
Tariff Tracker, June 21: Hong Kong dollar declines, but investors wary of US assets
Dear reader,
Earlier this week, the US Federal Reserve announced it would hold interest rates steady for the fourth time in a row, with Chairman Jerome Powell saying it was too early to gauge the economic impact of tariffs.
The benchmark lending rate in the US has remained in the 4.25 to 4.5% range since January. While the fallout of the tariffs would logically translate into higher prices of goods, inflation rose marginally to 2.4% in May. The labour market has also remained stable. Economists anticipate that any Fed rate cut would be in response to rising unemployment, in what is described as a 'bad news rate cut'.
Powell also signalled the possibility of 'higher energy prices' because of Israel's war with Iran, adding that 'those things don't generally tend to have lasting effects on inflation.'
On Friday (June 20), the Hong Kong dollar (HKD) declined to the lower end of its trading range against the US Dollar (USD), trading briefly at 7.85 HKD for the first time since 2023. Given the current market volatility, market hawks have speculated whether the HKD's recent decline signals the end of this currency peg. The Financial Times columnist Robin Harding wrote on June 9 that the Hong Kong dollar slump was a 'warning light for global markets'.
To understand why this happened, we need to consider the unique exchange rate system in play. Since 1983, the Hong Kong dollar has been pegged to the US dollar ($1 = 7.80 HKD) in what is called a linked exchange rate system (LERS). The city-state's central banking authority, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), strictly maintains this exchange rate within the range of 7.75-7.85 HKD, and steps in whenever there is any risk of breaching the bounds.
When the HKD appreciates ($1 < 7.75 HKD), the HKMA buys USD reserves to restore the targeted rate by supplying the HKD.
Ahead of anticipated talks between the US and China towards a trade deal, as well as the prospect of a trade deal with Taiwan, Asian currencies rallied against the dollar as part of the Sell America wave, which we explained in the May 5 Tariff Tracker. In early May, the HKD value breached the 7.75 mark four times on three days, according to the HKMA. Thus, the authority sold HKD129.4 billion in exchange for USD16.7 billion, following the LERS mechanism. According to a Bloomberg report, this had been its first such intervention in five years – the HKMA in 2022 and 2023 moved to sell the USD when its currency was depreciating ($1 > 7.85 HKD).
The base rate set by the HKMA is also linked to the US Federal Reserve's policy moves. However, the gap between the HK base rate and US interbank rate has widened to its largest since 2018, Nikkei Asia reported. The Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), a US interbank benchmark rate, is currently in the 4.3% range, while the corresponding Hong Kong Interbank Offer Rate (HIBOR) is at about 0.5%, its lowest level in three years, the report said.
The HKMA's purchase of USD reserves increased liquidity in the market as HKD supply increased, and with it, interest rates in Hong Kong fell sharply. The HIBOR fell by about 3% since May 2, the Nikkei report said.
So what seems to be the problem?
The FT column expressed concern about how this interest rate gap has persisted, with no sign of letting up. Ordinarily, investors would respond to such a scenario by opting for a carry trade, in which they borrow funds at the lower interest rate and invest in the currency with the higher interest rate, to profit from the interest rate differences between the two countries (arbitrage).
This has thus far not happened. The fallout of US President Donald Trump's shifty tariff policies has resulted in a wider shift away from the US dollar. Since May 2025, Asian currencies, including the South Korean won, Japanese yen and Singapore dollar, have appreciated against the US dollar.
The FT report highlighted two major issues:
* One, the extreme caution taken by banks and hedge funds in responding to the arbitrage opportunity. Given the general back-and-forth on tariff announcements, these organisations have become risk-averse to the possibility of what could be considered 'easy money'.
* Two, a declining trust level in American assets by Asian investors. The FT report cited the contentious Section 899 of the One Big, Beautiful Bill, currently in US Congress, which threatens higher taxes on foreign investments. Even if this clause may not see the light of day, the general unpredictability has made potential investors wary.
What does this mean for Hong Kong?
Hong Kong authorities have welcomed the low interest rates, Nikkei Asia reported. Lower interest rates help to boost consumption spending and mean cheaper borrowing, especially on items like housing mortgages. Further, the downward trend in property prices, underway since 2021, may finally be arrested, with major local real estate companies already witnessing a recovery in their stock prices, the Nikkei report said.
