logo
Federated Farmers Launches ‘SOS: Save Our Sheep' Campaign

Federated Farmers Launches ‘SOS: Save Our Sheep' Campaign

Scoop26-05-2025

Press Release – Federated Farmers
In just one generation New Zealand has lost over two-thirds of our national flock, reducing from over 70 million sheep in 1982 to fewer than 25 million sheep today.
Federated Farmers has launched a new campaign, SOS: Save Our Sheep, calling for urgent action to halt the collapse of New Zealand's sheep industry.
'Once the backbone of New Zealand's economy, sheep are fast becoming an endangered species in this country,' Federated Farmers meat & wool chair Toby Williams says.
'Each year we're losing tens of thousands of hectares of productive farmland. Where sheep and lambs once grazed, pine trees are taking their place.
'Sheep farming is at a real crossroads. That's why farmers are sending out an urgent SOS to save our sheep – and the Government need to answer that call before it's too late.'
In just one generation New Zealand has lost over two-thirds of our national flock, reducing from over 70 million sheep in 1982 to fewer than 25 million sheep today.
Sheep numbers are rapidly plunging with almost a million sheep disappearing every year.
'If that trend continues, we're not going to have any sheep left in our country within two decades. We'll just have hills plastered in nothing but pine trees,' Williams says.
'That would be a huge loss for our country – not just for our economy, but for our cultural identity and rural communities too.'
Williams says the number one driver of sheep farming's collapse is clear: carbon forestry.
'New Zealand's climate change policies are badly broken, and it's gotten to the point where food production and the viability of our rural communities are being threatened.
'The Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is effectively subsidising pine trees to offset fossil fuel emissions, and that's pushing sheep farmers off the land, never to return.
'We're the only country in the world that allows 100% carbon offsetting through forestry within our ETS.
'Most other countries have recognised this as a significant risk and have quite rightly set policies to restrict it – so New Zealand is way out of step with international norms.'
Between 2017 and 2024, 260,000 hectares of sheep and beef country were swallowed up by pines.
'That's not because forestry is necessarily a better use of the land, but because Government policy makes it more profitable to plant pine trees than to farm sheep,' Williams says.
'Climate policy is trumping food production. We're blindly sacrificing rural jobs, local processing infrastructure, and sustainable red meat exports at the altar of carbon offsetting.
'Unfortunately, the Government aren't doing enough to stop the relentless march of pine trees across productive farmland – and if they don't act soon, it will be too late.'
Federated Farmers is now calling on the Government to urgently review the ETS and fix the rules to either limit or stop the offsetting of fossil fuel emissions with forestry.
Williams says New Zealanders need to ask themselves a simple question: do we still value our sheep industry?
'Because if the answer is yes, we need to act now, and act fast, before it's too late.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IWCNZ Demands Immediate Justice And Urgent Action On Gaza Crisis, Citing Grave Violations Of International Law
IWCNZ Demands Immediate Justice And Urgent Action On Gaza Crisis, Citing Grave Violations Of International Law

Scoop

time10 hours ago

  • Scoop

IWCNZ Demands Immediate Justice And Urgent Action On Gaza Crisis, Citing Grave Violations Of International Law

