Android 16's back button bug is fixed, but you'll still have to wait
Earlier this week, multiple users noted that the back gesture had stopped working properly on some devices, leaving users with no choice but to restart their phones to restore functionality. There were also reports of the 3-button navigation bar freezing and not working correctly, particularly on Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 series devices. But it appears Google has found a fix.
Google reached out to Android Police co-founder Artem Russakovskii, confirming that the company has already fixed the bug affecting the back gesture. However, the update with the fix hasn't rolled out yet. It appears Google will include the patch in the next Android 16 update.
While the issue doesn't seem to be widespread, if you're still facing it, restarting the device is currently the only workaround. Some users noted that the bug surfaces more often when using third-party launchers, and switching back to the Pixel Launcher might help. Still, it's frustrating that Google has addressed the bug internally but hasn't released the fix.
We don't yet know when the next Android 16 update will arrive, but the best guess is sometime next month alongside the July security patch — meaning users might wait another two weeks for the fix to arrive. In addition to the back gesture issue, some users have also reported problems with scheduled dark/light mode not working, though Google has not yet commented on a fix for that.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
7 hours ago
- Forbes
Google Slashes Pixel 8 Pro Price Ahead Of Pixel 10 Launch
A Google Pixel 8 pro phone is displayed during a product launch event for the Google Pixel 8, and ... More Pixel 8 pro phones, Pixel Watch 2, and Pixel Buds Pro earbuds, in New York on October 4, 2023. (Photo by Ed JONES / AFP) (Photo by ED JONES/AFP via Getty Images) Similar to the company's Pixel 9 discount before the Galaxy Z Fold 7 debuted, Google's latest Pixel 8 Pro discount is its best yet, and lands weeks before the official Pixel 10 announcement. Google has slashed the cost of the Pixel 8 Pro by $400, bringing the price down to $599. That figure is a bit of marketing because the Pixel 8 Pro hasn't been $999 for a very long time, and the company runs consecutive deals, so it's rare to pay full price for a Pixel phone. Nonetheless, $599 is a very good price for the 2023 Google flagship. The phone also comes with a Pixel Watch 2 and a free case. Alongside the 10% store credit for Google One members. The downside is the poor trade-in pricing. Historically, Google has always been behind Apple and Samsung in valuing your used phone. That changed with a recent Google U.K. deal that raised trade-in prices to heights I haven't seen before for old handsets, some of which are essentially defunct (including the embattled Pixel 6a). Here is a selection of Google U.K.'s trade-in prices three weeks ago. In comparison, the company is now paying far less for the same phones. For example, Google values the Pixel 7 Pro at $145, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max at $355, and the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra at $224. Those Samsung and Apple handsets will likely net more on the secondary market. The Google Pixel 8 Pro Is Still Worth Considering A Google Pixel 8 Pro phone is displayed during a Google product launch event in New York on October ... More 4, 2023. (Photo by Ed JONES / AFP) (Photo by ED JONES/AFP via Getty Images) Even without a hefty trade-in discount, this is a solid deal for a phone that isn't wildly different to its successor, the Pixel 9. AI tools like Magic Editor, Best Take, and Video Boost have made it over to last year's Google phone. Formerly exclusive Pixel 9 features, such as the Pixel Weather app, have now migrated over to the Pixel 8. Only the updated hardware separates the two phones. The Pixel 8 will likely disappear from the Google store after the Pixel 10 lands in August. This may be one of the last chances to buy the phone directly from Google, if that matters to you. Another distinct possibility is that Pixel 8 Pro prices crash (at other retailers) after it disappears from the Google Store and the Pixel 10 lands because of its age. Being two generations old used to matter pre-2024, but with five years of software updates and security patches left, the risk is reduced.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
KeyBanc Raises Alphabet (GOOGL) Price Target to $215, Reaffirms ‘Overweight'
Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:) is one of the AI Stocks on Wall Street's Radar. On July 17, KeyBanc analyst Justin Patterson raised the price target on the stock to $215.00 (from $195.00) while maintaining an Overweight rating. According to the firm, Search, YouTube, and Cloud are going to lead to a solid Q2 for Alphabet, with revenue of $94.6 billion. The firm also anticipates positive commentary on AI Mode, Waymo, and expense efficiencies. It also expects to see the company highlighting the value of its platform approach to artificial intelligence. Pixabay/Public Domain Keybanc increased its earnings per share estimates for the stock to $9.88 for 2025 and $10.56 for 2026. This represents increases of 1% and 2% respectively. It also introduced a 2027 EPS estimate of $12.25, all above Street consensus. Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is an American multinational technology conglomerate holding company wholly owning the internet giant Google, amongst other businesses. While we acknowledge the potential of GOOGL as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None.
