logo
‘Downsize, make money and have fun': the retirees moving to the city

‘Downsize, make money and have fun': the retirees moving to the city

Times14-06-2025
Claire Carter has been selling country houses for 24 years, and she's noticed a sea change in attitudes.
Twenty years ago empty nesters would downsize from a big country house to a village. 'They no longer move to villages, they move to cities,' says Carter, head of country houses at John D Wood & Co. 'They want something that's socially more interesting, with everything on your doorstep.'
The dream of retiring to a bungalow in a sleepy seaside town or peaceful village is looking increasingly out of touch. Retiring to a city, after all, makes sense. Public transport in the countryside is notoriously poor, waiting times for GPs in rural areas are terrible and the best hospitals are in big cities. Living near adult children is another draw. Cities are also full of life. Henry Sherwood, founder of the Buying Agents, moved a retired couple from Cheltenham to Islington, north London. 'Their approach was that when you retire you have more time on your hands to do the things you enjoy, so why move to an area where there is less to do?'
Older people also have increasingly younger mindsets. 'Most of my clients are older or retired age,' Carter says. 'And they've got Pelotons in the garage. One client, every time I ring him he's playing padel. They're more active, they're more social. It's so different now. It's a whole new life for them. So instead of moving to a bungalow when your health isn't good, they're getting ahead of the game: we're going to downsize, get some money out of this and have some fun.'
One of Carter's clients, the empty-nesters John Dryden, 62, and his wife, Louise, 52, recently sold their five-bedroom house in four acres of East Sussex. John retired from running his travel business in November and Louise has retired from catering. In January they bought a three-bedroom, 1,700 sq ft apartment in the city of Brighton & Hove. It has two terraces and overlooks a busy park. They moved in May and have a spring in their step. 'Moving back to a city, it's amazing, it's buzzing,' John says. 'We go down to the park, it's all families, people playing tennis, people walking dogs. Stuck out in the country, we had lots of friends, but you don't always see people day to day.'
'The first night we moved in here, we ordered in from an Indian restaurant, and it was delivered bang! Twenty minutes, beautiful food. Last night we had Thai delivered, we have a Waitrose around the corner, everything is extremely easy.'
The couple didn't want to be slaves to their garden. 'We've got seven tennis courts below us now, we're very active, we play padel … And we wanted the buzz: to get back into the bars, restaurants, theatres and exhibitions, cinema. Bring it on.'
They've got rid of one of their two cars. 'We plan to cycle more, walk a lot more. We're walking to the supermarket rather than driving.'
The average price for a two-bedroom flat in Brighton & Hove in 2024 was £314,400, according to Hamptons. John declined to say what they paid, but came out ahead financially from downsizing, leaving them enough to enjoy retirement and travel. They go abroad every winter and wanted a home that's easy to lock up and leave. And they reckon their flat is 40 per cent cheaper to run than their old house, but also big enough to accommodate their two adult children — and future grandchildren — when they visit.
Other retired people are opting for bigger cities. According to a 2023 study by Age UK, there are almost 1.4 million older people (over the age of 60) living in London, the capital's fastest-growing demographic.
A 2021 survey found a 15 per cent increase in the number of over-65s retiring to inner London in the past decade, according to solicitors Bird & Co, who used figures from the Office for National Statistics.
Over-50s made up 8 per cent of all people moving into London from across Britain in 2022, according to Hamptons and ONS. Leafy outer boroughs like Havering, Bromley and Bexley have the highest percentage of over-60s, but central areas like Kensington & Chelsea and the City are in the top ten.
Shaun Hargreaves Heap, 73, and his wife, Lyndsey Stonebridge, 61, recently moved into the heart of the capital. After their children left for university, they sold their five-bedroom house in Norwich, where he has lived for 40 years. In January they bought a two-bedroom, 960 sq ft flat in Bloomsbury for £960,000 from Greater London Properties.
