Kremlin comments on rumors of Putin-Trump-Xi meeting
The ceremony, marking the 80th anniversary of Tokyo's defeat in WWII, is expected to take place in Beijing in early September – and Putin has already accepted Xi's invitation to attend, when the Chinese leader was visiting Moscow for the Victory Day celebrations.
'We know nothing about the possibility of such a meeting,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told TASS, responding to a report by the Times on Friday which claimed that Beijing is considering using the occasion to host a trilateral summit.
Last month, Trump said President Xi had invited him and First Lady Melania Trump to visit China during what he described as a 'very good' phone call focused on trade. However, there has been no official confirmation of any specific date from Washington or Beijing.
Analysts quoted by the Times suggested the anniversary could offer a symbolic platform for the three powers to engage in dialogue amid worsening global tensions. The British paper further claimed that Beijing 'tacitly encouraged speculation' on the subject by refusing to deny similar reports by Japan's Kyodo News last month. Chinese scholar Jin Canrong told Guancha that a joint appearance by Xi, Putin, and Trump at the military parade would 'send a powerful message to the world.'
While Trump has publicly pushed for a resolution to the Ukraine conflict and reengaged with Russian leadership since returning to office in January, frustration has grown over stalled negotiations. On Monday, Trump threatened to impose 100% secondary tariffs on Russia's trading partners if no breakthrough is achieved within 50 days.
Trump has also escalated a trade dispute with China, resulting in a tit-for-tat tariff standoff that peaked with 145% US duties on Chinese imports. Relations eased somewhat after a temporary deal was reached to reduce restrictions on key exports and freeze the tariffs at 30% and 10% respectively.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Was Peter the Great Russia's Antichrist – or its saviour?
Russia's Channel One is airing a new TV series, 'The Sovereign', about Peter the Great. It joins a long tradition of cinematic portrayals of the country's first emperor, stretching back to 1937. In one adaptation, the actor Vladimir Vysotsky even played Peter as a black man. So why another series now? Surely everything that can be said about Peter has already been said? Perhaps. But each generation needs to reimagine its foundational figures. Every era craves its own definitive image of the man who forged the modern Russian state. Early in the series, we hear Peter declare: 'I am defending the state from turmoil and destruction.' This comes as he, Alexander Menshikov, and their allies suppress the Streltsy rebellion of 1698, beheading its leaders. The series frames the rebellion not as a social uprising, but as a political coup linked to his regent and half-sister Sophia's ambitions. That may be historically accurate. But more importantly, the show makes clear that Peter's primary mission was to impose order. Not to expand liberty, not to celebrate freedom – but to build a functional, centralized state. We often associate Peter with Russia's turn to the West. And the West, in the modern imagination, is a place of liberty. But this is a projection. In the 17th century, the West was admired not for its freedoms, but for its effective statehood. Liberty without a state is meaningless. Peter understood this. His task was not to liberalize, but to organize. What was the context? Russia was blessed with vast territory, but cursed with climate. Until the late 19th century, oil and gas meant little. What counted was fertile land and sunshine. Russia had little of either. It wasn't backwardness by choice or culture – but by circumstance. Compare Peter's Russia with the France of Louis XIV. Both ruled over similar-sized populations, but Louis drew far more wealth from his lands. France's climate yielded olives, grapes, and abundant crops that could be stored, traded, and taxed. These natural advantages funded a glittering court and a centralized bureaucracy. Peter lacked these assets. But he compensated through force of will and ruthless reform. He borrowed institutional models from the West and bent them to Russian needs. He transformed the Muscovite Tsardom into an Empire – a structure capable of absorbing diverse peoples while enforcing uniform rule. Just as Christ said, 'I bring not peace, but a sword,' Peter brought not freedom, but structure. His legacy includes the colleges, the Senate, the Table of Ranks, the General Regulations, and a new administrative order. He built a police system. He founded a modern army and navy – the latter essentially from scratch, modelled on Western prototypes. This wasn't imitation; it was intelligent adaptation. The new series embraces this narrative: Peter as the architect of Russian statehood. Was it harsh? Certainly. Was it traumatic? Unquestionably. But the scale of his