logo
Bombay HC pulls up CBFC for not providing objections to film on UP CM Yogi Adityanath, makers to appeal rejection

Bombay HC pulls up CBFC for not providing objections to film on UP CM Yogi Adityanath, makers to appeal rejection

Indian Express7 hours ago
The Bombay High Court on Thursday directed the makers of a movie purportedly based on Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath to move the revising committee of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) after it was informed that CBFC's examination panel has refused to certify it.
The HC asked the revising committee to inform the makers of the 'objectionable scenes or dialogues' by August 11, after which the makers are required to inform the court of their decision on the changes they intend to make by August 12.
A bench of Justices Revati Mohite-Dere and Neela K Gokhale was hearing a plea by Samrat Cinematics India Pvt Ltd, the makers of the movie, Ajey: The Untold Story of a Yogi, who had approached the HC last month.
The petitioners said the movie, inspired by the book, The Monk Who Became Chief Minister, authored by Shantanu Gupta, was scheduled to be released in theatres on August 1.
The makers had alleged 'unreasonable and arbitrary' delay by the CBFC in clearing the movie. The HC had earlier asked the board to watch the movie and pass a reasoned order.
On Thursday, senior advocate Abhay Khandeparkar for CBFC informed the bench that the board screened the movie as per HC's directions and passed an order on August 6 rejecting to certify the movie. He said the makers can approach the revising panel of the board to challenge the decision.
Khandeparkar claimed the objections raised by CBFC were not only that the movie was based on a Constitutional figure, but certain scenes could be considered as 'defamatory' and 'objectionable'.
On the other hand, advocate Aseem Naphade for the filmmakers claimed the CBFC did not inform them about 'objectionable' scenes or dialogues before rejection to certify it despite it being mandated under the Cinematograph Act.
The HC then pulled up the board and observed a mere two-line reason given by the CBFC was 'not enough' and said it should have been brought to the makers' notice so that they could consider giving a 'disclaimer'.
The HC orally remarked that the CBFC's order was not adhering to the rules. The court also clarified that the board will not insist on any certificate or affidavit from any authority to certify the film. The HC will hear the plea next on August 14.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC directs MPSC to give answer sheet to civil judge aspirant
HC directs MPSC to give answer sheet to civil judge aspirant

Hindustan Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

HC directs MPSC to give answer sheet to civil judge aspirant

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Monday directed the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) to provide a copy of the answer sheet to a candidate taking the Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class exam, under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. Mumbai, India - September 03, 2021: Bombay High Court at Fort, in Mumbai, India, on Friday, September 03, 2021. (Photo by Anshuman Poyrekar/Hindustan Times) (Anshuman Poyrekar/HT PHOTO) Following an advertisement issued by the MPSC in 2022, the petitioner, Adnan Abbas Mookhtiar, took the main examination for the post of civil judge junior division and judicial magistrate first class. After he cleared the preliminary and main written examinations, he appeared for the interview. However, even though he had cleared the main exam and the interview, his name was not mentioned on the provisional select list. Mookhtiar filed an RTI application in 2025, seeking copies of the answer sheet to be furnished to him. However, he was barred from retrieving the copies on the grounds that the final selection list had not been pronounced yet. Thereafter, he approached the competent authority under the Right to Information Act, 2005, with a request to be provided a photocopy of the answer sheet of his main examination. The competent authority, however, rejected his application on the ground that the examination process had not yet been completed. The first appellate authority too rejected the application. Mookhtiar informed the court that the general instructions provided to the candidates published by the MPSC, state that if an application is made under the Right to Information Act, 2005, the answer sheet of the candidate concerned can be made available. On the other hand, advocate Ashutosh Kulkarni appearing for the MPSC submitted that if such applications are entertained at this juncture – before the examination process is completed – it could stall the examination process. Noting that the standard instructions issued by the MPSC did not specify that a copy of the answer sheet would be made available only upon completion of the examination process, the division bench of Justice M S Karnik and Justice N R Borkar granted relief to Mookhtiar by directing the authorities concerned to provide him the answers sheet. 'We are inclined to allow the petition to the extent that the photocopy of the answer sheet of the petitioner be handed over to him by the Respondent – Maharashtra Public Service Commission – within a period of one week,' the court concluded.

