Trump-Epstein controversy fractures GOP
The debate is fracturing the House GOP conference, with hardline conservatives — ardent MAGA allies — echoing the base's demands to make the documents public, while other Republicans are joining Trump's calls to 'not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.'
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) stunned Washington on Tuesday when — after initially deferring to the administration — he sided squarely with the first group, urging the Justice Department to release all the files related to Epstein in its possession.
'It's a very delicate subject, but we should put everything out there and let the people decide,' Johnson said in an interview with the conservative podcaster Benny Johnson.
But his remarks have only thrown a brighter spotlight on the administration's refusal to release the files, and the conservative frustrations that followed. By defying Trump, Johnson also risks a backlash from the president, who was crucial to Johnson's rise to the Speakership and has helped him survive tough internal battles since then.
Just a few hours later, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who has seemingly delighted in being a thorn on the president's side, said he would try to use a long-shot procedural gambit known as a discharge petition to force a vote on requiring the Department of Justice to release the Epstein files. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) cosponsored the resolution.
Democrats are only happy to exploit the GOP divisions. They're embracing the Epstein saga — and hoping to foster public disillusionment with Trump — by pressing the administration to disclose the files, and using a variety of procedural tools to try to force a vote on the matter.
'I can't say that I'm not enjoying watching it,' said Rep. Debbie Dingell (Mich.), the head of the Democrats' messaging arm.
Fueling the schadenfreude, many of the same right-wing figures who had inflamed the conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein's connections to powerful global 'elites' are now in top positions of the administration — and have abandoned the same narratives they once championed.
'The Republicans are victims of their own conspiracy theories,' said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.). 'And this conspiracy is biting them right in the ass.'
The converging dynamics are making one thing certain: The Epstein controversy is unlikely to subside any time soon, despite Trump's direct orders to drop the matter. Voters, some lawmakers said, are weighing in.
'I'm unhappy about it; my constituents are unhappy about it,' Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) told The Hill Tuesday morning. 'I got four or five calls from personal friends, which is kind of unusual about any issue. Even family members were upset, didn't understand. Some of my firemen buddies were upset about it, and I am, too.'
In a sign of the growing discontent with the current situation, Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, called for a special counsel to be appointed to oversee the Epstein matter, joining vocal MAGA figures in making the request.
She floated former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) for the job.
'Of course we want answers. Nobody is satisfied with what has been received, or lack thereof. No one is satisfied with the rollout of this,' Boebert said during another interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson. 'I think moving forward, we need a special counsel. That has got to happen. There has to be a special investigation into this if we aren't going to be provided information.'
Some lawmakers have suggested using the power of Congress to push forward on the issue, with House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) suggesting that the panel's chairman, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino.
'It's quite a squeeze play they're in, after creating this huge hullaballoo about it and now just wanting to sweep the whole thing under the rug,' Raskin said.
Jordan, for his part, answered a peppering of reporter questions on Tuesday about those officials and the Epstein case by repeatedly saying: 'I have confidence in the president and his team.'
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), who is leading a task force in the House Oversight Committee on the declassification of federal secrets, expressed frustration with the decision, but suggested the next step would not come from Congress.
'I've done literally everything that I can do from a legislative perspective, and so unfortunately, I'm not at the DOJ — although, if I was at the DOJ, that would be a glorious time,' Luna said.
But Luna added that the administration is 'aware of the want and need for transparency, so we'll see what ends up happening.'
The lingering controversy is putting Republicans between a rock and a hard place. They don't want to dismiss the concerns of their loyal base that's hungry for retribution against the rich and powerful — but desperately want to avoid angering the president or criticizing his favored appointees like Bondi.
Those circumstances were on full display Tuesday afternoon, when all Republicans — despite many of them wanting the files to be released — opposed a Democrat-led effort to trigger a vote on an amendment forcing the disclosure of the documents. Democrats urged their GOP colleagues to torpedo a procedural vote that would have prompted a subsequent vote on publishing the materials, but all Republicans let the referendum go forward.
'As predicted. Completely full of shit,' Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) wrote on X after the vote. '@RepMTG votes to keep Epstein Files buried. *After posting nonsense tweet saying she wants them released.'
In the House Rules Committee Monday afternoon, an effort to stage a vote on the same amendment similarly failed in an 8-4 vote. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), however, notably crossed the aisle in support of holding a vote on the measure.
Some Republicans are, similarly, choosing their words carefully as they try to address the pressure of the base and Trump.
