Shoddy that Donald Trump can't address MPs, says Nigel Farage
Last week France's President Emmanuel Macron gave an address to both Houses of Parliament during his three-day state visit to the UK.However, such speeches are not automatic. Only around one in four state visits since 1952 have included a formal address to Parliament. Trump did not address Parliament during his first state visit in 2019.In April, Labour MP Kate Osborne reportedly wrote to Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle asking him to stop Trump from addressing Parliament.A parliamentary motion urging the same thing had also been signed by some MPs, mostly from Labour and including some Greens.Speaking to the BBC, Farage, a prominent British supporter of the US president, acknowledged it would be controversial for Trump to address MPs and peers, as "anything to do with Donald Trump results in a row".But he said Trump was "more pro-British" than Macron, and the UK's alliance with the United States was key to trade and the Nato military alliance.Drawing a contrast with the "full ceremonial visit" offered to President Macron, he added: "This just tells you what this government's real priorities are."It's European Union above everything else, including America - who of course are not only our most important ally, but without whom we are defenceless. So I think the whole thing is shoddy".
The government is not planning to change the parliamentary schedule to allow Trump to speak to MPs and peers.Sir Keir Starmer's official spokesperson told reporters: "Questions on the timings and dates are for the Palace. They've obviously agreed dates with the President"."I would firmly steer you away from the idea the timings of a visit are anything to do with Parliament recess dates," he added.Meanwhile, Downing Street has confirmed Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer will meet Trump when the US president visits his golf resort at Menie in Aberdeenshire later this month.Number 10 said Sir Keir had accepted an invitation to meet during the "private" trip to Scotland.
State visits
Invitations for state visits are formally issued by the monarch, but on the advice of government - normally organised through the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO). Dates are set jointly by the government, the Palace and visiting dignitaries.The House of Lords will still be sitting during Trump's visit, but under long-standing parliamentary rules, a joint address to both houses can only take place when both are in session. The final decision rests with the Speakers of the Commons and Lords, though in reality any speeches are agreed with the government of the day. The Royal Family confirmed that Trump's visit will be based at Windsor Castle, with Buckingham Palace unavailable due to ongoing refurbishment. The ceremonial elements of the visit, including a state banquet and Guard of Honour, are expected to go ahead as planned.
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's team wanted Kilmar Abrego Garcia to face ‘American justice.' He could be deported again before trial
Donald Trump's White House is doing everything it can to make sure Kilmar Abrego Garcia never steps foot on U.S. soil as a free man – even if that means setting him free in another country while he faces criminal charges in this one. Federal prosecutors want to bring his smuggling case to trial as soon as possible. But if he's released from pretrial detention, immigration officials intend to arrest and deport him before a trial even begins, according to government lawyers. Abrego Garcia has pleaded not guilty, and his trial is set to begin January 27, 2026. He could be in another country by then. The administration spent weeks insisting Abrego Garcia would never be allowed back to the country after admitting he was wrongfully deported in March. Yet he was abruptly flown back to the United States from El Salvador last month to face a criminal indictment in Tennessee. At a press conference announcing his return, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Abrego Garcia would face 'American justice.' In recent court hearings in two different states, where judges are presiding over a criminal case and his wrongful removal lawsuit, Justice Department lawyers said they would only move forward with his criminal prosecution if he remains in custody while awaiting trial. If he is released on bail, they would let Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrest him and send him out of the country, again. Maryland District Judge Paula Xinis hauled Trump administration officials to court this month to understand what, if anything, the government intends to do with Abrego Garcia when he's released from pretrial custody. Department of Homeland Security officials admitted that ICE intends to arrest him, but they don't yet know where he will be deported. Government attorneys had previously announced plans to deport him to a 'third country' instead of his native El Salvador. 'There's been no decision made, as he is not in ICE custody,' Thomas Giles, assistant director for ICE enforcement and removal operations, testified last week. ICE intends to take custody of Abrego Garcia 'as soon as possible,' Giles said. Where he will await his removal from the country will depend on available space in immigration detention centers, according to Giles. Last month, Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes determined there is no legal basis to keep him in pretrial detention. She set potential conditions for his release, including wearing an ankle bracelet and living with his brother in Maryland. The federal judge overseeing his criminal case will decide next week whether to uphold that ruling. On July 16, Tennessee District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw Jr. said his decision will not be determined by what ICE wants to do. 'Frankly we don't know what is going to happen to him in that regard,' the judge said. But he said he was 'having a hard time understanding' arguments from federal prosecutors that there were no conditions under which Abrego Garcia — who does not have a criminal record — could be out of jail while awaiting trial. Holmes also appeared to reject the government's characterization of Abrego Garcia as a dangerous MS-13 gang member, human trafficker and serial abuser following claims from administration officials and government attorneys that 'defy common sense.' Under cross examination from defense attorney Sean Hecker, Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent Peter Joseph admitted that he did not know that one of the government's central informants in the case gave conflicting statements about Abrego Garcia's alleged gang ties in several interviews with federal agents. He also testified that he didn't know that the informants were in contact with other potential cooperators — at least three of whom sought deals with the government to legally remain in the United States in exchange for their testimony. Three of the witnesses are related, and Joseph admitted it was 'always a possibility' that they coordinated their stories to secure a better deal for themselves. 'They're family,' Crenshaw shot back. 