Godongwana hits back at Reserve Bank's 3% inflation target
Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana threw shade on the SA Reserve Bank's (Sarb) 3% inflation target announced last week – saying he has no plans to announce a lower inflation target in the Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS).
Sarb governor Lesetja Kganyago last week said the bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) now prefers to settle on a 3% inflation target, which would allow repo rates to settle at slightly below 6% from the current 7%.
This had created an expectation that the minister would confirm this move.
'It is well-established that policy-making responsibility in this area resides with the minister of finance, working with the President and Cabinet, who sets the inflation target in consultation with the Sarb,' said the minister's office in a statement on Friday. 'The Sarb then operates independently in its pursuit of the inflation target.
Added Godongwana: 'As I emphasised during the Budget presentation, any adjustments to our inflation-targeting framework will follow the established consultation process. This means comprehensive consultation between National Treasury, the Reserve Bank, Cabinet, and relevant stakeholders – not unilateral announcements that pre-empt legitimate policy deliberation.
'Any changes to the target, if necessary, will follow this process that I have outlined above.'
Godongwana's statement appears to be a nod to trade unions and those on the political left arguing that the Sarb should prioritise economic growth and jobs over lower inflation.
Lower inflation creates room for the Sarb to drop interest rates further, thereby stimulating growth and reducing the government's spiralling interest burden.
ALSO READ: A 3% inflation target: What it means for SA markets, and will it solve our debt issues?
It is 'quite extraordinary' that the Sarb, rather than National Treasury, is lowering the inflation target from 3-6% to 3%, when that policy mandate resides with government, notes Stephen Hanival, chief economist at the Department of Trade and Industry.
Sarb's 3% inflation target suggests no further rate cuts for now, but it is 'a positive development if we take a longer-term view,' says Izak Odendaal, chief investment strategist at Old Mutual's Symmetry business unit.
'There will always be inflation cycles, but structurally lower long-term inflation will benefit the South African economy and also support a rerating in its financial markets.'
Gina Schoeman, chief economist at Citibank South Africa, says expectations of a change in the official inflation target are misplaced.
'I think it was incorrect for anybody to expect that just because the Sarb announced their preferred target of 3%, within the official target range of 3-6%, that there would automatically be an announcement of a change in the official range by the time of the MTBPS.
'Sarb did a similar change in 2017, (from) what was then seen as a target of around 5.9% to what it said would be a preferred target of 4.5%. It has effectively done the same thing now, having managed to anchor inflation expectations at much lower levels around 3%. It is clear that with economic reforms moving forward – perhaps not at the pace people would like – comes efficiencies, which means the economy can afford to have a lower preferred [inflation] target.'
ALSO READ: What lowering the inflation target will mean for SA
Can SA handle a 3% target?
The issue of inflation targeting has been the subject of widespread consultation between National Treasury, the finance minister, deputy finance ministers and the Sarb. National Treasury's macro policy review last year said inflation targeting works and the economy would benefit from a lower target.
'Can this economy handle a 3% target? Yes, I believe it can,' says Schoeman.
'Sarb has said it will not try to achieve this immediately, but over a two- to three-year period.
'There will be supply shocks, which is why they have given themselves quite a long runway to achieve this 3% target. What they want to see is a trend towards 3%, rather than the [previous] mid-point of 4.5%.'
Odendaal told Moneyweb's Jimmy Moyaha that recent inflation data – excluding administered prices controlled by government-controlled entities such as Eskom and municipalities – put inflation at 4.5%, exactly midway in the 3-6% target range. 'Regulated prices, those that are directly controlled by the government, are running at 9.7% year on year,' said Odendaal.
The challenge for SA is to get these regulated price increases, such as electricity and municipal tariffs, into line with price increases elsewhere in the economy.
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Afrikaner refugee reveals car wash job: 'Be prepared to work!'
