Kentucky meets Oklahoma in SEC Tournament
Oklahoma Sooners (20-12, 7-12 SEC) vs. Kentucky Wildcats (21-10, 10-8 SEC)
Nashville, Tennessee; Thursday, 9:30 p.m. EDT
BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Wildcats -6.5; over/under is 163.5
BOTTOM LINE: No. 15 Kentucky and Oklahoma meet in the SEC Tournament.
The Wildcats have gone 10-8 against SEC opponents, with an 11-2 record in non-conference play. Kentucky is second in the SEC scoring 85.8 points while shooting 48.5% from the field.
The Sooners are 7-12 against SEC opponents. Oklahoma has a 3-4 record in games decided by less than 4 points.
Kentucky scores 85.8 points, 11.3 more per game than the 74.5 Oklahoma allows. Oklahoma averages 8.6 made 3-pointers per game this season, 0.2 more makes per game than Kentucky allows.
The teams meet for the second time this season. Kentucky won 83-82 in the last matchup on Feb. 27. Otega Oweh led Kentucky with 28 points, and Jalon Moore led Oklahoma with 20 points.
TOP PERFORMERS: Oweh is shooting 49.2% and averaging 16.2 points for the Wildcats. Amari Williams is averaging 12.4 points over the last 10 games.
Jeremiah Fears is averaging 16.7 points, 4.1 assists and 1.6 steals for the Sooners. Moore is averaging 12.2 points over the last 10 games.
LAST 10 GAMES: Wildcats: 6-4, averaging 82.9 points, 31.6 rebounds, 15.5 assists, 7.3 steals and 3.2 blocks per game while shooting 48.4% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 78.1 points per game.
Sooners: 4-6, averaging 76.4 points, 29.0 rebounds, 11.8 assists, 6.7 steals and 1.4 blocks per game while shooting 44.6% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 80.7 points.
___
The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.
The Associated Press
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Paul Finebaum names national championship favorite
Paul Finebaum names national championship favorite SEC college football analyst Paul Finebaum has a clear favorite for the national championship. In an interview with Mike Greenberg on ESPN's show "Get Up", Finebaum agreed that the Texas Longhorns should be the favorites to win the 2025-26 national championship. The first reason Finebaum laid out was the Longhorns' burgeoning junior quarterback. "They have Arch Manning," said Finebaum. "He's expected to be better than Quinn Ewers, and if he'd come in in the Cotton Bowl vs. Ohio State, they may have won that game." Georgia was close to landing Arch Manning, but unfortunately, they lost out to Texas at the very end. Now, Georgia will potentially have to face Arch Manning twice in 2025. The Bulldogs host Texas in Athens, Georgia, this November. The teams could meet again in the SEC championship. Finebaum also cited the transfer portal acquisitions and the easy schedule. "They reloaded in the portal to the tune of many millions of dollars, and I think Texas, other than having to go to Ohio State Week 1, Texas is in good shape," Finebaum continued. Texas had the nation's No. 1 recruiting class and No. 25 transfer class. The Longhorns rebuilt their defensive line through the transfer portal, landing Maraad Watson, Travis Shaw, and Cole Brevard. However, the Longhorns have yet to beat Georgia while in the SEC. Georgia handed Texas two of its three losses in the 2024-25 season, including the SEC championship. The two teams will square off in Week 12 for what could be a de facto SEC championship.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Josh Pate isn't sleeping on Oklahoma's John Mateer
Josh Pate isn't sleeping on Oklahoma's John Mateer The Oklahoma Sooners made a major upgrade at starting quarterback this winter. With former starter Jackson Arnold off to play for the Auburn Tigers, OU had a hole to fill under center. Not only did they fill it, they did so with a player, John Mateer, who is better than any QB the Sooners had on the roster a year ago. In fact, Mateer was the transfer portal's top overall player this year. Oklahoma beat out Miami and North Carolina to land the former Washington State star. After OU was atrocious offensively in 2024, Mateer's arrival gives the Sooners a chance to rebound back to their winning ways in 2025. At least that's what Josh Pate, the host of "Josh Pate's College Football Show", thinks. Because of familiarity with his play-caller and the help of players from multiple top-ten recruiting classes over the past few years, he has Mateer right alongside the best quarterbacks in the entire SEC. "I'm putting John Mateer in the top five," Pate said. "If I'm right, Oklahoma's gonna be a contender in the SEC. I believe in the OC-quarterback approach, bringing both of them in, not just one of them, especially when they're both qualified, and Ben Arbuckle and John Mateer are. I also think it greatly helps that John Mateer is not being brought into Norman, Oklahoma, and then being looked at by everyone down on their knees with their hands clasped praying, 'Please save us John, save us.' No, you don't need to save anyone. You need to go in there and play solid football and execute, make good decisions, because you know what you've got around you? You've got a top-ten roster around you. You've got a really good defense. You don't have to score 42 a game to win, and you've got guys calling plays for you that you're very familiar with. I think he's gonna be really good this year. That's why I've got Oklahoma