logo
‘Buy Now, Pay Later' Booms as Economic Pressures Mount

‘Buy Now, Pay Later' Booms as Economic Pressures Mount

WIRED04-06-2025

Jun 4, 2025 5:00 AM BNPL services have become an enduring part of the US economy. That might not be a good sign. Photo-Illustration:The economic winds whipped up by President Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff proclamations in early April have been anything but a gentle breeze. Rising prices, fomenting trade wars, and uncertainty about when tariffs will go into effect has led to a volatile economic climate.
People looking to buy electronics and other goods affected by the tariffs are trying to figure out whether they should wait it out to see if the administration's trade policies become more favorable, or quickly scoop up what they can while prices are still cheap-ish.
For consumers weighing a purchasing decision, buy now, pay later services like Klarna, Affirm, and Afterpay are offering to make that choice easier.
These companies make a relatively straightforward case: Spread out the cost of a purchase into smaller, more manageable payments over the course of a few weeks or months. Because BNPL services make deals with the sellers they're providing the payment plans for, the companies behind the BNPLs don't charge interest to the customer. So instead of spacing out a purchase with a credit card, say—which usually charges a high interest rate—BNPL would get you that thing you want for the listed price.
BNPL companies don't require you to have good credit, and they only charge fees if you're late with your payments. Otherwise it's a nice free amenity—and one that might indicate bigger financial troubles across the economy.
Nadine Chabrier, ​​senior policy council at the nonprofit Center for Responsible Lending, says it is easy to see why BNPL services are appealing. 'The top reasons consumers use buy now, pay later is because they can't afford the full cost of the item at once,' she says. 'Another reason is because there's a higher approval rate. It's that convenience factor.'
Economic uncertainty—over tariffs, rising inflation, and the possibility of a looming recession—is giving consumers pause about stretching their limited funds. It's rocky times like these when BNPL services become even more appealing.
'BNPL really skyrocketed in adoption during the pandemic,' says Matt Gross, a spokesperson for Affirm. 'It may not be as high-growth now as you saw in 2020, 2021, when everyone was stuck at home shopping online, but we're still growing at orders of magnitude faster than broader spending and consumption levels.' Stress Spending
Economic watchdogs have concerns about BNPL. The services often appeal to people with lower incomes, who financial experts have warned may be at risk of financially overextending themselves. Still, BNPL services are now woven into nearly every digital payment platform, and people have come to rely on them. PayPal offers it now, letting you spread out payments of almost anything. Klarna has partnered with DoorDash, so you can pay for your family's dinner in weekly installments. And people aren't just using them for electronics and pizza delivery, but also for basic essentials: A recent study found that 25 percent of BNPL users in the US were relying on the services to cover the costs of food and household sundries.
'Before tariffs even came into the picture, people were already using BNPL for gas and groceries,' Chabrier says. 'We're already talking about folks who may not have a lot of money or credit to spare. Additional economic stress could be hard.'
'Absolutely, this is a leading indicator of financial distress,' says Martin Kleinbard, founder of the consultancy firm Granular Fintech who formerly worked at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and coauthored a CFPB report about BNPL. 'Consumers are smart. They understand where they're getting the lowest-cost-of-credit option here and are going to avail themselves of that for the goods they have to get.'
Kleinbard says that in terms of acquiring debt, BNPL services can be more forgiving than high-interest loans like credit cards and payday loans.
'BNPL has grown rapidly over the last five years,' Kleinbard says. 'But it's still a tiny, tiny fraction of the overall spending and borrowing pie. You really have to think about it in the context of the alternatives. If the alternative is you were going to borrow anyway and it's an important purchase, then this is a pretty damn good option. This isn't a product with a lot of gotchas.'
Economically, lots of people have compared the looming uncertainty of the tariff situation with that of the pandemic. But Gross says Affirm has weathered the storm before and doesn't expect this economic shakeup to be all that different.
'I wouldn't go so far as to say this is an opportunity for us, other than to say that I think the last several years and years into the future is an opportunity,' Gross says. 'People are shifting their payment preferences to favor these types of products. And so in that sense, we are trying to be their favorite way to pay—not just when things are uncertain, but all the time.' Storm Watch
Shawn DuBravac, chief economist at the analyst firm IPC, says he agrees this is indeed a moment for buy now, pay later services, for better or worse. It's a service that's growing during a time of uncertainty that will make the service more appealing. The financial leg up it provides can indeed be helpful, but DuBravac cautions that the benefits are likely not evenly distributed.
'This could be a very good thing for some people; this could be a great service that could help them through a tough week,' DuBravac says. 'But you can't get around the fact that people who are using it then might have all of a sudden a downturn in their job. They lose their job, their household goes from two incomes to one income, all of a sudden they're strained.'
As with any loan, both the borrower and the lender incur risk. DuBravac says this moment, if the economy truly does spiral, may be the first real test of whether the BNPL industry is stable enough to keep themselves and their borrowers afloat. How well that system maintains in the face of financial downturn really depends on whether people are using it as a convenience or out of necessity.
'Are they using it as a bridge or are they using it as a crutch?' DuBravac says. 'If they're using it as a crutch, then I think there's a lot more risk there.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bridging the gap: How fusion teams drive business-IT alignment
Bridging the gap: How fusion teams drive business-IT alignment