'Family talk.' But it won't be Crenshaw's decision that decides whether Abrego Garcia walks free. That will be up to Judge Xinis in Maryland. She is expected to decide whether to block the Trump administration from deporting him a second time. Xinis has signaled that she will order the government to give him at least two days' notice, should the judge overseeing his criminal case release him from pretrial custody. Abrego Garcia was 16 years old when he fled gang violence in El Salvador and illegally entered the United States in 2011. Abrego Garcia, now 29, was living and working in Maryland with his wife and child, both American citizens, and two children from a previous marriage, when ICE agents arrested him in March. After government lawyers admitted in court documents that he was removed from the country due to a procedural error, federal judges and a unanimous Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to 'facilitate' his return. A 2019 order from an immigration judge had blocked his removal to El Salvador over humanitarian concerns, and Supreme Court justices unanimously agreed the Trump administration had 'illegally' defied that order. Still, the government spent weeks battling court orders while officials publicly said he would never step foot in the United States as they characterized him as a serial abuser and criminal gang member. But emails and text messages provided to members of Congress appear to show Trump administration and government lawyers were sympathetic to his wrongful removal and made efforts to get him out of El Salvador before the case made headlines causing major headaches for the White House. Erez Reuveni, a 15-year veteran of the Justice Department who was working in the Office of Immigration Litigation, was closely involved with several high-profile immigration cases in the first months of Donald Trump's presidency when he was fired in April. He supplied members of the Senate Judiciary Committee with a massive trove of internal messages showing the lengths the administration was taking to label Abrego Garcia a member of MS-13 as they tried to figure out if they were violating court orders by keeping him in El Salvador. Before the case exploded into a national story at the center of the president's anti-immigration agenda, administration officials spent several days discussing the feasibility of returning Abrego Garcia or ensuring that he would be protected from the gang violence he fled as a teenager. The messages also revealed simmering tensions between Justice Department attorneys who worked the cases in court and lawyers for Homeland Security who were directed to advance the president's agenda, regardless of legal risks. Meanwhile, Abrego Garcia was , according to his legal team. His attorneys alleged he experienced 'severe beatings, severe sleep deprivation, inadequate nutrition, and psychological torture' while locked up inside. 'Last time they put Kilmar Abrego Garcia on a plane, he didn't know where that plane was going until it landed at the airport in El Salvador,' his attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg told reporters last week. 'That's more or less what they want to do again, and that's what we're here to stop.'
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government minister explains why Reform UK is leading polls
Steve Reed, the Environment Secretary, expressed no surprise at Reform UK consistently leading Labour in polls, attributing it to public disenchantment with politics after 14 years of unfulfilled promises. Reed cited austerity, Brexit, and the ' Build Back Better ' initiative as examples of broken promises by the previous Conservative government, stating the public desires to see the change they voted for become a reality. Current polls show Reform UK leading with 29 per cent of the vote, ahead of Labour's 23 per cent, with a YouGov 'mega poll' suggesting Reform could secure 271 seats to Labour's 178 in a general election. This projected outcome would make Reform the largest party, though without a majority, and could lead to the unseating of several prominent Labour cabinet ministers. Polling expert Sir John Curtice described Labour's first year in power as disastrous, noting Keir Starmer had the 'worst start for any newly elected prime minister ' and that Labour's 35 per cent vote share was the lowest for a majority government.
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump tariffs land 100-year-old Stilton maker with £800k bill
Donald Trump's trade war has landed one of Britain's oldest Stilton cheese makers with an £800,000 bill. Bill Mathieson, chief executive of the 114 year-old Long Clawson Dairy, in Leicestershire, said the company would be forced to pay almost £1m in extra levies because of new US tariffs – despite Sir Keir Starmer signing a trade deal with Donald Trump. Mr Mathieson said: 'We've got about £10m of sales going into the US … you take that and we've ended up with an increase of just under £800,000. The trade deal has had no impact in terms of benefit for dairy [producers]. It's certainly not helpful.' Under the terms of Sir Keir's trade deal with the US, tariffs on British steelmakers were reduced to zero, but a 10pc levy remained on other goods including cheese such as Long Clawson's. Mr Mathieson said the company would be forced to increase the price of some of its cheese exports as a result, but that it would be unlikely it could fully recover the impact of the tariffs through price rises. However, he added: 'We might take a bit of a hit, but actually we're very positive about the opportunities that exist in the US. Our strategy will be to try and offset [tariffs] by going out and winning new business.' Founded in 1911, Long Clawson Dairy is Britain's largest producer of Stilton cheese and produces a significant amount of the world's supply. Mr Mathieson also warned that the company faces a barrage of extra costs closer to home owing to tax rises on employers brought in from April. He said: 'Just through National Insurance (NI) contributions and [a 6.7pc increase in the] National Living Wage, it impacted us to the tune of about £1.5m.' He said the company was having to raise its prices as a result. Food bosses have repeatedly warned that raising the cost of employment will fuel inflation. Food prices rose by 4.5pc in the year to June, climbing from a rate of 4.4pc in May. This was the fastest rate of food inflation since February last year. Mr Mathieson added: 'We have to pass this on, because we don't have the margins, and we don't want to be another Stilton that goes to the wall because we no longer make money in our business.' Many of Britain's Stilton makers have closed in recent years as the cheese has suffered from a lack of demand. Arla, the UK's biggest dairy company, said last year it would end production at its 244-year-old Tuxford & Tebbutt Creamery in Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, if it was unable to find a buyer. Long Clawson has spent recent years battling to rejuvenate the image of Stilton and convince Gen Z shoppers of its merits, working with celebrity chefs and social media influencers. Mr Mathieson said this project was now bearing fruit and that sales of Stilton and blue cheeses were growing strongly. He added that the company was working on developing a more mild Stilton to help appeal to younger people who have not developed a taste for the intense flavour of traditional Stilton. He said: 'What we've been told is that a younger generation, they'd like something that's a bit more of an entry point into blue cheese. So we've developed a Stilton that is milder and a lot more buttery.'