• Bloomsbury named one of the best places to live in London 2025
Hargreaves Heap, an economics professor, still works two days a week at King's College London, and his wife still works at University of Birmingham. 'I'm well past retirement age but academics really never stop working,' Hargreaves Heap says. 'Although there were work considerations, we made a conscious choice that we would like to be in central London because of what it offers in retirement. It's very cool for my wife to be able to use the British Library. For me, I can walk to King's, all the major galleries, all the major theatres, museums. And Bloomsbury has an amazing amount of green space, with so many squares. Russell Square is a wonderful place for seeing lots of people enjoying themselves.'
They frequent the shops, cafés and restaurants of Marchmont Street and Lamb's Conduit Street (the Italian Ciao Bella is their favourite). And they walk to the Waitrose and Curzon Bloomsbury cinema in the Brunswick Centre.
• It's not downsizing, it's 'rightsizing': how to move later in life
He couldn't see themselves retiring to the usual retirement enclaves. 'In a seaside village, you just don't have theatres, galleries and museums. As you get older, you sort of appreciate the ability to see what the human species is capable of.'
George McKerracher, 65, and his wife, Di, 60 have always been city people. George retired ten years ago from his job as a senior director at Asda, and Di two years ago as chair of a health company. Until recently, they lived in a three-bedroom 1,800 sq ft penthouse with a terrace in the centre of Leeds (it's now for sale for £1.095 million with Zenko City Living).
To be closer to family, they've bought a three-bedroom duplex in a listed townhouse in the West End of Glasgow, for which they paid over £800,000. 'Glasgow is a fantastic city,' George says. 'In the West End, the university is there, the botanic gardens, it's a cultural hotspot, with all the restaurants, coffee shops, cinemas. Di and I have breakfast out three times a week. The only thing is it rains 100 days a year, but the airport is a 20-minute Uber ride away.'
Why not retire to a peaceful village? 'We're not ready for that. We're still youngsters at heart. We are very active. We've got lots of friends. We walk a lot. We go to the gym three times a week. We travel. We have annual Bupa checks. I don't like the word retirement. When Alex Ferguson retired, he said, I can tell you one thing I'm not going to do: buy a pair of slippers. I identify with that.'
• Priced-out, stressed-out creatives are fleeing London for Glasgow
McKerragher still dabbles in business and investing. 'But we'd had enough of the cut and thrust and have a whole list of other things that we want to do. If we don't do it now, when will we do it?'
Apart from crime, the case against retiring to cities is the high cost of urban property. Carter says her clients usually come out in the black because they are downsizing. 'Most people want to walk away with change, to help the kids out or put a bit in the pension pot, and cover moving costs,' Carter says. 'I had clients who sold a chocolate-box house in the countryside in three acres for £1.8 million and bought a terrace in Clapham [south London] for £1.5 million.'
While rural and seaside locations are still the most popular overall for retirees, the retirement home industry is noticing a shift in sentiment. James Lloyd, Director of Policy at Associated Retirement Community Operators, said: 'Integrated Retirement Community operators are responding, with a new trend toward urban developments clearly observable in places like London, Chester and Bristol. While country locations remain popular, we think that in ten years, there will be an Integrated Retirement Community in every town centre.'
It's a far cry from the old days. 'Back then, every bungalow that came on the market, you knew who you were selling to,' Carter recalls. 'If I said to some of my clients now, here's a bungalow, they'd laugh at me. That's not what they're looking for. They want something modern, interesting, with more life going on. They're not just downsizing, waiting for the end.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government asks body to consult on axing ‘discriminatory' minimum wage age bands
Government asks body to consult on axing ‘discriminatory' minimum wage age bands

