
Archaeologists' Noah's Ark 'discovery' as they 'find' remains of Biblical boat
An explosive find by archaeologists using radar has unearthed potential remnants of Noah's ark in Turkey, complete with a "chemical imprint" and wooden residues.
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) technology revealed what looked like "pieces of wood and in the ground" and "the shape of a hall", suggesting evidence of the Biblically famed ark that is said to have preserved life from a great flood over 4,300 years ago.
At Durupinar Formation near Mount Ararat, an American research team has found hints of angular structures and a hidden void deep within the earth. Independent researcher Andrew Jones of Noah's Ark Scans utilised ground-penetrating radar indicating the presence of a 13-foot tunnel at the heart of the site.
Further GPR analysis suggests the existence of central and side corridors or hallways inside the ancient vessel, with three distinct layers beneath the surface, mirroring the Biblical description of the ark's triple decks.
Genesis 6:16 states, "Make a roof for the ark, and finish it to a cubit above, and set the door of the ark in its side. Make it with lower, second, and third decks."
Reflecting on the findings, Andrew shared with The Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN): "We're not expecting something that's fully preserved. What's left is the chemical imprint, pieces of wood and in the ground, the shape of a hall.", reports the Mirror US.
Less than a hundred years ago, the world was unaware of the Durupínar Formation, located a mere 18 miles south of Turkey's highest peak, Mount Ararat. It wasn't until heavy rains and earthquakes struck the area in May 1948 that the formation was revealed, almost by accident, after the elements washed away the mud concealing it—a Kurdish shepherd being the first to encounter it.
Noah's Ark's final resting place is said to be on the "mountains of Ararat" in the Bible, after a catastrophic 150-day flood supposedly eradicated all life not aboard the vessel. This particular formation is intriguingly situated near a mountain that could pass for the ark's described proportions and appearance.
The dimensions of Noah's Ark are biblically cited as "300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide, and 30 cubits high"—that's around 515 feet by 86 feet by 52 feet, sparking fierce debate about whether the ark really came to rest on Mount Ararat.
Although many scientists regard the formation simply as a quirk of nature, there are those who see potential evidence of something more astonishing. Amongst them is the team at Noah's Ark Scans who advocate the extraordinary viewpoint.
CBN News recently caught up with Andrew from Noah's Ark Scans who shared new insights from the ongoing independent research conducted at the Durupınar site. The investigative scans have identified angular subterranean formations, some as far down as 20 feet – potentially hinting at enclosed spaces under what might once have been a deck.
In Genesis 6:14, the Bible describes the ark: "Make thee an ark of gopher wood; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch. " Andrew highlighted: "This is not what you'd expect to see if the site were simply a solid block of rock or the result of random mudflow debris.
"But it is exactly what you'd expect to find if this were a man-made boat, consistent with the biblical specifications of Noah's Ark."
The team has also conducted soil testing, uncovering what Andrew described as "some interesting things."
He said: "We noticed that the grass growing within the boat-shaped formation is a different colour compared to the area just outside it," suggesting this could indicate a man-made origin rather than a natural one. William Crabtree, another member of Noah's Ark Scans, noted that a tunnel appears to run from the tip of the formation toward the middle, and it is large enough to walk through.
He also discussed their soil analysis, noting that organic matter was found to be twice as high inside the formation compared to the surrounding soil. "The potassium levels inside are also about 40 percent higher," William said.
He further explained: "If you know soil science-as I'm a soil scientist-you'll understand that potassium levels, organic matter, and pH can all be influenced by decaying organic material. If this was a wooden boat and the wood had rotted over time, we would expect to see elevated levels of potassium, changes in pH, and higher organic content-and that's exactly what we're finding."
Andrew and his team are set to expand their soil testing efforts beyond the 22 samples they have already collected. They also plan to conduct a core drilling survey and perform additional ground-penetrating radar scans around the site.
