MK party takes Ramaphosa to ConCourt over Mchunu special leave decision
The uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party has approached the Constitutional Court seeking to have President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to place Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on special leave set aside.
The party made the announcement on Friday afternoon after intensifying its call for the president to fire Mchunu by leading marches in Pretoria.
The marches were in support of KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi following his explosive media briefing earlier in July, where he alleged a connection between Mchunu and crime syndicates.
MK party escalates challenge against Ramaphosa in ConCourt
The president placed Mchunu on special leave and appointed two acting police ministers in the space of four days.
Ramaphosa first appointed Firoz Cachalia as acting police minister, then named Minister of Mineral Resources Gwede Mantashe to fill the role for the next two weeks until Cachalia formally takes office.
ALSO READ: Mandela Day marches: Avoid these streets in Tshwane as traffic congestion expected
In the court documents shared with the media, the MK party said the president's decision to place Mchunu on social leave and appoint Cachalia as acting minister was 'irrational', 'invalid', and inconsistent with obligations in the Constitution and Presidential Oath of Office.
'Declaring that the conduct or decisions of the president to establish the Judicial Commission of Inquiry is irrational and/or inconsistent with the obligations in section 83(b) of the constitution and/or the Presidential Oath of Office, read with sections 84(2)(f), 177, 178(4) and/or 180 of the constitution and is invalid,' the court papers read.
The party calls for each to be set aside with immediate effect.
'Mchunu must be fired'
MK party MP David Skosana told broadcasters that the party has made it clear that Mchunu must be fired.
'We want Ramaphosa to resign, and we want Senzo Mchunu to be fired,' Skosana said.
ALSO READ: 'Cyril must fall': Organisations march against Ramaphosa to Union Buildings on Mandela Day
Meanwhile, the party's move comes after it issued an ultimatum to the president demanding that he resign by 8am on Friday, Mandela Day.
The party warned that if Ramaphosa misses the deadline, it will respond with a motion of no confidence, nationwide mass action, and constitutional litigation.
Party 'disappointed but not surprised' that president didn't resign on Mandela Day
Ramaphosa did not resign by 8am on Friday morning. The party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela told the media on Friday that MK party was disappointed but not surprised that the president didn't resign.
[BREAKING NEWS] MK Party approaches the Constitutional Court seeking to have President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to place Police Minister
Senzo Mchunu on special leave set aside.#Newzroom405 pic.twitter.com/Wr8oO4vptq — Newzroom Afrika (@Newzroom405) July 18, 2025
'We believe that Ramaphosa is not fit to lead this country and must do the honourable thing, as comrade Nelson Mandela would have done. He would have told him to resign,' stated Ndhlela.
Ndhlela accused Ramaphosa of using commissions of inquiry as political tools to avoid accountability and called for immediate action against those implicated in corruption.
ALSO READ: 'Where's the proof?': Calls for Ntshavheni to answer for coup claims
'When crime is exposed, we say crime must be dealt with effectively immediately,' he said.
The spokesperson also accused the president of violating the constitution by bringing in Cachalia 'through the back door'.
Phala Phala and CR17
Ndhlela also called out the president for the Phala Phala scandal and mentioned the CR17 bank statements.
'Ramaphosa must also have his day [in court] like President Zuma,' he said.
Ndhlela concluded by reinforcing that MK party has approached the Apex Court and confirmed that marches will continue throughout the country, as well as the motion of no confidence against the president.
