logo
‘Choice is clear': NSW Treasurer's line in the sand as workers reject compo reform

‘Choice is clear': NSW Treasurer's line in the sand as workers reject compo reform

News.com.au15-05-2025

A staggering 95 per cent of essential employees with workplace psychological injury would be 'abandoned' under controversial proposed changes to the NSW workers compensation system, unions say.
The Minns government wants to overhaul the workers compensation system to tighten claims for psychological injury, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, saying the number of cases is growing and 'unsustainable'.
But Unions NSW says the proposed changes would make it harder for essential workers,
including firefighters and hospital staff, to be eligible to claim damages as a result of psychological injury in the workplace.
Under the government's proposal, an employee with a permanent impairment for a psychological injury under 31 per cent would not receive compensation. For a physical injury, the threshold would stand at a lower 15 per cent.
A survey of 10,000 essential workers released by the union in the wake of the proposed reforms found 83 per cent believed the changes would force injured colleagues back to work before it was safe, while 60 per cent said they had been exposed to trauma.
'We're talking about life and death decisions,' union secretary Mark Morey said.
'The government claims this is about financial sustainability, but their 30 per cent impairment threshold would abandon 95 per cent of psychologically injured workers – many of whom are already contemplating suicide.'
A NSW parliament inquiry will on Friday morning begin a hearing into the government's draft proposal.
Treasurer Daniel Mookhey is expected to tell the hearing the upcoming state budget would report a $2.6bn writedown arising from the Treasury Managed Fund, the government's self-insurer.
'As the TMF continues to deteriorate, the pressure for cash injections grows,' Mr Mookhey has said.
'Since I became Treasurer, the government has authorised an additional $1.2bn in cash injections to keep the public insurer fully funded.'
Mr Mookhey is expected to say previous Liberal treasurers Dominic Perrottet and Matt Kean had authorised an earlier $4.9bn injection, and that since 2018 the state government had borrowed $6.1bn so that the TMF's assets equalled its liabilities.
'I will not be authorising any further injections,' Mr Mookhey is expected to tell the hearing.
'Not until parliament decides its collective response to a scheme that most acknowledge is failing.
'Not when that money is coming at the expense of schools, hospitals or kids in need of out-of-home care.
'That choice is clear for me.'
Administered by icare, the TMF is a self-insurance scheme created by the NSW government to insure its agencies' risks.
As for the nominal insurer, the statutory body that steps in to provide workers' compensation to employees benefits when an employer is not insured, the picture Mr Mookhey is expected to paint on Friday morning is similarly dire.
At the June 2024 valuation, the nominal insurer held 85 cents for every dollar it expected to pay in compensation and has since them only plunged further into debt.
'Absent reform, I expect the scheme to plunge further into deficit when the scheme is revalued in six weeks,' Mr Mookhey is expected to say.
'Fast deterioration has real implications for sustainability of the scheme.
'Workers get less. Businesses pay more.
'Put simply – you can have the best workers compensation scheme in the world on paper. If it has no money – it helps no one.'
The NSW government previously said the current workplace health and safety and workers compensation laws were failing to both prevent psychological injury and to treat sufferers quickly so that they may be able to return to work.
Only 50 per cent of workers with a psychological injury return to work within a year.
That is compared to 95 per cent of workers with a physical injury under the current system, which the state government said spends seven times more on keeping an injured worker away from the workplace then it does on getting them healthy.
Mr Morey said respondents had shared stories of prolonged battles with the compensation system after suffering psychological injury in the workplace, with some telling the union that they 'would not be alive today' if they had not received compensation.
The union reported a Sydney firefighter having disclosed that he 'would have certainly taken my own life' had it not been for the compensation system, while another unnamed admin worker said they faced the risk of a 'mortgage collapse'.
'The system is already traumatic for injured workers who have to repeatedly prove they're suffering,' Mr Morey said of the changes.
These changes would make that process virtually impossible for the vast majority of psychological injury claims.
'There's a better way forward that doesn't involve abandoning our essential workers.
'When 97 per cent of workers are begging for better mental health support instead of compensation cuts, the government needs to listen before it's too late.'
More than 10,000 workers were surveyed by Unions NSW between April and May for the Cast Adrift report, with almost half employed in education, as well as staff working in health, transport, local government, and public and emergency services.
Of those respondents, more than 96 per cent identified at least one psychological hazard, while about 30 per cent said they experienced workplace violence or a hazardous physical working environment, and 44 per cent said that they had experienced bullying,
Unions NSW says workers who suffered bullying, sexual or racial harassment in the workplace would be required to go through a 'lengthy and expensive' court process to access treatment and support, further jeopardising the prospect of long-term care.
The proposed reforms have also faced pushback from the legal sector, including the Australian Lawyers Alliance whose spokesman, Shane Butcher, in a statement said the draft bill 'drastically strips rights away from all workers' in NSW.
'The proposed reforms are significant and will impact all workers injured physically or psychologically in NSW,' Mr Butcher said.
'All workers will have a much harder time accessing the support they need to recover and return to work.
'That is the primary objective of our modern workers compensation system. Nothing in the bill addresses prevention.
'These reforms will dump NSW workers who have suffered a psychological injury due to their work out of the workers compensation scheme.'
The Law Society of NSW president Jennifer Bell also said that while she recognised the workers compensation scheme was under pressure and in need of reform, the proposed changes risked stripping the rights of 'some of the community's most vulnerable'.
'There's no doubt the sustainability of the current scheme needs addressing, but that should not be at the cost of those people who have sustained serious and debilitating psychological injuries on the job,' Ms Ball said.
'The proposed increase of the 'whole person impairment' (WPI) threshold to 31 per cent will conceivably exclude nearly all workers with psychological injury from making a claim.
'To reach 31 per cent WPI, a person would need to demonstrate they're unable to live alone, care for dependants, or to function in society.'
The Law Society will instead propose a compromise at Friday's hearing, namely changing the WPI threshold to 21 per cent which Ms Bell said would 'ensure that many workers generally recognised by community standards as being severely impacted by mental ill-health would be able to make a claim'.
The hearing begins at 8.30am.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Living off scraps': 21-year-old wants pay norm banned
‘Living off scraps': 21-year-old wants pay norm banned

