Sanctioning Key Members Of Foreign Terrorist Organization Tren De Aragua
July 17, 2025
The United States is sanctioning the head and key members of Tren de Aragua (TdA), a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) that originated in Venezuela and has launched a campaign of terror throughout our hemisphere.
Hector Rusthenford Guerrero Flores (a.k.a 'Niño Guerrero') has a history of being involved in criminal activities for over two decades and currently is the detestable leader of TdA. Guerrero expanded TdA from a prison gang involved in extortion and bribery to an organization engaged in terrorism with growing influence throughout the Western Hemisphere. The Department of State, through the Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program managed by the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL), is offering a reward of up to $5 million for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Guerrero.
Today's sanction actions also target five additional key TdA leaders and affiliates, including one of TdA's co-founders and a close Guerrero lieutenant, Yohan Jose Romero (a.k.a. 'Johan Petrica'). INL is also offering a reward of up to $4 million for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Romero. These other TdA leaders are involved in atrocious crimes such as illicit drug trade, migrant smuggling, human trafficking, extortion, sexual exploitation of women and children, and money laundering, among other activities.
This action follows the recent designation of TdA as an FTO and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). The United States is committed to keeping the American people safe by using all available means to eliminate TdA's threats of violent crime throughout our hemisphere.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Could Trump's tariffs force NZ to rethink its trade diversity?
Italy got the same deal as us, 15%. The Italian Institute of International Political Studies dug into the numbers and found that the country's agricultural, pharmaceutical, and automotive sectors are likely to be hit the hardest, with the country's GDP projected to dip by 0.2%. On the other hand, the likes of Australia and the UK have secured a 10% tariff. So, how will the duties actually affect Kiwi businesses? Or is it really American consumers who'll pay the price? University of Auckland Emeritus Professor of Law Jane Kelsey told The Front Page it's hard to know the impact. 'It's very hard to be specific about what the consequences would be, and when people put figures on that, you should be quite skeptical. 'Tariffs are kind of blunt instruments, so it will mean that exports from New Zealand imports into the US will have a higher cost for importers in the US and consumers in the US. That could affect how much New Zealand goods they buy,' she said. She said New Zealand has a 'pretty basic export commodity model' and suggests that recent events should serve as a 'wake-up call to start thinking differently' about the diversification of our domestic market. 'There are real opportunities here, and we seem to have an aversion to taking those opportunities. 'It's not simply about diversifying to other markets, but it's also about rethinking our domestic economic model, which is currently based largely on the housing market and secondly on relatively low-value-added exports to a relatively small number of countries. 'But, we have a great difficulty generating that discussion here. There was a Productivity Commission report several years ago, before it was disbanded, that set out a process for diversification, which would thicken our domestic production, and that, unfortunately, seems to have fallen on deaf ears,' she said. Listen to the full episode to hear more about: Why the World Trade Organisation is 'in chaos'; The erosion of the rules-based trading system over successive US governments; And why it might be a mistake to view Trump's tariffs as purely economic. The Front Page is a daily news podcast from the New Zealand Herald, available to listen to every weekday from 5am. The podcast is presented by Chelsea Daniels, an Auckland-based journalist with a background in world news and crime/justice reporting who joined NZME in 2016. You can follow the podcast at iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
1News
12 hours ago
- 1News
'Do the right thing': Police renew appeal over murder of Kyle Whorrall
Police have renewed an appeal for the identities of others involved in the murder of Kyle Whorrall at an Auckland bus stop earlier this year. The 33-year-old American PhD student was attacked in Auckland's St John on April 19 and later died in hospital. Whorrall was in New Zealand pursuing his doctorate in entomology at the University of Auckland. A 16-year-old was charged with his murder, while a 33-year-old woman was charged with being an accessory to murder. Both pleaded not guilty with a trial date set for August 2026. ADVERTISEMENT Detective Inspector Glenn Baldwin said it was "time to do the right thing" for others at the scene. "We know there were others in the vehicle that night, and I'm asking people with that information to come forward now." He said the homicide investigation was "still very much active" and that police were "very interested" in speaking to anyone with information that can assist. "No piece of information is too small. There are people in the community that know exactly who was involved, and what happened. They need to do the right thing and speak up." Anyone with relevant information should contact police on 105 or attend their local police station.
