Psilocybin Safe, Effective for TRD: Phase 3 Data
Topline results from the ongoing COMP005 trial showed that a single 25-mg dose of the investigational drug was associated with a greater reduction in symptom severity on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 6 weeks than matching placebo, meeting the study's primary endpoint.
Additionally, there were 'no unexpected safety findings and no clinically meaningful imbalance in suicidal ideation between treatment and placebo arms,' the company added.
This is 'the first study of an investigational, synthetic psilocybin, and the first classic psychedelic, to report phase 3 efficacy data,' the company said.
The results are important for patients with TRD who do not respond to currently approved and available treatment options, Guy Goodwin, MD, chief medical officer at Compass, said in the release.
'This achievement provides hope that they can finally receive appropriate care and live the life they deserve,' Goodwin added.
Ongoing Research
COMP360 is a synthetic and proprietary formulation of psilocybin.
As reported by Medscape Medical News, results presented at the 2023 European Psychiatric Association Congress from a phase 2 study assessing a single 25-mg dose of the drug were associated with improvements of core symptoms in patients with TRD. It has also appeared to be effective for bipolar depression and for anorexia nervosa in two separate small studies.
COMP005 is the first of two ongoing and parallel-running phase 3 trials assessing the investigational drug. In it, 258 patients with TRD were enrolled across 32 US sites and randomly assigned to receive one administration of either the active drug at a dose of 25 mg or matching placebo. The newly released results are from the first part of the trial, which included blinding through 6 weeks.
From baseline to 6 weeks, the participants who received the active treatment had a significantly greater reduction in symptom severity on the MADRS compared to those who received placebo ( P < .001). In addition, there was a mean score treatment difference of -3.6 (95% CI, -5.7 to -1.5), demonstrating a clinically meaningful reduction, the company noted.
The trial's data, which were reviewed by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board, showed no new or unexpected safety findings and were consistent with those from previous COMP360 studies.
Part 2 of the ongoing trial will be evaluating results blinded through week 26, and part 3 will contain open-label treatment from week 26 to week 52.
'We eagerly anticipate further insights once we have the full dataset,' Kabir Nath, Compass' chief executive officer, said in the release.
For now, the company reported that it is planning to discuss these preliminary results with the US Food and Drug Administration.
In addition, the ongoing phase 3 COMP006 trial is aiming to enroll 568 participants from North America and Europe and will assess two fixed doses of the active treatment. Compass is expecting to receive 26-week data during the second half of 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
26 minutes ago
- Medscape
Talk Therapy Less Effective in Young vs Middle-Aged Adults
TOPLINE: NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression (TTad) were less effective for adults aged 16-24 years than for those aged 25-65 years, a cohort study of over 1.5 million people revealed. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a retrospective cohort study using the data of 309,758 young adults (aged 16-24 years; 69.4% women; 82.5% White) and 1,290,130 working-age adults (aged 25-65 years; 65.2% women; 83.6% White) who received psychological treatment through England's NHS TTad services between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was the change in symptom severity scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire nine-item (PHQ-9) and Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale seven-item (GAD-7) between age groups. Secondary outcomes were rates of recovery, reliable recovery, reliable improvement, and reliable deterioration. The analysis was adjusted for gender, ethnicity, local area deprivation, clinical factors, treatment intensity, and the number of sessions. Sensitivity analyses included geographical and temporal variation in age-related differences and adults older than 65 years in the working-age group. TAKEAWAY: Differences in pre-post symptom severity scores on the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 increased with age. In the unadjusted analysis, young adults experienced smaller improvements in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores than working-age adults (PHQ-9: b, -0.98; GAD-7: b, -0.77; P < .001 for both). The magnitude of difference was smaller in the adjusted analysis. Young adults had lower rates of reliable recovery (41.5% vs 48.