CM Yogi directs officials to take action on flood relief, Vision Document 2047
CM Yogi directs officials to take action on flood relief, Vision Document 2047

The Print

time37 minutes ago

  • The Print

CM Yogi directs officials to take action on flood relief, Vision Document 2047

He directed each department to prepare a concise and meaningful note summarising their work over the past eight years. These notes will support a 24-hour discussion session proposed during the upcoming Vidhan Mandal proceedings, where ministers will present their department's progress and commitments to the public. According to an official statement, the chief minister emphasised that the state is in the process of preparing the Vision Document 2047, which will determine the roadmap and future goals for UP's development over the next two decades. Lucknow, Aug 7 (PTI) Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Thursday chaired a high-level meeting here at Lok Bhavan where he issued key directives to officials regarding 'Viksit Bharat-Viksit Uttar Pradesh Vision Document 2047', flood relief efforts, preparations for the upcoming legislative session and the provision of free bus travel for women during Raksha Bandhan. To involve citizens in shaping this vision, the chief minister instructed that a QR code system be launched to collect public suggestions. These codes will be displayed in government offices, panchayat buildings, hospitals and bus stations. All relevant departments have been asked to ensure timely implementation. On flood relief efforts, Adityanath directed that control rooms in flood-affected districts remain continuously active, ensuring timely distribution of quality and sufficient relief material to every affected individual. He also emphasised the adequate deployment of boats for rescue and relief operations. Reviewing preparations for Raksha Bandhan, which will be celebrated on Saturday, the chief minister announced that women will be allowed free travel on Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) and urban bus services from the morning of August 8 until midnight of August 10, as part of the government's ongoing commitment to support women during festivals. He also advised departments to ensure that answers to legislative queries are logical, relevant and of high quality. Senior officials are expected to personally review responses before submission. PTI KIS KSS KSS This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

2013 Pune murder: Dabholkar murder convict tells HC there's no evidence against him
2013 Pune murder: Dabholkar murder convict tells HC there's no evidence against him

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

2013 Pune murder: Dabholkar murder convict tells HC there's no evidence against him

MUMBAI: Sharad Kalaskar, 31, who was convicted in May 2024 by a Pune trial court for the 2013 murder of rationalist and anti-superstition activist Dr Narendra Dabholkar, told the Bombay High Court on Thursday that no prima facie case had been established against him during the investigation and that no evidence was led against him at trial. 2013 Pune murder: Dabholkar murder convict tells HC there's no evidence against him Kalaskar has filed an appeal against his conviction and sought bail before a division bench of justice Suman Shyam and justice Shyam Chandak. Appearing on Kalaskar's behalf, advocate Nitin Pradhan argued that the prosecution had failed to produce any evidence linking his client to the Sanatan Sanstha, a Hindu nationalist organisation that has been under scrutiny for its alleged role in the murder. Dr Dabholkar, founder of the Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmoolan Samiti (MANS), was shot dead on the morning of August 20, 2013, during a routine walk in Pune. The killing was allegedly carried out by two men on a motorcycle, later identified as Kalaskar and Sachin Andure—both reportedly affiliated with the Sanstha. While both were convicted earlier this year, the court had also criticised investigative agencies for failing to identify the masterminds behind the plot. Sanatan Sanstha has also been linked to the killings of other prominent rationalists and thinkers, including CPI leader Govind Pansare and scholar MM Kalburgi. In the Dabholkar case, three other accused—Virendrasingh Tawade, Sanjeev Punalkar and Vikram Bhave—were acquitted due to lack of evidence. During Thursday's hearing, Kalaskar's counsel questioned several aspects of the investigation and trial. He submitted that the firearm allegedly used in the crime was recovered in August 2013 at the instance of two other individuals—Vikas Khandelwal and Manish Nagori—but neither the weapon nor the duo were mentioned in the chargesheet or examined during trial. Though the firearm was sent for forensic testing, the prosecution failed to establish any ballistic link between the gun and the pellets recovered from Dr Dabholkar's body, Kalaskar claimed. He also argued that key police officers involved in registering the FIR and conducting the investigation were not examined by the prosecution, and thus could not be cross-examined during trial. Kalaskar further pointed out that several alleged conspirators had been acquitted and that the weapon said to have been used in the shooting was never formally introduced as evidence during the trial. The high court has posted the matter for further hearing on August 21.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store