Trump's politically motivated sanctions against Brazil strain relations among old allies
In doing so, he has damaged one of the Western hemisphere's most important and long-standing relationships, by levying 50% tariffs that begin to take effect Wednesday on the largest Latin America economy, sanctioning its main justice and bringing relations between the two countries to the lowest point in decades.
The White House has appeared to embrace a narrative pushed by Bolsonaro allies in the U.S., that the former Brazilian president's prosecution for attempting to overturn his 2022 election loss is part of a 'deliberate breakdown in the rule of law,' with the government engaging in 'politically motivated intimidation' and committing 'human rights abuses,' according to Trump's statement announcing the tariffs.
The message was clear earlier, when Trump described Bolsonaro's prosecution by Brazil's Supreme Court as a 'witch hunt' — using the same phrase he has employed for the numerous investigations he has faced since his first term. Bolsonaro faces charges of orchestrating a coup attempt to stay in power after losing the 2022 election to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. A conviction could come in the next few months.
The U.S. has a long history of meddling with the affairs of Latin American governments, but Trump's latest moves are unprecedented, said Steven Levitsky, a political scientist at Harvard University.
'This is a personalistic government that is adopting policies according to Trump's whims,' Levitsky said.
Bolsonaro's sons, he noted, have close connections to Trump's inner circle. The argument has been bolstered by parallels between Bolsonaro's prosecution and the attempted prosecution of Trump for trying to overturn his 2020 election loss, which ended when he won his second term last November.
'He's been convinced Bolsonaro is a kindred spirit suffering a similar witch hunt,' Levitsky said.
Brazil's institutions hold firm against political pressure
After Bolsonaro's defeat in 2022, Trump and his supporters echoed his baseless election fraud claims, treating him as a conservative icon and hosting him at the Conservative Political Action Conference. Steve Bannon, the former Trump adviser, recently told Brazil's news website UOL that the U.S. would lift tariffs if Bolsonaro's prosecution were dropped.
Meeting that demand, however, is impossible for several reasons.
Brazilian officials have consistently emphasized that the judiciary is independent. The executive branch, which manages foreign relations, has no control over Supreme Court justices, who in turn have stated they won't yield to political pressure.
On Monday, the court ordered that Bolsonaro be placed under house arrest for violating court orders by spreading messages on social media through his sons' accounts.
Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversees the case against Bolsonaro, was sanctioned under the U.S. Magnitsky Act, which is supposed to target serious human rights offenders. De Moraes has argued that defendants were granted full due process and said he would ignore the sanctions and continue his work.
'The ask for Lula was undoable,' said Bruna Santos of the Inter-American Dialogue in Washington, D.C., about dropping the charges against Bolsonaro. 'In the long run, you are leaving a scar on the relationship between the two largest democracies in the hemisphere.'
Magnitsky sanctions 'twist the law'
Three key factors explain the souring of U.S.-Brazil ties in recent months, said Oliver Stuenkel, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: growing alignment between the far-right in both countries; Brazil's refusal to cave to tariff threats; and the country's lack of lobbying in Washington.
Lawmaker Eduardo Bolsonaro, Jair Bolsonaro's third son, has been a central figure linking Brazil's far-right with Trump's MAGA movement.
He took a leave from Brazil's Congress and moved to the U.S. in March, but he has long cultivated ties in Trump's orbit. Eduardo openly called for Magnitsky sanctions against de Moraes and publicly thanked Trump after the 50% tariffs were announced in early July.
Democratic Massachusetts Rep. Jim McGovern, author of the Magnitsky Act, which allows the U.S. to sanction individual foreign officials who violate human rights, called the administration's actions 'horrible.'
'They make things up to protect someone who says nice things about Donald Trump,' McGovern told The Associated Press.
Bolsonaro's son helps connect far right in US and Brazil
Eduardo Bolsonaro's international campaign began immediately after his father's 2022 loss. Just days after the elections, he met with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.
As investigations against Bolsonaro and his allies deepened, the Brazilian far right adopted a narrative of judicial persecution and censorship, an echo of Trump and his allies who have claimed the U.S. justice system was weaponized against him.
Brazil's Supreme Court and Electoral Court are among the world's strictest regulators of online discourse: they can order social media takedowns and arrests for spreading misinformation or other content it rules 'anti-democratic.'
