One year after Trump assassination attempt, changes at Secret Service but questions remain
One attendee was killed, two others wounded and a bullet grazed Trump's ear before a Secret Service counter sniper opened fire on Crooks and killed him. That day jolted an already chaotic race for the White House and solidified Trump's iconic status in his party and beyond.
It also became a turning point for the agency tasked with protecting the president. As more details emerged about what went wrong, questions multiplied: What happened to the Secret Service's planning? Why was a rooftop with a clear line of sight to Trump left unguarded? What motivated the shooter?
Another incident in September where a gunman camped in the shrubbery outside one of Trump's golf courses before being spotted and shot at by a Secret Service agent also raised questions about the agency's performance.
A year after Butler, multiple investigations have detailed the breakdowns that day. Under a new leader hired by Trump, the agency has been pushing to address those problems but key questions remain.
'This was a wake-up call for the Secret Service,' said retired supervisory agent Bobby McDonald, who's now a criminal justice lecturer at the University of New Haven.
Here's a look at what went wrong, what's been done to address problems and the questions still unanswered.
How'd he get on that roof? Who was talking to who?
All the investigations zeroed in on a few specific problems.
The building with a clear sight line to the stage where the president was speaking only 135 meters (157 yards) away was left unguarded. Crooks eventually boosted himself up there and fired eight shots with an AR-style rifle.
The Secret Service's investigation into its own agency's conduct said that it wasn't that the line-of-sight risks weren't known about ahead of time. It was that multiple personnel assessed them as 'acceptable.'
Supervisors had expected large pieces of farm equipment would be situated to block the view from the building. Those ultimately weren't placed, and staffers who visited the site before the rally didn't tell their supervisors that the line-of-sight concerns hadn't been addressed, the report said.
Another glaring problem: fragmented communications between the Secret Service and the local law enforcement that the agency regularly relies on to secure events.
Instead of having one unified command post with representatives from every agency providing security in the same room, there were two command posts at the rally. One investigation described a 'chaotic mixture' of radio, cell phone, text, and email used to communicate that day.
'Ensure such an event can never be repeated'
The Secret Service issued a report Thursday about what it has done to address problems laid bare at Butler.
'Since President Trump appointed me as director of the United States Secret Service, I have kept my experience on July 13 top of mind, and the agency has taken many steps to ensure such an event can never be repeated in the future,' said Sean Curran, whom Trump tasked with leading the agency. Curran was one of the agents standing next to Trump as he was hustled off the stage after the shooting.
The agency said it had implemented 21 of the 46 recommendations made by Congressional oversight bodies. The rest were either in progress or not up to the agency to implement.
Some of what they've done involves new equipment and a greater emphasis on addressing threats from above. They've created a new Aviation Division to oversee aerial operations like drones. The agency said it has two armored ATVs for use on golf courses and is producing another three. And they're purchasing mobile command vehicles that will be pre-positioned around the country.
But much of what the agency says it has done is about changing policies and procedures to address those July 13 lapses — things like revising their manual to 'advance procedures and communication practices' when it comes to coordinating with local law enforcement or clarifying who's responsible for events where protectees are appearing.
They've updated their procedures about documenting line-of-sight concerns and how those concerns are going to be addressed.
So far it doesn't appear that anyone has been or will be fired, although the agency's director at the time, Kim Cheatle, swiftly resigned. The agency said Thursday that six staffers have been disciplined with suspensions ranging from 10 to 42 days without pay; the six were placed on restricted duty or nonoperational positions. Their identities and positions were not released.
What we still don't know
In many ways Crooks and his motivations are still a mystery.
He was killed by a Secret Service countersniper and did not leave much information about why he did what he did. Investigators say they believe he acted alone and they didn't find any threatening comments or ideological positions on social media that shed light on his thinking.
And while it's clear what went wrong in Butler, questions linger about how things that were so clearly problematic — like that open roof — weren't addressed ahead of time.
Anthony Cangelosi, a former Secret Service agent who is now a lecturer at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, said that without being able to read the interviews with the agents involved in the Butler planning it's hard to know exactly why they did what they did. A year later, he still struggles with how so many things went wrong.
'I can't understand how many errors were made on that site that day,' he said. 'If they agreed to leave that roof unoccupied, I can't ... understand it for the life of me.'