'Me personally, you know, I would release every file, I release every picture — with the exception, I'd make sure that all of the victims' names are redacted,' Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.) said. But he added: 'I want to be crystal clear, I absolutely trust President Trump and Pam Bondi and Kash Patel. This is their call.'
And the Speaker, too, stressed his allegiance to the president.
'I do trust the president,' Johnson said. 'I know his heart and his head is in the right place. I don't question that at all. And I'm convinced they're going to sort this out.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration imposes limits on Mexican flights and threatens Delta alliance in trade dispute
The Trump administration imposed new restrictions Saturday on flights from Mexico and threatened to end a longstanding partnership between Delta Air Lines and Aeromexico in response to limits the Mexican government placed on passenger and cargo flights into Mexico City several years ago. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said Mexico's actions to force airlines to move out of the main Benito Juarez International Airport to the newer Felipe Angeles International Airport more than 30 miles away violated a trade agreement between the two countries and gave domestic airlines an unfair advantage. Mexico is the top foreign destination for Americans with more than 40 million passengers flying there last year. "Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg deliberately allowed Mexico to break our bilateral aviation agreement,' Duffy said of the previous administration. 'That ends today. Let these actions serve as a warning to any country who thinks it can take advantage of the U.S., our carriers, and our market. America First means fighting for the fundamental principle of fairness.' All Mexican passenger, cargo and charter airlines will now be required to submit their schedules to the Transportation Department and seek government approval of their flights until Duffy is satisfied with the way Mexico is treating U.S. airlines. It's not immediately clear how Duffy's actions might affect the broader trade war with Mexico and negotiations over tariffs. A spokesperson for Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum didn't reply immediately to a request for a comment, and she didn't mention the restrictions at an event Saturday. Delta and Aeromexico have been fighting the Transportation Department's efforts to end their partnership that began in 2016 since early last year. The airlines have argued that it's not fair to punish them for the Mexican government's actions, and they said ending their agreement would jeopardize nearly two dozen routes and $800 million in benefits to both countries' economies that come from tourism spending and jobs. 'The U.S. Department of Transportation's tentative proposal to terminate its approval of the strategic and pro-competitive partnership between Delta and Aeromexico would cause significant harm to consumers traveling between the U.S. and Mexico, as well as U.S. jobs, communities, and transborder competition," Delta said in a statement. Aeromexico's press office said it was reviewing the order and intended to present a joint response with Delta in the coming days. But the order terminating approval of the agreement between the airlines wouldn't take effect until October, and the airlines are likely to continue fighting that decision. The airlines said in a previous filing fighting the order that it believes the loss of direct flights would prompt over 140,000 American tourists and nearly 90,000 Mexican tourists not to visit the other country and hurt the economies of both countries with the loss of their spending. ___ Associated Press writer Amaranta Marentes in Mexico City contributed to this report. Josh Funk, The Associated Press
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration could deport immigrants to 58 other countries after Supreme Court opened door for swift removals
The Trump administration could soon deport immigrants to 58 countries that are not their place of origin, after a Supreme Court ruling earlier this week granted an emergency request to overturn a federal judge's restrictions on such removals. Human rights advocates warn that sending 'third-country' nationals to these countries could expose them to abuse and violence, and strand them in places where they have no ties and often can't speak the language. Throughout this year, as the White House pushes to rapidly deport millions of immigrants, diplomats have been lobbying at least 58 countries to accept these deportees, The New York Times reports, citing interviews with officials and diplomatic cables. So far, Mexico, El Salvador, Guatemala, Panama, Costa Rica, Rwanda, and Kosovo have agreed to such flights in varying degrees, while the State Department has already approached or plans to approach numerous other countries to reach similar agreements. Many of the potential nations are in Africa, and the list includes regimes plagued with violence, political strife, and human rights abuses, including Libya and South Sudan. An emergency ruling from the Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for such removals. In a 6-3 decision, the court's conservative majority granted an emergency request from the administration to overturn a nationwide injunction from April on removals to third countries without adequate notice but did not explain its reasoning. The court's liberal minority dissented, claiming the ruling was 'rewarding lawlessness.' A Massachusetts federal judge has accused the administration of violating the injunction when it notified a group of eight immigrants last month they would be deported in a manner of hours to South Sudan, a nation the State Department reports is plagued by slavery, kidnapping, sexual abuse, torture and extrajudicial killings. Those deportees remain at a U.S. base in Djibouti while a lawsuit