logo
ICE may deport some migrants to ‘third countries' without assurances they won't be tortured, memo says

ICE may deport some migrants to ‘third countries' without assurances they won't be tortured, memo says

NBC News4 days ago
The Trump administration may deport immigrants to a country where they have no connections, in some cases with as little as six hours' notice and without assurances from the destination country that the deported individuals 'will not be persecuted or tortured,' according to a new memo from a top immigration official.
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo, which says the policy is "effective immediately," was issued July 9 by acting Director Todd Lyons. It provides guidance to ICE employees on how to deport people to countries other than their country of origin and, 'in exigent circumstances,' even if there's a risk they will be persecuted or tortured there.
'If the United States has received diplomatic assurances from the country of removal that aliens removed from the United States will not be persecuted or tortured, and if the Department of State believes those assurances to be credible, the alien may be removed without the need for further procedures,' said the memo, which was first reported by The Washington Post and became public Tuesday in court filings.
Lyons wrote that 'in all other cases' where the United States has not received those assurances, ICE must comply with several procedures, including that an ICE officer will serve the immigrant with a notice of removal that lists what country the federal government intends to deport them to in a language that the immigrant understands; will not affirmatively ask whether the person is afraid of being sent to that country; and will wait at least 24 hours before removing the person from the U.S.
But 'in exigent circumstances,' Lyons wrote, the officer may deport the person in as little as six hours as long as the person is 'provided reasonable means and opportunity to speak with an attorney.'
Immigrants who could be subject to the policy include those who have been given final orders of removal but in which a judge has found they would still be at risk of persecution or torture if deported from the Unites States, as well as those who come from countries where the U.S. lacks diplomatic relations or an established ability to send deportees to those countries, such as Cuba.
Though ICE officers are told not to ask migrants if they are afraid of deportation to a third country, those who do state such a fear will will be referred for screening for possible protection within 24 hours, according to the memo. That screening could lead to the migrant being referred to immigration court for further proceedings or ICE possibly trying to send them to a different country than they one which they express fear of being deported to.
Trina Realmuto, the executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, which is involved in a federal lawsuit challenging the deportations of migrants to countries other than their own, said in a statement to NBC News that the memo establishes a policy that 'blatantly disregards the requirements required by statute, regulation, and the Constitution.'
She said the memo means there will be 'no process whatsoever when the government claims to have credible diplomatic assurances' for immigrants who are to be deported to third countries. Those assurances, she added, 'are unlawful' because they don't protect deportees from persecution or torture at the hands of non-state actors and because they violate legal requirements establishing that they be individualized and that migrants have the chance to review and rebut them.
Realmuto also criticized the government for not publicly sharing what countries it has obtained diplomatic assurances from and what those countries got in exchange.
The rest of the policy is 'woefully deficient,' she said.
'It provides a mere between 6- and 24-hours' notice before deportation to a third country, which is simply not enough time for any person to assess whether they would be persecuted or tortured in that third country, especially if they don't know anything about the country or don't have a lawyer,' Realmuto said.
In a statement to NBC News on Tuesday, before the memo became public, the Department of Homeland Security said the agency has 'successfully negotiated nearly a dozen safe third country agreements.'
'If countries aren't receiving their own citizens, other countries have agreed that they would take them. It is incredibly important to make sure we get these worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens out of our country,' Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in the statement. 'That is why these agreements, which ensure due process under the U.S. Constitution, are so essential to the safety of our homeland and the American people.'
The ICE memo follows a Supreme Court ruling in June that allows the Trump administration to deport immigrants to countries to which they have no previous connection.
That ruling put on hold a federal judge's order that said convicted criminals should have a 'meaningful opportunity' to bring claims that they would be at risk of torture, persecution or death if they were sent to countries the administration has made deals with to receive deported migrants.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a dissenting opinion that the court was 'rewarding lawlessness' by allowing the administration to violate immigrants' due process rights.
The fact that 'thousands will suffer violence in far-flung locales' is less important to the conservative majority than the 'remote possibility' that the federal judge had exceeded his authority, Sotomayor said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine's Zelenskiy offers Russia more talks next week
Ukraine's Zelenskiy offers Russia more talks next week

Reuters

time27 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Ukraine's Zelenskiy offers Russia more talks next week

