Will Robinhood or AppLovin fill the open spot in the S&P 500 index after Chevron-Hess shakeup?
Live Events
What's Driving the Speculation?
Are There Other Candidates?
How Does S&P Make These Decisions?
FAQs
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
A high-stakes guessing game is unfolding on Wall Street, and Robinhood Markets and AppLovin Corp , both NASDAQ-listed stocks, are at the center of it, as per a report.After Chevron completed its acquisition of Hess on Friday, a rare opening has emerged in the prestigious S&P 500 index, and now, all eyes are on which company will fill the spot, as per a Barron's report. Based on market speculations, both Robinhood and AppLovin are strong contenders, as reported by Barron's.There have been speculations that both these companies might join the S&P 500 as they are the biggest US companies based on market capitalisation that are not currently in the benchmark index, according to the report.AppLovin, the mobile technology firm based in California, is valued at $123 billion, while Robinhood, the popular trading platform based in California, is worth around $93 billion, as reported by Barron's. Despite their massive market capitalisations, neither company is currently in the S&P 500, according to the report.Both stocks jumped in early trading on Friday, with Robinhood rising more than 4% and AppLovin gaining over 3% as investors appear to be betting that one of them will be tapped to join the benchmark index, as per the Barron's report.ALSO READ : This little-known stablecoin just surged 337%, and it's turning heads in the business world However, the speculation isn't just random. It comes as the S&P Dow Jones Indices , which manages the S&P 500 index, recently added The Trade Desk, which operates an online ad platform, it will join the index on Friday, replacing Ansys following its acquisition by Synopsys, according to the report.The S&P Dow Jones Indices had announced the Trade Desk addition on July 14, which was the same day Synopsys revealed it would close the Ansys deal on July 17, as reported by Barron's.According to the report, the S&P Dow Jones Indices' announcement of a replacement for Hess, which was a former constituent in the S&P 500, could come late Friday.S&P Dow Jones Indices has a major say in which companies it wants to add to the S&P 500, but it generally does not mention the reasons why particular ones are added, according to the Barron's report. However, it has a pattern of usually adding the largest companies that are not in the index, as per the report.ALSO READ: Bitcoin to explode like Dogecoin in 2021? Bold prediction says it will be life-changing However, apart from Robinhood and AppLovin, other potential candidates that could be added to the index include Carvana, Ares Management, and Cheniere Energy, as even these three companies are among the largest companies that are not in the S&P 500 index, according to the Barron's report.Cheniere might have a higher chance compared to Carvana and Ares Management because it is an energy company and has a similar market value to Hess at about $50 billion, as per the report. Cheniere operates a large liquefied natural gas facility and is a big exporter of the fuel, the stock increased more than 5% in early trading on Friday, according to the report.As per Barron's analysis, S&P Dow Jones Indices sometimes replaces a company with one in the same industry, and also wrote that "technology and financials are underrepresented in the index relative to their weighing in the overall stock market, which could mean a tech or financial company will be added."They might be added to the S&P 500, and investors are getting excited about the possibility.Chevron just acquired Hess, creating an open slot in the benchmark index.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Subhash Chandra Garg: Don't vacillate on a regulatory framework for crypto assets
Next Story Subhash Chandra Garg India must catch up with other jurisdictions on setting up a mechanism for the legal oversight of digital assets that can assure investors the safety of their investments. Too many frauds have occurred. Time is ticking away but it's not too late to leap ahead. A strong regulatory ecosystem for crypto assets would enable Indians to participate in this market with confidence. Gift this article In early 2019, a committee I headed as secretary, department of economic affairs, proposed a law for digital currencies that would lay down the statutory base for a blockchain-based crypto assets ecosystem. In early 2019, a committee I headed as secretary, department of economic affairs, proposed a law for digital currencies that would lay down the statutory base for a blockchain-based crypto assets ecosystem. There was no follow-up on it and India still has no statute or regulation that defines 'crypto assets' and the rules of running a crypto business in the country. In the meantime, the world has moved rapidly towards mainstreaming crypto assets and crypto-currencies. The US Senate recently passed the GENIUS Act, legalizing privately issued dollar-backed stablecoins. The market value of cryptocurrencies now exceeds $3.25 trillion. If all cryptocurrencies are taken as a single currency, it would be the world's tenth largest by value. Can India continue to ignore crypto assets? Why should India not go about building a sound statutory and regulatory ecosystem for them? Also Read: Defence alert: Crypto is turning into a geopolitical weapon The consequences of inaction: I have closely watched India's crypto ecosystem over the past decade. Despite the absence of regulations, many crypto exchanges were set up. Operating outside the law or in a grey zone without a legal framework, they flourished for some time by conducting an incoherent mix of legitimate and illegitimate transactions. Then crypto gains were brought under the tax net, trading almost collapsed and some frauds came to light. GainBitcoin, a Ponzi-style multi-level marketing scheme that ran from 2015 to 2018, allegedly duped thousands of investors of an estimated ₹ 6,600 crore by promising fixed monthly returns of 10% on Bitcoin deposits, leaving scheme subscribers with worthless 'market