over their removals plays out. States that have agreed to take third-country deportees have received financial incentives, such as a reported $100,000 payment to Rwanda to accept an Iraqi man, or a controversial multi-million dollar deal with El Salvador to house Venezuelan deportees in CECOT, a maximum security prison human rights observers have compared to a gulag. Many of the nations being considered to accept U.S. flights were named this month in the Trump administration's renewed travel ban, and the administration has reportedly offered nations on the banned list, or under consideration to be added to it, relief if they accept deportees, the Times reports. The State Department told the paper it doesn't comment on diplomatic conversations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has enthusiastically embraced the idea of sending deported immigrants to third countries as a form of deterrence. 'I say this unapologetically, we are actively searching for other countries to take people from third countries,' he said at an April cabinet meeting. 'We are working with other countries to say, 'We want to send you some of the most despicable human beings to your countries — will you do that as a favor to us?' And the further away from America, the better, so they can't come back across the border,' he said. Once they are sent to third countries, immigrants could face a range of potential conditions, from detention in prison, to housing in migrant shelters, to offers of asylum or trips back to their home countries. Immigrant advocates warned that allowing such third-country removals would open these immigrants to abuse. 'The Supreme Court's ruling leaves thousands of people vulnerable to deportation to third countries where they face torture or death, even if the deportations are clearly unlawful,' Leila Kang of Northwest Immigrant Rights Project said in a statement after the decision. Solve the daily Crossword
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
What to know as Texas' search for flood victims stretches into a third week
AUSTIN, Texas — The search for victims of deadly flooding in Texas Hill Country is headed into its third week as officials try to pin down exactly how many people remain missing and lawmakers prepare to discuss authorities' initial response and providing better warning systems. Flash floods killed at least 135 people in Texas over the Fourth of July holiday weekend, with most deaths along the Guadalupe River in Kerr County, about 60 miles northwest of San Antonio. The Hill Country is naturally prone to flash flooding because its dry, dirt-packed soil cannot soak up heavy rain. The Texas Legislature is scheduled to convene Monday for a special session. Gov. Greg Abbott initially called lawmakers back to the Texas State Capitol in Austin for other reasons, but he and legislative leaders have added flooding-related issues to the agenda. State officials had been saying about 160 people were unaccounted for after the flooding in Kerr County alone, but they now say about 100 remain missing in Kerr and other counties. Kerr County officials said the number of missing people decreased as victims were recovered, contact was made with people who were found safe, and some reports were found to be unsubstantiated or falsified. Also, they said, the missing list fluctuates as reports come into a hotline. The floods laid waste to the Hill Country. Vacation cabins, youth camps campgrounds fill the riverbanks and hills of Kerr County, and Camp Mystic, a century-old Christian summer camp for girls in a low-lying area along the Guadalupe. At least 27 of its campers and counselors died. Abbott called the special session hoping legislators would pass a measure to regulate a booming business in THC products after he vetoed a bill that would have banned them. And since the flooding, President Donald Trump has told the Republicans who control state government to redraw congressional districts to help the GOP's chances of retaining a U.S. House majority in next year's midterm elections. Abbott said lawmakers would also review authorities' handling of the flooding and consider improving warning systems for Hill Country residents. Kerr County does not have a warning system because state and local agencies missed opportunities over the past decade to finance one. Trump and Abbott have pushed back aggressively against questions about how well local authorities responded to forecasts of heavy rain and the first reports of flash flooding. The president called a reporter 'evil' for raising such issues and said he thought 'everyone did an incredible job under the circumstances.' Abbott dismissed a question about who was to blame for the deaths as 'the word choice of losers' and used an analogy that began: 'Every football team makes mistakes.' 'The way winners talk is not to point fingers,' he concluded. Abbott has designated bills dealing with early warning systems and emergency communications as priorities for the Legislature's special session, scheduled to last 30 days. The House and Senate have formed special committees on flooding and disaster preparedness, and they're planning a July 31 visit to Kerrville, the seat of hardest-hit Kerr County, to hear comments from residents. The committees are scheduled to begin with a joint hearing Wednesday to consider the state's response to the fatal floods; planning for floods; infrastructure for managing floods; and communications among first responders. One bill already introduced by Republican Rep. Don McLaughlin would require the state's top public health official to set building standards for youth camps in 100-year floodplains — which FEMA defines as a high-risk area with a 1% chance of flooding in any given year. During a recent news conference, Republican state Rep. Drew Darby, a member of the House's committee, said lawmakers cannot bring back flood victims or undo the flooding. 'But what we can do is learn from it,' he said.
