Powell once said he couldn't imagine leaving the Fed early—other than dying. ‘You will not see me getting in the lifeboat'
Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell signaled in 2019 that he would rather go down with the ship than save his own skin and compromise the independence of the central bank.
As President Donald Trump continues to put pressure on Powell, an earlier standoff between the two men could offer clues on how their current one might play out.
In 2019, like today, Trump demanded the Fed hurry up and cut rates amid a trade war he had launched, raising questions about Powell's future as Fed chief and whether he would step down.
During a House Financial Services Committee hearing in July of that year, Powell was asked by then-Chairwoman Maxine Waters, 'If you get a call from the president today or tomorrow and he said 'I'm firing you. Pack up and it's time to go.' What would you do?'
'Of course I would not do that,' Powell replied.
'I can't hear you,' Waters said, prompting laughter in the chamber.
'The answer would be 'no,'' Powell reiterated.
'You think the president doesn't have the authority. Is that why you would not leave?' Waters asked.
'The law clearly gives me a four-year term, and I fully intend to serve it,' Powell said.
According to the 2022 book Trillion Dollar Triage by Wall Street Journal reporter Nick Timiraos, he was even more adamant in private about not stepping down early.
'I will never, ever, ever leave this job voluntarily until my term ends under any circumstances. None whatsoever. You will not see me getting in the lifeboat,' Powell told a reporter that spring. 'It doesn't occur to me in the slightest that there would be any situation in which I would not complete my term other than dying.'
For Powell, who was first appointed Fed chief by Trump, the top priority was to ensure the U.S. economy continued to expand but also to preserve the Fed as an institution, including its independence, according to the book.
Weeks after that House hearing, the Fed lowered rates a quarter point, but Trump kept haranguing and insulting Powell, calling for even more easing.
Given that history, Powell's tenure became an issue again after Trump was re-elected. In November, Powell was asked whether he would step down if asked by Trump. He replied no, adding later that it's 'not permitted under the law' for the president to fire or demote him or any other Fed governors in leadership positions.
Months later, Trump imposed sweeping tariffs across U.S. trading parters, raising fears of stagflation—weak economic growth coupled with high inflation. While inflation hasn't spiked yet and growth remains intact, the Fed has held off on lowering rates, drawing the ire of Trump.
On Wednesday, Trump said it was 'highly unlikely' that he would fire Powell, while confirming that he had discussed the 'concept' of dismissing him with House Republicans during a White House meeting Tuesday night.
Still, Trump and other White House officials have continued to attack Powell over renovations at the Fed's headquarters, accusing him of mismanagement.
Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a longtime critic of Powell, suggested the renovation issue was 'a pretext to get him fired.' Meanwhile, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon and other chiefs at top banks said this past week that central bank independence is crucial to the economy and financial markets.
Powell's term as chairman of the board of governors expires in May 2026, but his term as a governor extends to January 2028. That means he would still be eligible to serve as chairman of the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee, if he chooses to stick around as governor.
Historically, the board chair has also been FOMC chair, but the law allows the FOMC to determine its own internal organization. So it's possible one person could serve as Fed board chair, and a different person could serve as FOMC chair.
On Tuesday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said moves to replace Powell are under way and suggested that he should consider stepping down from the Fed entirely once his chairmanship ends.
'Traditionally, the Fed chair also steps down as a governor,' he told Bloomberg. 'There's been a lot of talk of a shadow Fed chair causing confusion in advance of his or her nomination. And I can tell you, I think it'd be very confusing for the market for a former Fed chair to stay on also.'
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
FICO To Roll Out New Scores to Reflect Your "Buy Now, Pay Later" Habits, Impacting Millions of Americans' Credit
"Buy now, pay later"users may hurt their credit if they don't pay back those loans on time. Credit score overseer Fair Isaac (NASDAQ:FICO) announced new scoring models last month that will evaluate BNPL usage when determining credit worthiness. The program, scheduled to roll out this fall may help some folks gain access to better loan terms but failing to pay on time is going to hurt. The processing services let retailers provide installment loans at the point of sale so buyers can spread out payments. The loans may have no interest or service fees, potentially encouraging customers to overspend. Not surprisingly, a Bankrate survey released in May showed that about 'half of buy now, pay later users have experienced issues like overspending and missing payments.' Don't Miss: —with up to 120% bonus shares—before this Uber-style disruption hits the public markets $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. FICO will include BNPL data on upgraded Score 10 and Score 10 T credit models. It wants the new data to provide lenders with "greater visibility into consumers' repayment behaviors, enabling a more comprehensive view of their credit readiness." FICO Vice President and General Manager of B2B Scores Julie May emphasized the impact on young buyers, noting it will "more accurately evaluate credit readiness, especially for consumers whose first credit experience is through BNPL products." Using FICO's Score 10 to roll out the initiative has raised some eyebrows because it won't be included in Score 8, currently the most widely used credit scoring product. In fact, FICO modeling is now up to Score 16 but, like the iPhone, older versions remain broadly popular due to long credit cycles and the need for lenders to invest, train and incorporate newer processes. Trending: Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs — Credit agencies have gathered BNPL loan activity for several years now. But this is a largely unregulated industry and not all payment processors report these transactions. So, a substantial chunk of U.S. lending activity may be missing from current data. FICO's new models will try to fill these gaps but there could be unintended consequences because, according to the survey, nearly one-third of Americans have used the service. Bankrate Senior Industry Analyst Ted Rossman told CNN that young folks with limited credit histories are frequent users, and those most vulnerable to credit downgrades. Given survey results, new models may amplify negative credit scores of those overspending and missing payments. Of course, it's hoped this credit activity will boost scores if debts are paid on time and in promises to aggregate multiple BNPL loans, but dangers abound if old school installment loan scoring seeps into the new models. Its common knowledge that borrowing up to your credit card limit is bad for your score because it signals financial stress. Now consider a young buyer who takes multiple BNPL loans at the same time. With traditional scoring, it looks like the customer is maxing out multiple short-term credit lines, raising all sorts of red flags. Rossman believes that customers who pay their debts promptly should be fine under the new rules, but hedges his bets despite FICO assurances. "Things like frequent opening and closing of accounts would be disastrous for your credit score," he told CNN. "With Buy Now, Pay Later, you're doing that every few weeks or even every few days." Read Next: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? FAIR ISAAC (FICO): Free Stock Analysis Report This article FICO To Roll Out New Scores to Reflect Your "Buy Now, Pay Later" Habits, Impacting Millions of Americans' Credit originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Can Investing $25,000 in the S&P 500 Today and Holding On for 25 Years Make You Wealthy?
