Most US adults say child care costs are a 'major problem,' a new AP-NORC poll finds
But they're divided over how to solve the problem and what role the government should have in that solution.
About three-quarters of U.S. adults see child care costs as a 'major problem,' but only about half say helping working families pay for child care should be a 'high priority' for the federal government, according to the June poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.
The latest congressional package of tax cuts included tax credits and benefits for parents and businesses that assist employees with child care. Those changes have been praised by some, while others say millions of families at lower income levels wouldn't get the full credit and would be affected by cuts in Medicaid and food stamps.
The poll findings help explain the difficulty advocacy groups, elected officials and families navigate in trying to address the high costs of care: While most agree it's a problem, there isn't a simple fix. For instance, while government-funded child care is popular, that might not be everyone's first choice. Many U.S. adults also think it's better for children with two parents to be cared for full time by a parent.
'Everyone kind of agrees that it's a problem that we need to address,' said Sarah Rittling, executive director of the First Five Years Fund advocacy organization. 'By having this issue out there, it really is driving a lot of bipartisan conversations.'
Some consensus on free day care and paid family leave
Most Americans support initiatives to offer child care or additional time for working families to spend with babies. About two-thirds support providing free or low-cost day care for children too young to attend public school, and a similar share favor requiring employers to provide paid family leave for new parents.
Women are more likely than men to support the proposals, and Democrats are more likely than Republicans, but each is popular across the board.
Mary Banek, a nurse anesthetist of Midlothian, Texas, said she helps take care of her 1-year-old grandson so he doesn't need day care. When she had her kids, she left the workforce and got a license to start a day care from her home to watch 12 children, including her own, so she could generate income.
Banek said she's surprised at the high fees at day cares these days.
'I don't know what's happened and why it is so expensive,' Banek said, adding maybe there's a way to cap costs. She doesn't feel the government should foot the cost.
Many think parents should be caregivers
While many solutions focus on families with working parents, there isn't broad agreement this is the best arrangement for children. Just under half of U.S. adults, 45%, say children with two parents are better off when one parent doesn't have a job and raises the children. Only about 1 in 10 say children are better off when both parents work full time, and about 4 in 10 say it doesn't make a difference.
Vice President JD Vance has tried to push for ideas that would encourage Americans to have families but has opposed government spending on child care, saying children benefit from having a parent or family member at home as a caretaker.
About half of men say children with two parents are better off when one is the full-time caregiver, compared with about 4 in 10 women.
Stephen Yip-Wineman, 45, a high school teacher from Murrieta, California, who describes himself as a moderate, said he feels society doesn't see the value of parents choosing to be caretakers.
'A lot of people are pushed into the idea that everyone in their family is going to work and that's the way of being a productive member of society,' Yip-Wineman said. 'They think staying home and taking care of the kids is somehow not contributing.'
Yip-Wineman has two children ages 12 and 14, and their mother stays home, but he says his ideas of having a parent do the caretaking don't have to do with making the mother the primary caretaker.
'Having a parent raise the kids is not about pushing traditional Christian values and trying to keep women out of the workplace," he said. "It's about trying to be more personally engaged with each other.'
Are changes happening?
Many Democrats and Republicans have endorsed expansions to the child tax credit as a way to support families and lift children and young families out of poverty.
While campaigning as Donald Trump's running mate, Vance raised the possibility of increasing the child tax credit to $5,000, saying that would help more parents stay home with their children.
About 7 in 10 U.S. adults said they'd support increasing the child tax credit from $2,000 to $2,500 for parents who are U.S. citizens, a Washington Post/Ipsos poll from June found. Republicans and Democrats were similarly likely to support this: About 8 in 10 of each were in favor.
In the final bill, however, the child tax credit increased to $2,200.
Beyond expanding the child tax credit, the package also increased a benefit allowing most working parents to claim a higher percentage of their child care expenses and get more tax credits.
Organizations want increased funding for federal early-learning and care programs, including a child care program for low-income families and an early-education program called Head Start. Trump's Republican administration backed away from a proposal this year to eliminate funding for Head Start.
Other groups, including Child Care Aware of America, have pointed out the new law's cuts in Medicaid would result in a loss of health coverage for many child care workers.