KYIV, July 19 (Reuters) - Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Saturday that Kyiv has sent Moscow an offer to hold another round of peace talks next week, and that he wanted to speed up negotiations for a ceasefire. Ukraine and Russia have held two rounds of talks in Istanbul over the past five months. They have agreed to swap prisoners but made no breakthroughs in ending almost three and a half years of conflict that started with Russia's 2022 invasion. "Everything should be done to achieve a ceasefire," Zelenskiy said in his evening address to the nation. "The Russian side should stop hiding from decisions," he added. The president said Rustem Umerov, who headed the Ukrainian delegation at both talks in Istanbul, had sent the Russian side the offer to hold the meeting next week, but gave no more details. Umerov, a former defence minister, was appointed last week as the head of the National Security and Defence Council and tasked with adding more momentum to the negotiations. Russia has been pressing a grinding offensive along the eastern front in Ukraine's Donetsk region. It has repeatedly said it is ready for a new round of talks but has not backed down from what Kyiv and its allies describe as its maximalist war aims. U.S. President Donald Trump, who has sharpened his tone against Russia in recent weeks amid worsening air strikes on Ukrainian cities, threatened harsher sanctions on Russia earlier this month if a peace deal was not reached within 50 days.

NATO scrambles war planes as Putin launches savage new strike on Ukraine - but dictator sees his capital Moscow hit in revenge
NATO scrambles war planes as Putin launches savage new strike on Ukraine - but dictator sees his capital Moscow hit in revenge

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

NATO scrambles war planes as Putin launches savage new strike on Ukraine - but dictator sees his capital Moscow hit in revenge

NATO was forced to scramble war planes over Poland overnight as Vladimir Putin launched a fresh wave of deadly strikes on Ukraine. Russia staged a five-hour missile and drone onslaught on the strategic city of Pavlohrad - in the worst attack it has suffered during the three-year war. A fire station in the city was destroyed, with damage to industrial enterprises and a five-story residential building. Meanwhile, one woman was killed and three people were wounded after a nine-storey apartment block was struck in Odesa. Putin, however, saw his capital Moscow targeted by strikes for the third night in a row following Donald Trump 's reported advice to pressure the Kremlin. Videos showed a series of explosion across the city and in Dmitrov, drone debris damaged a high-voltage power line. Explosions were also heard in the Moscow suburbs of Odintsovo, Solnechnogorsk, Istra and Zelenograd. One eyewitness was heard saying: 'There it flies! Shoot it down, damn it! Damn it, shoot it down! Yes! ****!' Another said: 'Damn, this is crazy.' In Rostov, Ukrainian strikes caused massive train disruption on the Moscow–Rostov-on-Don mainline, a key military supply route. In response to the intense strikes on Ukraine, which involved more than 400 drones, NATO fighters were scrambled from military air bases. 'Due to another attack by the Russian Federation targeting targets located in Ukrainian territory, air operations have commenced in our airspace,' it was said in an announcement from the armed forces operation command in Poland. 'Duty fighter pairs have been scrambled, and ground-based air defence and radar reconnaissance systems have been brought to the highest level of alert.' The statement continued: 'The measures taken are aimed at ensuring security in areas bordering the threatened areas.' It came just hours after Putin's crony Dmitry Medvedev warned that strikes on Ukraine would only intensify. In a post raging against new Western sanctions, the deputy chairman of Russia's security council declared: 'We should also pursue maximum disengagement from the EU and its most odious members. 'These now include not just the pathetic Balts, insolent Finns, Poles, whose partition was somehow left unfinished, and Brits, stewing in their own filth, but also Germany and France, whose leaders clearly aspire to the legacy of the Third Reich and the Vichy regime.' Last night's attacks follow reports that Trump had quizzed President Zelensky on why he has chosen not to strike to Moscow. 'We can if you give us the weapons,' Zelensky reportedly replied, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile, earlier this month Trump announced he would send Patriot air defense system to Ukraine to bolster the country's defence capabilities. The decision came as the US-president blasted Putin as 'two faced', saying that 'he talks nice, then bombs everybody'. Trump said: 'We will send them Patriots, which they desperately need, because Putin really surprised a lot of people. 'He talks nice and then bombs everybody in the evening. But there's a little bit of a problem there. I don't like it. 'We basically are going to send them various pieces of very sophisticated military equipment. 'They are going to pay us 100 percent for that, and that's the way we want it.' Trump's deployment of the missiles marked a U-turn from how he campaigned on an 'America First' platform.