NOW READ: MK party gives Ramaphosa until Mandela Day to resign
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
Active citizens: Phakeng speaks out on threats to SA's democracy
Phakeng says all South Africans must embody the spirit of service and justice South Africans should take confront the many problems the country faces before it is too late, says former UCT vice-chancellor professor Mamokgethi Phakeng. Phakeng was speaking at Hope Restoration Ministries in Kempton Park on Friday. 'We have begun to take the unacceptable as a given, we drive around potholes as if they are normal parts of the road,' she said. 'People read about children falling into pit latrines or having to cross dams to go to school in the Eastern Cape and they just say 'shame' and move on with their day. That numbness is precisely how democracies die.' Phakeng said it is rare for democracies to die through dictatorships or military coups. 'Democracies die more effectively through apathy. They die when good people stop paying attention, they die when good people stop believing in their power to bring change. 'When good people look away, when good people trust bad people with responsibilities, that is how democracies die,' she said. How to honour Madiba Phakeng said each citizen should stand up for what is right in honour of Nelson Mandela. 'Madiba himself taught us to face reality head on no matter how uncomfortable it is. So, we must confront these ugly truths if we ever hope to change them,' she said. It is in your hands She said it is now time for South Africans to take charge of their destinies and stop depending on political figures to save the country. 'I know that given our challenges it is very easy to think that we have to wait for someone to save us. 'We are waiting for a bigger hero, a more ethical politician a new government, a new policy, a billionaire philanthropist, the UN, or a miracle from somewhere. 'But fellow brethren we must be honest there is no one who is coming to save us.' The solution is active citizenry Phakeng said the solution to South Africa's problems is in active citizenry. 'I submit to you that the answer is active citizenship, active citizenship means that ordinary people not only politicians or officials but all of us come forward and take responsibility for the wellbeing of our communities and our country. 'It means not waiting for someone else to save us but rolling up our sleeves and getting involved.' ALSO READ: Mandela Day: Food and community upliftments How to become an active citizen Phakeng said active citizenship means each citizen must lead by example. 'If all we do is criticise without lifting a finger to help, then that is not active citizenship, that is commentary and it does not change anything. 'Active citizenship does not mean taking the law into our hands in a distractive way. 'Active citizenship is not anarchy, it is not looting or vandalising community resources out of anger or frustration.' Phakeng said another way of being an active citizen is to report corruption to the authorities. Her remarks come at a time when the country prepares for a national dialogue next month. This dialogue will provide South Africans with an opportunity to express their frustrations with the challenges in the country and come up with solutions. NOW READ: The real national dialogue has begun
The South African
7 hours ago
- The South African
Roland Schoeman accuses Cyril Ramaphosa's ANC of looting 'a trillion rand' in scathing tweet
South African Olympic gold medallist Roland Schoeman has ignited a storm of political controversy, this time accusing President Cyril Ramaphosa and the ruling African National Congress (ANC) of looting 'over a trillion rand' – a claim that drew mixed reactions from South Africans across the political spectrum. The 45-year-old swimming icon, who won gold at the 2004 Olympics in Athens in the 4x100m freestyle relay and has since become a prominent online political commentator, took to social media following Ramaphosa's latest address to Parliament, writing on X (formerly Twitter): 'Imagine where the country would be if you and your party didn't steal over a trillion rand.' The post, which quickly gained traction, triggered a polarising response – some users applauded his bluntness, while others condemned his remarks as simplistic, racially charged, or disconnected from South Africa's broader social and economic realities. While many users on social media agreed with Schoeman's anti-corruption message, others challenged his narrative, pointing out issues of historic inequality, white privilege, and deep-rooted systemic dysfunction that go beyond a single administration. @hopeinbetween replied: 'If they can stop pleasing whiteness, we could be in an even better and stronger position as a country!' @Vincent62343509 added: 'They allowed population growth to spiral with poor border control… compared to our economic growth, that's unsustainable.' Others were more scathing: @HumanOpinion1 wrote: 'Imagine trying to sell 'progress' after looting a trillion rand. That's like bragging about patching one pothole after burning down the whole highway.' The comment section revealed that, while frustration over corruption is shared across racial and political lines, Schoeman's tone and framing drew accusations of bias and oversimplification. Over the years, the swimmer-turned-commentator has regularly spoken out on issues including farm murders, racial identity politics, and EFF leader Julius Malema, once applauding the UK's decision to reject Malema's visa application. His use of terms like 'civilised nations' and support for greater US influence in South African affairs has also raised eyebrows, with some accusing him of promoting neocolonial sentiment. The Presidency has not responded directly to Schoeman's post, although the ANC has in the past dismissed similar public accusations as 'uninformed and populist'. Ramaphosa himself has consistently defended his administration's anti-corruption efforts, pointing to the Zondo Commission, reforms at SARS, and crackdowns on public sector fraud. Political analysts say Schoeman's remarks underscore a growing culture of online populism, where celebrities and influencers can shape national debate – often without accountability. 'Roland taps into a very real frustration many South Africans feel,' said political analyst Thami Ndlovu. 'But attributing all of South Africa's challenges to theft alone ignores the layers of complexity in our economy and society.' Others argue that voices like Schoeman's – while provocative – are reflective of a leadership vacuum and widespread disillusionment with post-apartheid governance. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