Afrikaner 'refugee' Errol Langton has advised South Africans hoping to resettle in the US to accept low-paying jobs. He's also warned them not to have unrealistic expectations about their new lives abroad. The IT business owner and part-time 'leafy green farmer' swapped his life in Johannesburg to live in Birmingham, Alabama. He now works at a local car wash. Langton was amongst the first group of white South Africans who applied for the refugee resettlement programme. In February, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order, granting refuge to Afrikaners or 'minorities', over his claims of 'racial discrimination' and 'persecution' in South Africa. Speaking in an interview with US intelligence expert Chris Wyatt, Errol Langton revealed that he had taken a job at a local car wash in Birmingham. Langton, who owned an IT business in South Africa, advised fellow refugee applicants to 'come over and be prepared to work.' He said, 'Take what you can get now and work on what you want later. Don't get here and want the $50-an-hour job; take the $15-an-hour job so that you can get on your feet. 'Take the low-paying job to start with and then build to what you want. I promise you, in a year's time, you will be there.' Errol Langton stated that the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) had given resettled refugees a 'starter loan' and aid to get on their feet. Several of his family members had already secured jobs just days into their stay, he claimed. He continued: 'If you play the victim card, you will not fit in. You will not be a part of society. 'It's not discrediting what has happened to you. If you get that out of your system and show that you've taken the opportunity that you've been given, and you go work hard on it, you can open any door. The opportunities are endless.' He also warned South African 'refugees' not to expect the same lifestyle in the US either. He said, 'There is nobody to clean up after you. If you make a mess, you clean it up. 'I don't care if you're 18 or 80, if you've got to do something, you do it. You can pay someone else to do it, but that is going to cost you'. According to various immigration and recruitment agencies, South African migrants flock to countries like Canada, Australia, the UK, the US, and New Zealand. These first-world countries offer the prospects of high living standards, thriving economies and job markets, and communities of South African expats. For immigrants, or refugees, there is a high demand for skilled labour in sectors like engineering, construction, IT, healthcare, finance, and education. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Chinese scholarships awarded to South African students
The Chinese Ambassador to South Africa, Wu Peng, and the Chinese Embassy hosted a send-off ceremony for South African students who have been awarded Chinese government scholarships for 2025. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers The Chinese Embassy in Pretoria hosted a send-off ceremony on Tuesday to celebrate South African students who received 2025 Chinese government scholarships, highlighting the importance of educational cooperation and cultural exchange. The Chinese Ambassador to South Africa, Wu Peng, congratulated the students on being awarded scholarships sponsored by the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM). A total of 11 South African students received the Chinese government scholarship, while eight students were awarded the Academic Education Programmes scholarship. The students were admitted to top-tier Chinese universities, pursuing degree programmes in fields essential to South Africa's national development, such as cybersecurity, engineering management, biological sciences, and healthcare. Wu encouraged them to immerse themselves in China's rich culture, witness its breathtaking landscapes, and experience the country's modern civilisation, including high-speed rail, digital payments, smart cities, and cutting-edge technologies. "Your experience will prove that choosing to study in China is the right decision," he said. He expressed appreciation to China's partners, including the Department of Higher Education and Training and the Department of Basic Education. "Educational cooperation is an integral part of the China-South Africa All-round Strategic Cooperative Partnership in the New Era," Wu said. He said the Chinese government scholarship served as a vital source of momentum for people-to-people exchanges, supporting South African youth in broadening their horizons, enhancing their capacities, and realising their dreams. Thandazo Sithole, one of the scholarship recipients, expressed her excitement about starting her studies abroad. She said she had always dreamed of doing something special, particularly in innovation and technology, and saw this scholarship as an opportunity to pursue her aspirations. Sithole described the scholarship as more than just an academic opportunity, but a chance for access, representation, and rewriting the narrative for African youth. On behalf of her fellow recipients, she said: "We are not just going to China as students, we are going as ambassadors of our country. This is an opportunity to immerse ourselves in a new culture, learn cutting-edge skills, and gain new ideas that can help shape a better world." Sandisa Maqubela, deputy director at the Department of Higher Education and Training's National Skills Fund, said the partnership between the department and China began in 2012 with an agreement to send 10 students to China and Sweden. While she acknowledged the department's value for its strategic partnership with China, she also noted that the current intake of students for 2025 was relatively small. "As the National Skills Fund, we also like to increase the number to the numbers that we previously had. I think pre-Covid we had more than 50 students who were based in China. Our commitment is that we really want to increase the number of young South Africans who are keen to become part of the global economy," she said.