"We want to compare what's inside the formation to what's outside," Andrew declared. "That could give us a much clearer picture of whether this is truly something man-made. ".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
Leaving Cert 2025 Biology exam advice and notes
Study Hub 2025 guest Andrew Cussen is here with some great tips and free notes to help Leaving Cert Biology students. Having returned from Melbourne he took up a role as a Maths and Biology teacher in the Dublin Academy of Education in August 2024. You can watch Andrew's Biology exam tips in the video above, and listen to the Podcast on RTÉ, Apple or Spotify. Download Andrew's notes below: More about Andrew Andrew has held various Assistant Principal roles and has corrected exams for the State Examinations Commission. He has developed student content and teaching resources for Science Solutions (DCG Solutions Ltd). Additionally, he has worked alongside the Junior Cycle Teachers Association and as a University Placement Tutor with Maynooth University to inform best teaching practices in Biology, Mathematics and Science.


Irish Daily Mirror
3 days ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Bible's eighth plague of locusts explained by scientists in terrifying discovery
Researchers at Tel Aviv University have recently unravelled a long-standing mystery documented in the Bible - the reason behind locusts forming massive, crop-destroying swarms. The team was particularly interested in what triggers these typically harmless and solitary insects to dramatically alter their behaviour and gather into vast migrating swarms, a phenomenon that has baffled both scientists and agriculturalists for centuries. These devastating swarms have been destroying crops and causing famines since biblical times. The Book of Exodus recounts locusts as the eighth of ten plagues descended on Egypt, where the Israelites were held captive. "They will cover the face of the ground so that it cannot be seen. They will devour what little you have left after the hail, including every tree that is growing in your fields," the scripture describes. The researchers at Tel Aviv University discovered that the gut bacterial composition of a locust, known as the microbiome, undergoes significant changes when the insect becomes part of a larger group, reports the Mirror US. A type of bacteria called Weissella, which is nearly non-existent in the microbiome of solitary locusts, becomes prevalent during the insect's "gregarious phase," which is when they swarm, according to the study's findings. Scientists used a custom-built model to monitor changes in the Weissella bacteria and discovered that swarming enabled the bacteria to spread and infect a large number of locusts, providing a clear evolutionary advantage. Prof. Amir Ayali, who led the study, said: "Our findings do not prove unequivocally that the Weissella bacteria are responsible for the swarming and migration of locusts. The results do however suggest a high probability that the bacteria play an important role in inducing this behaviour - a new hypothesis never previously proposed." Ayali noted the study's findings could have significant implications for the "countless people, animals, and plants all over the globe" still threatened by locust outbreaks. "We hope that this new understanding will drive the development of new means for combating locust outbreaks." Locust swarms can devastate crops and lead to famines. Over the past three years, large areas of Africa, India, and Pakistan have been severely affected by locust swarms. According to Locust Watch, a division of the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization, the Desert Locust (Schistocerca gregaria) "is the most destructive migratory pest in the world. "They are ravenous eaters who consume their own weight per day, targeting food crops and forage," it said. A single swarm has "the capacity to consume the same amount of food in one day as 35,000 people," the group added. In 2013, a swarm entered Israel from Egypt. The study from Tel Aviv University was released last month in the peer-reviewed science journal, Environmental Microbiology.


