logo
Trump suggests lower 80% China tariff ahead of Geneva trade talks - Economy

Trump suggests lower 80% China tariff ahead of Geneva trade talks - Economy

Al-Ahram Weekly09-05-2025

US President Donald Trump signaled on Friday that he could lower tariffs on Chinese imports, as the rival superpowers prepare for trade talks in Switzerland over the weekend.
"80% Tariff on China seems right!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, which would bring them down from 145 percent, with cumulative duties on some goods reaching a staggering 245 percent.
He added that it was "Up to Scott B.", referring to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who will confer with China's Vice Premier He Lifeng this weekend in Geneva to try to cool the conflict roiling international markets.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will also attend the trade talks in Switzerland.
In his post Trump did not say if he thought 80 percent should be the final, definitive level for tariffs on Chinese goods if and when the trade war ends, or an interim status.
In retaliation to the steep tariffs from Washington, China has slapped 125 percent levies on US goods.
"I think this is basically to show that both sides are talking and that itself is very important," Xu Bin, professor of economics and finance at the China Europe International Business School, told AFP. "Because China is the only country that has tit-for-tat tariffs against Trump's tariffs."
Beijing has insisted its position that the United States must lift tariffs first remains "unchanged" and vowed to defend its interests.
Bessent has said the meetings in Switzerland would focus on "de-escalation" -- and not a "big trade deal".
The head of the Geneva-based World Trade Organization on Friday welcomed the talks, calling them a "positive and constructive step toward de-escalation."
"Sustained dialogue between the world's two largest economies is critical to easing trade tensions, preventing fragmentation along geopolitical lines and safeguarding global growth," Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala said, according to a spokesperson.
'A better understanding'
"I don't expect major developments out of this, other than perhaps a better understanding of each side's negotiating position," Josh Lipsky, the Atlantic Council's chair of international economics said in an interview. "I think that's really the best we can hope for."
The talks in Geneva between Bessent and He will come two days after Trump unveiled what he called a historic trade agreement with Britain, the first deal with any country since he unleashed a blitz of sweeping global tariffs last month.
The five-page, non-legally-binding document confirmed to nervous investors that the United States is willing to negotiate sector-specific relief from recent duties -- in this case on British cars, steel and aluminium.
In return, Britain agreed to open up its markets to US beef and other farm products.
But a 10 percent baseline levy on most British goods remained intact, and the US Commerce Secretary later suggested that most countries should expect even higher duties -- especially if they currently run a goods trade surplus with the United States.
"The 10 percent baseline is for those countries that have (a) balanced budget with us, that are the best," Lutnick said in an interview with CNBC on Thursday.
Trump said the British deal would be the first of many, and that he hoped difficult talks with the European Union -- as well as China -- could soon produce results.
Several countries have lined up to hold talks with Washington to avert the worst of Trump's duties.
Major stock markets mostly rose Friday on growing optimism that tariff tensions will ease.
US stocks opened higher, while European markets were all in the green after a mixed showing in Asia.
Follow us on:
Facebook
Instagram
Whatsapp
Short link:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US President: Iran has become more aggressive in nuclear talks
US President: Iran has become more aggressive in nuclear talks

See - Sada Elbalad

time2 hours ago

  • See - Sada Elbalad

US President: Iran has become more aggressive in nuclear talks

Basant Ahmed US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that Iran has become more aggressive in the nuclear talks. Trump added in his remarks today that "it's surprising and disappointing to me. But we'll meet again, and we'll see what happens." He noted that the two sides remain at odds over whether the country will be allowed to continue enriching uranium on Iranian soil. Trump said the next round of talks between the United States and Iran will take place next Thursday, while a senior Iranian official and a US official said it is unlikely to take place that day. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt News Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean

Between Agreement and War: Israel's Strategic Dilemma over a Possible US-Iran Nuclear Deal
Between Agreement and War: Israel's Strategic Dilemma over a Possible US-Iran Nuclear Deal

Daily News Egypt

time3 hours ago

  • Daily News Egypt

Between Agreement and War: Israel's Strategic Dilemma over a Possible US-Iran Nuclear Deal