But until recently, few believed Eduardo's efforts to punish Brazil's justices would succeed.
That began to change last year when billionaire Elon Musk clashed with de Moraes over censorship on X and threatened to defy court orders by pulling its legal representative from Brazil. In response, de Moraes suspended the social media platform from operating in the country for a month and threatened operations of another Musk company, Starlink. In the end, Musk blinked.
Fábio de Sá e Silva, a professor of international and Brazilian studies at the University of Oklahoma, said Eduardo's influence became evident in May 2024, when he and other right-wing allies secured a hearing before the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee.
'It revealed clear coordination between Bolsonaro supporters and sectors of the U.S. Republican Party,' he said. 'It's a strategy to pressure Brazilian democracy from the outside.'
A last-minute tariff push yields some wins
Brazil has a diplomatic tradition of maintaining a low-key presence in Washington, Stuenkel said. That vacuum created an opportunity for Eduardo Bolsonaro to promote a distorted narrative about Brazil among Republicans and those closest to Trump.
'Now Brazil is paying the price,' he said.
After Trump announced sweeping tariffs in April, Brazil began negotiations. President Lula and Vice President Geraldo Alckmin — Brazil's lead trade negotiator — said they have held numerous meetings with U.S. trade officials since then.
Lula and Trump have never spoken, and the Brazilian president has repeatedly said Washington ignored Brazil's efforts to negotiate ahead of the tariffs' implementation.
Privately, diplomats say they felt the decisions were made inside the White House, within Trump's inner circle — a group they had no access to.
A delegation of Brazilian senators traveled to Washington in the final week of July in a last-ditch effort to defuse tensions. The group, led by Senator Nelsinho Trad, met with business leaders with ties to Brazil and nine U.S. senators — only one of them Republican, Thom Tillis of North Carolina.
'We found views on Brazil were ideologically charged,' Trad told The AP. 'But we made an effort to present economic arguments.'
While the delegation was in Washington, Trump signed the order imposing the 50% tariff. But there was relief: not all Brazilian imports would be hit. Exemptions included civil aircraft and parts, aluminum, tin, wood pulp, energy products and fertilizers.
Trad believes Brazil's outreach may have helped soften the final terms.
'I think the path has to remain one of dialogue and reason so we can make progress on other fronts,' he said.
___
Associated Press writer Mauricio Savarese in Sao Paulo contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
2 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Visitors to the U.S. on business and tourist visas may have to pay $15,000 bonds
Some international visitors to the United States might be required to pay up to $15,000 deposits as part of a new visa bond pilot program announced by the State Department this week in a document published in the Federal Register. The pilot program is another strategy the Trump administration is utilizing to crack down on illegal immigration and is meant to discourage the number of visitors who overstay their visas. The State Department said in the filing that those who overstay their visas pose a national security threat to the U.S. The program is being formed as part of the enforcement of a January executive order in which President Donald Trump declared there was an invasion by illegal immigration through U.S. borders. The consular officers in the respective U.S embassies will determine the amount of the bond during the issuance of the visa. Travelers will have to post the assigned bond amount before they are issued a single-entry visa, which will be valid for three months. Travelers with visa bonds would also be limited to traveling in and out of pre-selected airports. The list of airports has yet to be announced. The administration said 500,000 people overstayed their visas in 2023, based on data from the Department of Homeland Security. The pilot bond program will focus on those countries that the administration has identified as having high visa overstays. The program is limited to only B-1 business and B-2 tourist visas. It does not affect students applying for F-1 student visas. The full list of countries has yet to be announced. A State Department spokesperson said business and tourist visitors from Malawi and Zambia who are eligible for the B-1/B-2 visas will have to post bonds starting Aug. 20. According to Homeland Security's 2023 fiscal year visa overstay data, Malawi had a total visa overstay rate of 14% from 1,655 visitors, and Zambia had 11% from 3,493 visitors. The complete list of countries will be published when the program takes effect. This new program comes as South Florida airports saw a decline in the number of domestic and international travellers compared to the previous year. Dan Linblade, the president and CEO of the Greater Fort Lauderdale Chamber of Commerce, which represents more than 1,250 companies, said in a statement that international business and tourism were vital to the economy and the new bond pilot program is a 'disincentive to travel from abroad.' 'We are concerned of the potential negative impact on international tourism at a time when we see declining numbers related to foreign travel,' said Lindblade. 