___
The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
a minute ago
- New York Post
Thune warns Schumer may let govt shut down as ‘struggling' Dems scramble to appease far-left
Senate Majority Leader John Thune warned that Congress may be careening towards a partial government shutdown this fall because of pressure from the far-left flank of the Democratic Party. Thune (R-SD) observed that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has faced intense pressure from his base and mused that a few upcoming votes will provide more clarity about the risks of a partial shutdown. 'I think he [Schumer] probably thinks that it's beneficial to their political base, the far left of the Democrat Party, and you can kind of see what's happening up there in New York politics,' Thune told Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures.' In March, Schumer faced fierce progressive backlash after he declined to block a GOP-backed spending patch to avert a partial government shutdown. The blowback was so pronounced that Schumer was forced to reschedule parts of his book tour as progressives demanded Democrats in Congress put up more of a fight against President Trump. 3 Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated that a few upcoming votes on appropriations bills will help determine the likelihood of a government shutdown. Getty Images 3 Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer faced progressive backlash when he moved to avert a partial government shutdown in March. AP Government shutdown showdowns are one of the few instances in which Democrats have leverage with the Trump administration, given that they are the minority party in both the House and the Senate. Every new fiscal year, which starts on Oct. 1, Congress is required to fund the government via 12 appropriations bills or through a continuing resolution in order to avoid a shutdown. Both avenues are subject to the Senate fillibuster, which requires 60 votes to overcome. Republicans only have 53, which means they need cooperation from Democrats. At the moment, Congress has funded the government via a continuing resolution, which essentially means that it is running on autopilot until the fall. 'This is a party struggling for an identity. This is a party that's completely out of step with the mainstream of this country,' Thune added. 'We're going to be waiting to see anxiously what Chuck Schumer and other leaders on the Democrat side decide to do.' Earlier this month, Schumer railed against Republicans for advancing a rescissions package, which allows them to cancel previously approved spending without support from Democrats. Schumer argued that such a move jeopardizes negotiations over the government shutdown showdown. 'We are doing everything we can to keep the bipartisan appropriations process going,' Schumer told reporters earlier this month. 'And they're undermining it with rescissions, with pocket rescissions, with impoundment and every other way.' The implication from Schumer is that Democrats can't trust Republicans to stick to the terms of a bipartisan appropriations deal because they've shown a willingness to bypass them via rescissions and presidential impoundment, when Trump decides not to spend certain authorized funds. On the Republican side, GOP leaders, particularly in the House, have long struggled to get fiscal hawks on board with either a continuing resolution or the 12 appropriations bills. There's been a strong push from the right flank for deeper cuts to spending, something that is a dealbreaker for Democrats. 3 Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez hasn't said what her 2028 intentions are yet. LP Media Schumer also has to navigate dicey progressive politics. The Democratic establishment was upended last month when Zohran Mamdani bested former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary. The top Senate Democrat is up for reelection in 2028 and hasn't said whether or not he will run amid the threat of a challenge from 'Squad' Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). 'Ultimately, keeping the government funded is good for the country, and hopefully we will have bipartisan cooperation to do that,' Thune added. 'If their recent track record is any indication, they're under a tremendous amount of pressure from that far left wing of the Democrat Party to shut the government down.' The last partial government shutdown, which lasted 35 days, took place between late 2018 and early 2019 due to a feud between Trump and Democrats over border wall funding.


New York Times
2 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump calls for Washington Commanders, Cleveland Guardians to revert to previous names
President Donald Trump wants the NFL's Washington Commanders and MLB's Cleveland Guardians to revert to their previous team names. 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Sunday. 'Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them.' Advertisement Trump also told the team owners to 'GET IT DONE!!!' Cleveland Guardians team president Chris Antonetti said the club is focused on its future rather than talk of its past nickname. 'Not something I'm tracking or paying a lot of attention to, but I would say generally, I understand there are very different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago,' Antonetti said Sunday when asked about Trump's post. 