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
US tariff an existential threat for a third of metals and engineering sector
The effect of the US tariff on South African goods could cause many job losses in the metals and engineering sector and cause companies to close. The US tariff imposed on goods from South Africa exported to the United States poses an existential threat for some companies in the metals and engineering sector, according to a survey among SEIFSA member companies that showed 33.3% of companies in this sector are affected. The US announced a 30% import tariff on South African exports that will come into effect on Friday. This development prompted widespread concern in the South African metals and engineering sector, which relies on the US for approximately 8% of its total output. The Steel and Engineering Industries Federation of Southern Africa (SEIFSA) then conducted a snap survey across its membership base to assess the likely implications. SEIFSA received 126 responses from member companies and used it to compile an initial report on the impact of US tariffs on the metals and engineering sector. This report combines the quantitative as well as the qualitative feedback received and identifies the direct and indirect effects on companies, the market alternatives considered and notable initial perspectives emerging from the sector. ALSO READ: Act now to absorb impact of Trump tariffs on SA vehicle manufacturing sector – BLSA US tariffs in the metals and engineering sector According to the report, the self-reported exposure to the US tariffs can be categorised like this: Directly affected (revenue/job losses): 33.3% Indirectly affected (supply chain/economy): 23.8% Exploring alternative markets: 15.9% Uncertain about impact: 14.3% Unaffected: 12.7% Tafadzwa Chibanguza, CEO designate of SEIFSA, says these figures show that while not every respondent is directly exposed to the tariff, the majority anticipate either direct or cascading economic consequences which demonstrates the interconnectedness of the metals and engineering ecosystem. According to the survey, 71.1% of the respondents operate in the downstream value chain, while 13.3% operate in other value chains, 9.4% in the midstream (fabrication, processing and casting) and 6.3% upstream in metal production. Only 34.9% of the respondents export directly to the US, while 11.6% export indirectly through a value chain and 53.5% do not export to the US at all. Among those that do export to the US, 72.4% said up to 25% of their total sales are to the US, while 18.4% said it is the case for 26% to 50% of their exports, 51%-75% for 3.5% of the respondents and 76% to 100% for 5.8% of the respondents who export to the US. When the respondents were asked if they have long-term contracts with US-based customers that could be affected, 27.3% said yes, while 64.8% said no and 7.8% were not sure. Asked about their company's anticipated response or outcome as a result of the tariffs, these were their answers: What worries companies about US tariffs The respondents also gave these open-ended responses A significant number of respondents reported that the new tariffs would have severe and immediate consequences for their businesses. Many companies anticipate a dramatic drop in sales, with some stating that the US accounts for up to 20% of their turnover. The expected revenue declines are estimated at 10–20%. Several respondents indicated that if the tariffs persist, they would be forced to reduce their workforce or even close operations. In addition, some companies had to reconsider or halt planned investments. One notable case involved the redirection of equipment and production intended for the United States to another subsidiary, leading to the effective shutdown of a new South African facility. Manufacturers also expressed concerns about production uncertainty, especially where their product offerings are specifically tailored to US market demand. While some companies acknowledged the existence of alternative markets, most noted that these are limited and already under pressure. Asian suppliers, particularly from China, are aggressively pricing into African markets, making it difficult to shift exports regionally. Furthermore, protectionist policies in other countries have made export diversification even more challenging. Several companies reported a trade diversion effect, where redirected global supply chains have led to increased competition from lower-priced imports in key third markets, eroding South African competitiveness. Even companies not directly exporting to the US are bracing for spillover effects. Suppliers to exporters are anticipating reduced orders, while increased global steel prices and constrained access to key materials are expected to raise input costs. Respondents also flagged broader macroeconomic concerns, including rising inflation, decreased gross domestic product and worsening unemployment. There is a general sense of uncertainty, with companies citing delayed orders, client hesitation and investor risk aversion as immediate consequences. ALSO READ: 'It's just gone' – Trump's tariffs cost SA company R750m overnight US tariff responses from the metals and engineering sector These notable observations emerged from the responses: While some companies reported being unaffected, others described the tariffs as an existential threat, underscoring the uneven exposure within the sector. There were multiple calls for government intervention through export diversification incentives, financial support and stronger trade diplomacy. Some respondents criticised broader industrial policy frameworks, arguing that structural issues, such as high labour costs and electricity tariffs already undermined competitiveness before the tariffs were imposed. Lastly, one respondent highlighted the adverse impact on emerging green technology, noting that its unique energy-efficient product, which showed great promise, is now facing reduced demand due to the tariff-related uncertainty. Chibanguza says these responses show that the 30% US tariff is expected to have a significant and multidimensional impact on the South African metals and engineering sector. 'While not all companies are directly affected, the broader ecosystem, including suppliers, customers and competitors, face serious disruption.' ALSO READ: Concern about SA steel industry: Trump's tariffs and ArcelorMittal closure looming