Press Release – Islamic Women's Council of New Zealand This is not just a Palestinian issueit is a human rights crisis that demands urgent intervention. We urge New Zealanders, activists, and civil society groups to challenge misinformation, amplify Palestinian voices, and demand justice. As Eid approaches, it is a time for reflection, compassion, and togetherness. Yet, while many prepare to celebrate, our thoughts are with those in Gaza who are facing unimaginable hardship. The Islamic Women's Council New Zealand (IWCNZ) stands in unwavering solidarity with the Palestinian people, condemning the ongoing atrocities and humanitarian crisis in Gaza. As mothers, daughters, sisters, and advocates for justice, we cannot remain silent as innocent lives—especially women and children—continue to suffer under relentless attacks and unjust occupation. The military assault on Gaza is more than a conflict—it is a humanitarian catastrophe fuelled by systemic oppression, ethnic cleansing, and violations of international law. Entire families have been destroyed, homes flattened, hospitals bombed, and basic human needs deliberately denied. The international community has an obligation to act, yet far too little is being done. 'The systematic targeting of civilians and the deliberate denial of humanitarian aid in Gaza constitute grave breaches of international law,' states Dr. Maysoon Salama. IWCNZ. 'New Zealand has a proud history of advocating for peace and human rights on the global stage. We urge our government to live up to these values and take concrete action to halt this humanitarian catastrophe.' The continued violence against Palestinians is in direct violation of international law, including: The Fourth Geneva Convention (1949) – Prohibits occupation forces from targeting civilians, imposing collective punishment, and blocking humanitarian aid. The Rome Statute of the ICC – Defines war crimes, including indiscriminate bombings and forced starvation of civilians. The 1948 Genocide Convention – Holds nations accountable for acts that seek to erase a people through mass killings, destruction, and denial of survival resources. United Nations Resolutions – Numerous UN resolutions condemn Israeli occupation and reaffirm Palestinian sovereignty, yet enforcement remains weak due to global political bias. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) – Guarantees safety, education, healthcare, and basic human needs for every child, all of which have been stripped from Palestinian children in Gaza. The UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) – Recognizes the impact of conflict on women, calling for their protection and inclusion in peace processes —which has been ignored entirely in Palestine. New Zealand has long advocated for peace and human rights, but words are not enough. The Islamic Women's Council of New Zealand demands that the New Zealand Government: Publicly denounce Israel's violations of international law and demand accountability. Advocate for an immediate ceasefire and halt military funding that supports occupation forces. Enforce diplomatic and economic sanctions until Israel adheres to international law. Enhance humanitarian aid contributions to ensure medical relief reaches Palestinian families. Support Palestinian sovereignty by recognizing Palestine's right to self-determination. This is not just a Palestinian issue—it is a human rights crisis that demands urgent intervention. We urge New Zealanders, activists, and civil society groups to challenge misinformation, amplify Palestinian voices, and demand justice. As Muslim women, we feel the deep pain of mothers watching their children suffer, the anguish of families torn apart, and the urgency for a world where peace is more than just words. We will not stay silent. We will continue to advocate, amplify, and demand change until Palestine is free from occupation, oppression, and genocide.

The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals
The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals

Scoop

time10 hours ago

  • Scoop

The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals

Sanctions against Te Pti Mori MPs were historic, but they weren't the only thing that happened in the house. , Editor: The House While Parliament's week was dominated by its final event – Thursday's debate on the report from the Privileges Committee into a haka performed in the chamber – the rest of the week focussed on other business that, while more mundane, was still worthy of note. The Government appeared to have three objectives for this week in the house. Crucial to the administration's continuance, the first goal was to successfully complete the initial debate on the budget. The long initial budget debate could no longer dribble on over weeks, so the house spent six hours of the week completing the second reading debate, which is the first debate a budget gets. The reading was accomplished and so the Government continues. This may sound silly, but a Government cannot survive, if the house votes against its budget. Agreeing to vote for budget and taxation bills are the 'supply' portion of the 'confidence and supply' agreement that is the foundation of any coalition agreement. The budget focus now turns to select committees and what is called 'Scrutiny Week', when ministers appear before various subject committees to defend their budget plans. Scrutiny Week begins on 16 June. Slow seconds A second objective was possibly not in earlier plans for this week – to finally polish off the bills originally slated for completion two weeks ago during budget week urgency. Then, the Leader of the House had asked the house to accord urgency for 12 bills the Government hoped to progress through 30 stages of parliamentary debate. The plan was ambitious and it did not succeed. Despite day-long sittings until midnight Saturday (when urgency must end), only two bills were completed, others were untouched, and 13 stages were unfinished or unstarted. This week's plan for the house had MPs returning to the well for more of the same. Just like last time, progress was at a snail's pace. After quite a few hours, the Government had slugged its way through just a few more stages. The plan was slowed to a crawl by bills' committee stages (formally known as the Committee of the Whole House). Committee stages are a crucial way for MPs to publicly interrogate the minister in charge of a bill. With patience, they can tease out a lot about both a government's development of legislation and its intended real-world impacts. Because the committee stage has no set duration, it is also a way for the opposition to make the Government really work for progress. The Government did achieve progress on the bills left incomplete from budget week, but again, it was probably not what was hoped for. They will need to come back yet again in three weeks to have a third crack. The Opposition is showing itself to be quite effective at the filibuster. The Government's third objective was to have the debate on the recent Privileges Committee Report on three Te Pāti Māori MPs done by the week's end. As Leader of the House Chris Bishop said in re-initiating the debate: 'My encouragement would be for everybody to finish this debate today. 'Have a robust debate, but let's end this issue once and for all, and deal with the issue and get back to the major issues facing this country.' That wish was fulfilled with apparent agreement from across the house. As 6pm neared, the MP who eventually moved that a vote be taken was Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi. The frankly fascinating debate on the report will be reported separately.