'But it's a decision we made and we've gotten the opportunity to build the brand as the Guardians over the last four years and we're excited about the future that's in front of us.' The Commanders did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Trump's post. Both the Commanders and the Guardians began exploring name changes in 2020, in the wake of widespread protests over racial injustice that occurred around the United States following the death of George Floyd. At the time, Trump opposed the idea and said on Twitter that the franchises were considering changing their names to be politically correct. Retailers and corporations, including Walmart, Target, Nike and FedEx, which then owned Washington's stadium naming rights, urged the NFL team to change its name from the Redskins, which had been decried as a racist slur. Some companies even pulled merchandise with the team name off their shelves. Loud factions of Washington's fan base, particularly those around for the Super Bowl-winning era starting in 1982, criticized the team's decision to drop the former nickname. The team came up with a temporary stopgap, calling itself the Washington Football Team for two seasons. Following a nearly two-year rebranding process, Washington landed on Commanders ahead of the 2022 season. The name wasn't a hit, but more people inside and outside team headquarters began embracing the nickname when Washington went 12-5 last season and won two playoff games on the road before losing at Philadelphia in the NFC championship. Advertisement Team owner Josh Harris said in February that the polarizing nickname would remain in place. 'I think it's now being embraced by our team, by our culture, by our coaching staff,' Harris said. 'So, we're going with that.' In Cleveland, the club decided to explore name change possibilities in July 2020. That winter, team owner Paul Dolan said the decision came after months of 'discussions with fans, business leaders, players, social activists and researchers focused on Native American culture and issues' that led him to realize the name was no longer acceptable. Cleveland did not adopt an interim name like Washington did in 2020, and continued to play as the Indians in 2021. The franchise was a charter member of the American League, one of eight teams to break ground with the new league in 1901. The team initially went by the Bluebirds (often shortened to Blues), then the Broncos and then the Naps before switching to the Indians in 1915. In 2019, Cleveland dropped its Chief Wahoo logo, which had been the subject of annual Opening Day protests outside the ballpark. The club replaced the logo with a guitar-themed All-Star Game patch on its uniforms, a nod to the fact it hosted that season's All-Star Game and that the city is the site of the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. In July 2021, the club announced its new nickname, the Guardians, which was inspired by a pair of stone sculptures, known as the Guardians of Traffic, along the Hope Memorial Bridge near the ballpark. The team also debuted a 'Diamond C' logo on players' caps to go with the new name. Over the years, Trump has often voiced his opinion about divisive issues in the sports world. In 2017, he urged NFL owners to fire players who protested racial injustice and police brutality by not standing for the national anthem. His administration has targeted universities across the country for allowing transgender athletes to compete, saying they are violating Title IX. He has reportedly been considering issuing an executive order regarding college athletics for months. Advertisement Trump appears to be well aware of the symbolic power of sports. This year, he became the first sitting U.S. president to attend the Super Bowl. This month, he said that a UFC fight would be held on the grounds of the White House next year as part of the country's 250th birthday celebration.


CBS News
2 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump calls on Washington Commanders to "IMMEDIATELY" change back to former name
President Trump on Sunday pushed the Washington Commanders NFL team to return to its previous name, which was scrapped five years ago because it included a word that many view as a slur against Native Americans. "The Washington "Whatever's" should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this," Mr. Trump wrote. Meanwhile in baseball, the president also pushed the Cleveland Guardians MLB team to change back to the Cleveland Indians, a name the franchise got rid of in 2021. "We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!" he said. Mr. Trump claimed, "Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them." The football team in the nation's capital changed its name from the "Washington Redskins" in 2020, amid steep criticism and pressure from advertisers, Native American groups and some politicians. The team's then-owner, Dan Snyder, had previously vowed to leave the name in place. The team settled on the name "Commanders" after a brief period in which it was known only as the "Washington Football Team." A day before Sunday's post, Jason Buck, a now-retired defensive lineman who played on the Washington team in the 1990s, told TMZ he would "give anything" to meet with Mr. Trump to discuss changing the Commanders' name back. CBS News has reached out to the Commanders, the Guardians, the NFL and the MLB for comment. Mr. Trump has weighed in on the issue in the past. Earlier this month, he told reporters he was opposed to the Commanders' name change. "I wouldn't have changed the name," he said, when asked about an acrimonious redevelopment deal that could return the team to RFK Stadium in Washington, D.C. "It doesn't have the same ring to me. But you know, winning can make everything sound good. So if they win, all of a sudden, the Commanders sounds good, but I wouldn't have changed it." The team last won a Super Bowl in 1992. And in 2020, he wrote on X: "They name teams out of STRENGTH, not weakness, but now the Washington Redskins & Cleveland Indians, two fabled sports franchises, look like they are going to be changing their names in order to be politically correct." Earlier this year, the president also urged Massapequa High School in New York not to change its mascot's name and logo — currently the "Chiefs" — despite a state-level ban on Native American names for school mascots. Mr. Trump directed Secretary of Education Linda McMahon to "fight for the people of Massapequa on this very important issue." Just over a month later, the Department of Education alleged the state policy violated civil rights law, and in June, the department said it had referred the case to the Department of Justice after the state of New York declined to rescind the policy.