Delhi HC refuses Medha Patkar extension of lower court order
The Delhi high court on Tuesday declined to postpone the execution of a sessions court order releasing activist Medha Patkar on probation in a 2001 criminal defamation case filed by Delhi lieutenant governor VK Saxena.
On April 8, sessions judge Vishal Singh had granted Patkar probation, directing her to deposit ₹1 lakh as compensation and furnish a personal bond of ₹25,000 by April 23. The court noted that Patkar, leader of the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), was a person of repute with no prior convictions. The order came after Patkar appealed a May 24 ruling by a metropolitan magistrate that denied her relief and sentenced her to five months in jail.
On Tuesday, Patkar's counsel sought a two-week deferment of the execution, citing her absence from Delhi. The plea was heard by justice Shailender Kaur, who declined the request and advised the counsel to approach the trial court.
'Whatever is the order before the trial court, please follow the order. Please move the trial court (for postponing the execution),' justice Kaur told Patkar's counsel.
The application was filed as part of Patkar's appeal against an April 2 city court order upholding her conviction. On April 7, the high court scheduled May 19 as the next hearing in the matter.
The defamation case stems from a press release issued by Patkar on November 24, 2000, titled 'True Face of Patriot.' In it, she alleged that Saxena, then president of the National Council of Civil Liberties (NCCL), had donated a cheque to the NBA that later bounced. Patkar implied Saxena, a vocal supporter of the Sardar Sarovar Project, was covertly aiding the movement he publicly opposed.
At the time, Saxena's NGO was involved in exposing unfair trade practices and tax evasion in interstate commerce. Saxena filed the defamation complaint on January 18, 2001, alleging that Patkar's claims were false and intended to damage his reputation.
On May 24, 2024, metropolitan magistrate Raghav Sharma found Patkar guilty, concluding that her statements were deliberate, malicious, and aimed at tarnishing Saxena's image. On July 1, Sharma sentenced her to five months in prison and imposed a ₹10 lakh fine.
The sessions court later overruled the jail term, releasing Patkar on probation. However, the order was conditional on the timely deposit of compensation and execution of the bond, now due on April 23.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
9 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Rush Hour: Protesting opposition leaders detained in Delhi, Medha Patkar's conviction upheld & more
We're building a brand-new studio to bring you bold ground reports, sharp interviews, hard-hitting podcasts, explainers and more. Support Scroll's studio fund today. Congress leaders Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi were among Opposition leaders who were briefly detained by the Delhi Police during a protest against the Bihar voter roll revision. Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)'s Sanjay Raut and Trinamool Congress' Sagarika Ghose were also among those detained. All the detained members of Parliament were released around two hours later. The police said that although the Election Commission had allowed 30 parliamentarians to meet its members, over 200 MPs marched to the poll panel's office from Parliament. As part of the Bihar voter roll revision process, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list needed to submit proof of eligibility to vote. The Opposition has been alleging that the exercise risked disenfranchising voters as they may not be able to produce the necessary documents. The Supreme Court has upheld the conviction of activist Medha Patkar in a 24-year-old defamation case filed by Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena. However, the bench set aside a penalty of Rs 1 lakh imposed on her. The court also modified a probation condition requiring Patkar to appear before the trial court periodically, instead allowing her to furnish bonds. The case was filed in 2001, when Saxena was heading the Ahmedabad-based non-governmental organisation National Council for Civil Liberties. Saxena alleged that Patkar had defamed him in a press note titled 'True face of patriot', which the activist had issued in November 2000. A metropolitan magistrate held Patkar guilty of criminal defamation in May 2024. The conviction was later upheld by a sessions court and the Delhi High Court. Read more. The Supreme Court has told the Delhi government and municipal corporations of Noida and Gurugram to capture and shift street dogs to shelters, saying that 'immediate steps' needed to be taken to address the problem. The court told the authorities to start building shelters for 5,000 to 6,000 dogs within six weeks and report back to the court within eight weeks. The shelters must have sufficient personnel to sterilise and immunise the dogs, who should not be released into public places, the bench said. The court added that if any individual or organisation comes in the way of rounding up street dogs, it will order action against them. Read more. Five journalists from Qatari broadcaster Al Jazeera were killed in an Israeli attack on Gaza on Sunday. The channel said that this was a 'targeted assassination' and a 'premeditated attack on press freedom'. Correspondents Anas Al-Sharif and Mohammed Qreiqeh, and camerapersons Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa were in a tent for journalists near Gaza's Al-Shifa Hospital when it was struck by Israeli forces, Al Jazeera said. Al Jazeera alleged that the killing of its employees followed 'repeated incitement' and calls by several Israeli officials and spokespersons to target Al-Sharif and his colleagues. The Israel Defense Forces claimed on Monday that Al-Sharif was a 'terrorist' belonging to the Palestinian militant group Hamas and had 'posed as an Al Jazeera journalist'.