'If the State Department's focus is only targeted to bad players then the impact will be smaller.' The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, which covers the Sixth District of the Federal Reserve, including Florida, reported in July that group bookings from international travel to the U.S from Canada, Asia, and Europe continued to slow, but there was some growth in overall travel and tourism. In the filing this week, the Department of State said that after reviewing reports going back as far as 2000, when the Immigration and Naturalization Service Data Management Improvement Act was introduced, the reports of entry and exits of nonimmigrant visa holders to the U.S. who overstayed their visas show that thousands of visitors failed to depart by their visa terms. The first Trump administration had tried to initiate a six-month visa-bond pilot program in November 2020. The program was to 'serve as a diplomatic tool to encourage foreign governments to take all appropriate actions to ensure their nationals timely depart the United States after making temporary visits.' It was to run from December 2020 through June 2021. The State Department scrapped the pilot program due to the reduction of global travel because of COVID-19. 'Data collected during the Pilot may also be used to determine the effectiveness of visa bonds at reducing overstays, evaluate concerns about insufficient identity verification, and the extent to which visa bonds may deter otherwise legitimate B-1 and B-2 visa applicants from traveling to the United States,' the State Department said. The bond program will run until August 2026, and the countries on the list will continually be updated over the year. Visitors with bonds will have to file for a refund within 30 days of their departure from the United States. Failure to do so results risks forfeiting the deposits.


CNBC
3 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump contorts timeline of jobs report revisions in effort to justify firing BLS chief
President Donald Trump has tried to justify firing former Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer by claiming that her agency's gold standard employment reports were "rigged" in order to harm him politically. Trump has provided no evidence to support his allegation. Nonetheless, he has repeatedly claimed that the BLS issued "phony" strong-looking jobs numbers during the last year of the Biden administration, only to revise them sharply downward right after the 2024 presidential election. "Just days before the [Nov. 5 presidential] election, they put out numbers that it was like the country was on fire," Trump claimed Tuesday morning on CNBC's "Squawk Box." "And then they did a revision about two weeks later, and the revision was down by almost 900,000 jobs," he alleged. When a host pushed back, Trump doubled down, claiming "the numbers were rigged." "They announced these phenomenal numbers the two days before the election and a little bit before that, always these great numbers ... But after I won the election, then they announced a downward number, in other words, to bring it back to reality," Trump said. But Trump's account of how the jobs report revisions were issued in 2024 is wrong. And the true timeline undermines his claims. It's true that the BLS issued a large revision to its jobs tally last year: The agency revealed that the U.S. economy added 818,000 fewer jobs than originally reported for the year ended March 2024. But that revision did not come after the election, as Trump suggested Tuesday morning. Rather, it was issued in August 2024 — more than two months before the election, and after then-Vice President Kamala Harris had taken the reins as the Democratic nominee. Trump pounced on the figure at the time. "New Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that the Administration PADDED THE NUMBERS with an extra 818,000 Jobs that DO NOT EXIST, AND NEVER DID," he claimed in an Aug. 21 post on Truth Social. The figure came in the BLS' preliminary annual benchmark revision, when its employment estimates derived from surveys are calibrated against state unemployment insurance tax records. The final benchmark released in February, months after the election, revised hiring down by 598,000 — lower than the preliminary figure from August. Trump is also wrong to claim that the BLS issued "phenomenal numbers" just before the 2024 election. In fact, the final jobs report before the election revealed a sharp slowdown in October hiring, after a surge the previous month. That Nov. 1 report — less than a week before Election Day — showed just 12,000 workers had been added to U.S. nonfarm payrolls in October. At the time, it was the smallest monthly job gain in nearly four years, and it fell well below experts' already-low expectations. As soon as the Nov. 1 report was released, it was immediately weaponized for political purposes — by Trump, who used the data to bash Harris. "Today's jobs report is a great embarrassment for our Nation. Kamala has lied for years about their pathetic job growth, which has never been real," Trump wrote on Truth Social Nov. 1. "America is a Nation in Decline because Sleepy Joe, and Lyin' Kamala, didn't do their job." The BLS would later revise that weak jobs figure upward — but not until after Trump had won the election. Moreover, the sharp decline in October's initial report is now understood to have been driven by several factors outside of anyone's control. Major labor strikes at Boeing and