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.76), reliable improvement (68.6% vs 72.6%; aOR, 0.83), and recovery (43.7% vs 51.1%; aOR, 0.74) but higher rates of reliable deterioration (5.9% vs 5.2%; aOR, 1.15) than working-age adults. Age-related differences were consistent across regions and treatment years, with London having the smallest difference (3.0%) and the South West having the largest difference (~6.5%), and unchanged when including adults older than 65 years. IN PRACTICE: "Getting young adults into treatment more quickly, offering them treatment in a convenient and desired format, and working hard to ensure they stay in treatment have the potential to improve outcomes for this group. Addressing social factors that are of particular concern to emerging adults — eg, job and housing insecurity — might also be required to improve outcomes in young adults," the authors wrote. "Considering and trialling adaptions tailored to specific requirements of this age group, the management of information on mental health and mental illness, as well as expectations of treatment, might also be necessary," they added. SOURCE: This study was led by Rob Saunders, PhD, and Jae Won Suh, DPhil, University College London, London, England. It was published online on August 6 in The Lancet Psychiatry. LIMITATIONS: The use of routinely recorded health service data limited the availability of measures on general well-being and personal sense of improvement. Although the analysis was adjusted for neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and intellectual disability, the severity of these conditions and other potential confounders, such as gender identity, sexual orientation, and social support, were not captured. Moreover, unmeasured differences in treatment delivery and other common disorders in young adults may have influenced the results, and the findings were not generalisable to non-binary individuals due to limited data availability. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
My breast reduction left me with huge open wounds – but I still don't regret it
I always felt like an alien growing up – an alien with double H breasts. They were just too big for my frame and it was awful. So, when I first discovered breast reduction surgery at 19, I immediately knew it was what I needed to do. Unfortunately the transformation itself wasn't as simple. My body rejected the initial surgery, triggering a relentless 11-year journey of corrective procedures to fix the damage. At least 12 operations later and now 31, I pray that I am nearing the end of this surgical nightmare. I grew up with my mum, my dad and my older brother. As one of the oldest girls in my year at school, I was one of the first to go through puberty. I started gaining unwanted attention from around 14 – all the boys would make jokes about my breasts. I didn't have many relationships growing up as all the attention was solely focused on my chest. In any event, I didn't want anything to do with anything sexual or intimate, because I hated them so much. Even outside of school I received attention from men in the street. They would scream things at me – 'Look at the t--s on her!' When you're that young, you can't process things like that properly – it was horrific. By age 16 I was a double H. I would wear baggy clothing all the time – hoodies, shirts and never anything that would show cleavage – but you never feel you can hide them. They always felt extremely tender; the sensitivity was unbearable. My mental health also suffered. I was a very sad teenager, who struggled with depression. I've been in and out of therapy since I was 17. Exercising was mostly impossible. You could completely write running off – even star jumps or yoga. I'd strap them down in two sports bras. When that didn't work, I got a personal trainer. My PT was an ex-military man who was lovely, but had zero experience in training a young teenage girl with massive boobs. The route to surgery For the longest time I just accepted my fate. I didn't know what a breast reduction was, let alone that it was an accessible procedure. My mum was the one who brought my attention to it. I was 19 when one day she said to me, 'If you ever want a reduction, me and your dad will take care of it.' Immediately I knew that it was something I wanted to do – I was ready to be booked in. From then, it was full steam ahead. In that same week, I had an appointment with a Nuffield Health private surgeon who was recommended to me. He looked at me and confirmed he would be able to fix my boobs. I told my surgeon if he could make them an A cup that would be ideal. I just hated them so much that I preferred to have no breasts at all – I wanted to be flat chested. The surgeon wouldn't do that, but he would make them a 'normal' size for my frame and give me a B-C cup (I was around a size 14 at the time). He showed me a book with prints of his previous work before and after. They were all beautiful and perfectly healed to the point where you wouldn't even know they'd had surgery. I remember thinking, 'Sign me up and book me in!' The surgery was going to cost my parents about £6,000 but we didn't even try to have the surgery with the NHS because I was too desperate to wait and just wanted to get it done. There are very few women who get breast reductions this way. In order to qualify, you almost have to be verging on disabled – you can't just have back pain, you have to not be able to sit or stand up straight. I went in for the private surgery less than