
UN calls for halt to Afghan deportations amid abuse fears
A Taliban security personnel stands over an armoured tank bearing a Taliban flag, as he keeps guard during a religious procession by Afghan Shiite Muslims celebrating Ashura, on the tenth day of the Islamic holy month of Muharram, in Kabul on July 6, 2025. Picture: Wakil Kohsar / AFP
The United Nations insisted no one should be sent back to Afghanistan, after Germany on Friday deported 81 Afghans convicted of crimes to their Taliban-controlled homeland.
The UN rights office warned that surging numbers of Afghans being forced to return to their conflict- and crisis-torn country from elsewhere in the region especially but also further afield was creating 'a multi-layered human-rights crisis'.
'UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk calls for an immediate halt to the forcible return of all Afghan refugees and asylum-seekers, particularly those at risk of persecution, arbitrary detention or torture upon their return,' spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani told reporters in Geneva.
She stressed that sending people, even those convicted of crimes, back to a country where they risk facing serious abuses 'violates the core international law principle of non-refoulement'.
Germany defends deportations
The comments came after Berlin said it had deported 81 Afghan men convicted of crimes in Germany, the second such operation.
Germany, like most countries, stopped deportations to Afghanistan and closed its embassy in Kabul following the Taliban's return to power in 2021.
ALSO READ: Taliban enforces smartphone ban in Afghan schools
But it resumed expulsions last year, when the previous government of Social Democrat chancellor Olaf Scholz expelled 28 Afghan convicts.
Iran and Pakistan ramp up mass deportations
Friday's deportations come as Afghanistan is already reeling from the returns of more than 1.9 million people since the beginning of the year from Iran and Pakistan.
Iran has deported some 500,000 people in the past month alone, Shamdasani said.
The UN warned last week that as many as three million could arrive by the end of the year.
'Structural and systemic discrimination'
'People returning to Afghanistan, whether by compulsion or of their own volition, find a country facing an acute humanitarian and human-rights crisis,' Shamdasani said.
'They also face structural and systemic discrimination, gender persecution, issues related to ethnicity, obstacles to full reintegration into society, and a dearth of work and livelihoods as a result of a struggling economy.'
NOW READ: Lawyers for Human Rights slam Proteas for playing Afghanistan
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
a few seconds ago
- IOL News
Donald Trump pulls US from World Health pandemic reforms
The Trump administration said Friday that the U.S. is rejecting last year's changes to the World Health Organization's pandemic response, claiming they violate U.S. sovereignty. President Donald Trump's administration said Friday the United States was rejecting changes agreed last year for the World Health Organization on its pandemic response, saying they violated the country's sovereignty. Trump on returning to office on January 20 immediately began his nation's withdrawal from the UN body, but the State Department said the language from last year would still have been binding on the United States. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who is a longtime critic of vaccines, said the changes "risk unwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy." "We will put Americans first in all our actions and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe on Americans' speech, privacy or personal liberties," they said in a joint statement. Rubio and Kennedy disassociated the United States from a series of amendments to the International Health Regulations, which provide a legal framework for combatting diseases, agreed last year at the World Health Assembly in Geneva. "We regret the US decision to reject the amendments," WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a statement posted on X. He stressed the amendments "are clear about member states sovereignty," adding that the WHO cannot mandate lockdowns or similar measures. The changes included a stated "commitment to solidarity and equity" in which a new group would study the needs of developing countries in future emergencies. Countries have until Saturday to lodge reservations about the amendments. Conservative activists and vaccine skeptics in Britain and Australia, which both have left-leaning governments, have waged public campaigns against the changes. The amendments came about when the Assembly failed at a more ambitious goal of sealing a new global agreement on pandemics. Most of the world finally secured a treaty this May, but the United States did not participate as it was in the process of withdrawing from the WHO. The United States, then under president Joe Biden, took part in the May-June 2024 negotiations, but said it could not support consensus as it demanded protections for US intellectual property rights on vaccine development. Rubio's predecessor Antony Blinken had welcomed the amendments as progress. In their rejection of the amendments, Rubio and Kennedy said the changes "fail to adequately address the WHO's susceptibility to the political influence and censorship -- most notably from China -- during outbreaks." WHO's Ghebreyesus said the body is "impartial and works with all countries to improve people's health."