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Government asks body to consult on axing ‘discriminatory' minimum wage age bands

The Government has said it is pushing forward with plans to look at removing 'discriminatory' age bands for the national minimum wage as it extended the remit of the Low Pay Commission (LPC). It said the advisory body will consult with employers, trade unions and workers on narrowing the gap between the minimum wage rate for 18 to 20-year-olds, and the so-called national living wage – the UK minimum wage for workers 21 years and older. The LPC will also be required to put forward 'recommendations on achieving a single adult rate in the years ahead'. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'To ensure the right balance is struck between the needs of workers, business affordability and the wider economy, the LPC is being asked to consult on several issues before recommending the new rates.' Last year, Labour committed to removing these age bands to create a 'genuine' national living wage, as part of efforts to bolster employment rights. Currently, the national living wage for workers aged 21 and older is £12.21. Meanwhile, the minimum wage for workers aged between 18 and 20 is £10. There is also a minimum wage for those aged under 18, and apprentices, of £7.55. The Government said the change to the LPC remit will also ensure it actively considers the cost of living in its recommendations for changes to the minimum wage which are next applied from April 2026. The LPC, which was founded in 1997, provides recommendations to the Government each October regarding how it believes the minimum wage should be changed. The Government ultimately sets minimum wage rates for the following April after this advice. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'Low pay drags down living standards for our workers and in turn hurts our high streets and local businesses. 'This Government's plan for change will put money back in people's pockets, with this new remit marking the next step in considering how we ensure a fair deal for our lowest-paid workers while maintaining a competitive economy that boosts businesses and their employees alike.' Baroness Philippa Stroud, chairwoman of the LPC, said: 'We are pleased to receive our remit from the Government. 'Already, since the beginning of the year, we have spent significant time speaking with workers and employers to understand the pressures in the economy and the effects of the most recent increases in the minimum wage. 'We have held a successful call for evidence and received detailed submissions from all sides.'

Households could net thousands of pounds in savings from clean tech
Households could net thousands of pounds in savings from clean tech

The Independent

time42 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Households could net thousands of pounds in savings from clean tech

Households with clean tech including heat pumps, solar panels and home charging for electric cars could save £37,000 over 15 years, a report suggests. But high initial costs of adopting the green technologies are a barrier for most people, with 92% of those on lower incomes feeling they are 'out of reach', the research by energy company Ovo warns. The firm is calling for an expansion of grants and low-cost loans to help people make the switch to green tech, particularly low income households, as well as a social tariff to support vulnerable people through the UK's transition to clean energy. And it joins widespread calls to reduce the cost of electricity, which is significantly more expensive than gas due in part to high policy costs added to power bills, to further incentivise the switch to electric heat pumps and cars. The report from Ovo, which has been reviewed by academics from the universities of Exeter, Leeds and Stirling, warns delaying the shift to the clean tech that is critical for the UK's efforts to cut climate emissions has a major financial impact for households. It looks at six green measures: heat pumps, home insulation, solar panels, leased electric vehicles (EV), a home EV charger and a smart meter. The average household installing all the measures would pay out, after incentives, around £15,500 to make the green switch. But they would get the return on their investment within five years, with savings on bills from the insulation, efficient heat pumps, home-generated solar, battery storage of power and EVs which are cheaper to run than petrol equivalents totalling around £17,600 by that point, the study suggests. And 15 years after installation, net savings could total more than £37,000. Even if the cost of inflation and borrowing to invest in the green tech is taken into account, net savings could add up to more than £23,000 over 15 years, the report says. However surveying for the report also found nearly three quarters of people (72%) cited upfront costs as their main reason for delaying adopting green technology, with two thirds (67%) needing to prioritise immediate financial needs over long term savings. And 92% of households with an annual income of less than £30,000 in the survey said green technologies feel 'out of reach' financially. That is despite nearly four fifths (78%) of the more than 4,000 people polled by Strand Partners saying they wanted to decarbonise their home further. People living in private rental homes are in a particular bind, with 81% feeling 'trapped in energy inefficient homes' with landlords not incentivised to pay the upfront costs when bill savings will be realised by their tenants. There was also a lack of knowledge about green technologies, with just 41% of households in the survey aware heat pumps could reduce their energy bills over time, and 64% of respondents were confused about which technologies would be most suitable for their home. But alongside the financial savings clean tech can offer, there is growing evidence energy efficiency can increase property values, reduce exposure to sudden market shocks and improve daily life for example by making homes more comfortable, the report said. David Buttress, Ovo's chief executive, said: 'We've stumbled into a false debate. 'Net zero is framed as expensive and unrealistic – but the data is clear: not decarbonising will cost households and the country far more. 'We talk endlessly about the cost of action and investing in net-zero – but the real crisis is the cost of inaction, and the investment that our energy system would require even without net zero upgrades. 'We need to move away from endless debate and accept that there is a clear economic reason for moving to clean energy sources.' Dr Maximilian Gerrath, of the University of Leeds, said consumers were not just making economic decisions about green tech, 'they're navigating a maze of fear, complexity, and inertia'. 'To accelerate decarbonisation, we must make green homes not just affordable, but easy, visible, and aspirational. 'Most people don't resist green upgrades because they dislike them – they resist because the benefits feel distant, while the costs are immediate,' he said. Nick Davies, head of climate policy at Green Alliance environmental think tank, said: 'Upgrading our homes with clean tech isn't just good for the planet, it's good for our bank balances in the long run too. 'This research shows just how big the green homes bonus can be for households that switch to clean tech like solar, home EV charging and heat pumps. 'We need more households to be able to access government support or finance to cover the upfront costs for these upgrades, so that more people can enjoy the cash-saving benefits of clean technology.' A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesperson said: 'These findings show families can save thousands of pounds every year by upgrading their homes, protecting them from energy price spikes caused by volatile fossil fuel markets. 'We are investing £13.2 billion to upgrade up to five million homes over this parliament, while supporting industry to develop financing models that can remove the upfront cost entirely, helping more households make the switch to cleaner heating in a way that works for them.'

