Splitgate 2 Boss Says $80 Skin Bundle 'Slipped Through The Cracks'
One item in particular, an $80 skin bundle called Nano Swarm, quickly made the rounds. While Proulx talked on stage at Geoff Keighley's showcase about his love of old Halo LAN parties and wanting Titanfall 3, his free-to-play arena shooter was plastered with expensive microtransactions and about to get a new battle royale mode, undercutting his critiques of other modern live-service games like Black Ops 6. A silver-colored portal animation from the Nano Swarm bundle alone was originally priced at $34.
Proulx has been taking the opportunity to keep posting through the controversy over the weekend, including slashing the prices on all cosmetics and releasing short video diaries updating players on the status of 1047's post-launch priorities for Splitgate 2. 'I've had a lot of people ask me, 'How the hell did this happen in the first place, like an $80 bundle, that's not the 1047 way?'' he said. 'I agree and I thought I would just candidly tell you exactly what happened. So I'll start by saying no excuse of course like I should have been on this, we should have been on top of this.
He contionued:
The second I got off that stage I called Derek our lead game designer and I said 'Derek did you know we had an $80 bundle, this is news to me, like what the heck, that makes no sense,' and he didn't. Essentially what happened out former head of monetization who happened to come from call of duty was with us for less than a year and was very aggressive on price.
Actually prior to his departure we actually originally had founders packs for $100 and battle passes for $10 and the first thing Derek and I did when we revaluated everything a month ago was slash those things so founders went from $100 to $60 and we actually added in game currently that the game originally wasn't going to have we decreased the battle pass from $10 to $5 but unfortunately things slipped through the cracks.
In addition to shifting the blame to a past employee and once again trying to beef with Call of Duty, Proulx's explanation doesn't entirely square with the studio's defending of the pricey cosmetics just days prior. 'This pack features our most unique skins with complex animations & artwork,' the official Splitgate 2 account posted back on Friday. 'We have a variety of cheaper options. The game is free to play, & you don't need to buy anything to enjoy it to its fullest. Nothing is pay to win & never will be.'
So did the bundle 'slip through the cracks,' or is 1047 just backtracking now in the face of players revolting against a hostile monetization strategy that violates the 'old school' ethos Splitgate 2 wants to cultivate? People have pointed out on the subreddit that the problem isn't just that the prices started out to high. The shooter's in-game shop is also full of slimy practices like fake inflated discounts and currency mismatches so players always have to overspend to get what they want.
'Honestly, the store and its prices really feel like something out of a gacha game, except for the fact I don't think I know of any gachas that have you preorder [battle] passes,' wrote one player. 'Great gameplay, terrible business model,' wrote another.
Splitgate 2 is currently sitting at mixed reviews on Steam, though Proulx said the free-to-play shooter reached over 2 million players over the weekend. We'll see if the sequel can stick around longer than its predecessor did.
.
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle campaign is part of a wider cultural backlash
Actress Sydney Sweeney is once again embroiled in controversy. This time the debate isn't centred around Sweeney selling soaps infused with her bathwater or posting pictures of MAGA-inspired red caps. Instead, the Euphoria star is making rounds for her role in a contentious ad campaign with American Eagle Outfitters. While the entire campaign sparked debate online, one particular ad has drawn especially intense criticism. In it, Sweeney lounges artfully on a chaise while fastening a pair of American Eagle jeans. In a breathy voiceover, she says, 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair colour, personality and even eye colour.' As the camera slowly pans upward and she turns her eyes toward the viewer, Sweeney concludes, 'My jeans are blue.' Commentators and social media users have argued the campaign serves as a conservative dog whistle, conveying thinly veiled support for white supremacy and eugenics. American Eagle released a statement defending the ad on August 1, writing ''Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans,' on Instagram. Innocent marketing or intentional dog whistle? Eugenics is a discredited ideology rooted in white supremacy and scientific racism. It promotes the false belief that racial groupings are biologically determined, and that some groups are genetically superior to others and should selectively reproduce to preserve their 