a month later. My first surgery The experience leading up to the procedure was extremely uncomfortable because my surgeon had no bedside manner – none whatsoever. I remember the nurses really overcompensated for him, making conversation to calm my nerves. About half an hour before the surgery he came in to 'draw me up'. He took a marker pen and spent a long time with a ruler and tape measure drawing all over my chest. He circled my nipples and marked where he'd be moving them to. Once he'd finished he said, 'Right – see you in surgery,' and that was it. When I woke from the surgery, everything seemed fine. After the first night, I went home. The recovery was hard – because I was all stitched up, everything in my body was super connected. Even if I moved my elbow, I could feel the pain on my chest. I was practically immobile for two to three weeks – I needed help to sit and stand, to eat, even to go to the bathroom. Luckily, I was living at home with my parents, so I had their full-time support. When the surgery starts to go wrong After a week, I changed my dressing as the surgeon had instructed me to. That's when I noticed that my left breast had a hole at the T-join. It's the most common place for a split (I believe there is a 20 per cent chance of wound separation) because there's a lot of tension from the three points of flesh joining together. It was horrible to look at but the smell, too, was horrific. At its worst, the hole [seen below] was roughly the size of a bulging 50p coin, so we went straight back to the surgeon. He was so unbothered by everything – he said: 'Oh, that happens, let's just stitch it back up in two days.' That was a quick anaesthetic procedure, but as soon as I got home from that, every other stitch on me started to burst open. We pushed him to explain what was happening to my body, but he refused to explain or offer any sympathy. He would just say, 'You knew this could happen,' without explaining what 'this' was. It felt like he didn't want it to be his problem, so his defences immediately went up. In hindsight, we think that I was allergic to the stitches the surgeon used because my body seemed to completely reject them. Over the space of a week, my breasts began to look more and more deformed – and infection was thriving. We went back to the surgeon and this time my mum challenged his indifference. He suggested that I come into the hospital every other day to get redressed. My mum felt strongly at that point I needed another surgery. After a couple of days, he came back and said he would have to charge me thousands of pounds to essentially redo the original surgery. He offered no sympathy. This wasn't an option for us any more. We didn't want to trust this person with another full surgery. We chose to go back to the hospital every other day to get redressed. For the most part, my body was left to heal these huge open wounds. It took nearly a year of this for the skin to fully close. I couldn't swim, I couldn't go to the gym, I couldn't even have a bath. What should have been three or four weeks of healing became a year. I did very little during that year. My friends were as understanding as they could be, but they couldn't fully comprehend what I'd done. There was no guarantee that I was healing. Some days my wounds would be closing and then a week later, they'd get even bigger than before. There were times that I wondered if I was ever going to get better. That year was my lowest point – I was a shell of a person. Finding a new surgeon Once I was finally healed, the next job was to get the scars revised. We tried to go through the NHS for this because I was so self conscious of the scars. The process of getting the surgery covered by the NHS was horrific, and I hope no one else has to go through it. For the first stage of the process, I had to take photos of my breasts. I went into this old fashioned hospital photo booth room and was made to stand in front of the camera with my deformed boobs while a stern-faced lady shouted at me to put my hands up and down. Those photos were then sent to a board of people on the NHS who decide who can qualify for surgery and can't for non-life threatening complications. The second stage of the process involved me going to face the board, and essentially selling myself and my story to them. I had to say why I needed the surgery and how it would affect me if I didn't get it. I was essentially pleading with a room full of strangers and begging them to see my point of view. I just couldn't face it, so instead we found a new private surgeon. This time my mum personally looked into a surgeon who specialised in reconstructive surgery. She spent a lot of time emailing and calling on my behalf to find the perfect surgeon. The surgeon we went for in the end was an expert in burns and cancer patients who needed reconstructive surgery. We asked the new surgeon what the problem could have been with the original surgery, as the previous surgeon would not. He confirmed that I was either allergic to the Vicryl stitches used, or I'd suffered an extreme infection. I've had all my corrective surgeries with him since. Vicryl stitches are commonly used in surgery so the