'Finally!': Oldham to demand public inquiry into 'scourge' that has ‘hung over borough for far too long'
Oldham Council will demand a statutory public inquiry into 'the scourge of child sexual exploitation both historic and current', following an extraordinary meeting of the authority.
A judge-backed review would give the council more power to demand evidence from governmental institutions than what has been described as a 'Telford-style' local inquiry currently planned for the borough.
The decision comes just three months after a previous request for a government-led review was rejected by the home secretary, sparking a major public backlash.
READ MORE: Woman arrested on suspicion of child neglect after baby rushed to hospital in Middleton
READ MORE: 'I'll f*****g kill you': Mum batters rival parent in brutal attack outside school gates
Councillors unanimously voted for the inquiry at an extraordinary meeting, called by Oldham's Conservative Group tonight (February 12).
Councillor Lewis Quigg, who proposed the motion, said: 'This national public inquiry is to right an incredible wrong. It's about time that the lid is lifted on this disaster, this national scandal of children who have been abused in some of the most evil acts.'
Councillor David Arnott added the issue had 'hung over this borough for far too long' and that the council had 'failed many times to stop horrific abuses continuing for years'.
The vote came after a lengthy and jumbled debate. Multiple amendments to the motion eventually left councillors confused about what they were voting for, causing members of the public to burst into laughter while others left the room.
After a 30 minute adjournment, a new 'hybrid' version of the motion blended two amendments together. These included changes in language to avoid retraumatising survivors and victims of CSE, a commitment to putting victims' voices at the centre of any new inquiry and calling upon the Greater Manchester Combined Authority to lend their voice to the call for statutory powers.
Councillors also discussed the singling out of men with Pakistani heritage within the original motion, with Lib Dem Coun Helen Bishop arguing that it was 'too narrow a focus' which could put people at risk of 'not recognising predators within other communities'.
Coun Abdul Wahid, of the Oldham Group, added: 'Justice must prevail. We as British Pakistani Muslims are not interested in statistics. Even one predator in our community is one too many. That's why we will do what we must here and within our communities to root out these criminals, who have tarnished the good name of British Pakistani Muslims across the country.
'But let me be absolutely clear: this is not just about one community. Child Sexual Exploitation has plagued villages, towns and cities across the UK. It has been carried out by organised criminals of different backgrounds and covered up by communities and institutions of all ethnicities. The victims were failed by police who ignored them, social services who dismissed them and politicians who looked away.'
The motion was passed to applause from the public gallery, with some exclaiming: 'Finally!'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
24 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Mahrang Baloch Writes From Prison: ‘Speaking Up for Justice Is Not a Crime'
It has been more than two and a half months since I was thrown into prison —Hudda Prison, in Quetta, Pakistan, the same place father was caged nearly two decades ago, also for promoting the rights of the people of Balochistan. Since my arrest, Pakistan's state secuity agencies have deployed every tactic to break me. I have been offered a deal: stay silent, avoid political activity, and you can be home. I refused. The state has failed to produce a single piece of evidence linking me to any act of violence or criminality. The only "proof" they cite is a press conference I gave a few days before my March 22 arrest. I spoke to reporters after armed militants had hijacked a train and held 300 passengers hostage for hours. The attack occurred in the Balochistan, the largest province in Pakistan, and was carried out by Baloch separatists who have been fighting with the state for decades. At the press conference, I spoke not to defend the hijackers—our movement, the Baloch Yakjehti [Unity] Committee, has always renounced violence. Indeed, my intention was to draw a distinction between those who confront the state with arms and those who confront it with words. It's a crucial distinction, one the state prefers to blur. In Pakistan, 'terrorist' is a label pinned on anyone who advocates for Baloch rights. Those who speak up run the risk of arrest by military and intelligence agencies. After their arrest, they might never be seen again. If they are, it is often as a body, produced after a violent incident like the train attack. This was why I asked reporters: Who were the more than two dozen 'unidentified' bodies brought to Quetta's Civil Hospital after the hijacking? And why were 13 of them buried overnight without being named? The attackers, the Baloch Liberation Party, had released pictures and details of the 12 militants it said were killed. The identities of the rest were a mystery, but we had our suspicions. In Balochistan it is common practice, after violent episodes, for the forcibly disappeared persons to be put to death, and their bodies produced as those of militants. I demanded DNA testing of those who