capitalization' tokens. The Central Bureau of Investigation has been investigating it and conducting raids. Also Read: The triumph of crypto bros: Don't just shrug and move on WazirX, India's largest crypto exchange, faced Enforcement Directorate searches in August 2022, which led to the global exchange Binance publicly distancing itself from WazirX despite an earlier ownership claim, causing widespread confusion. In 2024, WazirX suffered a massive hack that resulted in the loss of 45% of the user assets (worth $230 million) held by it. There is no recourse in sight for the investors who lost their crypto assets. In a Singapore court, WazirX proposed a restructuring plan to distribute the remaining user assets. The proceedings reveal a tale of compromises, hidden actors and regulatory violations, including operations conducted without a digital token service provider (DTSP) licence. They also exposed an offshore entity registered in Panama that held effective operational control. Under the radar are numerous fly-by-night operators with various schemes aimed aggressively at retail investors in small cities. Some online exchanges are fake; others end in rug pulls, leaving asset buyers clueless once these platforms vanish. To prevent such fraud, India needs smart, enforceable and investor-centric crypto regulations. Let crypto crises not go waste: All the crypto crises we have faced, involving substantial erosion in the wealth of crypto investors, have reinforced what I have long maintained: India's approach to crypto assets has been piecemeal, passive and systemically unsustainable. We must bring crypto-asset operations in India within the ambit of a defined and enforceable legal and regulatory framework that would help create a fair and transparent system of ownership and trading. We should break the existing legal and regulatory logjam by separating trading, custody, lending, broking and technical services. This will help eliminate problems of groupthink and moral hazard (risky actions taken in the belief that someone else will bear the consequences). We also have to provide legal recourse to investors if a platform fails or causes them other forms of suffering. This is a moment of reckoning: We can avoid the flawed models of early crypto adopters. We know how to build large-scale digital systems. We built Aadhaar for identity, the Unified Payments Interface for payments and the goods and services tax network for taxation. We can surely build a reliable governance framework for digital assets and exchanges that operate as marketplaces for trades. These exchanges would ensure liquidity under the watch of independent custodians and a comprehensive regulatory mechanism. We can lean on global experiences. The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, for example, lays down clear responsibilities for operators and custodians. The GENIUS Act of the US focuses on regulating stablecoins. Even Pakistan is currently establishing a crypto-regulatory authority. India, a country that pioneered innovative infrastructure for fintech and digital payments, must not remain on the sidelines. We need to create space for well-regulated digital assets to thrive. Also Read: Rupee-backed stablecoins could complement RBI's digital currency India's new crypto assets ecosystem should have four cornerstones: First, clearly segregated functions for crypto exchanges, brokers, aggregators, custodians and other entities: These must be recognized as distinct players with defined roles. Second, compulsory licensing: All entities in the ecosystem must operate within sound financial regulatory oversight. Third, full and functional transparency: Institute regular audits, disclosure norms for operational structures and mechanisms for incident reporting. Fourth, insistence on Indian jurisdiction: Asset ownership and contractual agreements must be legally enforceable under a specific Indian law. In addition, we need strong penalties for fraud and false advertising to deter all actors with any mala fide intent. If we build a strong statutory and regulatory ecosystem for crypto assets, Indians would be able to participate in this market with confidence in the safety of their investments. Global investors will see India as a sound market. With clear obligations to meet, operators would focus on responsible innovation and safeguarding investor interests. Delays are costly, but India still has a leadership opportunity here. The time to act is now. The author is former finance secretary of India. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Vedanta rejects baseless allegations, calls Viceroy's claims unfounded
Continuing its triad against mining Moghul Anil Agarwal's Vedanta group, US-based Viceroy Research has alleged that the group's semiconductor unit was a "sham commodities trading operation", designed to avoid classification as an NBFC, a charge the mining conglomerate dismissed as baseless. US short seller Viceroy Research, which last week published a scathing report about Vedanta Group and followed it with similar reports on group companies, in fresh allegations said Vedanta Ltd's subsidiary, Vedanta Semiconductors Pvt Ltd, was part of a scheme to allow the Mumbai-listed firm to remit brand fees to parent Vedanta Resources in April this year, when it faced a severe liquidity crisis. In a statement, Vedanta spokesperson said the group "strongly rejects the baseless allegations made in the report regarding Vedanta Semiconductors Pvt Ltd (VSPL)". "All business activities of VSPL have been transparently disclosed and are in line with statutory norms," it said. Viceroy said, "VSPL is a sham commodities trading operation designed to improperly avoid classification as a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC)". "This scheme was devised to facilitate Vedanta Ltd's remittance of brand fees to Vedanta Resources' (VRL) in April 2025, when it faced a severe liquidity crisis," Viceroy said. "VSPL's operational illusion needs 24 months of regulatory silence to fulfil its purpose, repaying its offshore lenders and hiding the near-catastrophe of April 2024. While credit analysts are snoozing through the alarm bells, India's regulators