AT&T data breach settlement: Who's eligible, how to claim, and what to know
The first breach, announced in March 2024, exposed data from 73 million current and former customers. That included birth dates and Social Security numbers, which were found on the dark web.
The second breach, announced in July 2024, involved hackers stealing call and text records from a third-party cloud platform. This affected nearly all AT&T wireless customers.
After the breaches, many lawsuits were filed across the country. These were later combined into two class-action cases.
On August 4, 2025, AT&T said a settlement has been reached. $149 million will go to people affected by the first breach. $28 million will go to those impacted by the second breach.
Also Read: AT&T has a new budget-friendly plan for seniors: Do you qualify?
The settlement still needs final approval. A court hearing is set for December 3, 2025, in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Customers can file claims while waiting.
Who are eligible to file ?
Anyone whose data was exposed in either breach can file.
Emails are being sent to eligible customers from attsettlement@e.emailksa.com. The claims are being handled by Kroll Settlement Administration.
If you're not sure if you qualify, call (833) 890-4930.
How to file?
You must fill out a claim form by November 18, 2025. Go to TelecomDataSettlement.com to file online or request a paper form.
Filing a claim means you give up your right to sue AT&T later over these breaches.
How much you can receive ?
Up to $5,000 for people affected by the March 2024 breach. Losses must have happened in 2019 or later.
Up to $2,500 for people affected by the July 2024 breach. Losses must have happened on or after April 14, 2024.
Up to $7,500 for people affected by both breaches.
You must show proof that your losses were caused by the breaches.
When payments might happen ?
The court will decide on December 3, 2025. If the settlement is approved, there may still be delays due to appeals and claim processing.
Payments will not be sent until sometime after that. The settlement site says to be patient.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
'Russia lost an oil client': Trump says he ‘may not have to' impose secondary tariffs on India after Putin meet
Trump on Friday said Russia has 'lost an oil client' after Washington imposed penalties on New Delhi for buying Russian crude, but hinted he may not impose similar secondary tariffs on nations continuing such purchases. US President Donald Trump speaks during a visit to the Kennedy Centre in Washington. He warned that Russia would face very severe consequences if it didn't adhere to a ceasefire after Friday's meeting. Reuters US President Donald Trump on Friday said Russia has 'lost an oil client' after Washington penalised New Delhi for buying Russian crude, but further emphasised that he may hold off on imposing similar secondary tariffs on other countries continuing such purchases of oil. 'Well, he (Russian President Vladimir Putin) lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40 per cent of the oil. China, as you know, is doing a lot… And if I did what's called a secondary sanction, or a secondary tariff, it would be very devastating from their standpoint. If I have to do it, I'll do it. Maybe I won't have to do it,' Trump told Fox News before leaving for Alaska to meet Putin. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's tariffs on India His remarks came even as New Delhi has not confirmed any halt in oil imports from Moscow, despite Washington's decision to levy a fresh 25 per cent duty, on top of an earlier 25 per cent tariff, on Indian goods from 27 August. Earlier, Trump (on August 6) escalated the pressure by doubling duties on Indian products to 50 per cent, targeting New Delhi for its continued Russian oil imports. India condemned the move as 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' warning it would hit exports in sectors such as textiles, leather and marine goods. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said India 'will not back down' under economic pressure. Bloomberg reported that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian crude following Trump's action, though no official confirmation has been made. Indian Oil chairman AS Sahney said on Thursday that India 'has not halted purchases from Russia' and continues to buy solely on economic grounds. India, which became Russia's largest oil buyer in 2022 after Western sanctions, faces the prospect of its crude import bill rising by USD 9 billion this year and USD 12 billion next year if it cuts off Russian supplies, according to the State Bank of India. The report suggested Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the UAE could fill the gap. Russian crude is also being offered to Indian refiners at discounted rates as EU sanctions and US threats weigh on global demand, Bloomberg cited data firm Kpler as saying.


Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What might Trumpian meddling mean for Intel?