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

‘Living off scraps': 21-year-old wants pay norm banned

A fired-up Gen Zer has declared being paid fortnightly in Australia should be straight-up 'banned' because she finds it difficult to manage her salary. Ren Adelina, 21, has amassed over 700,000 views on TikTok by declaring she's unhappy with a fortnightly pay cycle. 'Getting paid fortnightly needs to be genuinely banned,' she said. 'One week I am so rich, I am so rich! The next week … I am living off genuine scraps.' According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, fortnightly is the most common pay cycle for Aussie workers, followed by weekly and then monthly. Speaking to Ms Adelina reiterated her position and said she'd much prefer to be paid more frequently. 'I think it should be banned because for us Gen Zers we were never taught how to manage money properly,' she said. 'Getting a huge influx of money at once, of course, we are going to get excited and are going to blow it all on food, shopping, outings, etc.' Ms Adelina said the problem with that is that once it is gone, it is gone, and then she's got to hang out for another gruelling seven days. 'Then, after we spend it all, there is none left for the next week. Maybe I just have a shopping addiction,' she said. The 21-year-old doesn't just want to ban fortnightly pay with no other solution. She's got plans. 'I believe we should get paid weekly instead as it provides more frequent income, making it easier to manage all expenses. I think it also simplifies budgeting,' she said. Ms Adelina's suggestion of banning fortnightly pay quickly took a turn when people on the internet broke the news to her that some people get paid … monthly. One warned, 'Wait until you get paid monthly.' The 21-year-old replied, 'Stop, that is so scary!' Someone else chimed in and said getting paid monthly is 'criminal' and another demanded to know what professions get paid monthly so they can avoid them. The commentator quickly discovered that monthly pay isn't specific to one industry. Everyone, from childcare workers to tradies, get paid monthly. It is just up to the employer's discretion. The comment section quickly became populated by workers getting paid monthly who argued that fortnightly wasn't so bad in comparison. 'Babe, I'm counting my coins on monthly pay,' one said. 'Monthly is horrendous,' another shared. 'I get paid monthly. You got lucky,' someone claimed. 'Every adult I know gets paid monthly. Budgeting is hard,' another worker shared. 'Fortnightly isn't bad. Wait until you see monthly,' one warned. 'I applaud those who can wait a whole month. I can't even do two weeks,' someone else shared. Quite a few people also suggested to the 21-year-old that it wasn't how frequently she was getting paid but rather how she managed her money. 'Just budget. It really is not that difficult. I love getting paid fortnightly,' one shared. 'Not knowing how to budget should be banned,' another joked. 'I get paid fortnightly, and when you get paid, literally just split it in half and put it aside in another account until the following week,' someone else said.

‘Weekly basis': Lawyer reveals why young people are still carrying knives, despite harsher laws
‘Weekly basis': Lawyer reveals why young people are still carrying knives, despite harsher laws

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

‘Weekly basis': Lawyer reveals why young people are still carrying knives, despite harsher laws