are famously light sleepers." In April 2024, Vedanta Limited (VEDL) faced a severe liquidity crisis. "In response, VEDL reactivated VSPL, not as a semiconductor venture, but as a zero-margin trading entity, whose operations appear to consist entirely of paper-based commodity trading." "VSPL tapped offshore lenders for a short-term, INR-denominated, 10 per cent NCDs secured by VEDL's stake in HZL (equivalent to 1 per cent of outstanding shares). VSPL then began trading commodities (copper, silver, gold) on a zero-margin basis reminiscent of wash trading," Viceroy alleged. VSPL, it said, remitted the loan to VEDL as a 24-month 12 per cent loan, with the spread intended to cover the sham operation's costs. The semiconductor unit, superficially an operating entity, would face reduced scrutiny for loan repayments under FEMA, Companies Act, PMLA and AML frameworks. "VSPL will likely have to continue these sham operations until FY27, when the loans fall due and repayment will have to be routed back through it. If, at any point, the regulators intervene at VSPL, the lender group is likely facing a total wipeout," the US short-seller alleged. Vedanta spokesperson in the statement said, "Loans between VSPL and Vedanta Ltd were executed in full compliance with applicable laws, corporate governance standards, and both Vedanta Ltd and VSPL have consistently reported accurate loan terms, interest rates, and collateral in line with statutory norms," it said, adding that it would encourage stakeholders to only reply on verified disclosures and audited financials. Viceroy, on July 9, said it has taken a short position against the debt of Vedanta Resources, the UK-based parent of Indian miner Vedanta Ltd, and alleged in the report that the British firm is "systematically draining" its Indian unit. Vedanta had dismissed the report as "a malicious combination of selective misinformation and baseless allegations", and that Research issued it without contacting the group. Viceroy, in its latest report, said despite Vedanta's claim that it failed to engage, it is yet to receive a response to the issues flagged since July 9. "For a company so quick to dismiss our findings, one might expect answers to be equally swift. It's been over a week since we formally requested clarification," the short seller added.
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Viceroy alleges Vedanta Semiconductor is a Rs 2,500-cr sham; co says baseless
Continuing its triad against mining Moghul Anil Agarwal's Vedanta group, US-based Viceroy Research has alleged that the group's semiconductor unit was a "sham commodities trading operation", designed to avoid classification as an NBFC, a charge the mining conglomerate dismissed as baseless. US short seller Viceroy Research, which last week published a scathing report about Vedanta Group and followed it with similar reports on group companies, in fresh allegations said Vedanta Ltd's subsidiary, Vedanta Semiconductors Pvt Ltd, was part of a scheme to allow the Mumbai-listed firm to remit brand fees to parent Vedanta Resources in April this year, when it faced a severe liquidity crisis. In a statement, Vedanta spokesperson said the group "strongly rejects the baseless allegations made in the report regarding Vedanta Semiconductors Pvt Ltd (VSPL)"."All business activities of VSPL have been transparently disclosed and are in line with statutory norms," it said, "VSPL is a sham commodities trading operation designed to improperly avoid classification as a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC)". "This scheme was devised to facilitate Vedanta Ltd's remittance of brand fees to Vedanta Resources' (VRL) in April 2025, when it faced a severe liquidity crisis," Viceroy said."VSPL's operational illusion needs 24 months of regulatory silence to fulfil its purpose, repaying its offshore lenders and hiding the near-catastrophe of April 2024. While credit analysts are snoozing through the alarm bells, India's regulators are famously light sleepers." In April 2024, Vedanta Limited (VEDL) faced a severe liquidity crisis. "In response, VEDL reactivated VSPL, not as a semiconductor venture, but as a zero-margin trading entity, whose operations appear to consist entirely of paper-based commodity trading." "VSPL tapped offshore lenders for a short-term, INR-denominated, 10 per cent NCDs secured by VEDL's stake in HZL (equivalent to 1 per cent of outstanding shares). VSPL then began trading commodities (copper, silver, gold) on a zero-margin basis reminiscent of wash trading," Viceroy it said, remitted the loan to VEDL as a 24-month 12 per cent loan, with the spread intended to cover the sham operation's semiconductor unit, superficially an operating entity, would face reduced scrutiny for loan repayments under FEMA, Companies Act, PMLA and AML frameworks."VSPL will likely have to continue these sham operations until FY27, when the loans fall due and repayment will have to be routed back through it. If, at any point, the regulators intervene at VSPL, the lender group is likely facing a total wipeout," the US short-seller spokesperson in the statement said, "Loans between VSPL and Vedanta Ltd were executed in full compliance with applicable laws, corporate governance standards, and both Vedanta Ltd and VSPL have consistently reported accurate loan terms, interest rates, and collateral in line with statutory norms," it said, adding that it would encourage stakeholders to only reply on verified disclosures and audited on July 9, said it has taken a short position against the debt of Vedanta Resources, the UK-based parent of Indian miner Vedanta Ltd, and alleged in the report that the British firm is "systematically draining" its Indian had dismissed the report as "a malicious combination of selective misinformation and baseless allegations", and that Research issued it without contacting the in its latest report, said despite Vedanta's claim that it failed to engage, it is yet to receive a response to the issues flagged since July 9. "For a company so quick to dismiss our findings, one might expect answers to be equally swift. It's been over a week since we formally requested clarification," the short seller added.