WHEN LIP-BU TAN was summoned to the White House on Monday, he was ostensibly there to explain his investments in Chinese startups. After the meeting Donald Trump, who just a few days earlier had called for the boss of Intel to resign, was full of praise for his 'amazing story'. Mr Tan has kept his job. But he probably had not reckoned on gaining a co-CEO. Mr Trump is now reported to be considering an investment in the chipmaker on behalf of America's government. Intel, whose shares have jumped by 10% in response to the news of a potential bail-out, is in a funk. Demand for its old chips is waning.(REUTERS FILE) Intel, whose shares have jumped by 10% in response to the news of a potential bail-out, is in a funk. Demand for its old chips is waning. Mr Tan, who took over in March, has indicated that the company will not invest further in its advanced '14a' manufacturing process until it finds customers willing to pay it to make chips for them using the technology. Construction of its manufacturing plant in Ohio, where building began to star-spangled fanfare in 2022, has slowed to a crawl. Layoffs have been brutal. The firm has lost around half of its value since 2023 and its huge debt burden has been downgraded by rating agencies. Like his predecessor, Mr Trump thinks that Intel, America's only domestic manufacturer of advanced chips, is too important to fail. Joe Biden's administration approached the problem by showering the firm with subsidies: the company is the biggest beneficiary of the CHIPS Act. Mr Trump has vowed to cut back on such largesse. But any deal would do the opposite of untethering Intel from the state. Indeed, the president is reportedly even considering using funds from the CHIPS Act to finance an investment. That the government should meddle in business is now a matter of consensus among American politicians, though they disagree over what form this should take. Mr Trump's approach is becoming clear. He is not bureaucratic enough to be European, and he changes his mind too often to be Chinese. Instead, he behaves more like an activist investor straight off Wall Street, wringing out concessions after dressing down bosses in public. He cares a lot about share prices. Two recent investments indicate how this might work out for Intel. In June America's government took a 'golden share' in US Steel after the firm was bought by Nippon, a Japanese industrial outfit. Mr Biden had opposed the acquisition in the hope of winning union votes. He blocked the deal on spurious national-security grounds after a review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), America's inbound-investment watchdog. Mr Trump initiated another review and approved the deal. As part of a revised agreement the president gained the right to appoint a board member and a veto over lowering steel production in America. Intel, too, should expect that any deal will involve interacting directly with Mr Trump, rather than the federal bureaucracy. Control over manufacturing in Ohio may be one area of interest for the president. What Intel needs more than new board members is customers for its manufacturing, or 'foundry', arm. They have not been forthcoming, partly because Intel's chip-design business competes with would-be buyers such as AMD and Nvidia. A second transaction offers some clues as to how they might be persuaded. In July America's Defence Department invested $400m in MP Materials, a producer of rare-earth metals, and will guarantee the price it receives for its output at above-market rates. A few days later Apple, involved in its own negotiations with the president, also announced a supply agreement with MP Materials. Mr Trump may demand that chip designers such as AMD and Nvidia, which rely on his approval to sell their products in China, use Intel's manufacturing. A more radical option could see him force them to club together and purchase Intel's struggling foundry business. That's a deal any activist would be proud of pulling off.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
37 minutes ago
- First Post
No additional 25% tariffs on India? Has Trump changed his mind after meeting Putin?
The Trump-Putin summit in Alaska ended without a Ukraine deal, leaving India directly exposed to Washington's steep tariffs on exports tied to Russian oil imports. With duties set to rise to 50 per cent on August 27, Trump has hinted that he may 'think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now' US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands during a press conference following their meeting to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, in Anchorage, Alaska, US, August 15, 2025. File Image/Reuters For India, the high-profile summit between United States President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, carried additional weight. New Delhi was hoping for an outcome that could ease or avert the heavy tariffs Washington has tied to its Russian oil purchases. Trump and Putin held talks in Alaska amid high expectations that the two leaders might announce some form of agreement on Ukraine. Both men presented their discussions in a positive light but stopped short of confirming a breakthrough. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Putin referred to an important 'agreement' emerging from the dialogue, while Trump described 'considerable progress' but admitted that no final settlement had been reached. 'There are just a very few [sticking points] left,' Trump told reporters. 'Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant — but we have a very good chance of getting there.' Putin, in turn, highlighted the need to improve bilateral ties with Washington while holding firm to Russia's central positions on the war. He reminded his audience that Russia and the United States share a border across the Northern Pacific and evoked the cooperation of the Second World War as a model for the future. Despite the conciliatory words, the absence of a tangible agreement means the punitive trade measures Trump has tied to Ukraine remain in place. For India, this directly translates into higher costs and trade friction with its largest export destination. India caught in the crossfire of US tariffs In early August, Trump ordered an additional 25 per cent duty on Indian exports to the US, which he subsequently doubled to 50 per cent. The additional measures, scheduled to take effect on August 27, have been explicitly linked to India's continued imports of Russian crude oil. Trump has presented the tariffs as part of a broader strategy to weaken Moscow's finances and push it toward compromise. 