IOL News
19 hours ago
- IOL News
BRICS media should leads the charge for an inclusive global narrative
General view during a plenary session of the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. With nearly half the world's population represented by BRICS nations, the influence our media outlets hold in shaping narratives, challenging bias, and offering alternative perspectives is vast. Image: Pablo Porciuncula / AFP AS leaders and media representatives from across the BRICS nations gathered in Rio de Janeiro for this year's BRICS Media Forum, we found ourselves at a critical juncture in global media and geopolitics. With the recent expansion of BRICS to include Indonesia and 10 new partner countries under the BRICS+ framework, the forum signalled a deepening of collaboration, not just among governments and economies, but also across our most vital communications platforms. The forum's guiding vision aligns with Brazil's broader BRICS+ priorities for 2025: strengthening inclusion, enhancing South-South cooperation, and reforming global governance. In this context, the media plays an indispensable role in promoting dialogue, building trust, and safeguarding truth. With nearly half the world's population represented by BRICS nations, the influence our media outlets hold in shaping narratives, challenging bias, and offering alternative perspectives is vast. The Rio forum offered us the opportunity to reaffirm our shared values and recalibrate our responsibilities, especially in a world increasingly threatened by disinformation, propaganda, and polarisation. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Three central themes guide the forum: Championing Justice – Media's role in shaping a new world order Strengthening Exchanges – Media's recipe for invigorating Africa's growth Fostering Innovation – Media's duty in driving green development Each of these topics presents a roadmap not only for BRICS cooperation but for how the global media landscape could evolve toward greater fairness, accuracy, and ethical responsibility. A key pillar of any functioning democracy, and indeed of sustainable development, is press freedom. Across the world, the media have come under pressure, whether through government censorship, corporate interference, or subtle forms of financial manipulation. As BRICS media leaders, we must be vigilant and vocal in defending the freedom of the press, both within our borders and abroad. Equally important is the fight against fake news and disinformation. One proposal worth serious consideration is the formation of a BRICS joint media task force dedicated to countering misinformation. Through shared technological tools, fact-checking systems, and journalist exchanges, we can collectively elevate the credibility and integrity of news disseminated within and beyond BRICS nations. Diversity and inclusion also deserve a central place in the BRICS media agenda. Our alliance encompasses a wide array of cultures, languages, and lived experiences. This diversity must not only be reflected in our coverage; it must be celebrated as a strategic advantage. Through collaborative reporting, editorial partnerships, and cultural exchanges, we can resist the homogenisation of media that so often accompanies Western dominance in global news flow. Technological innovation is another vital area. The digital age has brought unprecedented challenges and opportunities. As BRICS nations, we must invest in innovation and digital inclusion, especially in underserved regions, so that the full benefits of new media platforms are available to all. From combating digital surveillance to embracing AI responsibly, media innovation must be shaped by ethical and human-centred values. Beyond media collaboration itself, the BRICS bloc also has a historic opportunity to challenge structural inequalities in global governance. One bold proposal is the establishment of a BRICS Ratings Agency, a counterbalance to Western-dominated financial rating institutions that often fail to account for the developmental realities of the Global South. A BRICS-led agency could offer more nuanced, fair, and contextually appropriate assessments, especially for public enterprises and state-led development projects. Similarly, the idea of a common BRICS currency continues to gain traction. While implementation would be complex and gradual, such a currency could help member states reduce dependency on the US dollar, stabilise trade relations, and enhance economic sovereignty. As we look to the future, institutional reforms must remain at the heart of the BRICS project. A permanent secretariat or coordinating body for BRICS media, for example, would help ensure continuity, shared standards, and deeper collaboration. It would also safeguard our momentum beyond rotating presidencies and changing political landscapes. * Adri Senekal de Wet is the editor-in-chief of Independent Media. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.