Electric cars eligible for new government grants revealed
Electric cars eligible for new government grants revealed

The Independent

time42 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Electric cars eligible for new government grants revealed

The first electric car models eligible for new government grants have been revealed. The discount will be automatically applied at the point of sale. These are the first models approved under the new £650 million electric car grant. This will enable motorists purchasing a new electric car to save either £1,500 or £3,750, depending on sustainability criteria. It is hoped the measure will encourage more drivers to switch to electric motoring. Drivers will be able to save £1,500 with the purchase of new Citroen e-C3, e-C4, e-C5 and e-Berlingo cars, the Department for Transport (DfT) said. The DfT said many drivers cite upfront costs as a 'key barrier' to buying an EV, and the grant will bring down prices so they 'more closely match their petrol and diesel counterparts'. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'With the first four models approved today, and more to come over the next few weeks, this summer we're making owning an electric car cheaper, easier and a reality for thousands more people across the UK. 'Once again we're delivering our plan for change by standing firmly on the side of motorists and manufacturers, driving down costs for consumers, supporting jobs and putting money back in people's pockets.' Greg Taylor, managing director of Citroen UK, said: 'We want everyone to have the opportunity to make the switch to an electric car, and this support will help make our cars more accessible for our customers.' Edmund King, AA president, said 'any government support to boost the demand for EVs is welcome', adding: 'This discount of £1,500 for some more affordable EVs will help a number of those with tighter budgets. 'We look forward to seeing the full list of discounts up to £3,750 on more models to really push the market forward.' Dan Caesar, chief executive of lobby group Electric Vehicles UK, welcomed the announcement and called for manufacturers to 'support a scheme which the EV industry needs to be conspicuously successful'. Under the government's zero emission vehicle (Zev) mandate, at least 28 per cent of new cars sold by each manufacturer in the UK this year must be zero emission, which generally means pure electric. Across all manufacturers, the figure during the first half of the year was 21.6 per cent. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced in April that sales of new hybrids that cannot be plugged in will be permitted to continue until 2035. Changes to the Zev mandate also mean it will be easier for manufacturers who do not meet the targets to avoid fines.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store