What We Are Reading Today: ‘The Regime Question'
The regime question—often boiled down to 'democracy or autocracy?'—has been central to democratic politics from the start.
This has entailed not only fights over the extent of the franchise but also, crucially, ongoing struggles over core principles of democracy, the 'rules of the game.'
In this timely study, Amel Ahmed examines the origins and development of the regime question in Western democracies and considers the implications for regime contention today.
She argues that battles over the regime question were so foundational and so enduring that they constitute a dimension of politics that polarized political opponents across the regime divide.
Ahmed investigates four historical cases in the study of democratic development: the United Kingdom between the Reform Act of 1832 and World War II (1832–1939), Imperial and Weimar–era Germany (1876–1933), the French Third Republic (1870–1939), and the US before World War II (1789–1939).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
2 hours ago
- Leaders
Rwanda Takes US Migrants for Cash: Human Rights Concerns Mount
Rwanda has officially agreed to accept up to 250 migrants from the United States as part of a new agreement that includes a cash grant. This decision aligns with the Trump administration's broader strategy to deport migrants to third countries. However, it raises significant concerns regarding human rights, legality, and the troubling trend of wealthier nations paying other countries to accept deportees. Rwandan government spokesperson Yolande Makolo announced the agreement on Tuesday. She emphasized that nearly every Rwandan family has faced displacement hardships, stating, 'Our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation.' The agreement was signed by officials from both countries in Kigali in June. A Rwandan official, speaking anonymously to Reuters, revealed that the US had already sent an initial list of 10 migrants for vetting. The White House, along with the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department, did not provide immediate comments on the deal. Financial Implications Under this agreement, Rwanda will receive funding from the US in the form of a cash grant. Although the Rwandan official confirmed that the grant letter was signed in July, they did not disclose the specific amount involved. Phil Clark, a professor at SOAS University in the UK, remarked, 'This is the real surprise in this deal.' He noted that the previous announcement indicated the US was trading this policy for a peace deal with the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Now, it appears Rwanda will also benefit financially from hosting these migrants. The two countries may expand the scheme beyond the initial 250 migrants. Those sent to Rwanda will have the option to leave the country if they choose. Resettlement Conditions Rwandan authorities will have the final say on who can be resettled. They have made it clear that they will not accept individuals who have served part of a prison sentence or who face criminal charges. Additionally, there are no plans to allow deportees to complete US prison terms in Rwanda, and child sex offenders will not be accepted. Makolo stated that approved migrants would receive job training, healthcare, and housing support. She emphasized the opportunity for these individuals to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade. In June, the US Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration could deport migrants to third countries. However, the legal battle continues. A federal lawsuit challenging this policy is currently underway in Boston and may reach the Supreme Court again. The US has also pressured other countries to accept deportees. In March, more than 200 Venezuelans accused of gang involvement were sent to El Salvador, where they were held until a later prisoner swap. A Broader Context Talks between the US and Rwanda began earlier this year, according to Rwanda's foreign minister. While Western leaders often commend Rwandan President Paul Kagame for rebuilding the country after the 1994 genocide, rights groups accuse his government of human rights abuses and supporting rebel groups in eastern DR Congo Kagame has denied these allegations. The UN refugee agency (UNHCR) has warned that some migrants deported to Rwanda could face forced returns to the countries they fled. Rwanda, with a population of around 13 million, has faced criticism from international watchdogs for its restrictions on free speech and political opposition. Nevertheless, the Rwandan government has positioned itself as a willing partner for Western nations seeking to offload asylum seekers and migrants. Previously, Rwanda signed a deal with the UK under then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. However, no deportations occurred under that plan due to years of legal challenges, and it was officially dropped in July 2024 by the incoming Labour government. A Shift in Policy Clark noted that this issue extends beyond Rwanda, reflecting a broader shift in policy across the West. 'These countries have now decided that it is acceptable to spend more money sending migrants away than they used to spend hosting them,' he said. The Trump administration has defended third-country deportations as a means to quickly remove individuals, especially those with criminal records. Supporters argue that this approach helps prevent threats to public safety. In contrast, critics label the policy as dangerous and inhumane, as it sends individuals to unfamiliar countries where they may face harm or lack support networks. Short link : Post Views: 11
Saudi Gazette
8 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
World marks 80 years since US dropped atomic bomb on Japan as global powers still trade nuclear threats