Harsher penalties will do little to curb the spike in youth knife crime unless the underlying reasons why they are being carried are addressed, a leading criminal lawyer has declared. Astor Legal principal lawyer Avinash Singh said he deals with people charged with knife offences on a weekly basis, with many also involved in the illegal drug trade. 'We have represented a number of minors accused of carrying knives – generally from lower socio-economic areas carrying knives for self-defence,' Mr Singh told NewsWire. 'Unfortunately, a lot of these young people have been assaulted and/or threatened themselves. 'They feel that reporting the matter to police after the fact will do them little good, particularly if they are seriously injured or even killed,' he said. 'As such, they often feel that they have to carry a knife to protect themselves.' The hard truth then, is that harsher crimes may not reduce offending, or make the community any safer, Mr Singh said. 'While it is understandable that governments and the community demand tougher laws to combat knife crime, this is unlikely to do much to reduce it in my opinion,' he said. 'People who carry knives are unlikely to stop just because of increased penalties. 'Research has found that they stop when they are no longer exposed to an environment where carrying a knife is seen as a necessity,' he said. 'This means addressing these communities by providing resources, programs and funding to prevent the issue – something governments have continuously failed to do.' The Victorian Allan Government announced in May it will be introducing laws to ban the sale and possession of machetes following an alleged spate of machete assaults. From September 1, those carrying a 'controlled weapon' or knife in Victoria will face up to two years imprisonment or a fine of $30,700. 'In Victoria, community safety comes first. We must never let places we meet become places we fear,' Premier Jacinta Allan said. 'I hate these knives, and I will keep introducing as many laws as it takes to get them off our streets, out of our shops and out of our lives.' NSW introduced sweeping knife law reforms in 2024, giving police the right to scan people with handheld electronic metal-detecting wands, as well as increasing the maximum penalty for anyone found guilty of selling a knife to a child under 16. Those found guilty in NSW face four years imprisonment fines up to $4,400. Mr Singh said he feared 'the expanded search powers will disproportionately be used against young people from lower socio-economic areas'. 'This leads to distrust of police and can in fact have the opposite effect – that is, young people keep knives but simply avoid police and are less likely to report crimes'. He said this is already seen in the rising amount of NSW youth caught up in the criminal system following legislation changes and bail reform. 'The strictest knife crime laws at present are in NSW. While the laws have only recently been introduced, there has been a noticeable increase in the courts seeing knife offences,' Mr Singh said. 'This, along with recent Bail Act reforms in NSW, has led to a marked increase in children being refused bail and held in custody, which does nothing to address their behaviour or promote rehabilitation of offenders.'

Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff backs ousted federal MP Bridget Archer's political comeback
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff backs ousted federal MP Bridget Archer's political comeback

News.com.au

time5 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff backs ousted federal MP Bridget Archer's political comeback

Ousted rebel MP Bridget Archer has confirmed she will be making a state tilt, with under-pressure Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff backing her for preselection. The announcement comes as Mr Rockliff is expected to call an election within days after the state Labor government, led by Opposition Leader Dean Winter, passed a no-confidence motion in parliament. Mr Rockliff said Ms Archer has 'put her hand up for preselection' for one of the seven state seats of Bass, with the Liberals currently holding three of the electorates. The political comeback comes just weeks after the former Liberal MP for Bass lost her seat to first-time candidate and former basketball coach Jess Teesdale, suffering a 9.4 per cent swing against the Liberal Party. Ms Archer acknowledged the Liberals 'bruising federal election loss', and said she was 'absolutely appalled' by Mr Winter's state parliament 'shenanigans'. '(It's) an utterly disgraceful display of self interest and a grab for power with no credible alternative in place, either, no credible alternative pathway for Tasmania going forward,' she told reporters. 'He has refused to make the parliament work. He declined the opportunity to make this parliament work.' During her six-year stint in federal parliament, Ms Archer earned a reputation for crossing the floor on issues like the social media ban for children under 16s, despite bipartisan support from the Coalition. Asked if she would still cross the floor on issues she feels strongly about, Ms Archer said the hoped she 'would not need to' but admitted that she was 'a strong voice'. 'I am the same person that I have always been. I'm not likely to sit quietly and not have my say,' she said. 'Do I want to go out and fight another election? No, I don't, because also I suspect the people of Tasmania don't want to be going to another election. 'But the reckless and selfish actions of Dean winter and his grab for power have sent us to this situation.' Mr Rockliff also reiterated comments that Mr Winters has 'forced' an election on Tasmanians, just 16 months after the most recent state election, and the fourth state poll in just seven years. While Mr Rockliff could prevent a snap poll if he resigns, he claimed Mr Winter has 'forced an election upon Tasmanians'. While parliament will resume on Tuesday to pass critical supply bills 'I did not want an election. I wanted the parliament to continue in a sensible way, it has been working well by any objective analysis,' he said. 'This is a parliament that was elected back in March 2024 and a parliament that has largely been working well, all but for Dean winters, selfish grab for power.' Federal Tasmanian senator Jonno Duniam has urged the state leadership to have a 'good, long think' over the potential for a sudden election. 'Unless my colleagues are 100 per cent certain that the voters of Tasmania are not going to punish them for sending them to an early election, they should be taking whatever steps are necessary,' he said. 'Going to an election will be a bad outcome.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store