NDTV
10 hours ago
- NDTV
Supreme Court Confirms Medha Patkar's Conviction In Defamation Case
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to interfere with the conviction of activist Medha Patkar in the 2021 criminal defamation case filed against her by VK Saxena -- the now Lieutenant Governor of Delhi. A Bench of Justices MM Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh was dealing with a special leave petition (SLP) filed by Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar, challenging a Delhi High Court order that had maintained her conviction in the matter. However, in a bit of relief to Ms Patkar, the Justice Sundresh-led Bench set aside the penalty imposed and directed that the supervision order would not be enforced. Earlier, on July 29, the Delhi High Court upheld Medha Patkar's conviction, rejecting her revision plea against a Saket court order that had dismissed her criminal appeal. A single-judge Bench of Justice Shalinder Kaur observed that Ms Patkar failed to point out any procedural defect that would amount to a miscarriage of justice in the case, noting that her conviction was based on due consideration of the evidence and applicable law. However, Justice Shalinder Kaur had modified the probation condition requiring her to appear before the trial court every three months, permitting her to appear virtually or be represented by an advocate. In 2001, Saxena filed two defamation suits against Ms Patkar -- one over allegedly derogatory remarks made during a television interview, and the other concerning a press statement. Senior Advocate Gajinder Kumar presented Saxena's case in the court. The legal tussle arose from an earlier suit filed by Ms Patkar in 2000, accusing Mr Saxena of publishing defamatory advertisements targeting her and the NBA. In July last year, Metropolitan Magistrate Raghav Sharma sentenced Ms Patkar to five months in jail and ordered her to pay Rs 10 lakh as compensation to Saxena. On appeal, Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Vishal Singh of the Saket Court upheld Ms Patkar's conviction but ordered her to be released on probation of good conduct for a period of one year, subject to prior deposit of a compensation amount of Rs 1 lakh, which will be released in favour of the complainant (Saxena). It had opined that an insensitive approach towards others' reputation and abuse of the right to free speech must be met with criminal sanction, adding that Ms Patkar, being herself a person of repute, must know the value of one's reputation and how defamation can result in loss of face and public esteem of the victim.
Hindustan Times
12 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
SC confirms activist Medha Patkar's conviction in defamation case by Delhi LG VK Sexena
The Supreme Court on Monday confirmed the conviction of activist Medha Patkar in a 25-year-old defamation case filed by Delhi LG V K Saxena. The high court on July 29 upheld the conviction and punishment awarded to 70-year-old Patkar. Saxena filed the case 25 years ago when he was heading an NGO in Gujarat.(HT Photo) A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh said it was not inclined to interfere with the Delhi high court order on the matter that released Medha Patkar on "probation of good conduct" but required her to appear before the trial court once every three years. It added, "However, taking into consideration the submission of the counsel for the petitioner, the penalty imposed stands set aside and we further clarify that the supervision order will not be given effect." The high court on July 29 upheld the conviction and punishment awarded to 70-year-old Patkar. Saxena filed the case 25 years ago when he was heading an NGO in Gujarat. The high court had said there was illegality or material irregularity in the findings of the trial court and added that the order of conviction was passed after due consideration of evidence and the applicable law. It had said that Patkar failed to demonstrate any defects in the procedure which was followed or any error in the law which resulted in the miscarriage of justice. The high court also upheld the order on sentence, where Patkar was released on "probation of good conduct", and said it did not require any interference. Probation is a method of non-institutional treatment of offenders and a conditional suspension of sentence in which the offender, after conviction, is released on bond of good behaviour instead of being sent to prison. The high court, however, had modified the condition of probation imposed by the trial court, requiring Patkar to appear before the trial court once in every three months, and allowed her to either appear physically or through videoconferencing or be represented through the lawyer during the appearances. The Narmada Bachao Andolan leader challenged the April 2 sessions court order upholding her conviction handed out by a magisterial court in the case. The sessions court, which upheld Patkar's conviction in the case, released her on "probation of good conduct" on furnishing a probation bond of ₹25,000 on April 8 and imposed a precondition on her of depositing ₹1 lakh as fine. The magisterial court on July 1, 2024 sentenced Patkar to five months of simple imprisonment and slapped a ₹10 lakh fine after finding her guilty under Section 500 (defamation) of the IPC. Saxena filed the case as president of the National Council of Civil Liberties against Patkar for her defamatory press release against Saxena issued on November 24, 2000. On May 24, 2024, the magisterial court held that that Patkar's statements were not only per se defamatory but also "crafted to incite negative perceptions" about him. The accusation that the complainant was "mortgaging" the people of Gujarat and their resources to foreign interests was a direct attack on his integrity and public service, it had said. On April 2, the sessions court had dismissed a challenge to the order and held Patkar was "rightly convicted" and there was "no substance" in the appeal against the verdict of her conviction in the defamation case.
