
Regressive jirgas
The federal government's recent move to revive the jirga system in the newly merged districts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is not just regressive, but also unconstitutional and dangerously reminiscent of the colonial-era governance. A committee led by the Federal Minister for Kashmir Affairs and Gilgit-Baltistan has been formed to explore alternative justice systems in these districts, raising fears of a de facto rollback of the 25th Constitutional Amendment, which integrated the former tribal areas into Pakistan's legal and administrative mainstream and abolished the jirga system — a move celebrated as a step towards constitutional equality, rule of law, and human rights for the region's long-neglected population.
Nonetheless, the initiative to reinstate this system signals not only a betrayal of the promises made to the tribal population but also a troubling attempt to offload state responsibility for justice onto a parallel, informal, and often brutal institution.
Undoubtedly, jirgas operate entirely outside the constitutional framework and the rule of law. They violate the principle of separation of powers, usurp judicial authority, and often lead to egregious human rights violations. Most disturbingly, jirgas are structurally biased against women. The recent tragic case of a 19-year-old bride murdered in Pirwadhai, Rawalpindi, allegedly on the orders of a jirga, and the killing of a couple in Balochistan on the pretext of an illicit relationship are only the latest examples in a long list of so-called "honour" killings facilitated by these illegal forums. Such incidents are a stark reminder that when justice is privatised, it is the most vulnerable who suffer.
The Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 makes it abundantly clear that only the state has the authority to administer justice, and such illicit practices of informally adjudicating on civil and criminal matters are violative of Articles 4, 8, 10-A, 25 and 175(3) of the Constitution. In 2004, the Sindh High Court declared jirgas unconstitutional and illegal, a position reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in 2006 and again in 2017.
The top court also noted that the jirga and panchayat systems violate Pakistan's international legal obligations, including commitments under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Yet, the persistence and now potential formal revival of these forums illustrate the state's failure to assert its monopoly on justice and its hesitance to challenge entrenched tribal and feudal power structures.
Supporters of jirgas argue they provide swift and culturally resonant dispute resolution. But this is a false economy. The real reason people turn to jirgas is not their efficiency or fairness, but because the formal justice system remains slow, expensive and inaccessible, particularly in rural and tribal areas. Instead of reinstating medieval mechanisms, the state should commit to making the judiciary accessible, the police accountable, and the legal system responsive to citizens' needs.
Worse still, this regressive proposal comes at a time when the federal government has failed to meet its financial and developmental promises to the merged districts. The commitment to provide Rs100 billion annually in development funds, along with a 3% share in the NFC award, remains unfulfilled. The resurgence of militancy, ongoing political tussles between the Centre and K-P, and administrative chaos in the merged districts have only compounded public disillusionment. The state's failure to deliver tangible benefits post-merger has created a vacuum, one it now dangerously proposes to fill with a broken, discredited system.
Let us be clear: reinstating jirgas is not a neutral administrative measure; it is a reversal of constitutional progress and a betrayal of the people of the tribal districts. It reinforces outdated power hierarchies, legitimises violence against women, and undermines national unity. The path forward lies not in restoring colonial relics but in upholding the Constitution, investing in institutional reform, and ensuring equal protection of the law for every citizen.
Pakistan must decisively reject the politics of appeasement cloaked in cultural nostalgia. It is time to bury jirgas for good.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
29 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Lula rejects ‘humiliation' of calling Trump over US-Brazil tariff
BRASILIA: As U.S. tariffs on Brazilian goods jumped to 50% on Wednesday, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told Reuters in an interview that he saw no room for direct talks with U.S. President Donald Trump which he believes would turn into a 'humiliation' for him. Brazil is not about to announce reciprocal tariffs, he said. Nor will his government give up on cabinet-level talks. But Lula himself is in no rush to ring the White House. 'The day my intuition says Trump is ready to talk, I won't hesitate to call him,' Lula said in an interview from his presidential residence in Brasilia. 'But today my intuition says he doesn't want to talk. And I'm not going to humiliate myself.' Despite Brazil's exports facing one of the highest tariffs imposed by Trump, the new U.S. trade barriers look unlikely to derail Latin America's largest economy, giving Lula more room to stand his ground against Trump than most Western leaders. Lula described U.S.-Brazil relations at a 200-year nadir after Trump tied the new tariff to his demand for an end to the prosecution of right-wing former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is standing trial for plotting to overturn the 2022 election. Brazil's Lula says he won't take orders from 'gringo' Trump The president said Brazil's Supreme Court, which is hearing the case against Bolsonaro, 'does not care what Trump says and it should not,' adding that Bolsonaro should face another trial for provoking Trump's intervention, calling the right-wing former president a 'traitor to the homeland.' 'We had already pardoned the U.S. intervention in the 1964 coup,' said Lula, who got his political start as a union leader protesting against the military government that followed. 'But this now is not a small intervention. It's the president of the United States thinking he can dictate rules for a sovereign country like Brazil. It's unacceptable.' Lula said his ministers were struggling to open talks with U.S. peers, so his government was focused on domestic measures to cushion the economic blow of U.S. tariffs, while maintaining 'fiscal responsibility.' He also said he was planning to call leaders from the BRICS group of developing nations, starting with India and China, to discuss the possibility of a joint response to U.S. tariffs. Lula also described plans to create a new national policy for Brazil's strategic mineral resources, treating them as a matter of 'national sovereignty' to break with a history of mining exports that added little value in Brazil.