IOL News
20 hours ago
- IOL News
Senior clerics visit Gaza following deadly church strike
Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem Pierbattista Pizzaballa (L) and a members of a Christian visit the Saint Porphyrius Church in Gaza City on July 18. Image: Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP Two of the most senior Christian leaders in Jerusalem travelled to Gaza on Friday after Israeli fire killed three at the Palestinian territory's only Catholic church, provoking international condemnation. The rare visit came after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel "deeply regrets" the strike on the Holy Family Church in Gaza City and blamed a "stray" round. Israel strictly controls access to the territory, where the civil defence agency on Friday reported that further Israeli strikes killed at least 25 Palestinians, including a family of five in their own home. Local people used their bare hands to pick through the debris in the southern city of Khan Yunis in a desperate search for survivors. "Entire families are buried under the rubble," Louai Abu Sahloul, a relative of the victims, told AFP, adding that the relentless wave of strikes was taking its toll. "People are like walking dead, tired of hunger, pain and destruction everywhere in Gaza," he said. The Catholic Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Pierbattista Pizzaballa, and his Greek Orthodox counterpart, Theophilos III, headed to Gaza and met local Christians following Thursday's strike. They visited both the Holy Family Church and the Greek Orthodox Saint Porphyrius Church in what the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem called "the shared pastoral solicitude of the Churches of the Holy Land and their concern for the community of Gaza". The Greek Orthodox Jerusalem Patriarchate called it a "powerful expression" of church unity and solidarity. 'Stop the needless slaughter' The clerics last week visited the occupied West Bank with diplomatic representatives from more than 20 countries after an attack on an ancient Byzantine-era church blamed on Israeli settlers. Both churches said the Gaza visit had been facilitated with the help of aid agencies and also involved the delivery of food supplies and emergency medical equipment. In Italy, Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said the delegation arrived with 500 tonnes of aid for local civilians. Pope Leo XIV, the leader of the Catholic Church, said he was "deeply saddened" by the strike on the church, where hundreds of displaced people were sheltering, including children and those with special needs. His predecessor, Pope Francis, kept in regular contact with parish priest Father Gabriel Romanelli and repeatedly called for an end to the Gaza war, which has created a humanitarian crisis for the people living there. Romanelli was one of 10 people injured in the strike and was seen with bandages on his leg. The Vatican said the pope called Pizzaballa on Friday morning to ask about the situation in Gaza and the condition of Romanelli and the other wounded. "He expressed his support and affection to the entire community gathered around the parish and those suffering from the violence, and reiterated his intention to do everything possible to stop the needless slaughter of innocents," a statement read. The pontiff also spoke with Netanyahu and expressed concern about the "dramatic humanitarian situation", renewing his appeal for negotiations, a ceasefire and the end of the war, a separate statement added. A spokesman at Netanyahu's office told AFP the conversation was "friendly" and the prime minister expressed his regret. 'Mistake' Both Italy and France called the strike "unacceptable" while US President Donald Trump called Netanyahu after having "not a positive reaction" on hearing about it, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said. "It was a mistake by the Israelis to hit that Catholic church, that's what the prime minister relayed to the president," she told reporters. The Jerusalem churches, which have jurisdiction for Catholics and members of the Greek Orthodox Church across Israel and the Palestinian territories, said they had ensured the medical evacuation of those injured. One was in a critical condition and two others were seriously wounded, the Jerusalem Patriarchate said. Out of the Gaza Strip's population of more than two million, about 1,000 are Christians. Most of them are Orthodox but according to the Latin Patriarchate, there are about 135 Catholics in the territory. Israel's military maintains that it does not deliberately target churches and religious sites. But the Jerusalem Patriarchate said there had been "repeated assaults on Christian holy sites in Gaza". The war was sparked by Palestinian militant group Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, which led to the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's military retaliation has killed at least 58,667 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza. The UN considers these figures to be reliable. AFP