
What in-flight turbulence is and when it becomes dangerous for passengers and crews
Several turbulence-impacted flights have been reported this year.
While turbulence-related fatalities are quite rare, the tally of injuries has grown over the years. Some meteorologists and aviation analysts note that reports of turbulence encounters also have been increasing and point to what climate change may be doing to flying conditions.
Planes hitting bumpy air is mostly minor, however, and airlines have tried to improve safety. Experts advise travelers to stay vigilant, stressing wearing a seat belt whenever possible.
What causes turbulence
Turbulence is essentially unstable air that moves in a non-predictable fashion. Most people associate it with heavy storms. But the most dangerous is clear-air turbulence, which often occurs with no visible warning.
Clear-air turbulence happens most often in or near the high-altitude rivers of air called jet streams. The culprit is wind shear, which is when two huge air masses close to each other move at different speeds. If the difference in speed is big enough, the atmosphere can't handle the strain, and it breaks into turbulent patterns like eddies in water.
Recent flights shaken by turbulence
In June, five people were taken to a North Carolina hospital for evaluation after an American Airlines flight from Miami hit turbulence on its way to Raleigh-Durham International Airport. The plane landed safely.
Earlier that month, severe storms in southern Germany forced a Ryanair flight to make an emergency landing after violent turbulence injured nine people, German police said. The flight was traveling from Berlin to Milan with 179 passengers and six crew members. Eight passengers and one crew member were hurt.
In March, a United Airlines flight from San Francisco to Singapore experienced severe turbulence over the Philippines. The plane was carrying 174 passengers and 14 crew members. Five people were injured and the plane landed safely in Singapore.
Several flights were diverted to Waco, Texas, on March 3, because of turbulence. Five people were injured aboard a United Express plane flying from Springfield, Missouri, to Houston.
Last year, Italian authorities launched an investigation after two easyJet flight attendants were injured when their flight from Corfu to London's Gatwick Airport was buffeted by turbulence. The pilot made an unscheduled landing in Rome.
In May 2024, a 73-year-old British man died and dozens of people were injured aboard a Singapore Airlines flight that hit severe turbulence. His death was under investigation. Authorities said he may have had a heart attack.
It's unclear how common injuries are
Tracking the number of turbulence-related injuries worldwide is difficult. But some countries publish national data.
Most reports of in-flight turbulence from 2009 through 2018 resulted in one or more serious injuries and no damage to the plane, the National Transportation Safety Board reported.
Between 2009 and 2024, 207 people were injured seriously enough during turbulence to require hospital treatment for at least two days, according to the NTSB. Most of them were flight attendants, who are more likely to be out of their seats during a flight.
How pilots try to avoid it
Pilots try to avoid turbulence partly by using a weather radar display. Sometimes they can simply see and fly around thunderstorms.
But clear-air turbulence 'is altogether another animal,' said Doug Moss, a former airline pilot and safety consultant. It can be devastating, he said, 'because the time before the incident can be very calm, and people are caught off-guard.'
Air traffic controllers will warn pilots after another plane runs into clear-air turbulence, Moss said. Many pilots also look for signs of wind shear, then plan to avoid those areas, he said.
Modern planes are strong enough to handle just about any turbulence. Cabin areas such as overhead bins may receive cosmetic damage, 'but these don't impact the structural integrity of the planes,' Moss said.
Scientists look at climate change's influence
Some scientists note that reports of turbulence encounters are on the rise. Several researchers have pointed to potential climate impacts as one of the possible explanations.
Professor Thomas Guinn, of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, explains that some predict climate change could alter the jet stream and up the wind shear, which would drive up turbulence.
Paul Williams, a professor of atmospheric science at the University of Reading in England, said there was 'strong evidence that turbulence is increasing because of climate change.'
Williams said in a statement last year that his research team discovered that severe clear-air turbulence in the North Atlantic has increased by 55% since 1979, for example. The team's projections signal that severe turbulence in the jet streams could double or triple in the coming decades if global conditions continue as expected, he said.
There could be a rise in overall air traffic that may increase turbulence encounters as the number of flight tracks go up, said Larry Cornman, a project scientist at the National Science Foundation's National Center for Atmospheric Research.
What travelers can do to stay safe
In short, buckle up. Turbulence can be tricky to predict, but experts stress that the first line of defense is keeping the seat belt fastened, whenever possible.
And airlines have taken steps for safety. Last November, Southwest Airlines said it was ending cabin service earlier so that passengers return to their seats and fasten seat belts sooner.
The change was intended to 'reduce the risk of in-flight turbulence injuries,' the company said.
Also last year, Korean Air decided to stop offering a beloved instant noodle, Shin Ramyun.
'This decision is part of proactive safety measures in response to increased turbulence, aimed at preventing burn accidents,' the Seoul-based airline said in a statement.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
US airline launches new nonstop routes to UK and Europe
Alaska Airlines is launching two new nonstop routes from Seattle to London Heathrow and Reykjavik, Iceland. These services are scheduled to begin in spring 2026, representing the fourth and fifth intercontinental destinations for the airline from Seattle by 2030. The London route will operate daily and year-round using 787-9 Dreamliner aircraft, competing with British Airways, Delta, and Virgin Atlantic. The Seattle-Reykjavik service will be seasonal, running during the summer using 737-8 Max aircraft, and will compete with Icelandair. Alaska Airlines CEO Ben Minicucci stated that these new routes will accelerate the airline's vision to connect guests globally and enhance the international travel experience.