The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals
The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals

Scoop

time12 hours ago

  • Scoop

The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals

, Editor: The House While Parliament's week was dominated by its final event - Thursday's debate on the report from the Privileges Committee into a haka performed in the chamber - the rest of the week focussed on other business that, while more mundane, was still worthy of note. The Government appeared to have three objectives for this week in the house. Crucial to the administration's continuance, the first goal was to successfully complete the initial debate on the budget. The long initial budget debate could no longer dribble on over weeks, so the house spent six hours of the week completing the second reading debate, which is the first debate a budget gets. The reading was accomplished and so the Government continues. This may sound silly, but a Government cannot survive, if the house votes against its budget. Agreeing to vote for budget and taxation bills are the 'supply' portion of the 'confidence and supply' agreement that is the foundation of any coalition agreement. The budget focus now turns to select committees and what is called 'Scrutiny Week', when ministers appear before various subject committees to defend their budget plans. Scrutiny Week begins on 16 June. Slow seconds A second objective was possibly not in earlier plans for this week - to finally polish off the bills originally slated for completion two weeks ago during budget week urgency. Then, the Leader of the House had asked the house to accord urgency for 12 bills the Government hoped to progress through 30 stages of parliamentary debate. The plan was ambitious and it did not succeed. Despite day-long sittings until midnight Saturday (when urgency must end), only two bills were completed, others were untouched, and 13 stages were unfinished or unstarted. This week's plan for the house had MPs returning to the well for more of the same. Just like last time, progress was at a snail's pace. After quite a few hours, the Government had slugged its way through just a few more stages. The plan was slowed to a crawl by bills' committee stages (formally known as the Committee of the Whole House). Committee stages are a crucial way for MPs to publicly interrogate the minister in charge of a bill. With patience, they can tease out a lot about both a government's development of legislation and its intended real-world impacts. Because the committee stage has no set duration, it is also a way for the opposition to make the Government really work for progress. The Government did achieve progress on the bills left incomplete from budget week, but again, it was probably not what was hoped for. They will need to come back yet again in three weeks to have a third crack. The Opposition is showing itself to be quite effective at the filibuster. The Government's third objective was to have the debate on the recent Privileges Committee Report on three Te Pāti Māori MPs done by the week's end. As Leader of the House Chris Bishop said in re-initiating the debate: "My encouragement would be for everybody to finish this debate today. "Have a robust debate, but let's end this issue once and for all, and deal with the issue and get back to the major issues facing this country." That wish was fulfilled with apparent agreement from across the house. As 6pm neared, the MP who eventually moved that a vote be taken was Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi. The frankly fascinating debate on the report will be reported separately. - RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Enjoy our articles or podcast at RNZ.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store