top ten in the preseason." Sooner Nation has long clamored for complementary football in Norman. For years, OU fans had to watch incredible offenses, led by Heisman Trophy-level quarterbacks, be ultimately let down by bad defenses. The trio of Baker Mayfield, Kyler Murray and Jalen Hurts combined for four College Football Playoff appearances in five seasons from 2015 to 2019, and it was the inability to get stops on defense that, for the most part, sunk those excellent Oklahoma teams in the semifinal round each time. When Brent Venables took over for Lincoln Riley, the hope was that he could change that. In the years since, Venables has built up a defense that looks like it can compete in the SEC. But, just as the defense was getting really good in 2024, Oklahoma's offense fell off a cliff with Seth Littrell and Jackson Arnold at the helm. Complementary football eluded OU yet again. With plenty of returning starters, the Oklahoma defense looks like it has the pieces to be good again. On the other side of the ball, the Arbuckle-Mateer combination hopes to finally bring high-level play on both offense and defense, at the same time, to Norman in 2025. Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow Aaron on X @Aaron_Gelvin.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
The Thunder are now even with the Pacers. Time for the NBA Finals panic meter!
The Bounce Newsletter | This is The Athletic's daily NBA newsletter. Sign up here to receive The Bounce directly in your inbox. Three significant events happened on this date. In 1980, the Celtics set themselves up for immense success by trading the No. 1 overall pick and Rickey Brown to the Warriors for Robert Parish and the third overall pick. Those picks ended up being a Joe Barry Carroll for Kevin McHale swap. Then, on this date in 1985, a 38-year-old Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was unanimously voted the oldest finals MVP ever after beating the Celtics. In 1987, Magic Johnson mimicked Abdul-Jabbar by beating Boston in Game 4 of the Finals with the 'junior, junior sky hook.' Thunder uninterested in a Pacers comeback It's weird how the Pacers have affected the way we watch a playoff game. As the Thunder built their lead, going up by as many as 22 points in the fourth quarter of Game 2, it didn't totally feel reasonable to count out the Pacers. They were having a miserable game, including not shooting the 3-ball with the same success as Game 1. The Pacers weren't able to replicate their success against the players around Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. And they weren't able to dominate on the boards. Indiana was got swallowed up by everything OKC did on both ends of the floor. Advertisement I'm not sure which moment you decided the lead was safe for the Thunder, but they made sure not to leave any doubt this time. There wouldn't be a furious comeback as the Thunder essentially cruised to a 123-107 victory, but I'm not sure any of this felt like smooth sailing. At the same time, it's the Thunder. They put teams away at a historic pace. Remember, they set the record for most double-digit wins in the NBA this season. If you only went off their double-digit victories, they'd have the third-most wins and still be the No. 1 seed in the West. The Thunder solved a lot of the problems from Game 1: All of this made Gilgeous-Alexander's job easier. He had 34 points on 11-of-21 shooting, and was 11-of-12 from the line. That brings him to 72 points on 25-of-51 shooting through two games, and he's now shot 20 free throws in two games. His point total is the highest by any player in their first two NBA Finals games (the previous record holder? You'll read about him shortly!). SGA also had eight assists. If the Pacers tried to replicate their strategy of eating a bunch of points from the league MVP while shutting everybody else down, they failed. Indiana needs more aggressiveness from Tyrese Haliburton. He was too slow to get going in this game. The Pacers also have to get Pascal Siakam in better position to score. They must generate the same corner looks as they did in Game 1. And you can't have another game in which Obi Toppin has as many shot makes in a game as James Johnson does in 'garbage time.' (That number was one, by the way.) NBA Finals Panic Meter: Indiana clocks in at 🚨🚨 | OKC is at 🚨🚨🚨 Both teams head back to Indianapolis for Game 3 Wednesday. We've got some time to break down where both teams could go from here. Buzzer-beaters are a writer's worst nightmare 🏀 Killing deadlines. What happens when Haliburton or someone else hits a buzzer-beater? Your hard work gets scrapped. 🏀 A dozen. SGA became the 12th NBA player in history to score 3,000 combined points in a season. 🫂 Community. David Aldridge reflects on how shared rebuilds have forged bonds between the Thunder and Oklahoma City. Advertisement 🏀 Steps forward. Rick Carlisle and Haliburton needed to evolve. That's how they made the NBA Finals. 🇨🇦 Friend or foe. When you reach the Finals, friendships don't matter. Just ask SGA and Andrew Nembhard. 