new surgeon used an old fashioned stitch, and I never had wound separation again. He is such a kind man, so compassionate and reassuring. When I first met him, I said: ' Knowing that you exist, I can't believe I didn't come to you in the first place.' From the beginning, he took me seriously, listened to me and explained things in a way that I could understand. I've had at least six surgeries (I've had a lot more scar tissue removed from my left breast than my right and it was hard to keep the symmetry) and five additional procedures like steroid injections. My last appointment with him was about eight months ago. How I feel now I decided to start posting pictures on Instagram as a way to celebrate my new body and my newfound confidence. For me, losing my boobs was the best thing for me because I suddenly fell back in love with my body. I went back to my old ex-military PT and am now into fitness again. I am happy to be in pictures with my friends, and wear clothes and pretty lingerie that are flattering. My mental health has improved drastically as a result. And even though my surgery went horribly wrong at first, I would still recommend reduction as a surgery for women who need it. I've never met anyone who has regretted a breast reduction. It has revitalised my life – and I don't regret it one bit either. As told to Nicole Collins Breast reduction: the low-down A breast reduction is a popular procedure which removes fat, skin and glandular tissue from the breast to make them smaller. It is the second most popular cosmetic procedure in Britain, with 4,641 people undergoing the surgery in 2023. The nipples may also be repositioned to look more natural in relation to the newly reduced breast size. The surgery usually takes two to four hours, is performed under general anaesthesia and may require you to remain in the hospital for a couple of days after the procedure to heal. Recovery can vary, but typically it is recommended to take one to two weeks off work, and expect a full recovery within two to three months. Breast reductions performed privately on average cost around £6,500 plus the cost of follow-up care. Those who experience distress or physical discomfort due to their breast size may be able to get their breast reduction covered by the NHS. To do this, you would have to consult with your GP and demonstrate how your breast size is impacting your quality of life. The criteria for getting it covered varies depending on where you live, but typically includes factors such as the size of your breasts, your weight, your general health and whether you smoke. The British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS) are the national board who accredit and certify private surgeons and NHS surgeons around the country. All plastic surgeons are required to be on the General Medical Council (GMC) specialist register, but BAAPS assures quality held to a certain criteria. Those seeking the procedure should ensure that their plastic surgeon is board certified by searching on BAAPS's online registry. Reconstructive procedures: the wider costs The most popular reconstructive surgeries in the UK are breast reconstruction following a mastectomy due to breast cancer. In 2023, BAAPS reported a 94 per cent increase in individuals requiring hospital treatment in the UK after getting cosmetic surgery abroad. BAAPS estimate that the average cost on the NHS for a corrective surgery is around £15,000 per patient. A recent study recording the number of patients reporting to NHS hospitals with post-op surgery complications across 17 months found that 96 per cent of cases were from surgeries performed in Turkey. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Scientists use Stephen Hawking theory to propose 'black hole morsels' — strange, compact objects that could reveal new physics
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Tiny black holes created in the aftermath of violent cosmic collisions could offer unprecedented insight into the quantum structure of space and time, a new theoretical study proposes. What's more, signals from these "black hole morsels" could potentially be detected by current instruments, scientists reported in the study, which was published in the journal Nuclear Physics B. "Our work shows that if these objects are formed, their radiation might already be detectable using existing gamma-ray observatories," Francesco Sannino, a theoretical physicist at the University of Southern Denmark and co-author of the study, told Live Science via email. Hawking radiation and the smallest black holes One of the deepest mysteries in modern physics is how gravity behaves at the quantum level. The new study offers a bold proposal to explore this regime by looking for the glow produced by tiny black holes created in the aftermath of giant black hole collisions. The idea that black holes are not entirely black, and therefore could emit faint radiation, was first proposed by Stephen Hawking in the 1970s. His calculations revealed that quantum effects near a black hole's event horizon would cause it to emit radiation and lose mass — a process now known as Hawking radiation. The black hole temperature is predicted to