City of Cape Town ready to square off against National Government over Public Procurement Act
Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis Image: Supplied The Constitutional Court has opened the ring for a sparring match between the City of Cape Town and National government, by granting the City direct access to challenge the controversial Public Procurement Act, a case with potentially far-reaching consequences for the autonomy of municipalities and the future of local service delivery across South Africa. The case, which now heads to the country's highest court, revolves around both procedural and substantive concerns: that the Act was passed unlawfully, and that its implementation would severely constrain municipalities' ability to respond quickly to critical infrastructure needs. Chief Justice Mandisa Maya issued directions on 14 July, giving national government until 8 August to file its answering affidavit. The City has until 22 August to respond. The Presidency has confirmed it will make its position clear in those legal filings. Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya told Weekend Argus: 'Our responses will be contained in our papers, which will be made known against the court set deadline.' For the City of Cape Town, the case is not merely a legal formality. Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis described the court's decision to grant direct access as a crucial development. 'We welcome the Concourt granting direct access to hear this vital matter. 'We believe the Act was passed unlawfully, with fatal shortcomings in public participation and parliament's procedures.' The City's application contends that the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) vote that passed the Bill was flawed because seven of nine provincial delegations did not have valid final mandates. This alone, the City argues, is grounds for the legislation to be invalidated. However, Mayor Hill-Lewis emphasised that beyond procedural defects, the impact of the law on everyday service delivery is at the heart of their opposition. 'Beyond these issues, the Act will slow down local service delivery and make it much harder for municipalities to procure quickly in response to local needs. "Local government must be able to act swiftly to resolve urgent water, sanitation, electrical, waste, and environmental issues. Instead, this bill will slow down municipalities via a massive new red tape burden and interference from other spheres of government. This is unconstitutional, and undermines local government's direct accountability to serving residents.' The Constitutional Court made a ruling this past week Image: File In a comprehensive set of written responses to Weekend Argus, the City expanded on specific operational concerns. These include restrictions on municipalities' ability to procure emergency services without central approval, and the creation of a single national Public Procurement Office (PPO), which will assume oversight of municipal procurement systems. 'Specialised services or goods might be needed for urgent repairs to water, sewer or electricity infrastructure that may pose serious environmental risk or danger to residents. In these cases for example, municipalities will no longer have the power to lawfully deviate from procurement regulations for urgent service delivery without centralised approval via the centralised national Public Procurement Office (PPO).' The City warned that if the PPO database fails or is delayed, procurement for urgent services at municipal level could grind to a halt across the country. Added to this, the legislation prevents municipalities from maintaining their own supplier databases or making payments outside the central system. These concerns are amplified by the cost and complexity of implementing the law. While the Act is not yet fully operational, the City says National Treasury is still in the process of establishing the necessary regulations and systems. 'The Act is not yet in full effect as the necessary regulations and systems are still being established by National Treasury.' Even so, the City is already anticipating the financial and bureaucratic burden that will follow if the legislation stands. 'Yes because there will likely be human resource costs and other operational expenses required to cope with the major new red tape and compliance burden.' The legislation introduces 36 new regulatory requirements still to be promulgated. Municipal officials warn these changes will create delays, legal uncertainty, and reduced flexibility to deal with time-sensitive contracts. One such example is the potential for long and complex appeals against tenders — which, under the Act, would block the finalisation of contracts until the appeals process concludes. The City says this will discourage public-private partnerships and hinder investment in infrastructure, particularly in fast-growing urban areas. Cape Town has not stood alone in its opposition. The City maintains that it has engaged every possible forum to raise its objections, including public participation processes, submissions to the South African Local Government Association (SALGA), and intergovernmental meetings. 'The City has opposed the legislation at every stage including via public participation and SALGA channels. The City is acting in the interests of all municipalities.' At the heart of the City's legal argument lies a constitutional principle: that local government is not merely a service provider for national mandates, but a constitutionally distinct and autonomous sphere with direct accountability to residents. 'As a starting point, local government has constitutional autonomy and direct obligations to residents which the bill unconstitutionally infringes, aside from any and all further negative impacts.' [email protected] Weekend Argus
