Behind Trump's move to back off Powell: Lawyers warned against it.
Privately, White House officials also acknowledged uncertainty about whether the argument would hold up in court. That doesn't mean the president is going to drop the subject as he works to undermine Powell's credibility and pressure him into submission.
'Whether or not it's illegal, I don't know,' said one official, granted anonymity to speak candidly about the legal strategy. 'But is it a good thing to point out to damage this guy's image? Yeah.'
The conversations were a backdrop to the latest drama this week over whether Trump might attempt to oust Powell, whom he appointed as chair in 2017 but now regularly blasts for keeping interest rates elevated. In an Oval Office meeting Tuesday with a group of House Republicans, the president suggested he might fire the Fed chief, only to publicly say the following day that it was 'highly unlikely' that he would do so.
But Trump has not ruled out moving against Powell.
The lawyers in recent days informally told the White House counsel's office that it would likely lose a court fight if Trump fired Powell solely based on accusations that he mismanaged the multi-year renovation project and misled Congress about it, according to the people, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
Uneasy markets are also among the factors influencing Trump. The president worried that firing Powell would undermine the government's ability to cheaply finance its debt, the people added. Treasury bonds, stocks and the dollar briefly fell Wednesday in response to news reports that Trump was poised to fire Powell.
The market for U.S. government debt showed signs of dysfunction in early April after Trump announced unexpectedly high tariffs on countries, a precarious situation that led the president to pause many of those levies. Fears about further turmoil in that market hang over the prospect of removing Powell.
White House aides referred back to the president's Wednesday remarks, adding that Trump takes into consideration many factors and listens to a variety of people in his decision-making process.
Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Trump kept the door open to the renovation-related legal strategy.
'I mean, it's possible there's fraud involved with the $2.5, $2.7 billion renovation. This is a renovation,' he said. 'How do you spend $2.7 billion, and he didn't have proper clearance, et cetera, et cetera? So you know that's going on. There could be something to that, but I think he's not doing a good job.'
Trump has grown more publicly frustrated with Powell, who has held interest rates steady as he waits to see how tariffs play out in the economy. Import taxes can lead to both higher inflation — which would call for higher rates — and slower growth, which would call for lower rates.
But Fed board members can only be removed from their position 'for cause.' That provision has not been fully litigated but has generally been interpreted to mean that the president can't fire a central banker over policy disagreements. The Supreme Court in May signaled that Powell is legally protected from being removed by Trump.
Administration officials seized on the new strategy earlier this month after Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott pressed Powell on the ballooning costs of upgrades to the Fed's headquarters on the National Mall and an adjacent building owned by the central bank.
Last week, White House Budget Director Russ Vought launched a probe into the project and the Fed chief's congressional testimony, calling for a response from Powell within seven business days. Vought, speaking at a breakfast with reporters hosted by the Christian Science Monitor Thursday morning, said his office is planning a site visit to the Fed's headquarters in the next week to get 'the answers to some of our questions' about the project's cost overruns.
'They either misled Congress, or they need to go back to the National Capital Planning Commission and have a reassessment of the project,' Vought said. 'Those are the important things that we're going to get to the bottom of.'
The central bank has attributed the hefty price tag to a range of factors, including remediation for asbestos and lead contamination, the rising cost of building materials and the historic nature of the building. Powell told Scott and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in a letter this week that the headquarters has not been comprehensively renovated since it was built in the 1930s.
The Fed chief also asked the central bank's inspector-general to look into the project, a step that National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett told NBC News 'impressed' him.
Sophia Cai contributed to this report.
CLARIFICATION: This story has been updated to clarify that outside lawyers informally spoke to the White House counsel's office.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alan Dershowitz also said the convicted sex trafficker should be granted immunity to speak about her relationship with Epstein.
Jeffrey Epstein's former lawyer thinks Ghislaine Maxwell should have her 20-year prison sentence commuted—and be given immunity to testify before Congress about the late financier. 'Ghislaine Maxwell is basically serving the sentence that Epstein would have gotten,' lawyer Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax's Sunday Agenda on Sunday. 'She should never be in jail for 20 years. What should happen is, she should be free,' Dershowitz continued. 'She should have her sentence commuted. She should then be called in front of Congress. Have Congress give her total immunity, and then she can tell everything she knows.'