Forbes
10 hours ago
- Forbes
Black Voices Are Training Big Tech. But Who's Protecting Them?
Howard University and Google are partnering under the name Project Elevate Black Voices to release ... More data that can be used by artificial intelligence to better understand African American English. It was recently announced that Howard University and Google are partnering under the name Project Elevate Black Voices to release data that can be used by artificial intelligence to better understand African American English (AAE). A media release from Howard University explained that researchers traveled across the United States to capture different dialects used within the Black community, collecting 600 hours of vocal data across 32 states in different dialects, dictions and accents. The project's aim is to address the inherent bias baked into many artificial intelligence-driven tools we use to address difficulties interpreting and understanding Black users who have dialects and diction more common in the Black community. Howard University will own the dataset and licensing, making the data available to researchers and institutions at historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) and will allow Google to use the dataset to improve its products. In an Instagram post made by pocintech about the project, there were many who were leery of the partnership stating it wasn't a good idea, with some wondering how this partnership would benefit the Black community. It's understandable for some to be suspicious about this type of partnership. There is a long history of tech being extractive, exploitative and harmful to the Black community. The erasure of Black creators who have started trends and viral dances yet are the least protected on social media, racial bias in facial recognition software used for policing and surveillance, and technology that is more likely to flag Black creator's content as 'offensive,' are just a few examples. Though the backlash is warranted, we should also consider the different ways that a robust dataset containing different types of AAE can benefit Black workers and help create better technology. Many companies use tech tools like Zoom and Microsoft Teams auto-captioning, AI notetakers, and meeting recording summaries. Having more data about AAE will help to improve these speech recognition tools, which can often misinterpret AAE. In some cases, a dataset like this may make employees less likely to codeswitch because they won't have to worry as much about whether their voice and speech patterns will be understood by workplace AI tools, making these tools more inclusive and accessible. Industries like healthcare, customer service and the legal sector, which may use speech-to-text tools for things like clinical documentation, customer sentiment analysis, and to transcribe legal documents could particularly benefit from Project Elevate Black Voices. Many companies use tech tools like Zoom and Microsoft Teams auto-captioning, AI notetakers, and ... More meeting recording summaries. The criticism that can be seen online is not completely unwarranted. There are very real tensions around who will have access to the dataset in the future and some are worried that the data could be extracted and exploited to the detriment of the community that it was designed to benefit. The value of this type of rich data outside of improved speech recognition tools is a preservation and archive of Black American culture during a time when Black history is being actively erased. In the wrong hands though, this type of data could be used in nefarious ways, furthering the use of Black AI influencers and digital Blackface, training AI products without the compensation or credit (and in some cases the knowledge) of those whose data was used to train these products, and expanding the use of surveillance technology that disproportionately harms and targets Black people. According to Howard's media release about the partnership, 'The Howard African American English Dataset 1.0 will initially be made available exclusively to researchers and institutions within historically Black colleges and universities to ensure that the data is employed in ways that reflect the interests and needs of marginalized communities, specifically African American communities whose linguistic practices have often been excluded or misrepresented in computational systems.' It's understandable to question how this data could be used to further the harm that Black communities already face. While the initial intentions in collecting this data may be benevolent, it's imperative to understand how easy it is for data to be wielded for corrupt and capitalistic purposes. It is a great move that the data will be available to HBCU institutions, but a word of caution: Black-led, Black-founded and Black-owned organizations and institutions are not immune to harm and extraction—one could argue that within these systems, harm is more insidious and is sometimes more challenging to spot and combat. Organizations and institutions that are primarily Black or led by Black people can still engage in practices that are oppressive and harmful. Audre Lorde taught us that, 'the true focus of revolutionary change is never merely the oppressive situations we seek to escape, but that piece of the oppressor which is planted deep within us.' We must be careful that when we are trying to reclaim equity and repair broken tools that we do not recreate newer versions of the same harmful systems.
