Trump's onetime friendship with Jeffrey Epstein is well-known - and also documented in records
WASHINGTON — The revelation that U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi told U.S. President Donald Trump that his name was in the Jeffrey Epstein files has focused fresh attention on the president's relationship with the wealthy financier and the U.S. Justice Department's announcement this month that it would not be releasing any additional documents from the case.
But at least some of the information in the briefing to Trump, which The Wall Street Journal said took place in May, should not have been a surprise.
The president's association with Epstein is well-established and his name was included in records that his own Justice Department released back in February as part of an effort to satisfy public interest in information from the sex-trafficking investigation.
Trump has never been accused of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein and the mere inclusion of someone's name in files from the investigation does not imply otherwise. Epstein, who killed himself in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial, also had many prominent friends in political and celebrity circles besides Trump.
Trump's ties to Epstein
It should have been no shock to Trump that his name would be found in records related to Epstein.
The February document dump from the Justice Department included references to Trump in Epstein's phone book and his name was also mentioned in flight logs for Epstein's private plane.
Over the years, thousands of pages of records have been released through lawsuits, Epstein's criminal dockets, public disclosures and Freedom of Information Act requests. In January 2024, a court unsealed the final batch of a trove of documents that had been collected as evidence in a lawsuit filed by Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre.
Records made public also include 2016 deposition in which an accuser recounted spending several hours with Epstein at Trump's Atlantic City casino but didn't say if she actually met Trump and did not accuse him of any wrongdoing. Trump has also said that he once thought Epstein was a 'terrific guy,' but that they later had a falling out.
'I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him,' Trump said in 2019 when video footage unearthed by NBC News following Epstein's federal indictment showed the two chatting at a party at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in 1992, when the now president was newly divorced. 'He was a fixture in Palm Beach. I had a falling-out with him a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years.'
The department's decision to not release additional files from the case
The Justice Department stunned conspiracy theorists, online sleuths and elements of Trump's base this month when it released a two-page letter saying that a so-called Epstein 'client list' that Bondi had once intimated was on her desk did not exist and that officials did not plan to release any additional documents from its investigation despite an earlier commitment to provide transparency.
Whether Bondi's briefing to Trump in May influenced that decision is unclear.
The Justice Department did not comment directly on her meeting with Trump but Bondi and Blanche said in a joint statement that a review of the Epstein files showed that there was nothing warranting further investigation or prosecution.
'As part of our routine briefing,' the statement said, 'we made the President aware of our findings.'
Eric Tucker, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
22 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
Opinion: Provinces must align on health care, not just trade
Op Eds We can borrow a line from Charles Dickens to describe our current state of politics in this country: 'It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.' The 'worst of times' describes the international trade turmoil caused by Donald Trump's fluctuating tariffs and erratic deal-making, with significant implications for our economy. What is less frequently discussed is 'the best of times' impact — the unity the U.S. president's actions has created among premiers and the federal government. Pan-Canadian trade barriers are falling, and interprovincial project ideas abound. This is good news for Canada, even as a possible trade deal with the United States presumably wends closer. As patient-partners in health research, and part of a non-profit organization that helps cancer patients receive essential treatments, we ask: If we can find equal footing among the provinces and territories on trade, why not on health care? Why can't we streamline access to medically necessary treatment for patients across the country who are badly in need of them? For many, this is a matter of life or death. At the moment, provincial and territorial governments make their own decisions about what drugs to reimburse for eligible people and under what conditions. There are many instances across the country where governments don't reimburse people for essential medications at all, leaving patients to find the money on their own. This includes cancer treatments. Sometimes this means people must go without necessary drugs or necessary food. This is the 'choice' our so-often-called 'patchwork quilt' of coverage sometimes provides. The federal government also has its own drug plans for groups under its jurisdiction — and recently, for contraceptives and diabetes medication through the 2024 Pharmacare Act (in provinces that have finalized their agreements with the federal government). Now that we have decided to become Team Canada on trade, there is no reason not to extend this to drug access. During his election campaign, Prime Minister Mark Carney talked about 'Canada Strong,' his plan to unite, secure, protect and build Canada, including comprehensive measures to build and protect our health care system. He talked about adding doctors, building hospitals and delivering better mental health services. He said we would build a stronger health care system. A stronger health care system includes ensuring that people in Canada have equal access to medically necessary services, and that the coverage is portable across the country. These are among the five key principles underpinning the Canada Health Act. Provinces are already on board for getting people medically necessary treatments. Last month, Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who heads the Council of the Federation, comprising all provincial and territorial premiers, said one of their aims is to accelerate getting life saving medications to people who need them. So if every level of government supports the need for medically necessary services — and drug treatments should surely fit into that category — why are we not tearing down the barriers to our patchwork quilt of public drug reimbursement plans? Where you live in the country should not determine whether or not you receive essential medications. Access to health care in Canada — including life-saving medications — should be seamless across provincial and territorial borders. It is not only the right thing to do for patients, but it is also a boon to the economy — getting people healthy and contributing to our society in any way they can. So we ask Carney and the Council of the Federation: If we can find practical solutions to remove trade barriers that are bad for our economy, why can't we find a practical solution to the barrier of unequal access to medically necessary treatments across this country, too?
