&w=3840&q=100)
AAIB chief slams 'premature' foreign media reports on Air India crash
This is the first public statement by Yugandhar since the June 12 crash of Air India's Boeing 787-8 aircraft (registration VT-ANB), which killed 241 of the 242 people onboard. Titled 'Appeal', his statement came hours after The Wall Street Journal published a report that pointed to the captain, Sumeet Sabharwal, turning off fuel switches moments before the crash.
Citing people familiar with the U.S. side of the investigation, WSJ said cockpit voice recordings indicate Sabharwal moved the fuel control switches to the "cutoff" position after take-off — triggering a surprised and panicked response from the first officer, Clive Kunder.
The WSJ report said the U.S. assessment was based on black box data and speculated on whether Sabharwal's actions were deliberate or accidental. It added that such details could lead U.S. authorities to examine potential criminal liability, had the crash occurred on American soil.
Yugandhar on Thursday evening said: 'It is essential to respect the sensitivity of the loss faced by family members of deceased passengers, crew of the aircraft and other deceased persons on ground.'
'It has come to our attention that certain sections of the international media are repeatedly attempting to draw conclusions through selective and unverified reporting. Such actions are irresponsible, especially while the investigation remains ongoing,' he stated.
The AAIB had released its preliminary report on July 12, which revealed that fuel supply to both engines was cut off shortly after take-off. The two fuel control switches were moved to the 'cutoff' position in quick succession, and although they were turned back on about 10 seconds later, the engines had already flamed out. The report stated that one pilot asked the other why he moved the switches, and the other responded by denying it. The report did not identify who said what. The AAIB report did not rule out technical faults, and said aviation medicine and psychology experts were involved in the ongoing probe.
'The purpose of the AAIB's investigation and preliminary report is to provide information about what happened. At this stage, it is too early to reach any definite conclusions,' Yugandhar said on Thursday, urging the public and media to refrain from 'spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process.'
He stressed that the AAIB was investigating the crash 'in a rigorous and most professional manner' under the Aircraft (Investigation of Accidents and Incidents) Rules, 2017, which govern India's obligations under international aviation protocols, notably ICAO's Annex 13. These rules lay down procedures for impartial, non-criminal investigations focused on safety improvement rather than blame.
Yugandhar also underlined AAIB's track record, noting that it had investigated 92 accidents and 111 serious incidents since its inception in 2012. He called the AI171 crash 'the most devastating accident in recent aviation history' and said it had 'understandably drawn public attention and shock,' but this was not the time 'to create public anxiety or angst towards safety of the Indian aviation industry, particularly on the basis of unfounded facts.'
He stated: 'AAIB appeals to all concerned to await publication of the Final Investigation Report after completion of the investigation. AAIB will also publish updates as and when required which have technical and public interest.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
22 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Air India plane crash probe: Captain RS Sandhu appointed domain expert
Veteran pilot and former Air India director of operations Captain RS Sandhu has been appointed as a domain expert by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) in the ongoing probe into the Ahmedabad plane crash, sources told PTI on Sunday. Sandhu, who was also a designated examiner for the Boeing 787-8 fleet at Air India, had taken delivery of the now-crashed 787-8 plane—VT-ANB—in 2013. Air India flight AI171, which crashed minutes after take-off on June 12, killed 260 people — 241 on board and 19 on the ground. 'AAIB has onboarded seasoned aviator RS Sandhu in the ongoing investigation of the Air India Boeing 787-8 plane crash in Ahmedabad last month,' one of the sources told PTI. Sandhu, who was with Air India for nearly 39 years in various capacities, is the founder of aviation consultancy firm Aviazione. He had also headed a team that worked on the integration of the Tata group airlines. The investigation of the plane crash has come under controversy after The Wall Street Journal reported that their source had heard the audio recording recovered from the plane, in which the junior pilot can be heard asking the senior pilot about switching off the fuel supply. Notably, the preliminary findings of the investigation have suggested that the plane crashed due to an issue with the fuel supply switch. Following the reports, pilots have raised concerns over the issue, and later Air India clarified that the fuel switches of all their Boeing Dreamliner aircraft—the same model involved in the Ahmedabad plane crash—are functioning properly. The aircraft manufacturer Boeing has also come under the radar of the controversy, and a 2024 report has resurfaced after the crash, in which a deceased whistleblower—a former Boeing employee—warned that the manufacturing facility of the Dreamliner 787 was plagued by 'shoddy work practices and poor oversight.' [ With inputs from PTI ]
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Aviation Minister slams Western media for speculative reporting on Air India Boeing crash probe
