbrook Media. This reveals Denmark-based Universal Robots as a key technology partner in Amazon's latest automation push. A technician in a factory setting next to an industrial automation machine. Vulcan is designed to handle tasks such as picking and stowing, integrating advanced touch sensitivity to perform delicate, repetitive movements with higher precision. Though Amazon has not officially confirmed its supplier, the robotic arms match Universal Robots' design, and are reportedly outfitted with grippers from Robotiq, another firm known for seamless compatibility with Teradyne's automation products. Hunterbrook estimates the Vulcan project could be worth as much as $400 million for Teradyne, Inc. (NASDAQ:TER), as Amazon continues to invest in automating logistics for the 14 billion items it handles development highlights Teradyne's growing presence in warehouse and supply chain automation, adding another major client to its industrial roster. Shares of Teradyne moved higher following the report's release. Teradyne advances industrial automation through collaborative robots and machine testing systems used in manufacturing, logistics, and high-volume warehouse operations. While we acknowledge the potential of TER as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Best Non-Mega Cap NASDAQ Stocks to Buy Right Now and 13 Cheap Stocks Under $50 to Buy Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.