Globe and Mail
22 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Brazil requests consultations at World Trade Organization over Trump's tariffs
RIO DE JANEIRO (AP) — Brazil requested consultations at the World Trade Organization over tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump against the South American nation that went into effect on Wednesday. Trump has directly tied the 50% tariff on many imported Brazilian goods to the judicial situation of his embattled ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is currently under house arrest. "The United States has flagrantly violated key commitments the country has agreed upon at the WTO, such as the principle of the most favored nation and tariff ceilings negotiated at that organization,' Brazil's foreign ministry said in a statement. The most favored nation principle is a cornerstone of Geneva-based WTO, whose aim is to get countries to respect trade agreements. The principle directs its members to treat each other equally in trade. WTO panels are set if no agreement is reached in disputes between members. 'Brazil's government reiterates its availability for negotiation and hopes these consultations contribute to a solution to the matter,' the Brazilian foreign office said. The U.S. government has not made comments about Brazil's move. Earlier, a Brazilian government official told The Associated Press Brazil understands that the case could drag on and there's no guarantee of success. The official, who wasn't authorized to discuss the matter publicly, spoke on condition of anonymity. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has repeatedly said that the trade body needs a revamp to be enabled to mediate in conflicts. Brazil's government estimates that 35.9% of the country's goods shipped to the American market have been affected. That is about 4% of Brazil's total exports. Trump directly tied the 50% tariff on imported Brazilian goods to the judicial situation of his embattled ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is currently under house arrest. Last month, Bolsonaro was ordered to wear an electronic ankle monitor and to obey a curfew while the proceedings are underway. Lula is yet to speak about the move. On Tuesday, the leftist leader said he wouldn't call Trump to talk about trade 'because he doesn't want to' speak about it. Lula said that he might instead 'invite him to attend (November's climate summit) COP in Belem.'
National Post
22 minutes ago
- National Post
'Do it over': New statue of Martin Luther King, Jr. unveiled in Florida city faces backlash
A Florida city got a surprise last week when a new statue of Martin Luther King Jr. was unveiled. Article content The responses have ranged from polite to outright dismissive. 'It doesn't look like him,' Winter Park resident Nora Koenecke told NBC News. Article content It was unveiled during the annual Heritage Unity Festival and the backlash has flooded social media, reports The Root, with residents saying the statue has a cartoonish vibe, awkward proportions, and a face that looks nothing like Dr. King. Article content Article content View this post on Instagram A post shared by The Neighborhood Talk (@theneighborhoodtalk) Article content 'It looks awkward. It just didn't look up to the standards that Winter Park is so well known for,' Jonathan Blount, co-founder of Essence magazine, told Florida TV station, WESH 2 News. Blount underscored local dissatisfaction, saying the statue appeared to be more of a caricature of Dr. King than a proper depiction of the iconic civil rights leader. Article content Article content The artist who created the controversial piece is Andrew Luy of Huntsville, Alabama. He was selected by a committee of members from the city's arts and parks communities. The design was approved by the King family prior to its installation, he said in his defence. Article content 'The feedback I got from the committee and also the majority, actually all of the attendees that came to the unveiling, was greatly positive,' Luy told People Magazine. 'I didn't have direct contact with the King estate, but from what I heard, they were very happy with the representation of the sculpture of Dr. King.' Article content 'Do it over,' insisted Blount. 'I mean, it just isn't good enough for a permanent lifelong representation of someone who is so important to our history,' he said, even suggesting he would help raise money for a redo. Article content Article content Winter Park's mayor, Sheila DeCiccio, has acknowledged the concerned feedback from residents and also highlighted the funds that have already been spent. Article content 'Maybe it just didn't come out the way everybody had hoped it would,' she said. 'I don't know that there's anything we can do about it at this point, because it was a very big investment.' Article content