Irish Daily Mirror
6 days ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Scientific evidence on whether Adam and Eve really did exist
Scientists believe they may have finally discovered whether or not Adam and Eve truly existed. According to the Bible, Adam and Eve were the first two humans, created by God. The Old Testament states that they lived in the Garden of Eden and are central to the belief that all humans descended from a single pair of original ancestors. Despite scepticism surrounding the biblical tale, there is an increasing amount of evidence suggesting that some elements of the story could be accurate. Remarkably, archaeologists have uncovered surprising signs that Eden was not only a real location but could also have been the cradle of civilisation as we know it, as reported by The Daily Mail. Biologists have demonstrated that all living humans do indeed share a single common ancestor, but reconciling the Bible's historical accounts with modern science does necessitate discarding much of the narrative. In the sacred text, Adam and Eve reside in a place named the Garden of Eden, depicted as a land of abundance and plenty. Surprisingly, the Bible provides a fairly precise indication of where this mythical garden is situated, reports the Mirror US. In Genesis, the first book of the Bible, it is stated that a river flows through Eden and splits into four tributaries: The Pishon, the Gihon, the Tigris, and the Euphrates. The age-old tale of Adam and Eve's origins might need a rethink, with experts suggesting our biblical forebears might not have been Homo Sapiens after all. The Tigris and Euphrates rivers, still flowing through Iraq today, are familiar names from the story, but the exact whereabouts of the other two rivers, Gihon and Pishon, remain a mystery, casting doubt on their existence. Scholars believe the Garden of Eden could have been in various places, yet the most convincing location is thought to be Mesopotamia. This area, whose name translates to 'between rivers' from Ancient Greek, is cradled by the Tigris and Euphrates and sprawls across parts of what are now eastern Syria, northwestern Turkey, and much of Iraq. Professor Eric Cline, an expert in classical and biblical archaeology at George Washington University, penned 'From Eden to Exile', where he supports this theory as aligning with both scriptural texts and archaeological findings. In his book, Professor Cline explains: "This makes some sense from a textual point of view, because not only does the biblical account say that the garden lay 'in the east', meaning to the east of Israel, but it also mentions the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers in connection with the Garden of Eden." Mesopotamia is widely regarded as the cradle of agriculture, where both plants and animals were first tamed over 10,000 to 20,000 years ago during what's known as the Neolithic revolution. This shift led humans away from their hunter-gatherer roots, giving rise to our earliest permanent settlements. Prof Cline said: "This area may have also become somewhat of an agricultural paradise for the local residents following the invention of irrigation during the fourth millennium BC." To bolster the Biblical narrative, scientists indeed think all present-day humans hail from a single woman. Dubbed 'Mitochondrial Eve,' she represents the universal matrilineal ancestor, traceable through DNA. This singular ancestor concept stems from the understanding that regardless of a population's size, most female lineages are destined to extinguish at some point. Thus Mitochondrial Eve wasn't the inaugural human, yet after all alternative female lines ceased, leaving no trace in mitochondrial DNA—inheritance that flows exclusively from mothers to offspring. Applying the same reasoning, scientists inferred the existence of a 'Y-chromosome Adam' as the root of every living human's Y-chromosome. Despite this, the theory has its critics, with some arguing that although everyone on the planet shares DNA with common ancestors, this does not necessarily mean that they came from a single "first couple." It is possible that the man and woman lived in different eras and may not have had children together, with their existences potentially being centuries apart. However, Dr Joshua Swamidass, a biologist from Washington University, counters that there is no reason to rule out the possibility that humanity descended from a single couple. The cases of Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosome Adam demonstrate that there is no scientific barrier to humans having a common ancestor, even if the population never dwindled to just two individuals. In an article published in Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, Dr Swamidass wrote: "Many individuals are each individually ancestors of 'all the living'." He explained that all humans alive today descend from each of these universal ancestors, and the same can be said for all individuals alive in AD 1 or when recorded history began. Dr Swamidass suggested that two of these universal ancestors could be a specific couple, referred to as Adam and Eve in scripture, from whom all humans descend. While Dr Swamidass is not presenting this as a definitive explanation, he is highlighting that our current understanding of evolutionary biology does not preclude the existence of Adam and Eve as a couple. Nevertheless, as Dr Swamidass noted, there remains the issue that Homo Sapiens were not the first humans to inhabit Earth. Professor William Lane Craig, a philosopher from Houston Christian University, has confidently claimed that Adam and Eve were the original humans, predating Homo sapiens. Using criteria such as the ability for abstract thought, technological progress, and symbolism, he suggests that true humanity began much earlier. In an article for First Things, Professor Craig argues: "Adam and Eve may plausibly be identified as belonging to the last common ancestor of Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals - usually designated as Homo Heidelbergensis." He also said: "Adam plausibly lived sometime between around 1 million years ago to 750,000 years ago - a conclusion consistent with the evidence of population genetics."