logo
Generative AI a top priority for firms but privacy concerns remain: GIC survey

Generative AI a top priority for firms but privacy concerns remain: GIC survey

Generative AI a top priority for firms but privacy concerns remain: GIC survey
Source: Straits Times
Article Date: 08 May 2025
Author: Timothy Goh
Many exploring its use for software development and IT applications.
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a top priority for many companies seeking to boost efficiency and productivity.
But they have concerns over the adoption of the technology in areas such as data privacy and talent shortages, according to a new survey by GIC and consulting firm Bain & Company.
The survey polled senior executives from 44 companies in 12 markets, including the US, Singapore and India.
It found that 36 per cent of those surveyed had data privacy concerns regarding the use of generative AI, while 32 per cent pointed to a lack of in-house expertise or resources to adopt the technology.
Another 20 per cent were unsure about its return on investment.
The firms polled – spanning industries such as financial services, technology and media and entertainment – were among the participants in GIC's Bridge Forum Summit held in San Francisco on May 6 and 7.
The biennial event was expected to host about 300 attendees, including entrepreneurs, start-up founders and tech executives from 17 countries.
Despite the concerns, interest in generative AI adoption is high, with 82 per cent of firms exploring the use of the technology for software development, followed by information technology applications at 64 per cent and improving employee effectiveness at 61 per cent.
In addition, 90 per cent of respondents said generative AI has met or exceeded expectations, with the same share expressing trust that employees are using or will use the technology.
More than 60 per cent of respondents have set aside funds for adopting generative AI. Budgets vary by company size. More than half of the firms earning under US$500 million (S$644.2 million) in annual revenue allocated between US$1 million and US$5 million per year, while 38 per cent set aside less than US$1 million a year.
Larger companies with annual revenue above US$5 billion reported the highest levels of spending on generative AI: About 29 per cent allocated between US$1 million and US$5 million, another 29 per cent set aside between US$6 million and US$10 million, and 14 per cent reported budgets exceeding US$10 million.
But 14 per cent of these larger firms had no AI budget, and another 14 per cent allocated less than US$1 million.
Mr Chris Emanuel, head of GIC's technology investment group, told The Straits Times on May 6 that the generative AI journey for companies seeking to adopt the technology is still in its early stages.
Firms seeking to adopt generative AI have much to learn – from having the right expertise to choosing suitable tools and putting in place safeguards for data privacy and regulatory compliance.
These gaps, he noted, will open up investment opportunities as tech firms innovate to meet such needs.
'GIC is focused on making sure that the companies who are building AI solutions have long-term, durable moats,' Mr Emanuel said.
GIC chief executive Lim Chow Kiat said in his speech at the event on May 6 that the sovereign wealth fund will need to allocate capital to the 'right places', given the pace of AI developments.
He said that GIC sees the AI 'value chain' in three parts – enablers such as semiconductor, cloud and cyber-security providers; monetisers building apps, services and platforms; and adopters using AI to improve processes, customer experiences and productivity.
'We see long-term potential across all three segments, but we also know that hype and overvaluations are real risks,' Mr Lim said.
'That's why we are focused on identifying durable moats, differentiated technology and teams and sound business models.'
Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction.
Print

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MAS clarifies position on regulation of digital token service providers
MAS clarifies position on regulation of digital token service providers