New Delhi: Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu Kinjarapu on Sunday said the government will wait for the final report on the investigation into the Air India Boeing crash before making any comments, even as he slammed the Western media for its slanted coverage of the tragic incident. He urged the Western media to avoid speculation on the cause of the Air India crash and praised the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) for successfully decoding the black box data in India. 'AAIB has made an appeal to all, especially Western media houses, which may have a vested interest in the kind of articles they are trying to publish,' the minister said. 'I believe in AAIB. They have done a wonderful job in decoding the whole black box and getting the data out in India itself,' the minister said. 'It was a huge success for us because in previous incidents, whenever the black box was seen to be damaged, it was always sent abroad to get the data out. But this is the first time that AAIB has successfully decoded everything. The preliminary report has also been prepared,' Naidu pointed out. The minister stated that making any comments until the final report comes is not a good exercise for anyone. The government is being very cautious and studying the report thoroughly, and whatever necessary steps are required in terms of safety would be implemented, he added. 'Regarding the incident and investigation, we have to wait for the final report before we say anything,' the minister said. Meanwhile, the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Chairperson Jennifer Homendy also stated that recent media reports on the crash of an Air India Boeing Dreamliner that killed over 260 people were premature and speculative. A report in the Wall Street Journal, which was followed up by another by Reuters news agency, was seen to be biased against the pilots in trying to pin the blame on them for the crash, even though no such conclusion has been reached in the investigation at this point. Homendy said investigations of this magnitude take time, and that the NTSB will continue to support AAIB's ongoing probe. This came following AAIB's public appeal issued on Thursday (July 17), noting a strong appeal to the public and media, raising concerns about 'selective and unverified reporting' by certain international outlets in the aftermath of the crash. 'It is essential to respect the sensitivity of the loss faced by family members of deceased passengers, crew of the aircraft and other deceased persons on the ground. It has come to our attention that certain sections of the international media are repeatedly attempting to draw conclusions through selective and unverified reporting. Such actions are irresponsible, especially while the investigation remains ongoing. We urge both the public and the media to refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process,' AAIB said in a letter. The Bureau clarified that at this stage, 'it is too early to reach any definite conclusions,' and the final report will be published only after the investigation is complete, including the identification of 'root causes and recommendations'.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Court orders probe into custodial irregularities by police in celebratory firing case
1 2 Panchkula: In a case involving celebratory firing and alleged custodial misconduct, the sub-divisional judicial magistrate (SDJM) of Kalka, Abhimanyu Rajput, has directed the police commissioner to initiate a departmental inquiry and submit an action-taken report. The court's intervention follows serious procedural lapses in the investigation and treatment of the accused. The case surfaced after a video circulated on social media showed 18-year-old Parvesh Sharma allegedly firing a weapon during panchayat election celebrations on the night of June 16-17. He was booked under Section 288 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, and Section 25(9) of the Arms Act, 1959, and later granted bail. His co-accused, Neeraj, was arrested with a country-made .12-bore "katta," prompting the addition of more serious charges. However, during the July 18 hearing, the court found that the investigating officer failed to justify the application of Section 27(2) of the Arms Act, which pertains to prohibited arms. Neither the IO nor the SHO could confirm whether the weapon was automatic or military-grade. Further, Neeraj was not lodged in Central Jail, Ambala, as directed, and alleged custodial assault. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo He was presented in court without a medical exam, and a medico-legal report was only prepared after judicial intervention. The court granted him interim bail on a ₹20,000 personal bond and ordered preservation of CCTV footage from July 15 to 17. In a related development, Parvesh's counsel, Deepanshu Bansal, revealed that his client suffered four injuries in custody and was re-arrested despite bail. The court termed the arrest illegal and ordered a fresh medical examination. The court has also directed that allegations of custodial torture be reported to the sessions judge, in line with a 2019 Punjab and Haryana High Court directive. BOX: Injuries to the accused Quoting the court-ordered medical report, Deepanshu Bansal, counsel for Parvesh (18), stated that he suffered four injuries in custody. He was re-arrested even after being granted bail. Police said that he was arrested in the same case after some other sections were added. Terming it as an illegal arrest, he was again granted bail, and Panchkula chief medical officer was asked to conduct a medical examination. MSID:: 122783825 413 |