Key Points A buy-and-hold strategy can be a great way to grow your portfolio while also avoiding the temptation to chase trends and risky stocks. The S&P 500 is at record highs, and while it has historically averaged double-digit returns, investors may want to brace for the possibility of lower returns in the future. If you don't think you're on track to meet your investing goals, you may want to consider investing more money or focusing on growth stocks. 10 stocks we like better than SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust › For not only years, but decades, tracking the S&P 500 has been a reliable way to generate significant stock gains. Since the index tracks the best stocks on the U.S. markets, it offers a great low-risk way to ensure you're positioned for long-term growth. But what if you invested a lump sum of $25,000 into an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the S&P 500, such as the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: SPY), and simply held on for 25 years? Could that be enough to make you wealthy and allow you to retire comfortably? Let's take a look. How much could your portfolio be worth after 25 years? A buy-and-hold strategy can be a good way to ensure your portfolio rises in value. Sometimes, just leaving your portfolio alone can be the best thing you can do for your future. The temptation to chase the latest trends or hot stocks can end up doing more harm than good and derail your investment goals and objectives. If you have a diverse portfolio or if you are invested in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF, a set-it-and-forget-it approach can be a great one to consider deploying. Over time, your investment should rise in value, though there's no guarantee stocks will rise or be up when you need the money. The variable that can have the most significant effect on your overall returns is unfortunately the one that is also nearly impossible to predict: your average annual return. And with the S&P 500 around all-time highs right now, it may be wise to assume that its average returns from here on out may trend a bit lower than its historical average of around 10%. Here's how a $25,000 investment in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF might look like after a period of 25 years, if the average annual return is between 7% and 9%. Year 7% Growth 8% Growth 9% Growth 5 $35,064 $36,733 $38,466 10 $49,179 $53,973 $59,184 15 $68,976 $79,304 $91,062 20 $96,742 $116,524 $140,110 25 $135,686 $171,212 $215,577 Calculations and table by author. A $25,000 investment would grow significantly over the years under this scenario, but with potentially below-average returns, you're not likely to end up with a boatload of money to consider yourself rich, or enough to retire with after 25 years. Your investment might end up growing to more than a couple of hundred thousand dollars and strengthen your overall financial position, but if your goal is to end up wealthy, i.e., having a portfolio worth over $1 million, then this strategy may not be sufficient to get you there. What you can do if you don't think you're on track to hit your goals If you're worried you may not reach your investing goals, there are things you can do to try to achieve better results. Investing more money, even if it's on a monthly basis, can be a way to slowly pad your portfolio's balance over time, and allow more money to be compounded over the years. And the more you invest, the quicker that your gains will accumulate. If that's not an option, what you may also want to consider is focusing more on growth stocks, rather than simply mirroring the market. By investing in tech stocks or companies with promising growth prospects, you may have better chances of outperforming the market and achieving better-than-average returns. This can involve more research and be more time-consuming, but it's an example of where picking individual stocks or simply focusing on ETFs that track growth stocks can be a better option than mirroring the S&P 500. It adds more risk into the equation, but the payoff can be worthwhile in the end. Regardless of what approach you decide to take, it's a good idea to revisit your portfolio on a regular basis to see how you're doing and if you need to recalibrate and adjust your holdings. Should you invest $1,000 in SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust right now? Before you buy stock in SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Can Investing $25,000 in the S&P 500 Today and Holding On for 25 Years Make You Wealthy? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Author Michael Wolff tells The Daily Beast Podcast about the psychology behind Trump's look-alike female staffers.
While writing his 2018 bestselling book Fire and Fury, author Michael Wolff spent seven months observing the goings-on at the White House, where he was given 'carte blanche' access to President Donald Trump and many of his key staffers. It was during this time that Wolff noticed that a lot of the president's staffers were women, and they mostly all fit a similar mold: long hair worn down, skirts above the knee, high boots, and, in Wolff's estimation, not always qualified for the roles they had secured. Yet it wasn't just that the women all looked similar to each other. 'They look like Melania,' Wolff stated of female staffers past and present, pointing to Hope Hicks, Alina Habba, Natalie Harp, and Margo Martin as examples.