However, this trend is likely temporary and would come to a halt once the HKMA intervenes to arrest the depreciating HKD value, which in turn would reduce liquidity and temporarily increase the HIBOR.
There are other factors at play as well. In its latest policy note on June 19, the HKMA noted that the HKD had been strengthening for months before the tariff announcements. The note drew attention to the 'buoyant capital market activities' by Chinese investors in the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, which helped its stock market index, the Hang Seng Index, gain 10% in the first four months. Further, dividend payments by listed companies in May and June also helped boost the HKD demand.
The HKMA has asserted that the LERS is working as it is expected to, and that the fluctuations in the HKD are all part of the system.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
PM Modi to embark on multi-nation tour in July as India builds global consensus on combatting terror
New Delhi: Strengthening multilateralism, fostering bilateral economic cooperation and garnering further support on India's fight against terrorism from countries across different continents, Prime Minister Narendra Modi will embark on a major tour of several nations, including Brazil for 17th BRICS Summit, early next month. PM Modi is expected to visit Morocco, Argentina, Brazil, Trinidad and Tobago (T&T) and Jordan from July 2-10, top officials have revealed while not ruling out stopovers in more nations. Consolidating India's position as a voice of the Global South, Prime Minister Modi has been spotlighting India's emergence as a 'Vishwa Bandhu' in a divided world. Over the last 11 years, India has also strongly established itself as an all-weather friend of Africa with PM Modi emphasising New Delhi's commitment to the continent. The State Visit to Morocco will only be the second by an Indian PM after late Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee's landmark February 1999 visit to the North African nation. King Mohammed VI, who had chosen India for his first visit to an Asian country in 2001, visited India again in 2015 to participate in the third India Africa Forum Summit (IAFS-III). Analysts reckon that it was his meeting with PM Modi on the sidelines of the event that intensified the partnership between both countries like never before. Since then, India and Morocco have seen over two dozen Ministerial visits and signing of more than 40 MoUs/agreements in areas including counter-terrorism, cyber security, space, agriculture, vocational training, etc. PM Modi's significant visit would take place in the aftermath of the heinous April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and holds huge significance as Morocco also continues to battle the growing onslaught of terrorism, militancy and extremism in the Sahel region. Morocco is also a member of the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS and co-chairs the Africa Focus Group. After wrapping up his engagements in Africa, PM Modi could visit Argentina, sources with knowledge of the itinerary that is being finalised, said. The multi-faceted relations between the two countries have strengthened, especially after being elevated to the level of Strategic Partnership during the State Visit to India of the then President of Argentina in February 2019. In what was the first bilateral meeting between the two leaders, Prime Minister Modi had met Argentina President Javier Milei, on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Rio de Janeiro in November 2024. The two leaders, the PMO stated after the meeting, had an engaging discussion and also expressed satisfaction at the broadening of the Strategic Partnership between the two vibrant democracies in the last few years. They had also noted the deepening of trade and economic relations with India emerging among the top five trading partners of Argentina. PM Modi would then attend the BRICS Summit at the Museum of Modern Art, scheduled to be held in Rio de Janeiro on July 6-7. In the last Summit, held under Russia's chairship in Kazan in October 2024, PM Modi had noted that the event was taking place at a time when the world is undergoing several uncertainties and challenges including conflicts, adverse climatic impacts, and cyber threats, placing greater expectations upon BRICS. Addressing two sessions of the BRICS Summit in Kazan, PM Modi had suggested that the group take a people-centric approach to tackle these challenges and also underlined the need for early adoption of a Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism at the United Nations to combat the menace of terrorism. It is expected that PM Modi will visit Trinidad and Tobago in the southern Caribbean after the BRICS Summit. Last November, while addressing the 2nd India-CARICOM Summit in Georgetown, Prime Minister Modi had underscored that India stands firmly for giving voice to the concerns of the Global South. Noting that the Global South countries were the most impacted by the challenges and conflicts of recent years, he had also reaffirmed India's steadfast commitment to Caribbean countries as a reliable partner. It was on the sidelines of the Summit in Guyana that PM Modi also met with the then Prime Minister of Trinidad & Tobago, Keith Rowley and congratulated him for adoption of India's flagship UPI Platform by the Caribbean nation while assuring further collaboration in the field of digital transformation. Both countries also share deep-rooted people-to-people ties since 1845, when the first ship 'Fatel Razack' carrying 225 Indian indentured workers reached the shores of Trinidad, then a British colony. On his way back to India, it is expected that PM Modi will be visiting Jordan, a country that has had historical links with India since times immemorial. PM Modi had transited Amman in February 2018 during his official visit to Palestine when he was received by King Abdullah at his private residential palace followed by a bilateral meeting between the two leaders. After King Abdullah's historic State Visit to India in February-March 2018, both leaders have met on four occasions - at a pull-aside meeting during the 74th UNGA in New York on 24 Sep 2019; in Riyadh during the 'Future Investment initiative' meeting held in October 2019; on the sidelines of COP-28 in Dubai in December 2023; and, on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Apulia, Italy in June 2024. On April 24, in a phone call with Prime Minister Modi, King Abdullah II had strongly condemned the ghastly terror attack in Pahalgam and conveyed sincere condolences at the loss of innocent lives. "His Majesty emphasised Jordan's rejection of violence in all its forms, and wished the injured a speedy recovery," the Jordanian King's office said in a statement after the phone call.


Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
The $1,999 Liberty Phone is made in America. Its creator explains how.
Next Story Ben Raab , The Wall Street Journal Purism's Liberty Phone, priced at $1,999, is the most advanced U.S.-made smartphone but lacks competitive specs compared to the iPhone. Limited by domestic supply chains and higher costs, it sources components globally. Despite scaling potential, Purism sells fewer than 100,000 units, as many parts still come from Asia. The phone's unique features cater to security-conscious users. Purism's $1,999 Liberty Phone is assembled in the U.S. with parts from the U.S. and elsewhere, including China. Photo: Purism Gift this article It is possible to build a smartphone in the U.S. right now. But it won't be as sleek or as powerful as an iPhone, and it will cost a lot more. It is possible to build a smartphone in the U.S. right now. But it won't be as sleek or as powerful as an iPhone, and it will cost a lot more. Todd Weaver's company, Purism, developed the Liberty Phone, the closest anyone has gotten. It has specs that would have been more impressive a decade ago, and it costs $1,999. President Trump has threatened steep tariffs on foreign-made smartphones to pressure companies like Apple to shift manufacturing stateside. Meanwhile, the Trump Organization is promoting a 'Made in the U.S.A." phone for $499 with specs that deem it unlikely to be built here anytime soon. Supply-chain analysts agree it's impossible to match Asia's production quality and scale for now. But Weaver's Liberty Phone, not the Trump phone, offers a unique look at the realities of domestic manufacturing. And why nobody else is doing it. The Liberty Phone's motherboard is built in-house, the chip comes from Texas, and the assembly is done at Purism's facility in Carlsbad, Calif. But not all of its parts are U.S. made: Other components come from China and other Asian countries. 'I've been working on this for 10 years and we've done everything we possibly can to build from U.S. manufacturing," Weaver says. 'There are just some parts that don't yet have a supply chain. We're gonna keep incrementing there until we can get to that point." Weaver says he can produce Liberty Phones at a rate of about 10,000 a month, but so far, he's sold fewer than 100,000. By comparison, Apple shipped around 225 million phones in 2024, according to market analyst firm Canalys. The Liberty Phone also doesn't run on Android or iOS. Its processor, produced by Dutch semiconductor firm NXP in Austin, Texas, is designed for cars, not smartphones. It runs on Purism's own PureOS, which is limited to calling, texting and web browsing, plus some basic apps like a calculator. Purism founder Todd Weaver holds up the Liberty Phone's motherboard, manufactured at the company's California facility. Photo: Purism The screen and battery come from China and the rear-facing camera comes from South Korea. Weaver says a fully U.S.-made phone is limited by a lack of domestic infrastructure. There are no companies mass-producing smartphone screens in the U.S., for example. Complications like this, even at Purism's small scale, help explain why Apple and others haven't made a serious attempt at producing premium smartphones in the U.S. 'Even if the specs were less impressive, it would take many, many years to be fully sourced out of the U.S. and not practical," says Jeff Fieldhack, a research director at Counterpoint Research. 'Cost aside, we don't have factories here building application processors, high-end displays or most of the other things in your smartphone." Weaver says the Liberty Phone costs about $650 to make. The iPhone 16 Pro Max, a much more powerful device, was estimated to cost around $550 to make in China last fall, according to TechInsights. Purism's higher U.S. labor costs are partially offset by cheaper, lower-quality parts: a basic camera, low-resolution screen and half the RAM. Weaver says the Liberty Phone isn't built to compete with an iPhone right now. He says the $1,999 retail price reflects a securely sourced phone with a vetted supply chain. About half of Purism's customers are government agencies across the U.S., he says. 'On the consumer side, it's security geeks, parents who want a phone for their kid, elderly people or people who want to avoid big tech," says Weaver. 