Israel harbours deeper concerns over US President Donald Trump's potential nuclear deal with Iran than it ever did regarding the agreement negotiated under Barack Obama. According to Tel Aviv, the imminent accord would leave Iran merely months away from acquiring a nuclear weapon while severely limiting Israel's ability to deliver a decisive military strike against Tehran's nuclear infrastructure. In this scenario, Iran would preserve its controversial program, and Israel would lose what it perceives as a historic opportunity to dismantle Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Over a month ago, Trump unexpectedly announced the beginning of direct negotiations with Tehran, aiming to curtail Iran's nuclear program in exchange for the easing of economic sanctions. His declaration came in the presence of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had traveled to Washington seeking American approval for pre-emptive strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Over the past two years, Israel has weakened Iran's regional influence through sustained military operations against its allies—Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon—and by the removal of its key ally, former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. At the same time, severe Western sanctions have crippled Iran's oil-dependent economy. Upon finalizing the deal, Trump is expected to assert that he has extracted greater concessions from Iran than his predecessors, Obama and Joe Biden. His claim would hinge on two major factors: the inclusion of US nuclear inspectors alongside IAEA monitors in Iran's nuclear sites and a complete halt to uranium enrichment—even at low levels—for a symbolic period that may last a year. However, Israeli officials remain deeply concerned, viewing this agreement as even riskier than the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) of 2015, which they largely dismissed as flawed. Dr. Hatem Sadek President Biden's most significant diplomatic achievement was persuading Tehran to freeze its 60% uranium enrichment—a feat achieved in 2023 through a US agreement releasing $6 billion of Iran's frozen assets. Obama, on the other hand, succeeded in reducing Iran's medium-enriched uranium stockpile to 3.67% but failed to halt enrichment entirely or secure Tehran's consent for American inspectors to participate in monitoring. There are several additional concessions Trump may secure that neither Biden nor Obama could—such as guarantees against attacks on US forces or a temporary moratorium on Iran's ballistic missile tests, which have both conventional and nuclear applications. If accomplished, why does this alarm Israeli officials? Israeli intelligence leaders, including the Mossad Director and the head of military intelligence, have spent substantial diplomatic capital lobbying the Trump administration and its envoy, Steve Witkoff, in numerous meetings across the Middle East, Europe, and the US Their objective was to push negotiations toward two extreme outcomes: Tehran's submission or a decisive military strike. However, these efforts clashed with Trump's transactional style, which prioritizes immediate gains over long-term strategy. While Israeli officials believe they made some progress, fears persist that Trump's main goal is securing a deal—regardless of whether it aligns with Israel's stringent security concerns. Additionally, if Trump pressures Israel to abandon military action, it might not only prevent overt strikes but also hinder covert operations, such as Mossad-led sabotage missions that have delayed Iran's nuclear weapons program in recent years. In 2015, Iran relied on about 20,000 aging IR-1 centrifuges, requiring roughly a year to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb. By 2025, however, Iran possesses thousands of advanced IR-4 and IR-6 centrifuges, a fraction of which could be concealed in undisclosed facilities much smaller than the known sites at Natanz and Fordow. This would allow Tehran to achieve weapons-grade uranium within months. Reports indicate Iran's current enrichment levels reach 60%—a threshold demonstrating mastery of nuclear science, making bomb acquisition more a matter of timing than technical capability. From Israel's perspective, any agreement at this stage would consolidate Iran's nuclear potential while lifting international sanctions, enabling Tehran to accelerate its program. By contrast, Israeli leadership sees the current moment as an unparalleled strategic opportunity: with Hamas and Hezbollah weakened, no time is more suitable for a pre-emptive strike. In conclusion, whatever restrictions and safeguards Trump's team negotiates, at best they would leave Iran just months from a nuclear breakout while denying Israel its clearest chance in decades to strike. Tehran may be open to a deal but remains wary of Trump's unpredictable leadership and sceptical of any non-binding agreement that a future US administration might discard. The most it would likely accept is a temporary enrichment suspension in exchange for the release of frozen funds and recognition of its right to civilian nuclear energy—an outcome Israel would see as disastrous. Meanwhile, Gulf states and regional actors, while wary of Iran's ambitions, increasingly prefer uneasy coexistence over a catastrophic war that could disrupt economies and stall development plans. The negotiation landscape remains murky and fraught with uncertainty for all involved. Dr. Hatem Sadek – Professor at Helwan University The post Opinion | Between Agreement and War: Israel's Strategic Dilemma over a Possible US-Iran Nuclear Deal appeared first on Dailynewsegypt.

Israel strike on Lebanon kills a man and his son - Region
Israel strike on Lebanon kills a man and his son - Region

Al-Ahram Weekly

time12 hours ago

  • Al-Ahram Weekly

Israel strike on Lebanon kills a man and his son - Region

Lebanon said an Israeli drone strike on Tuesday killed a man and his son in a southern village, the latest deadly attack despite a November ceasefire, with Israel claiming the two were militants. The Lebanese health ministry said in a statement that "an Israeli enemy drone carried out a strike in the village of Shebaa, killing two people and wounding one". The two dead were a father and his son, with the state-run National News Agency saying the man wounded was also his son. Israel has repeatedly bombed its northern neighbour despite the November ceasefire that ended more than a year of hostilities with Hezbollah including two months of full-blown war. In the capital Beirut, a Lebanese military official told AFP that army forces had launched a search in a building in the city's southern suburbs, a densely populated area where Hezbollah holds sway. Israel warned on Friday that it would keep up its strikes on Hezbollah targets across Lebanon. The Lebanese government has condemned a massive Israeli strike on south Beirut last week, on the eve of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha. Hezbollah said the Israeli air raid levelled nine residential blocks. The Israeli military said the strikes targeted underground drone factories. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun condemned the attack as "a flagrant violation" of the ceasefire agreement. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store