had been buried in the dead of night. Families of the disappeared feared, with good reason, that their loved ones were among them. Read more: Pakistan Jails Baloch Human Rights Activist So I am in jail for insisting on the distinction between peaceful activism and violence. My work had already drawn unwelcome international attention. In May 2024, Pakistani officials were outraged after I visited Norway at the invitation of PEN Norway, the Norwegian branch of PEN International and the World Expression Forum. I was even harassed on Norwegian soil by individuals linked to Pakistan's embassy in Oslo, whose intervention was ended by the Norwegian domestic security agency, PST. When I returned to Pakistan, I was immediately charged with sedition, and treated as if I had returned from an ISIS camp in Syria or Iraq rather than one of the most peace-loving countries in the world. In October, the government's smear campaigns amplified with my inclusion on the TIME100 Next Emerging Leaders. I was called 'Malala 2' and a Western puppet. Surveillance around me intensified, and I was placed on the Fourth Schedule, an anti-terror watch list typically reserved for hardened militants, and which restricts the movement and activities of the listed. I was barred from travelling abroad. I am learning the price of peaceful activism. For decades, Pakistan has kept the rest of the country, and the world, in the dark about Balochistan. It remains an information black hole. Among those the military and intelligence agencies have forcibly disappeared, killed, or forced into exile are journalists who dare to write about these atrocities. According to the Balochistan Union of Journalists, more than 40 have been killed since 2000. Foreign media are denied access to the region. From this darkness, a woman leading a grassroots movement for Baloch rights was unacceptable. The hostility of the state intensified with the BBC's 100 Women list, and a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. But if international pressure has prevented my being killed, I face psychological warfare, threats, and the constant spectre of danger. I write this the day my sister told me that the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISIS-K) released a 100-page Urdu-language booklet accusing me of being a Western agent. Their "evidence"? The TIME honor and Norway trip. Other BYC leaders are in jail with me: Sabghat Ullah Shah Jee, Beebarg Zehri (a disabled man), Gulzadi, and Beebow. I tell them: We are not the first to be imprisoned for demanding peace, justice, and rights. From Nelson Mandela to Narges Mohammadi, we walk the same path. We draw strength from their courage, intellect, and defiance. Our movement is rooted in peace. We speak against enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, forced displacement, and the systematic denial of basic rights to the Baloch. We are the rightful owners of the Saindak Copper-Gold Project (worth billions of dollars, but the profits are not shared with the local population), the Reko Diq mine (estimated to hold copper and gold reserves worth over $60 billion, but the benefits are not reaching the Baloch people), and Gwadar — the gateway to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Yet, 70% of Balochistan's population lives below the poverty line. Read more: Pakistan Bars Activist From Traveling to TIME Event Honoring Her The state is offended and brands us terrorists and violent. But we are not violent. The state is armed, powerful, and ruthless. It uses violence to silence those who ask for justice. The practices once reserved for the Baloch, considered lesser citizens, are now expanding to other parts of Pakistan. Former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his party are now under the military's wrath. He is jailed. Is Imran Khan also a terrorist? Are members of his PTI party now "agents of hostile agencies"? If the Pakistan Army and its intelligence agencies are as competent as they claim to be, why have they failed to present a single piece of credible proof? Why have they not held a fair, transparent trial? Because this isn't about the law; it's about fear, their fear of our truth. This prison is more than bricks and bars. It carries the memory of my father. As a child, I visited him here. I didn't grow up playing with toys. I grew up holding posters of my father, who was detained and then disappeared. When I turned eighteen, I received his lifeless, tortured, bullet-riddled body. This is not just my story. It's the story of every child in Balochistan. Childhood here is shaped by grief, fear, and posters of the disappeared. When our generation came of age, those of us raised in the shadows of state violence, we vowed: No child after us should suffer the same fate. We are fully aware of the power imbalance between us and a nuclear-armed state. It controls the media. It runs smear campaigns. It weaponizes the judiciary. It deploys overwhelming force. It controls the parliament. It operates proxy groups and armed militias. Our confinement is part of a war of narratives. Speaking up for justice is not a crime. Raising our voices against state violence is not treason. Demanding rights is not terrorism. It is humanity. And one day, we believe, this struggle will succeed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Police say boy chased for blocks after attempted robbery