🎧 Tuning in. Today's 'NBA Daily' discusses how the league has made a mess of displaying the Larry O'Brien trophy during broadcasts. The story of the greatest players in NBA history. In 100 riveting profiles, top basketball writers justify their selections and uncover the history of the NBA in the process. The story of the greatest players in NBA history. Celebrating Don Nelson as an all-time coach Prior to Game 2 in OKC, the NBA managed to get a famous face back into the NBA spotlight. Hall of Famer Don Nelson was somehow coerced away from Hawaii, where he has lived for a very long time, to come to the mainland to accept an award. It wasn't just any award, though. He was honored with the Chuck Daly Lifetime Achievement Award from the National Basketball Coaches Association. That's how you get Nelson back into the NBA mix, if only for a night. Nelson hadn't left Maui in seven years, according to Joe Vardon's article. And somehow, Rick Carlisle was able to get him to Oklahoma City to accept this award. That's how much Daly meant to NBA coaches, and that's how much Nelson means to the coaching fraternity. Nelson innovated on both ends of the floor. He was a genius in looking ahead of the game, sometimes decades at a time, and forecast where the league was headed. Nelson is second all-time in coaching wins (1,335). He's tied with Daly for 15th on the all-time wins list when it comes to playoff victories (75). Maybe his most famous playoff victories of all came from leading his Warriors squad over his former Mavericks team in the 2007 playoffs. The reason it was significant is because Golden State was an No. 8 seed, and Dallas was a 67-win No. 1 seed, marking one of the biggest upsets ever. Nelson never won a title as a coach. In fact, he never won a conference title. But he'll always be cemented as one of the best coaches we'll ever see. You can thank him for the point-forward idea. Mavericks fans can also thank him for continuing to fuel the fire between them and the front office/ownership. Nelson remarked at his press conference that trading Luka Dončić was a massive mistake by the front office. Advertisement By now, it wouldn't shock me if Nelson is halfway back to Maui as he regales people of Marques Johnson being the first point-forward. Or maybe he wants to talk about creating Run TMC. Or how he used to implore Steve Nash to shoot more. Or Baron Davis to attack that Russian guy under the basket. Whatever it was, Nelson knew the game of basketball like the back of his hand. He likely still does. Allen Iverson turned 50 over the weekend Whenever we discuss players of yesteryear or players today within historic contexts, we get into time travel. What would this player do back in previous eras? What would a player from long ago look like in today's NBA? We fire up the Delorean, gun it to 88 miles per hour, and then just start arguing about players within a historic vacuum. As a Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Famer turned 50 years old on Saturday, I had a thought about that. I'm so glad Allen Iverson didn't play in today's NBA. It has nothing to do with the style of today's game and it being 3-point heavy. It has nothing to do with whether or not he could fit in with how analytics are affecting basketball. It has everything to do with how basketball is covered, how it is discussed and how social media affects the culture of the game. Even with the existence of Michael Jordan and his billion-dollar shoe enterprise, it wouldn't be hard to argue that Allen Iverson is the biggest icon in basketball history. That doesn't mean greatest player. That doesn't mean richest or most successful. But when we're talking about cultural influence and how he affected the aesthetics of both the game and the players themselves, Iverson changed the course of history as much as anybody. The braids. The tattoos. The shooting sleeve. The way he dressed for the game. And then, on top of it, the swagger he brought to the court, harmoniously married with the array of moves and innovation of how he attacked individual defenders, traps and double teams. Put Iverson in today's dissecting, loud-mouthed landscape, and I'm not sure how much of an influence he would have been allowed to be. Iverson was iconic, not by carefully manicured effort like we see so many PR-driven personalities today. He was iconic because things would be done his way, and he had the spine to speak his mind when he felt he was being unfairly misrepresented. Iverson's persona seemed to exorcise ghosts of the NBA's past from the conversation, and make everybody live in the present. Blink and you missed him. Sure, his signature move had him carrying the ball. Who cares? It was the greatest show on the court. He crossed up everybody. He dotted your eye with jump shots and crossed your t's and ankles with his brazen disregard for convention. He saw Michael Jordan in front of him as a rookie, and just knew he had to see if he could pull off his famed crossover on the greatest player ever. Iverson wouldn't have been appreciated now how he was then. We would have been told the way he plays isn't right. We would have been told his personality is a PR liability waiting to happen. We would have been told how inefficient his game was. Advertisement Instead, watching and experiencing Iverson when we did ensure his legacy and icon status are forever safe. He was a middle finger to tradition, and yet a celebration of all things that make basketball great. Happy 50th to one of the best to ever do it in any era. It truly was a joy to experience Allen Iverson take over an entire culture Streaming links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.