'good genes.' Historically, the end goal of eugenics has been to eliminate so-called 'bad genes' — often associated with non-white, disabled, poor or otherwise marginalized communities — so social elites can maintain their dominance. Fashion advertising playing on eugenic themes has a long history. Commentators have gestured to similarities between the Sweeney ad and the infamous 1980s campaign for Calvin Klein featuring a then-15-year-old Brooke Shields, who rolls around in her Calvins while talking about genetic codes, evolution and survival of the fittest — language evocative of eugenic thinking. The American Eagle campaign appears to be a direct homage to the Calvin campaign, but is rhetoric reminiscent of eugenics really something we want to reference in marketing? The return of 'traditional' femininity The American Eagle campaign is pointedly titled 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans,' with 'jeans' sometimes swapped out for 'genes.' It's clearly meant to be tongue-in-cheek. But this is not just a harmless ad. If the campaign didn't reflect broader cultural tensions, neither U.S. President Donald Trump nor Sen. Ted Cruz would have commented on it. 'The crazy Left has come out against beautiful women,' Cruz wrote in a tweet about the controversy. A right-wing media outlet went further, claiming body positivity was bringing 'the giggling blonde with an amazing rack … to the brink of extinction.' With its celebration of Sweeney's conventionally attractive appearance, American Eagle has reintroduced the 'traditional' feminine figure loudly and proudly. In this sense, the campaign symbolizes a changing of the cultural tides: out with body positivity, in with the 'amazing rack' and all it signifies. In our present cultural moment saturated with conservative messaging, Sweeney — a young, thin, white and sexualized Hollywood star — is hardly a surprising figure to hear extolling the quality of her 'genes' (sorry, jeans). Read more: From the rise of tradwife influencers and SkinnyTokers to the ritualized feminine performance of 'morning shedders,' the campaign lands squarely within a broader revival of regressive feminine ideals wrapped in aspirational, white-washed beauty. Exorcising self-love from the corporate agenda As a feminist media scholar interested in the intersection of pop culture and the far right, my ongoing research explores the rise of anti-feminism and right-wing politics. We are no longer in the age of popular feminism, when corporations eagerly appropriated feminist rhetoric to sell their products and services. In its place, brands are reverting to traditional imagery: thin, white women styled for the male gaze — a term referring to the objectification and sexualization of women in popular media, from film and television to fashion ads. It's a strategy that has long worked for them, and it's one they're glad is back in vogue. The aesthetic regression encapsulated in the Sweeney American Eagle campaign reveals what many critics suspected all along: the corporate embrace of feminism was never sincere. Read more: Campaigns touting 'love your body,' 'empowerment,' and 'confidence' in the late 2010s and early 2020s were intentionally designed to court progressive consumers and profit from the popularity of feminism. The core business model of these corporations — sell insecurities and reap profits for shareholders — had not fundamentally changed. If anything, as other scholars argue, self-love marketing encouraged women to not only upgrade their bodies but also their minds. It was no longer culturally acceptable that women look good; they had to also feel good about their bodies. That standard required more work and, of course, products, which brands happily supplied. Spurred on by an increasingly conservative political climate, many brands are no longer shy about expressing their motives. Thin is back in and whiteness is re-associated with rightness. Living through the cultural backlash As I have argued elsewhere, we are currently living in backlash times. In her 1991 book, journalist Susan Faludi wrote that backlash is 'a recurring phenomenon' that 'returns every time women begin to make some headway toward equality.' Although many news articles are describing a consumer 'backlash' to the Sweeney American Eagle campaign, I'm referring to something different: the rise of a cultural backlash against progressive social movements and politics. This backlash is currently taking shape across political, legal and economic domains, and it goes beyond a single ad. Today's current backlash is a reaction to popular feminism, Black Lives Matter, DEI and incisive systemic analyses found in feminist, anti-racist and queer scholarship and activism. The Sweeney campaign is just one expression of this larger pattern. Faludi shrewdly observed that 'images of the restrained women line the walls of the popular culture's gallery' during periods of backlash. That insight feels newly relevant. Just days after American Eagle dropped its campaign, Kim Kardashian's company SKIMS released their 'sculpt face wraps' — a product designed to give users a more 'sculpted' jawline. On the SKIMS website, product images show women ensnared in products that resemble Hannibal Lecter's famous mask or a surgical brace. They are disconcerting, to say the least. If Faludi has taught us anything, it's that a trend of images showing women restrained — physically or to rigidly defined roles — are not only harbingers of a menacing future, but are indicative of a chilling present that we must recognize to resist. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organisation bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Meaghan Furlano, Western University Read more: Girls' voices are needed to tackle misogyny and the manosphere – but they are being ignored Misogyny has become a political strategy — here's how the pandemic helped make it happen How Trump's racist talk of immigrant 'bad genes' echoes some of the last century's darkest ideas about eugenics Meaghan Furlano does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kristi Noem Calls ‘South Park' Portrayal of Her Sexist and ‘So Lazy'
The latest episode depicts the DHS Secretary repeatedly murdering dogs - and heavily botoxed Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem isn't a fan of how she was depicted on Wednesday's episode of 'South Park.' Speaking to CNN, Noem didn't note any objection to the main part of the portrayal — her fictional counterpart on a crazed, puppy-murdering spree. Instead she objected to the show's commentary on her personal aesthetics. 'It's so lazy, it constantly makes fun of women for how they look. Only the liberals and the extremists do that,' Noem said while calling into CNN. 'If they wanted to criticize my job, go ahead and do that, but clearly they can't. They just pick something petty like that.' More from TheWrap 'Wednesday' Creators Unpack the Twisty Season 2 Part 1 Ending Seth Meyers Calls Trump a 'Checked-Out Freshman' Amid Focus on White House Ballroom | Video Is 'Real Time With Bill Maher' New Tonight? The Plan for New Paramount: 7 Things We Learned From Talking to David Ellison and His Exec Team If you haven't yet seen the episode, the b-plot sees Noem repeatedly murdering puppies while her makeup team struggles to maintain her botoxed face, which keeps collapsing. It's a reference to her autobiography, where she reveals she once killed a dog in a fit of anger, a story she seemed to think reflected well on her, as well as a reference to her very well-documented 'MAGA makeover.' Meanwhile, the 'South Park' portrayal continues the puppy-murdering subplot to the point where Noem kills Krypto, the dog from 'Superman,' and then into the ending credits, where Noem is last seen entering a pet store with her rifle. The post Kristi Noem Calls 'South Park' Portrayal of Her Sexist and 'So Lazy' appeared first on TheWrap. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Kristi Noem Calls ‘South Park' Portrayal of Her Sexist and ‘So Lazy'
The latest episode depicts the DHS Secretary repeatedly murdering dogs - and heavily botoxed Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem isn't a fan of how she was depicted on Wednesday's episode of 'South Park.' Speaking to CNN, Noem didn't note any objection to the main part of the portrayal — her fictional counterpart on a crazed, puppy-murdering spree. Instead she objected to the show's commentary on her personal aesthetics. 'It's so lazy, it constantly makes fun of women for how they look. Only the liberals and the extremists do that,' Noem said while calling into CNN. 'If they wanted to criticize my job, go ahead and do that, but clearly they can't. They just pick something petty like that.' More from TheWrap Kristi Noem Calls 'South Park' Portrayal of Her Sexist and 'So Lazy' Gina Carano Thanks Elon Musk for Funding Her Lawsuit After Disney Settlement: 'Good Samaritan Deed' 'Chimp Crazy' Subject Tonia Haddix Sentenced to 46 Months in Prison After Faking Prized Ape's Death New Paramount President Jeff Shell Says Real Estate Assets Are 'On the Table' for Possible Sale, but Not Hollywood Lot If you haven't yet seen the episode, the b-plot sees Noem repeatedly murdering puppies while her makeup team struggles to maintain her botoxed face, which keeps collapsing. It's a reference to her autobiography, where she reveals she once killed a dog in a fit of anger, a story she seemed to think reflected well on her, as well as a reference to her very well-documented 'MAGA makeover.' Meanwhile, the 'South Park' portrayal continues the puppy-murdering subplot to the point where Noem kills Krypto, the dog from 'Superman,' and then into the ending credits, where Noem is last seen entering a pet store with her rifle. The post Kristi Noem Calls 'South Park' Portrayal of Her Sexist and 'So Lazy' appeared first on TheWrap.