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The stock market is being led by a new group of winners
The stock market is being led by a new group of winners originally appeared on TheStreet. For a while, the S&P 500's returns have been dominated by a select group of technology kingpins known as the Magnificent 7. Those seven stocks, Alphabet, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta Platforms, Nvidia, and Tesla, powered the market higher due to massive spending and demand growth for artificial intelligence training and remain key cogs in the S&P 500's performance, but more recently, a new basket of stocks is delivering big returns, potentially signaling the early days of a regime change. Unlike the Mag 7, the new leaders are far less tied to AI. Sure, names like Palantir and Nvidia remain big winners, but the broader group of stocks delivering eye-popping returns spans more industries, including finance and, yes, even space. Stocks jump on renewed optimism It's been a tale of two markets this year. First, stocks took a drubbing beginning in February when President Donald Trump launched his trade war, instituting 25% tariffs on Canada and White House followed that up with more tariffs, often higher than Wall Street and businesses expected, including a baseline 10% tariff on all imports and a 25% tariff on autos. Altogether, the tariff tit-for-tat took a big toll on stocks, causing the S&P 500 to fall by 19% — nearly into bear market territory — and the Nasdaq Composite to tumble about 24% through early April. Then, everything changed. President Trump paused most reciprocal tariffs on April 9, providing leeway for trade deals that could settle tariffs at more reasonable levels. The glimmer of hope for avoiding a worst-case scenario of high tariffs sparking inflation and sending the economy into a tailspin marked a bottom for stocks, kicking off a record-setting rally. The S&P 500 has marched 24% higher, while the Nasdaq has rallied by over 30% as more people have lowered their forward inflation expectations. While there's some concerning economic data on jobs and the economy, market gains suggest we'll sidestep an economic reckoning, providing upside to revenue and earnings growth. New stock market leaders emerge By now, most investors are familiar with market darlings Nvidia and Palantir, two of the most prominent AI players. Given its dominance in high-end AI semiconductor chips and optimization software, Nvidia is the de facto Goliath in AI network infrastructure. Palantir has become a go-to for securely developing AI apps for government and stocks have been top performers over the past few months, rising 82% and 107% from their early April lows. But other big-cap technology companies haven't performed nearly as well. Alphabet and Apple are up 28% and 23%, respectively. Solid, but not game-changing. You could have bought the Nasdaq 100 and done much better. Instead, a new set of stock market darlings has been outpacing the market, including space technology leader Rocket Lab () and fintech leader SoFi Technologies () . Cryptocurrency leader Coinbase () has also been a star. These three stocks are up 214%, 130%, and 176%, respectively, from their April lows. Moreover, to understand just how good the performance of this new basket of leaders has been, you need look no further than the VanEck Social Sentiment ETF () . The BUZZ ETF invests in "75 large cap U.S. stocks, which exhibit the highest degree of positive investor sentiment and bullish perception based on content aggregated from online sources including social media, news articles, blog posts, and other alternative datasets," according to VanEck. In short, it attempts to keep its finger on the pulse of the most interesting stocks. So far, that strategy is working. The BUZZ ETF gained 36% in the second quarter and is up 22% year-to-date through June. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 is up 11% and 6%. It's up 66% since early April, and month-to-date through July 18, it's gained 8% versus a 2% return for the Nasdaq. More on next-generation stocks:"Look at how poorly the QQQs have done relative to BUZZ since April. Think about this, we consider the QQQs to be the pinnacle of technology stocks, yet they practically look like the healthcare stocks relative to the S&P when compared to BUZZ," wrote long-time technical analyst Helene Meisler on TheStreet Pro. It's not just Rocket Lab, Coinbase, and SoFi powering the ETF, either. Yes, those are the three largest holdings in BUZZ, but AST SpaceMobile and Robinhood () are number four and five, and they've been up 186% and 219% since early April. Nvidia and Palantir are only BUZZ's 10th and 11th biggest holdings, so while their gains are substantial, they're not the ones behind the ETF's significant outperformance. Does the rise of Rocket Lab, thanks to a steady stream of revenue growth from shooting satellites into the sky, or SoFi, which is increasingly disrupting traditional banking, signal the rise of a new guard, or is it just a temporary speculative frenzy? "I was taught that corrections are the market's way of changing leadership," wrote Meisler. "Was the spring plunge the market's way of changing leadership? Or is this just speculation run amok? If you go back to that ratio chart, it's a trend that has been in place for at least a year." Of course, stocks don't go up in a straight line, and some backfilling of gains for this new group of winners is to be expected. Still, one year is a pretty long period for this ETF and its biggest components to outpace the broader market. Todd Campbell owns Rocket Lab, SoFi Technologies, Nvidia, and stock market is being led by a new group of winners first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 20, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 20, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Guardians president responded to Trump's random tirade about name change
At this present moment in time, you might think Donald Trump would realize he has bigger fish to fry than ranting and raving about professional sports teams changing their nicknames to decidedly non-racist labels. And, well, you'd probably be right. But that didn't stop the 47th U.S. President from going on an arbitrary (and pretty nonsensical, with all things considered) diatribe about how American sports teams like the Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians should revert back to their old, decidedly racist nicknames. Somewhere along the way, Trump invented the concept of an "original six" in baseball out of thin air (which doesn't exist and is actually an NHL concept) to invoke the Guardians, for which an "original six" label wouldn't even apply. Again, it seems like Trump may be brazenly trying to drum up some sort of cannon fodder grievance to distract from other, more pressing issues. I mean, I'm just saying that I wouldn't rule it out, is all. Shortly after Trump's Sunday morning shot in the dark, er, I mean, testimonial, Guardians president Chris Antonetti responded to his reference about the franchise's name. In short, Antonetti politely declined, citing an "opportunity to build the [Guardians'] brand" while being "excited" for the future. You know what the amusing kicker is here? It would take years for the Guardians, or anyone in a similar position, to go back and earnestly rebrand. It's not as if it's some overnight, effortless operation that can be done on someone's whim. How long have the Cleveland Guardians had their current nickname? After years of backlash, in late 2020, the Guardians revealed they would drop their old "Indians" nickname after the conclusion of the 2021 season. They have been the Guardians ever since. It was the eighth official name change in franchise history for an organization that officially started as the Columbus Buckeyes/Senators in 1896. It was the fifth name change since they started calling Cleveland home in 1900. This article originally appeared on For The Win: Guardians president politely declines Donald Trump's demand for name change