achievements is undeniable. Take St. Petersburg. The very idea of building a European imperial capital on a swamp, without a robust financial system or local expertise, was absurd. Yet 300 years later, the city remains one of Europe's jewels and a source of national pride. Konstantin Plotnikov plays Peter with fierce intensity – the role demands little more than a penetrating stare. Evgeny Tkachuk, as Menshikov, is more nuanced: cunning, impulsive, charming, drunk, and politically shrewd. His performance conveys both loyalty and ambition, making him a compelling foil to the tsar. The early episodes unfold in the Sloboda, a German quarter reminiscent of gentrified Elektrozavodskaya. That visual parallel may help the show resonate with younger viewers. Yet not everything is pitch-perfect. At one point, Menshikov flirts with a German waitress. Peter, handing her a coin, says 'Fille danke' instead of the correct 'vielen Dank.' A small slip – but you wonder how no one on the production team caught it. It's the sort of clumsy foreign-language moment we used to mock in old Hollywood films. Still, such details don't detract from the show's power. The main thing is that it tells a coherent story – a story that matters. Because Peter the Great is not just a historical figure. He's a symbol. He represents the hard choices required to pull a sprawling, disorganized nation into modernity. He chose order over liberty because Russia, at that moment, needed order to survive. And that's why Russian art keeps coming back to him. In times of uncertainty, we look for clarity. Peter offers that. He reminds us that statehood is never accidental. It must be built – with sweat, blood, and vision. His legacy isn't comfort. It's structure. Not freedom, but foundation. Every generation has to decide what it values most. This series suggests that, for Russia, the answer is still clear. Order first. The rest will article was first published by the online newspaper and was translated and edited by the RT team
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine offered Russia timeframe for talks
The secretary of Ukraine's National Security and Defense Council (NSDC), Rustem Umerov, has proposed holding a new round of talks with Russia next week, Vladimir Zelensky has announced. The two sides have held two rounds of direct negotiations in Istanbul so far this year, with Umerov leading the Ukrainian delegation. At their most recent meeting in June, the negotiators exchanged draft proposals outlining their visions for a peace deal and agreed on further prisoner exchanges. Moscow has since confirmed its readiness to continue the TO FOLLOW
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
New EU sanctions against Russia take effect
The EU's 18th sanctions package against Russia over the Ukraine conflict, targeting Moscow's energy and banking sectors, has gone into force, the bloc has announced. The new restrictions became official after the relevant regulations were published in the EU's Official Journal on Saturday. The package was adopted by the 27-member bloc on Friday after Slovakia, which had opposed the curbs, received guarantees from the European Commission regarding the availability of gas and oil. Among other things, the sanctions banned transactions with 22 more Russian banks and the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) and forbid the use of the Nord Stream gas pipelines, which were crippled by underwater blasts in 2022 and remain inoperable. The head of the Russian parliament's Committee on Financial Markets, Anatoly Aksakov, told TASS on Friday that the new EU sanctions are just 'fluctuations of air' for the country's banks. Even medium and smaller financial institutions have long been prepared for the possibility of being disconnected from the Western SWIFT baking systems, Aksakov said. Russia's Yandex Bank and Ozon Bank, which were hit by the new restrictions, said on Saturday that their operations have not been affected by the development. The sanctions also upgraded the EU price cap on Russian crude oil, fixed at $60 per barrel, replacing it with a dynamic mechanism that remains 15% lower than the average market price. It will now kick in from $47.6 per barrel. The EU also added another 105 vessels to a blacklist of what Brussels calls a 'shadow fleet' involved in transporting Russian oil, bypassing the bloc's restrictions. This puts the overall number of tankers denied access to EU ports and service at over 400. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the new sanctions, saying that they will remain in place until the Ukraine conflict is settled. Russia has repeatedly expressed readiness to negotiate peace with Kiev, while accusing Ukraine and its Western backers of being unwilling to look for a long-term solution that would address the root causes of the crisis. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov called the EU curbs 'illegal,' but insisted that Russia has already obtained 'a certain immunity' to them.