The widow of Corey Comperatore, who died during the Butler assassination attempt, echoed some of that sentiment during an interview with Fox News this week.
'Why was that such a failure? Why weren't they paying attention? Why did they think that that roof didn't need covered? I want to sit down and talk to them,' Helen Comperatore said.
Cangelosi said he still questions whether the agency asked for additional personnel to cover a busy election year and if they did, whether those requests were granted. He thinks the Secret Service needs better pay to retain agents tempted to leave the agency for other federal government jobs.
McDonald said he suspects part of the problem ahead of the Butler rally was that the Secret Service might have had a hard time understanding that the type of protection Trump needed wasn't the same as for other former presidents.
He said it 'boggles the mind' how Crooks was able to get on that roof and said that 'communication' and 'complacency' are the two issues that he thinks really went wrong in Butler.
But he also said that he feels the agency is moving in the right direction. 'A lot of good people doing a lot good work there,' he said, 'and I hope they continue to move in the right direction.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DOJ Probing for Collusion in CLO Market During Libor Transition
(Bloomberg) -- The US Justice Department is conducting a criminal antitrust investigation into whether some investors in collateralized loan obligations colluded to bolster their positions as markets transitioned away from the scandal-plagued London interbank offer rate in early 2023, according to people familiar with the matter. Why the Federal Reserve's Building Renovation Costs $2.5 Billion The Dutch Intersection Is Coming to Save Your Life Milan Corruption Probe Casts Shadow Over Property Boom Mumbai Facelift Is Inspired by 200-Year-Old New York Blueprint How San Jose's Mayor Is Working to Build an AI Capital Antitrust prosecutors in New York have sent subpoenas to financial firms as they seek to determine whether investors with an equity stake in the $1.3 trillion CLO market illegally coordinated as the underlying buyout debt was repriced, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing the confidential probe. The investigation was opened about a year-and-a-half ago, the people said. A spokesperson for the Justice Department declined to comment. In the last few months of 2022 and early 2023 — shortly before the final phaseout of Libor — a flurry of companies in the leveraged loan market rushed to switch the benchmarks on their debt. Often, they tried to exclude an adjustment that was meant to compensate investors for the fact that the Secured Overnight Financing Rate — the debt's new benchmark — consistently printed below Libor. CLO managers, who repackage leveraged loans into bonds of varying risk and size, saw how some companies were about to reap benefits during that transition if that additional spread wasn't added, as it lowered the interest the companies paid. The most junior holders of the bonds they issued, also known as equity, stood to lose millions as they get paid last after every other investor in the bond has received their payments. Communications between CLO equity holders near the transition deadline is part of what is being investigated by prosecutors, said the people familiar with the matter. CLO equity investors were particularly exposed during the transition because their returns depend on the excess cash flows from underlying loans after higher-ranking CLO debt holders have been paid, and because of the significant leverage built into the structures. Smaller interest payments mean there's less left over for them to pocket. Antitrust law bars competitors from colluding for economic gain. Because each CLO investor is a separate entity, it could potentially be illegal for them to agree with each other on the financial terms for an investment. In criminal collusion or price-fixing cases, prosecutors must show evidence of an agreement, but don't need to provide proof of economic harm, potentially giving them an advantage if a case goes to trial. Still, if the government ultimately brings charges, it would need to convince a jury the actions came from collusion instead of firms reaching the same decision independently. A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border Thailand's Changing Cannabis Rules Leave Farmers in a Tough Spot How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All What the Tough Job Market for New College Grads Says About the Economy How Taylor Swift Turned a Glitter Freckle Maker Into a Sensation ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


CNN
25 minutes ago
- CNN
Sen. Amy Klobuchar blames Trump for Epstein fallout: ‘This is his making'
Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar discusses the pressure mounting on President Trump to release all the Epstein files.


Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Demands Washington Commanders Return To Original Name 'Immediately'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump demanded that the Washington Commanders return to their former, more controversial name "immediately," in a Sunday morning Truth Social Post. Trump said there is a "big clamoring" for the team to be renamed the "Washington Redskins Football Team." He also called for the Cleveland Guardians to revert their name back to the Cleveland Indians." "Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!" he wrote. This is breaking news, more updates to follow.