at U.S. ports had the short-term effect of removing thousands of workers from payrolls in October. Hurricanes in the Southeast also impacted that initial report by closing roads and businesses, making it more difficult to collect accurate data. The White House did not respond to CNBC's request for comment or further explanation of Trump's remarks. A Labor Department official, in comments provided by the White House, criticized McEntarfer's leadership, saying that she waited too long to inform the department about data-collection challenges at the BLS. But these are not the critiques Trump has made himself. Instead, Trump announced McEntarfer's firing in a Friday afternoon social media post that accused her of having "faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory." CNBC has reached out to McEntarfer for comment. "I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY," Trump wrote. "Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes." The post came hours after the initial jobs report for the month of July showed weaker-than-expected growth. The BLS in that report also issued two revisions to initial reports from previous months. Both of them revised the jobs numbers sharply downward, shaving a combined total of 258,000 jobs off the year's tally. The downward revisions and the missed expectations for July spurred a sharp decline in financial markets. By Friday's close, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had fallen more than 500 points. The move to fire McEntarfer drew widespread criticism over fears that government employment data, which is relied upon to gauge the health of the U.S. economy and make major policy decisions, will become politicized and untrustworthy. Experts also say that even if a BLS commissioner wanted to manipulate monthly jobs report data, it would be impossible given how the data is collected, analyzed and released to the public. The White House has defended Trump's decision, with National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett saying on NBC News that the job revisions "are hard evidence" in support of the president's claims. Trump said he plans to announce McEntarfer's replacement in the coming days.


UPI
3 minutes ago
- UPI
Georgetown University researcher settles with feds after arbitrary arrest
In New York City, people hold a silent vigil for those who have been detained by federal agents. On Tuesday, court documents revealed the U.S. Justice Department reached a settlement that partially resolves the nearly five-month long legal fight by a Georgetown University researcher after his arbitrary arrest in March by masked agents of U.S. Immigration Custom and Enforcement, part of President Donald Trump's hard-right immigration policy moves. File Photo by Angelina Katsanis/UPI | License Photo Aug. 6 (UPI) -- Georgetown University researcher Badar Khan Suri was permitted to return to his job and stay in the United States after a deal was struck with the federal government as litigation plays out in court. On Tuesday, five-page court documents revealed the U.S. Justice Department reached a settlement that partially resolves the nearly five-month long legal fight after his arbitrary arrest in March by masked agents of U.S. Immigration Custom and Enforcement, part of President Donald Trump's sweeping immigration policy moves. Suri, a citizen of India, is in the United States on an academic visa and has not been charged with a crime. Tuesday's DOJ deal retroactively restored the legal status for Suri and his children but does not end efforts to deport him. He was arrested March 17 by masked ICE agents outside his apartment in Arlington, Va., in the outskirts of the nation's capital in the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration and academics in expressing interest or concern over Palestinian plight in Gaza. U.S. Homeland Security's Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin claimed on social media that Suri was "actively spreading Hamas propaganda and promoting antisemitism on social media." She further stated he had "close connections to a known or suspected terrorist, who is a senior advisor to Hamas." Suri was then sent to a Texas detention immigration detention facility. He argued in legal documents that he was likely targeted by the administration due to his marriage to a U.S. citizen of Palestinian origin and that his First Amendment rights had been violated. In May, his immediate release without bond was ordered by U.S. District Judge Patricia Giles on condition he maintain a Virginia residence and attend in person case hearings. Giles said at the hearing that his release was "in the public interest to disrupt the chilling effect on protected speech." At the time of his arrest Georgetown said university officials were "not aware" of any criminal activity. "We support our community members' rights to free and open inquiry, deliberation and debate, even if the underlying ideas may be difficult, controversial or objectionable," a Georgetown University spokesperson told The Hill. "We expect the legal system to adjudicate this case fairly," it added. On Tuesday, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union said Siri's legal team felt "encouraged" that the government agreed to restore the status and federal records for Suri and his family. "We know Dr. Suri is eager to rejoin the academic community at Georgetown and this will give him the opportunity to do that this fall," the ACLU's Eden Heilman told Politico.