Singapore Law Watch

time14 hours ago

  • Singapore Law Watch

MAS clarifies position on regulation of digital token service providers

MAS clarifies position on regulation of digital token service providers Source: Straits Times Article Date: 09 Jun 2025 Author: Timothy Goh The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said it has set the bar 'high' for licensing, and will 'generally' not issue a licence. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has clarified that digital token service providers offering services solely to customers outside Singapore – whether involving digital payment tokens or capital market products – will need to be licensed from June 30. The central bank added in its clarification on June 6 that it has set the bar 'high' for licensing, and will 'generally' not issue a licence. 'The money laundering risks are higher in such business models and if their substantive regulated activity is outside of Singapore, MAS is unable to effectively supervise such persons,' it said. Without a licence, existing digital token service providers serving only overseas customers will be required to cease these activities when the regime comes into effect on June 30, said MAS. In its response on May 30 to feedback on a consultation paper regarding its proposed regulatory framework for digital token service providers, MAS noted that such providers may be more vulnerable to money laundering and terrorism financing risks due to the internet-based and cross-border nature of their services. This increases the likelihood that they could be misused for illicit purposes, to the detriment of Singapore's reputation. The proposed regulatory framework will come under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022. MAS also clarified that service providers for digital payment tokens or tokens of capital market products that serve customers in Singapore are already regulated, and there will be no change to what these licensed providers can do. Providers serving customers in Singapore may also offer services to overseas clients, while those dealing with other types of tokens – such as utility or governance tokens – are not subject to licensing or regulation under the new regime and are therefore unaffected. MAS said that it has reached out to persons who, based on information available to them, may be affected by the new regime to clarify its policy position and to discuss their plans for an 'orderly wind-down' of the activity. It added that 'based on available information, we are aware of a very small number of such providers'. Parties who may be affected by the digital token service regime may contact MAS at [email protected]. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print

Private assets giant Brookfield expects alternative investments to replace public markets in 25 years
Private assets giant Brookfield expects alternative investments to replace public markets in 25 years

Business Times

time18 hours ago

  • Business Times

Private assets giant Brookfield expects alternative investments to replace public markets in 25 years

[SINGAPORE] Bruce Flatt, the billionaire chief executive officer of Toronto-based Brookfield, is understandably bullish on the prospects of alternative investments. The Canadian investment giant has, after all, amassed more than US$1 trillion in assets under management (AUM), and is one of the world's largest managers of alternative assets, also commonly known as private markets. Flatt foresees that, in 25 years, more retail investors would be channelling their funds to private assets, and the asset class would then no longer be billed as 'alternative'. The 59-year-old, who was in Singapore recently, told The Business Times: 'Fifty per cent of most individuals' retail accounts will have private investments in them. And this is a wholesale change of retirement savings accounts around the world ... so owning private businesses should be called 'mainstream' over the next 25 years.' When that happens, fixed income and equities would become known as alternative assets, he said. Recalling when he first pitched private markets to institutional investors 25 years ago, he said he had described the asset class as nascent. It has since then become mainstream for deep-pocketed investors such as GIC and Temasek Holdings. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Private markets are growing in popularity, as more countries are allowing retail investors to dabble in the asset class, potentially unlocking additional billions worth of funds. Singapore's central bank is assessing feedback to its proposal, made in late March, to broaden retail investors' access to private markets. Institutional investors such as pension funds, insurance companies and sovereign wealth funds have also entered the fray, allocating more capital to private markets, which have been shown to outperform public-market assets in the long term. More funds flowing into private markets, coupled with the trend of falling initial public offerings on world exchanges, have led to bullish growth forecasts for alternative assets. One of the most bullish is from Bain; it predicts private markets growing at more than twice the rate of public markets, with AUM hitting as high as US$65 trillion in 2032. Singapore expansion Even then, the size of private markets pales in comparison with that of public ones. Data provider Ocorian noted that the total AUM in global public markets stood at US$230 trillion in 2024, compared to the US$12.7 trillion in private assets. Flatt is confident that Brookfield will capture a sizeable chunk of the business out of Singapore. Its office in the city-state is 'a (regional) hub servicing clients and looking after institutional, retail and individual investors – it's a very important city for us', he said, adding that Brookfield sources about a third of its capital for its overall business out of the Asia-Pacific. Flatt said about half the team works on Singapore deals, and the rest are focused on the Asia-Pacific, where Brookfield's AUM is US$146 billion, about 13.5 per cent of its total. The company does not break down AUM by countries. Singapore's AUM is small, but the Brookfield team working on it has shot up from four in 2014, when its office first opened in the Republic, to more than 40 today. To accommodate further expansion, Brookfield is moving to a bigger office in CapitaGreen, a 40-storey Grade-A office tower in the central business district, this month. Together with its subsidiary Oaktree Capital Management, Brookfield will occupy a floor. The extra space will enable the firm and Oaktree to grow to more than 100 staff in the next three to five years. Despite having been in Singapore for more than 10 years, Brookfield sealed its first transaction in the country only last month. It bought three industrial properties from Mapletree Industrial Trust for S$535.3 million, paying a 2.6 per cent premium over their combined independent valuation. Why did Brookfield take so long? Flatt said that as a value investor, Brookfield assesses the current investment environment to be 'much more agreeable' than in 2014, when a lot of capital was chasing assets in the market. In addition, 'it always takes us a long time to get people in place and to be comfortable investing' from when Brookfield first built a hub in Singapore. Eyeing more deals in Singapore With a decade-long presence and the Mapletree transaction, he is confident of a higher number of transactions in the next 10 to 20 years. 'We're a lot more experienced, we have our relationships here, we know all the businesses and companies, institutions, and therefore the future of the business should be much more substantial because of that.' Referring to Brookfield's key focus on real estate, infrastructure, renewable energy, industrial, private equity and private credit, the billionaire chief said 'all the above are open for business' when the firm scours for deals in Singapore. Flatt started his career in Brascan, Brookfield's predecessor, at age 25 back in 1990, and worked his way up to the C-suite in 2002. Since then, he has been credited with expanding Brookfield's presence to more than 30 countries. And with the 2019 acquisition of a majority stake in Oaktree, he also helped propel Brookfield into the ranks of the world's top alternative-asset managers. His value-driven investment thesis, long tenure as CEO, ownership of Brookfield and frugal habits – he takes the subway to work – have led to some observers describing him as Canada's Warren Buffett. Together with a group of partners, he owns 20 per cent of Brookfield. His net worth was US$6.2 billion as at Jun 8, going by Forbes' estimates. That is tied closely to Brookfield's share price, which has jumped 108 per cent in the past five years, in a trajectory that has been largely in line with the company's income growth. In its first quarter ended Mar 31, Brookfield's distributable earnings before gains on asset sales rose 30 per cent year on year to US$1.3 billion, as momentum across its core business remained strong. The first-quarter report follows a record-breaking year in 2024, when distributable earnings rose 15 per cent to hit US$4.9 billion. Brookfield said it uses distributable earnings before realisation because the metric shows income available to be distributed to common shareholders or to be re-invested into the business.