Express Tribune
17 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India's SC to hear IIOJK statehood plea
A woman stands next to Amir Nazir Wani's family house, which was destroyed by the Indian authorities, in Khasipora village in Tral, occupied Kashmir on April 27, 2025. — Reuters/Adnan Abidi India's top court will hear a plea for the restoration of Kashmir's federal statehood later this week, court officials said Tuesday, as the region marked six years under direct rule from New Delhi. The hearing, scheduled for August 8 in the Supreme Court, follows an application filed by two residents of the disputed territory, where a separatist insurgency has raged for years. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Hindu nationalist government in August 2019 revoked IIOJK limited autonomy and brought it directly under federal control. The move was accompanied by mass arrests and a communications blackout that ran for months as India bolstered its armed forces in the region to contain protests.


Express Tribune
18 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PTI's parliamentary core falls to ECP's guillotine
Listen to article The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Tuesday delivered a major blow to PTI's parliamentary muscle, disqualifying several of the party's top opposition leaders on the day it marked the second anniversary of Imran Khan's arrest with countrywide protests. The axe fell hard, sweeping away the party's parliamentary leadership in both houses, following a recent ruling by an anti-terrorism court (ATC) in Faisalabad. The court handed down prison sentences of up to 10 years to over 100 PTI leaders and workers, including key opposition figures, for their alleged involvement in the May 9 riots, triggered by Khan's dramatic arrest in 2023. Those de-notified include Senate Opposition Leader Shibli Faraz, National Assembly Opposition Leader Omar Ayub Khan, Sunni Ittehad Council chief Sahibzada Hamid Raza, and PTI Parliamentary Leader Zartaj Gul. Three members of the Punjab Assembly – Muhammad Ansar Iqbal, Junaid Afzal Sahi, and Rai Muhammad Murtaza Iqbal – have also been disqualified. Acting on the convictions, the ECP issued a formal notification disqualifying nine lawmakers under Article 63(1)(h) of the Constitution, which bars any person convicted of an offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced to two or more years in prison from holding elected office. "A person shall be disqualified from being elected or chosen as, and from being, a member of the Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) if he has been, on conviction for any offence involving moral turpitude, sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not less than two years, unless a period of five years has elapsed since his release," reads Article 63(1)(h). The ECP stated the lawmakers, having been convicted and sentenced, now "stand disqualified under Article 63(1)(h) of the Constitution," adding that, "Consequently, their seats have become vacant". All nine had been found guilty by the ATC for their alleged roles in the May 9 unrest, when PTI supporters, incensed by Khan's arrest outside the Islamabad High Court, stormed and vandalised military installations, including martyrs' memorials. The PTI had earlier declared that any attempt to arrest Khan would cross its "red line". In the aftermath, the military declared May 9 as a "Black Day", calling it a "dark chapter" in national history. However, the PTI has consistently claimed the events were a "false-flag operation" orchestrated by the establishment to frame the party and crush dissent. The ECP's move landed just as PTI was reigniting street agitation to mark the anniversary of Khan's arrest. With the latest disqualifications, the PML-N-led ruling alliance now sits virtually unchallenged in parliament, deepening the political vacuum and tightening the noose around what remains of the opposition. Reacting to ECP's decision, Ayub stated on X that he was grateful for the opportunity to serve as the leader of the opposition in NA. Expressing that his leader, Imran Khan and his colleagues had nominated him, he said that he has been de-seated as MNA NA18 Haripur and opposition leader "due to a bogus verdict by the ATC Faisalabad Judge Sheikh Javed Iqbal, who has wrongly convicted me for 10 years". Ayub further stated that the court "relied on the evidence of prosecution witnesses who were rejected by the ATC Sargodha Judge last year, and we were acquitted". He said the verdict proves "there is no rule of law in Pakistan". "This hybrid regime and its backers were perturbed by my stand as Leader of the Opposition for stating the truth and holding them accountable," he asserted. He vowed to challenge both the ATC verdict and the ECP disqualification in court, expressing hope that Chief Justice Yahya Afridi would take note of what he called the "deplorable state of affairs in Pakistan's judiciary." Ayub ended on a defiant note, saying, "I was, I am, and I will be a worker of PM Imran Khan and PTI".