'Well, he [Russian President Vladimir Putin] lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40 per cent of the oil. China, as you know, is doing a lot… And if I did what's called a secondary sanction, or a secondary tariff, it would be very devastating from their standpoint. If I have to do it, I'll do it. Maybe I won't have to do it,' Trump said in an interview with Fox News before departing for Alaska. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The move has been condemned by New Delhi as 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable.' Prime Minister Narendra Modi has asserted that India 'would not back down in the face of economic pressure.' Trump also said, 'I think everything has an impact,' referring to Russia's outreach for talks. 'When you lose your second largest customer, and you're probably going to lose your first largest customer, I think that probably has a role.' He claimed that informing India of new charges on its Russian oil dealings 'essentially took them out of buying oil from Russia' and that this helped drive Putin to seek a meeting. Indian officials, however, have publicly contradicted this assertion, stating that imports from Russia have not been suspended. Still, the scale of the tariffs makes them among the steepest Washington has ever imposed on a partner country, putting India in the same category as Brazil, which has also been targeted. Trump connects India tariffs to India-Pakistan ceasefire Trump has repeatedly cited his role in mediating tensions between India and Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror attack in May. The clashes, which saw both countries claim to have shot down each other's aircraft, raised fears of a major escalation. Indian Air Chief Marshal AP Singh later stated that Indian forces had damaged several US-made F-16 jets stationed at Pakistan's Jacobabad airbase, though details of India's own losses have not been made public. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Take a look at India and Pakistan. they were shooting down aeroplanes already, and that would have been maybe nuclear. I would have said it was going to go nuclear, and I was able to get [a ceasefire] done,' Trump said. He argued that he leveraged US trade ties to press both sides toward de-escalation: 'I deal with all of the countries for trade… So if there's a war going on, and if we're doing trade with one or both of them, I say we're not going to do a deal unless you make peace.' Trump has even suggested that his involvement in multiple conflicts, including the situation between India and Pakistan and the ongoing war in Ukraine, strengthens his claim to recognition such as the Nobel Peace Prize. Why Russian oil matters to India India's reliance on Russian oil grew significantly after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. As Western nations cut back their imports, Russia began offering steep discounts to secure buyers, and India emerged as one of the largest purchasers. By 2022, New Delhi had become Russia's biggest oil customer, surpassing even its long-term suppliers Iraq and Saudi Arabia. The strategy allowed India to strengthen its energy security and contain domestic fuel inflation. It also enabled Indian refiners to process Russian crude into petroleum products for export, including to European markets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But Washington has viewed these imports as a crucial source of revenue for Moscow's war effort, and has increasingly sought to cut them off. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned ahead of the Alaska summit that further penalties could follow if no peace deal materialised, and called on Europe to impose parallel sanctions on countries still conducting extensive trade with Russia. A bill under discussion in US Congress would even give the president authority to levy duties of up to 500 per cent on states considered to be sustaining Moscow's wartime economy. India, however, has maintained that its decisions are guided by economic necessity. Officials have clarified that the country has not halted purchases from Russia in response to US threats and continues to procure oil on the basis of cost-effectiveness. How US' tariffs may impact India Indian exports worth nearly USD 40 billion, spanning textiles, marine products, and leather goods, are likely to be affected. Sectors heavily dependent on the US market will be hit hardest, with exporters already warning of potential layoffs and reduced competitiveness. If India were to reduce or suspend its Russian imports in response to US pressure, the financial strain could be even greater. A study by the State Bank of India has estimated that India's crude oil import bill could increase by USD 9 billion this financial year and USD 12 billion in the next without discounted Russian supplies. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates are seen as possible alternatives, but their oil typically commands higher prices, leaving India more vulnerable to global price fluctuations. US restraint towards China While India has already been targeted with steep tariffs, Trump has so far refrained from taking similar action against China, Russia's largest oil customer. The US and China are simultaneously negotiating a potential trade deal aimed at reducing tensions, which could partly explain Washington's hesitation. 'India doesn't buy your oil. The European Union won't buy it. And why in the back of my head was I thinking, wait a minute, Donald Trump just delayed possible a possible increase in tariffs on China? Why do I think that probably President Trump was thinking ahead that maybe if you had to, that would have been part of the consequences?" Fox News asked Trump after the meet. Trump replied, 'Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that now. I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think you know, the meeting went very well." STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, if punitive measures against Beijing are eventually rolled out, China could become the primary focus of US secondary sanctions. For India, the uneven application of penalties raises questions about whether New Delhi is being disproportionately singled out despite China's larger role in sustaining Russia's oil revenues. The full 50 per cent tariff on India set to take effect on August 27 threatens to undercut its exports to the US market, while its energy partnership with Russia remains under scrutiny. With inputs from agencies