be inversely proportional to its mass. So for massive astrophysical black holes, the effect is minuscule, with temperatures so low that the radiation is effectively undetectable. But for very small black holes, the situation is different. "Black hole morsels are hypothetical micro-black holes that could be formed during the violent merger of two astrophysical black holes," Giacomo Cacciapaglia, a senior researcher at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) and co-author of the study, said in an email. "Unlike the larger parent black hole, these morsels are much smaller — comparable in mass to asteroids — and thus much hotter due to the inverse relationship between black hole mass and Hawking temperature." Related: Scientists detect most massive black hole merger ever — and it birthed a monster 225 times as massive as the sun Because of this elevated temperature, these morsels would evaporate relatively quickly, releasing bursts of high-energy particles such as gamma-rays and neutrinos. The team's analysis suggests that this radiation could form a distinct signal that may already be within reach of present-day detectors. A new handle on quantum gravity Although no such morsels have been observed yet, the researchers argue that the formation of these tiny black holes is theoretically plausible. "The idea is inspired by analogous processes in neutron star mergers," Stefan Hohenegger, senior researcher at the Institut de Physique des Deux Infinis de Lyon and co-author of the study, explained in an email. "It's supported by estimates from beyond-General Relativity frameworks, including string theory and extra-dimensional models." In such extreme environments, small-scale instabilities might pinch off tiny black holes during the merger process. These objects, in turn, could evaporate through Hawking radiation over timescales ranging from milliseconds to years, depending on their mass. Crucially, if such radiation is detected, it could open a window into new physics. "Hawking radiation encodes information about the underlying quantum structure of spacetime," Sannino said. "Its spectral properties could reveal deviations from the Standard Model at extreme energy scale, potentially leading to discoveries of unknown particles or such phenomena as extra dimensions predicted by various theories." Such energy scales lie far beyond the reach of even the most powerful particle colliders, like the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. The possibility that black hole morsels might provide a natural "accelerator" for probing these physics is what makes them so compelling. According to the team, the signature of a black hole morsel would be a delayed burst of high-energy gamma-rays radiating in all directions — unlike typical gamma-ray bursts, which are usually beamed. Instruments capable of detecting such high-energy signals include atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes, like the High Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS), in Namibia; the High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory (HAWC), in Mexico; and the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) in China, as well as satellite-based detectors, like the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. "Some of these instruments already have the sensitivity required," Hohenegger noted. The researchers didn't stop at theorizing. They used existing data from HESS and HAWC to place upper bounds on how much mass could be emitted in the form of morsels during known black hole mergers. These limits represent the first observational constraints on such phenomena. "We showed that if black hole morsels form during mergers, they would produce a burst of high-energy gamma rays, with the timing of the burst linked to their masses," Cacciapaglia said. "Our analysis demonstrates that this novel multimessenger signature can offer experimental access to quantum gravitational phenomena.' What comes next While the study provides a compelling case for morsels, many uncertainties remain. The exact conditions for their formation are still poorly understood, and no full simulations have been performed at the scales necessary to model them. But the researchers are optimistic. RELATED STORIES —See the universe's rarest type of black hole slurp up a star in stunning animation —Exotic 'blazar' is part of most extreme double black hole system ever found, crooked jet suggests —Paperclip-sized spacecraft could visit a nearby black hole in the next century, study claims "Future work will involve refining the theoretical models for morsel formation and extending the analysis to include more realistic mass and spin distributions," Sannino said. The team also hopes to collaborate with observational astronomers to perform dedicated searches in both archived and upcoming datasets. "We hope this line of research will open a new window into understanding the quantum nature of gravity and the structure of spacetime," Hohenegger said. If black hole morsels exist, they may not only illuminate the sky with exotic radiation but could also shed light on some of the deepest unsolved questions in physics. Solve the daily Crossword