TOKYO — As the world marks the 80th anniversary of the first use of a nuclear weapon, on the Japanese city of Hiroshima near the end of World War II, the planet is closer to seeing them used again than it has been in decades, experts and survivors are warning. At the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park on Wednesday morning, dignitaries and the dwindling number of survivors were set to commemorate the moment a US B-29 bomber dropped the atomic weapon known as 'Little Boy' on August 6, 1945. Three days later, the nearby city of Nagasaki was destroyed by a second US atomic bomb. More than 110,000 were killed instantly in the attacks, while hundreds of thousands more perished from injuries and radiation-related illness over the years. To this day they remain the only times that nuclear weapons have been used in warfare. And yet these weapons continue to present a very present-day threat. 'The divisions within the international community over nuclear disarmament are deepening, and the current security environment is growing increasingly severe,' Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Wednesday. 'We don't have much time left, while we face greater nuclear threat than ever,' Nihon Hidankyo, a Japanese grassroots organization of survivors that won the Nobel Peace Prize last year for its pursuit of nuclear abolition, said in a statement ahead of the ceremony. 'Our biggest challenge now is to change nuclear weapons states that give us cold shoulders even just a little.' Contemporary tensions have been reflected in just the past week, with nuclear saber-rattling between Russia and the United States over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. And recent months have seen the US strike Iranian nuclear facilities with its powerful conventional bombs in a bid to stop Tehran's nuclear program. Earlier in the year, nuclear powers India and Pakistan fought a brief conflict over the long-running issue of control of Kashmir, prompting world leaders to scramble and avoid a dangerous escalation between the two. 'We see a clear trend of growing nuclear arsenals, sharpened nuclear rhetoric and the abandonment of arms control agreements,' Hans Kristensen, associate senior fellow with the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute's (SIPRI) Weapons of Mass Destruction Program, said in June. The alarming nuclear trends played a large role in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists earlier this year moving their 'Doomsday Clock,' founded in 1947, closer than ever to a planet-wide catastrophe, 89 seconds to midnight. The clock moved only one second from 90 seconds in 2024, but the 2025 report says the small difference should not be reason to celebrate. 'Because the world is already perilously close to the precipice, a move of even a single second should be taken as an indication of extreme danger and an unmistakable warning that every second of delay in reversing course increases the probability of global disaster,' a press release on the move said. The group also considers climate change, biological threats like pandemics and bioweapons, and 'disruptive technologies,' for instance, nefarious use of artificial intelligence, when setting the clock. But the nuclear threat was front and center of their report released at the end of January. 'The countries that possess nuclear weapons are increasing the size and role of their arsenals, investing hundreds of billions of dollars in weapons that can destroy civilization,' the Doomsday Clock report said. The Hiroshima atomic bomb, with an explosive yield of 15 kilotons, would be considered a low-yield nuclear weapon by today's standards. The largest nuclear weapon in the US arsenal has a yield of 1.2 megatons, 80 times greater than the Hiroshima bomb. A single modern nuclear weapon, if exploded over a large city, could kill millions instantly, experts warn. And there are more than 12,000 total in the hands of nine nuclear powers – the US, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel – according to SIPRI. Nearly all of those countries 'continued intensive nuclear modernization programs in 2024, upgrading existing weapons and adding newer versions,' SIPRI's latest annual report said. The US and Russia combined hold about 90% of the world's nuclear weapons, but smaller nuclear powers are growing or planning to grow their arsenals, according to the report. China has been at the forefront of growth, adding about 100 nuclear warheads a year, a trend the SIPRI said it expects to continue. India is thought to be adding to its stockpile, and the UK is expected to soon, the report said. Meanwhile, North Korea shows no sign of backing off its nuclear status, with Kim Yo Jong, the powerful sister of leader Kim Jong Un, saying last month that Pyongyang won't give up its warheads in exchange for talks with Washington and Seoul. 'Any attempt to deny the position of the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state ... will be thoroughly rejected,' she said, using the initials of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the country's formal name. — CNN
Saudi Gazette
9 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump's envoy Witkoff meets Putin as ceasefire deadline looms
MOSCOW — A meeting between US envoy Steve Witkoff and Russia's Vladimir Putin is under way at the Kremlin, Russian media has said. Witkoff arrived in Moscow on Wednesday as Donald Trump's deadline for Russia to agree a ceasefire in Ukraine looms. The US president has said Russia could face hefty sanctions or see secondary sanctions imposed against all those who trade with it if it doesn't take steps to end the "horrible war" with Ukraine. Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine's president, has warned that Russia would only make serious moves towards peace if it began to run out of money. He welcomed the threat of tougher US sanctions and tariffs on nations buying Russian oil. In images shared by Russian outlets, the two men - who have met several times before - were seen smiling and shaking hands in a gilded hall. Expectations are muted for a settlement by Friday, and Russia has continued its large-scale air attacks on Ukraine despite Trump's threats of sanctions. Before taking office in January, Trump claimed he would be able to end the war between Russia and Ukraine in a day. He failed, and his rhetoric towards Russia has since hardened. "We thought we had [the war] settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever," he said last month. Three rounds of talks between Ukraine and Russia in Istanbul have failed to bring the war closer to and end, three and a half years after Moscow launched its full-invasion. Moscow's military and political preconditions for peace remain unacceptable to Kyiv and to its Western partners. The Kremlin has also repeatedly turned down Kyiv's requests for a meeting between Zelensky and Putin. Meanwhile, the US administration approved $200m of additional military sales to Ukraine on Tuesday following a phone call between Zelensky and Trump, in which the two leaders also discussed defence cooperation and drone production. Ukraine has been using drones to hit Russia's refineries and energy facilities, while Moscow has focused its air attacks on Ukraine's cities. The Kyiv City Military Administration said the toll of an attack on the city last week rose to 32 after a man died of his injuries. The strike was the deadliest on Kyiv since the start of the invasion. Ukrainian authorities on Wednesday reported that a Russian attack on a holiday camp in the central region of Zaporizhzhia left two dead and 12 wounded. "There's no military sense in this attack. It's just cruelty to scare people," Zelensky said. — BBC