The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
How would a holiday lottery work? Simon Calder spins the travel roulette wheel
The old town of Dubrovnik has a spectacular location on the edge of the Adriatic, and a deep history. Churches and cottages line the cobbled streets and heavenly stairways, all wrapped in ancient walls. And on any day in summer, the place is overrun with tourists. Some are attracted by the sheer good looks of the Croatian city; others are lured by the Game of Thrones connection. The remainder were simply dropped off for the day by a cruise ship and are following (and augmenting) the crowd. Residents of other key tourism 'honeypots' across Europe, including Amsterdam, Barcelona, and Venice, say visitor numbers are unsustainable and are damaging the community, as well as the fabric, of the city. Glenn Fogel, chief executive of parent company, believes visitor numbers to key destinations could be limited by a combination of 'higher cost and lottery'. He told the BBC: 'Even though you may not be wealthy, you should still get a chance to visit some of those beautiful and great places in the world.' So how might such schemes work? These are the key questions and answers. Surely the easy (and lucrative) way to limit tourism is to raise prices? That is certainly a valid mechanism. Venice imposes a visitor levy on certain days, and there have been calls this week to increase the admission charge to €100 (£87). Meanwhile, authorities in Amsterdam are raising accommodation taxes. And in Edinburgh, which at this time of year is hosting the Festival and Fringe, hotel rates are so high that 'normal' tourists are staying away. Justin Francis, chief executive of Responsible Travel, says: 'Price rises, tourism taxes, regulating accommodation – especially Airbnb – and 'demarketing' are ways to ensure limit numbers.' In the context of high fees, he cites the example of gorilla tracking in Africa, where permit prices can reach $1,500 (£1,130). Mr Francis says: 'Far from causing outcry, tourists view the handful of expensive permits as an exclusive, once-in-a-lifetime experience. The experience has not been boycotted; permits regularly sell out. Better still, the forests remain intact, and gorilla numbers, which were once threatened, have increased substantially since the introduction of tourism.' But high prices can exclude less wealthy travellers from iconic locations, which many people believe that is unfair. In France, for example, many museums – including the Louvre in Paris – have designated days when admission is free. But when demand is unrelenting, using a lottery system has some appeal. Are lotteries currently used to manage tourism numbers anywhere? Yes. The principal that access to fragile locations should be decided randomly is used at a small scale to limit visitor numbers to US National Parks. For example, each year 450 permits are granted for rafting through the Grand Canyon on the Colorado River. At a hikers' refuge in the National Park, Phantom Ranch, bed spaces are allocated by lottery 15 months in advance. Justin Francis, an advocate for accessible tourism, says lotteries are also used for cultural events in Japan and some Antarctic expeditions. Could the principle be extended to entire cities? In a few specific cases, quite easily. Notable examples are cities such as Venice, surrounded by water, and the old town of Dubrovnik, with a big wall around it and limited access points. At present visitors arriving in Venice on 'permit days' have to present either ID proving they are a local or a worker, or evidence that they have paid the levy. That could be changed to proof that you have been successful in the lottery. But for large, sprawling cities such as London it would be utterly unmanageable – there will not be tourist checkpoints on the M25. However, key locations could operate with a quota system. For example, the royal parks have fences and gates that would allow for relatively easy control. How would a lottery actually work? Systems for allocating scarce resources through chance are already well-established for key sporting events, such as Wimbledon, the Olympics and the World Cup, so there should not be a problem with the technology. Applicants would go online and state their wish to visit on a particular day. At some appointed time, an electronic lottery would allocate the correct number of prizes – with lucky winners having a QR code to show at the gate. Residents and workers would need to show ID. What could possibly go wrong? Plenty. For a start, consider a family group of six. Would they all be able to apply together – or might some win and some lose? Individuals will doubtless try to game the system, for example by submitting multiple applications using different email addresses. Given the ability of sharks and touts to profit from excessive demand, however sophisticated a ticketing system may be, some permits coud be sold for inflated prices. While some locations in a few key cities are hopelessly overcrowded, inbound tourism in most places is rightly regarded as huge benefit – the closest that a city, county or nation can get to free money. Were parts of a country to start cordoning off areas and making tourism into something of a lottery, visitors may simply move to other nations. A highly localised case of overtourism could be alleviated, but at the cost of livelihoods for many in the tourism industry.


Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Birmingham airport shuts after plane makes emergency landing
Birmingham airport has shut after a private aircraft made an emergency landing. All departures and arrivals have been stopped until 6pm after a twin-engined Beech King Air, which had been heading to Belfast, declared an in-flight emergency and diverted to Birmingham. Pictures from the scene show a Beech King Air stopped on what appears to be Birmingham's main runway. Its landing gear appears to have collapsed. Emergency crews are on the scene. Data from Flight Radar 24 suggests the aircraft that made the emergency landing was a Beech King Air 200. This is the same type of plane that crashed at Southend airport in July, killing all four people aboard.