Travelers to the U.S. must pay a new $250 ‘visa integrity fee' — what to know
Travelers to the U.S. must pay a new $250 ‘visa integrity fee' — what to know

NBC News

time2 hours ago

  • NBC News

Travelers to the U.S. must pay a new $250 ‘visa integrity fee' — what to know

Visitors to the United States will need to pay a 'visa integrity fee,' according to a provision of the Trump administration's recently enacted One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The fee applies to all visitors who need nonimmigrant visas to enter, and cannot be waived. However travelers may also be able to get the fees reimbursed, according to the provision. Details about the new requirement are scant, which has resulted in 'significant challenges and unanswered questions regarding implementation,' a spokesperson from the U.S. Travel Association told CNBC Travel. However, here is what is known thus far. How much is the fee? The fee will be at least $250 during the U.S. fiscal year 2025, which runs from Oct. 1, 2024, to Sept. 30, 2025. However, the secretary of Homeland Security is free to set the fee higher, according to the provision. Thereafter, the visa integrity fee will be adjusted for inflation. Who must pay the new fee? The 'visa integrity fee' applies to all visitors who need nonimmigrant visas, which includes tourists, business travelers and international students. When is the fee paid? The fee is paid when the visa is issued, according to the provision. Thus, visitors whose visa requests are denied will not be charged. Does the fee replace other visa fees? No, the provision states that the new fee is 'in addition to' other fees, including regular visa fees. 'For example, an H-1B worker already paying a $205 application fee may now expect to pay a total of $455 once this fee is in place,' Steven A. Brown, a partner at the Houston-based immigration law firm Reddy Neumann Brown PC, wrote in a post on his firm's website. Additionally, the fee must be paid on top of a 'Form I-94 fee,' which the One Big Beautiful Bill Act increased from $6 to $24. That fee must be paid by anyone who is required to submit a Form I-94 arrival and departure record, which applies to most travelers. How can travelers get reimbursed? To get their money back, visa holders must comply with the conditions of the visa, which includes 'not accept[ing] unauthorized employment,' and not overstay the visa validity date by more than five days, according to the provision. Reimbursements will be made after the travel visa expires, it says. What isn't known The fee has not yet been implemented, according to Brown. It is not clear when it will begin. 'I believe it would need a regulation, or at least a notice in the Federal Register, regarding implementation on collection,' said Brown. It is also unclear how travelers will pay the fee, the U.S. Travel Association told CNBC. 'The bill directs the DHS Secretary to charge the fee, but DHS does not own the visa application, issuance or renewal process — so where and when would DHS collect the fee?' the spokesperson said. In response to CNBC's enquires, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said: 'The visa integrity fee requires cross-agency coordination before implementation.' More questions surround how and when the reimbursement process kicks in. Since many visas are valid for several years, the U.S. Congressional Budget Office said it expects 'a small number of people would seek reimbursement.' Moreover, 'CBO expects that the Department of State would need several years to implement a process for providing reimbursements. On that basis, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase revenues and decrease the deficit by $28.9 billion over the 2025‑2034 period.' Brown said he is advising clients to treat the fee as nonrefundable. 'If you get it back, great. But it is usually difficult to get money back from the government,' he said. 'I would rather them view it as a 'bonus' if they get the refund.' The purpose of the fee 'President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill provides the necessary policies and resources to restore integrity in our nation's immigration system,' a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told CNBC. Data shows most visa holders comply with their visa terms. For the fiscal years between 2016 and 2022, between 1%-2% of nonimmigrant visitors overstayed their visas in the United States, according to the U.S. Congressional Research Service. However, an estimated 42% of the approximately 11 million unauthorized population living in the United States entered the country legally, but overstayed their period of admission, the data shows. Effect on incoming travelers Brown said the visa integrity fee will likely impact B visa holders — or leisure and business travelers — and international students more than other types of travelers. 'For B visa holders, they may not want to add an additional $250 per person to their trip costs,' he said. The new fee, plus the I-94 fee, come as the United States prepares to host several major events in 2026, including the 'America 250' celebration, in honor of the country's 250th anniversary, and parts of the FIFA World Cup. These hurdles are compounded by problems at Brand USA, the destination marketing organization that promotes inbound travel into the United States, which saw the One Big Beautiful Bill Act slash its funding from $100 million to $20 million. The cuts came after the U.S. Commerce Department fired nearly half of Brand USA's board members in April. In a statement, Fred Dixon, the organization's president and CEO, said it is 'disappointed' with the cuts yet hopeful that the funds will be restored for the fiscal year 2026. 'We remain focused on growing legitimate international inbound travel and the vital boost it provides to the U.S. economy,' he said. Ahead of the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, U.S. Travel Association President and CEO Geoff Freeman praised the bill's contributions to U.S. infrastructure, air traffic control and border security.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store