Virgin Australia seeks to raise US$442.8 million in IPO, term sheet shows
Virgin Australia seeks to raise US$442.8 million in IPO, term sheet shows

Business Times

time6 days ago

  • Business Times

Virgin Australia seeks to raise US$442.8 million in IPO, term sheet shows

BAIN Capital-owned Virgin Australia is looking to raise A$685 million (S$442.7 million) in an initial public offering, according to a term sheet seen by Reuters on Wednesday. The company has set the offer price at A$2.90 per share and the offer size reflects 30 per cent of Virgin's total issued capital. Bain Capital did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. The airline, Australia's second largest behind Qantas, will sell 236.2 million shares in the IPO to value the company at A$2.32 billion on a fully diluted basis, the term sheet showed. Virgin will have an enterprise value of A$3.6 billion, taking into account its net debt of A$1.31 billion. Bain's shareholding will reduce from about 70 per cent to 39.4 per cent following the IPO, while Qatar Airways will retain a 23 per cent stake, according to the term sheet. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Institutional bookbuilding will close on Thursday and Virgin's shares are due to start trading on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) on June 24, the term sheet showed. The IPO is being carried out through a front-end book building process, which means investor bids are taken ahead of the prospectus being reviewed and approved by Australian regulators. Virgin's IPO has been in the making for more than two years but was put on hold due to volatile global financial markets during 2023 after investment banks were appointed. Bain bought Virgin for A$3.5 billion (S$3.15 billion) including liabilities five years ago after it was placed in voluntary administration, the closest Australian equivalent to Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Virgin collapsed in 2020 following tough Covid-19 restrictions that damaged the global airline industry. Australia's benchmark S&P/ASX200 index has gained 3.77 per cent so far in 2025. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store