'Someone who needs a wicked-strong camera is not our audience." Weaver estimates he could scale to building 100,000 phones a month within six months. But getting there would require investment to cover new machines, more line operators and added floor space. He has no traditional venture-capital funding, relying only on revenue and crowdfunding. Tariffs likely won't affect his costs at his current production rates because he ordered a large batch of parts when he started and still has them in supply at his facility. Weaver says that a long-term tariff on imported electronics could make the Liberty Phone's manufacturing cost more competitive, since the cheap components would only see marginal increases, and more components are likely to be built in the U.S. soon. While companies like Intel already manufacture chips in the U.S. and firms like TSMC and Micron are building domestic facilities, Fieldhack says those efforts are a small fraction of global production. Companies lack incentives to move more to American soil. 'A lot of it isn't leading edge, the cost is still high, and it would still take a long time," he says. Write to Ben Raab at Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News , Corporate news , Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.


India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Outdated, misinformed, and disconnected from reality," Amit Malviya slams Rahul Gandhi's claims on Make in India
New Delhi [India], June 21 (ANI): BJP leader Amit Malviya on Saturday hit back at Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's criticism of the 'Make in India' initiative, and said that India's manufacturing sector is growing strongly under Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Amit Malviya said India is now the world's second-largest mobile phone maker, growing from just 2 factories in 2014 to over 300 today. He added that the PLI scheme brought in Rs 10,905 crore in investments, with total production of Rs 7.15 lakh crore and exports of Rs 3.9 lakh crore, proving Rahul Gandhi's claims wrong. In a post on X, Amit Malviya wrote, 'Rahul Gandhi claims that manufacturing is collapsing under Modi's 'Make in India'. Let's bust the myths with facts. India is now the world's 2nd largest mobile phone producer. From just 2 mobile manufacturing units in 2014 to over 300 today. The so-called 'failed' PLI scheme, as labelled by Rahul Gandhi, has led to: Cumulative investments of 10,905 crore, Total production worth 7.15 lakh crore, Exports of 3.9 lakh crore, Electronics production value rose from 18,900 crore (FY14) to 4,22,000 crore (FY24).' 'Mobile phone exports surged 77-fold from 1,566 crore (2014-15) to 1.2 lakh crore (2023-24), 99.2% of mobile phones sold in India are now made in India, up from just 26% in 2014-15. Under the PLI scheme for electronics alone, 1,39,670 direct jobs have already been created. 1.8 lakh new companies were registered in 2023-24, marking a 16% increase over the previous year. Electronics exports hit USD 38+ billion in FY24-25, a 32% year-on-year increase. PLI allocations for electronics rose from 5,747 crore (FY24-25) to 8,885 crore (FY25-26) a clear signal of continued commitment,' the post reads. Malviya said that under PM Modi, India has transformed from an importer to a global manufacturing powerhouse. He said the government has approved major semiconductor projects worth Rs 1.52 lakh crore and that electronics production is expected to reach USD 300 billion by 2026. He dismissed Rahul Gandhi's criticism as outdated and said India is growing, building, and leading in the tech and manufacturing sectors. 'The government has approved landmark semiconductor projects worth 1.52 lakh crore, a critical leap into deep-tech manufacturing. Overall, electronics production is projected to reach USD 300 billion by 2026. Under PM Modi, India has transformed from an importer to a global manufacturing powerhouse. Rahul Gandhi's narratives are outdated, misinformed, and disconnected from reality. India is building. India is growing. India is leading,' the post further reads. Earlier in the day, the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi saying that despite promises of a 'Make in India' factory boom, manufacturing in the country is at a record low and youth unemployment is very high. Gandhi questioned the effectiveness of the 'Make in India' initiative, highlighting that manufacturing in the country has fallen to a record low of 14 per cent of the economy since 2014. (ANI)