NZ Herald
15 hours ago
- NZ Herald
US tariffs: Why Christopher Luxon couldn't lower US tariffs on New Zealand goods
Some are baffled as to why Australia has a lower rate than New Zealand. The answer lies not in diplomacy, but in Donald Trump's world view. The President believes the United States' trade deficit is caused by other countries taking unfair advantage. His solution? Impose tariffs on countries that run a trade surplus with the US in the belief that it will bring manufacturing home. On April 3 (NZT), the President declared 'Liberation Day' for American industry and announced a sweeping tariff plan: a 10% universal tariff on all imports and a punitive, up-to-50% tariff on countries running a trade surplus with the US. No country, certainly not the United Kingdom, has negotiated to 'secure a low tariff rate'. The best any country has done is reduce their proposed tariff. The UK and European Union have trade agreements with the US. Australia and New Zealand do not. The result? The UK and Australia face a 10% tariff. New Zealand and the EU face 15%. What's the difference? Not the deal – the difference is the trade balance. The US has a trade surplus with the UK and Australia. It has a trade deficit with the EU and New Zealand. That's the 'logic' behind the new rates. Critics who want to blame Luxon must explain how Hipkins could have done better. Australia – despite being 'America's sheriff' – still hasn't secured a meeting with Trump. Canberra is spending eye-watering sums on American nuclear submarines. It hasn't helped. Back in April, when Trump's tariff list was released, New Zealand officials were surprised we had the same tariff as Australia. The best explanation? The White House's grasp of geography. Uninhabited Antarctic Herald Island reportedly also received the same tariff. The best explanation is the White House thought New Zealand was part of Australia, a belief I have encountered often in America. Any negotiation would have had to begin by explaining that New Zealand is not part of Australia, and having to admit we have a trade surplus. Keeping our head down made sense. The minister publicly warned our tariff was likely to go up. Those who think tough talk would have helped should look to Canada. A founding Nafta member and one of America's closest allies, Canada has been negotiating longer than anyone. Its tariff? Thirty-five percent. If we had followed O'Connor's advice, we too could have a 35% tariff. Trade Minister Todd McClay has pointed out that New Zealand does not run a consistent trade surplus. Every time Air New Zealand buys a Boeing, the balance swings the other way. Over time, our trade is roughly even. If Trump's tariffs were rational, we would have a free trade agreement. But Trump doesn't do rational. Instead of engaging in politics, O'Connor should support New Zealand's long-standing bipartisan trade policy. He should tell exporters that no New Zealand Government could have negotiated a better deal. But he could also point out that these tariffs are not sustainable. It is Stein's Law that what is unsustainable will pass. What will change Trump is reality – and reality hit hard last Friday. Trump claims tariffs will bring jobs home and be paid for by exporting countries. The textbooks say otherwise – and now the data do too. Last Friday's US jobs report revealed 258,000 fewer jobs than previously reported, due to sharp revisions for May and June. Trump responded by firing the independent commissioner who released the figures so no one will believe future job reports. The job losses are exactly what economic theory predicts. The latest data also say manufacturing is contracting and inflation remains above the Federal Reserve guideline. Tariffs are sales taxes paid by consumers. While they hurt exporters, Americans pay the bill. According to the Yale Budget Lab, the new tariffs will cost the average American family around US$2400 ($4050) a year. Voters in Ohio don't like rising living costs any more than in Ōtara. If Trump doesn't make a U-turn – and he could – it is likely the Republicans, despite Texas gerrymandering, will lose the House next year. That would strip Trump of the power to impose tariffs, a responsibility that constitutionally belongs to Congress. The Trump tariffs will not last. Exporters who can hang on will be the beneficiaries.