Fast Company

time11 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Bridging the gap: How fusion teams drive business-IT alignment

The traditional boundaries between information technology (IT) and business units are becoming increasingly blurred. Especially as organizations adopt digital transformation initiatives such as artificial intelligence, the need for alignment across teams becomes even more critical. To stay competitive and drive innovation, organizations should work to bridge the gap early between these two domains with high-impact collaboration and consensus on objectives. THE CHALLENGE AND IMPLICATIONS OF SILOED OPERATIONS Historically, IT and business units have operated in silos, each focusing on their individual department goals. In fact, according to McKinsey & Company's 2023 The State of Organizations report, 33% of respondents say initiatives in their companies are being launched in organizational silos, thereby limiting their effectiveness. This separation can lead to miscommunication, misaligned goals, and inefficiencies. Business teams may view IT as a support function, while IT departments might see business units as lacking technical understanding. When IT and business strategies are not in sync, the consequences can be significant. Common challenges include: Delayed Projects And Outcomes: Without clear communication and shared objectives, projects may face delays due to conflicting priorities or misunderstandings yielding delayed benefits. Increased Costs And Risk: Disjointed priorities can lead to redundant efforts or investments in technologies that do not support business goals, resulting in wasted resources or increased risk. Reduced Agility: Organizations may struggle to adapt to market shifts if IT and business units are not working cohesively, leading to missed opportunities. THE SOLUTION: BUILDING FUSION TEAMS To overcome these challenges, organizations should consider embracing fusion teams, which are cross-functional groups that integrate members from IT and business units. These teams work collaboratively toward shared objectives, leveraging diverse expertise to drive innovation and efficiency. By breaking away from the traditional silos, fusion teams can combine technical knowledge with business insights to ensure both perspectives are considered from the start. At my company, we've embraced the fusion team model to connect the dots between IT and business units. By dedicating professionals from operations, marketing, and technology to work together as cohesive pods, we've witnessed great improvements in project delivery times and value realization, without losing oversight. This collaborative approach has facilitated our ability to align our technological initiatives closely with business objectives, resulting in solutions that are both technically sound and strategically relevant. KEY STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESSFUL FUSION TEAMS Building a fusion team is a strong first step toward spanning the divide between IT and business, but assembling the team is only the beginning. To unlock real value, leaders should focus on how to set these teams up for long-term success by ensuring they have the structure, support, and shared goals needed to drive meaningful outcomes. Strategies leaders can consider include: Align On Shared Goals: Set clear, common objectives and target outcomes that connect directly to your organization's broader strategy. When everyone understands what they're working toward, teams remain focused, motivated, and aligned. Regularly revisit these goals to ensure they remain relevant as priorities evolve. Dedicate Resources: Assign employees from IT and business units to work together full time with clear role definition and embedded decision rights. By committing dedicated resources, you foster stronger collaboration and create a sense of ownership within the team. Choose The Right Team Structure: Think about whether a centralized or decentralized approach fits your organization best. Centralized teams provide structure, consistency, and focus, while decentralized teams may offer more agility and closer ties to specific business functions. In some cases, a hybrid model may offer the best balance. Rethink Reporting: Consider adjusting reporting lines to drive deeper collaboration. For example, having IT team members temporarily report to business leaders across certain projects can help shift mindsets and instantly realign priorities. Bridging the gap between IT and business teams is no longer a luxury, but a necessity in today's business environment. By fostering fusion teams and promoting a culture of collaboration, organizations can enhance efficiency, drive innovation, and achieve strategic objectives more effectively.

Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' cracks down on Biden's student loan 'scheme,' top Republican says
Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' cracks down on Biden's student loan 'scheme,' top Republican says

Fox News

time12 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' cracks down on Biden's student loan 'scheme,' top Republican says

The chairman of a key Senate panel is claiming victory against former President Joe Biden's student loan plans as part of President Donald Trump's "one big, beautiful bill." "The Biden administration was attempting to forgive student loans for people who willingly took on the loan and required the taxpayer, including people who never went to college and would never make what the person who took the loan would ever have the hope to make," Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, R-La., told Fox News Digital. "So we end that transfer of that student loan on the taxpayers, and that's probably our biggest savings." Cassidy's committee released its portion of the Trump agenda bill late on Tuesday. A press release for the legislation said it "ends Biden's student loan schemes that transfer debt onto the 87 percent of Americans who chose to not go to college or already paid off their loans" and "also prevents future Democrat administrations from implementing schemes." The bill specifically takes aim at Biden's expansion of Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations and Closed School Discharge regulations, which Republicans have held up as costly policies that shift federal student loan borrowers' burdens onto other taxpayers. Various versions of Biden's plans had previously been struck down in court. The bill would also eliminate federal Grad PLUS loans, a program used by graduate-level and professional students to pay for their studies, which can be used for graduate students' entire cost of attendance. It would instead keep in place a $20,500 annual limit for Federal Direct Unsubsidized Loans on graduate degrees, capped at $100,000 total, excluding undergraduate loans. For professional degrees, it keeps a $50,000 annual unsubsidized loan limit and a $200,000 total cap. The legislation is also aimed at cracking down on taxpayer funding subsidizing degrees from lower-performing universities. Colleges that see people with undergraduate degrees earn less than the typical high school graduate in their state, or graduate programs where attendees then earn less than the normal bachelor's recipient, would be blocked from federal student loan programs. "What we've got was a situation where people can borrow more money than they can effectively pay back, and that destroys their life, leaving them with a debt burden which keeps them unable to do other things in life. And there's at least some sense that universities offering these programs know that's the case. And so we attempt to fix that," Cassidy said. "So we have provisions that would say that if the degree being acquired does not end up paying more, the person receiving that degree doesn't get more on average than a person who did not get that degree, then the federal government is not going to lend them money." To encourage more people to pursue non-collegiate degrees, the bill would also establish a Workforce Pell Grant. Pell Grants are currently aimed at low-income students pursuing bachelor's degrees and are generally not repaid. "For example, a student gets a commercial driver's license. They're going to go out and make $100,000 a year after a couple of years of driving, I am told. And so we want to enable those people to accomplish that," Cassidy said. Foreign income would be taken into account when evaluating Pell Grants, while farm and small business assets would not, under the GOP bill. Those and several other measures in the legislation would add up to roughly $300 billion in taxpayer savings, Cassidy said. Senate Republicans are currently working through their version of Trump's massive agenda bill, which passed the House late last month. Republicans are using the budget reconciliation process to pass a sweeping bill advancing Trump's agenda on taxes, immigration, energy, defense and the national debt. They are also working to use it to bring down the national debt – nearing $37 trillion – with the aim of cutting $1.5 trillion in federal spending. Reconciliation allows the party in power to completely skirt the minority, in this case Democrats, by lowering the Senate's threshold to advance from 60 votes to 51. The legislation must adhere to a specific set of rules, however, including measures that deal with the budget, taxation, or the national debt. Both the House and Senate must agree to identical versions of the bill before it gets to Trump's desk for a signature. The House's version passed 215 to 214, and leaders there have implored the upper chamber to change as little as possible. Cassidy acknowledged there were some changes made but was optimistic about how they'll be met in the House. "There's several things, but one thing I think that they're going to like is that we do fully fund the Pell Grant program. You know, we address the shortfall there. And so I think they're going to like it," he said. "It's going to give low-income students access to career education. We need those kind of career type jobs to make sure that all this manufacturing and construction has a workforce to address it. And so we think it helps the needs of society. We think it helps the needs of the student." House and Senate GOP leaders had previously set a goal of having a bill on Trump's desk by the Fourth of July. Cassidy declined to comment on whether that was a feasible benchmark but argued that lawmakers should be ready to extend that timeline – and possibly shrink their summer recess – to get the final product. "As far as I'm concerned, the most important thing is to get it right. So if there is a delay, the president said it today – if there is a delay, that's not that big of a deal. The most important thing is we get it right," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store