WEST PITTSTON, LUZERNE COUNTY (WBRE/WYOU) — A man has been arrested after police say he and a group of people chased a boy for blocks in an SUV after attempting to rob him at a park in West Pittston Monday night. Wyoming Area Regional Police Department (WARPD) responded to the area of Parke and Carpenter streets in the Garden Village around 8:15 p.m. for a report of a person being chased by several people with knives and guns, according to a media release. When interviewed, the juvenile victim told them he was at Morris Park when three men approached him. Police say two of the men had guns, and one pressed a gun into his stomach while the third man showed a knife. One of them searched the victim's pockets and asked about the value of his belongings, but nothing was taken, police reported. According to WARPD, the boy took off and was chased by the three men, along with a woman, in a tan SUV until he reached a home where he met with police. 4 arrested after ICE raids Exeter pallet shop Officers then located three juvenile males, a juvenile female, and an adult man in the area. Police say one of the juveniles had a Glock-style BB gun in his waistband. The suspected vehicle was impounded while police awaited a search warrant. Police say they have charged John Williams, 19, of Wyoming, with aggravated assault, attempted robbery, and related offenses. Police say the investigation is ongoing and more arrests are expected. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Epoch Times
7 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Scots ‘Voted for Change', Says Starmer After Labour's Surprise By-election Win
Sir Keir Starmer has said people in Scotland have 'voted for change' following Labour's shock win in the Hamilton by-election. The prime minister congratulated Labour's new MSP Davy Russell and looked ahead to next year's Scottish Parliament election, saying it is a chance to 'turbo-charge delivery.' Russell took the seat vacated by the death of Scottish Government minister and SNP MSP Christina McKelvie. Posting on social media on Friday morning, Starmer said: 'People in Scotland have once again voted for change. 'Next year there is a chance to turbo-charge delivery by putting Labour in power on both sides of the border. 'I look forward to working with you.' Related Stories 2/3/2025 6/2/2025 Labour's candidate, who is the deputy lord lieutenant of Lanarkshire, beat the SNP's Katy Loudon, who fell to her third defeat since 2023. The win comes against the backdrop of national polls which place Scottish Labour in third place behind the SNP and Reform UK, and will undoubtedly give a boost to Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar's bid to become first minister in next year's election. Sarwar told BBC Radio Scotland's 'Good Morning Scotland' programme he is confident Labour can win that contest. When asked if his party can defeat the SNP, which has been in power in Scotland since 2007, Sarwar declared: 'Absolutely. 'I believed it before this by-election and I continue to believe it now. 'Next year the choice is simple—a third decade of the SNP with John Swinney as first minister or a new direction for Scotland with me as first minister. 'That is the choice facing the people of Scotland, that is the campaign over the next year, and that is a campaign I am confident we can win. 'I think what the people of Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse did yesterday was lead the way to that change of government next year and a Scottish Labour government next year.' He also said he will 'continue to challenge the poison of Reform,' making clear he is 'talking about the people who lead Reform' and not those who 'may be tempted' to vote for them. Mach of the Hamilton campaign had been dominated by a Reform advert—branded 'racist' by Labour and others—which had alleged Sarwar would 'prioritise' the Pakistani community. A surge in support for Nigel Farage's party saw it come in third place in Hamilton, just 800 votes behind the SNP, although there had been speculation Reform could come second or possibly even win the seat. Reform deputy leader Richard Tice insisted the party is 'delighted' with the result. Speaking to BBC Radio 4's 'Today' programme, he said: 'It's truly remarkable. 'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP, so it's an incredible result.' At the election count earlier, Tice told the PA news agency he was 'thrilled to bits' with the result. When the votes were counted, Russell polled 8,559, Loudon took 7,957 votes, and Reform's Ross Lambie secured 7,088. Speaking to PA after the declaration, Sarwar said: 'I think people need to change the script, because we've proven the pollsters wrong. 'We've proven the commentators wrong, we've proven the bookies wrong. 'We've proven John Swinney wrong and so many others wrong too.' In the final days of the campaign, the first minister had said it was a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform, and Sarwar asked what it says about a government that has been in power for 18 years when 'all it has to offer in a campaign is vote SNP to stop Farage.' Swinney said Loudon had 'fought a superb SNP campaign' and that he was 'clearly disappointed' his party was unable to win. 'Labour won by an absolute landslide in this area less than a year ago—we came much closer tonight, but the people of Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse have made clear that we still have work to do,' he added. 'Over the next few days, we will take time to consider the result fully.'
