China Builds New Structure in Disputed Waters Claimed by US Ally
The dispute echoes a similar one with South Korea, which has recently stepped up its objections to Chinese activities in the Yellow Sea. Beijing's neighbors fear it plans to achieve de facto control over these areas.
Newsweek reached out to the Chinese Foreign Ministry via email with a request for comment.
Tokyo views unilateral construction as a violation of the spirit of a still-unimplemented 2008 agreement to jointly develop gas fields until the two sides can agree on a formal demarcation of each's exclusive economic zone-within which a state is entitled to sole access to resources under maritime law.
The issue comes as China increases patrols by its heavily armed coast guard near the Japan-administered, Beijing-claimed Senkaku Islands, drawing stern rebukes from the U.S. ally.
Japan's Foreign Ministry said on Wednesday it had "immediately issued a strong protest" to the Chinese embassy in Tokyo over the latest structure.
"It is extremely regrettable that China is advancing unilateral development in the East China Sea, while the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf have not yet been delimited," the ministry said in a statement.
In the protest, Kanai Masaaki, director-general of the Asian and Oceanian Affairs Bureau, urged Beijing to resume talks on implementing the 2008 accord, the statement said.
Tokyo says this is the 19th structure of its kind. The continued additions, which have included hydrocarbon platforms and oil rigs-both permanent and mobile-indicate China is ramping up fossil fuel production in these waters.
While China sees the 2008 agreement as non-binding, it has so far limited construction to its side of the median line. Japan believes these operations are likely draining gas and oil basins that straddle the line and that the resources should be shared.
The controversy mirrors a similar dispute in the Yellow Sea, where China has a separate agreement with South Korea. That accord covers a provisional measures zone-an area where the countries' EEZ claims overlap and where both sides agreed to limit activity to fishing and navigation.
Seoul says a jack-up rig China installed in these waters in 2022-without notification-could qualify as a permanent structure and signal the start of Chinese eastward expansion. China insists the platform supports aquaculture operations.
The issue featured in talks when officials from both sides met for talks in April. South Korean officials have since warned of "proportional" countermeasures if Beijing fails to be more transparent about the rig and its purpose.
Collin Koh, senior fellow at Singapore's Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies, told Newsweek: "Erecting structures along the median line in contested maritime spaces help give an appearance of effective control and administration, thus facilitating one to push a claim."
China has not yet publicly responded to Japan's latest complaint. But based on past behavior, it is likely to move forward with the new installation.
Related Articles
US Ally Confronts Armed Chinese Ships in Disputed WatersChina Factory Protests Show When US Tariffs Began to BiteTrump Trade Deals Offer Lifeline to Farmers and Ranchers Like Me | OpinionUS Reveals Nuclear Submarine in China's Backyard
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
12 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
The U.S. May Change Strategy in Its Battle With China for AI Dominance
This weekend, Shanghai was host to China's annual 'World Artificial Intelligence Conference,' a government-organized AI showcase packed with tech giants from both China and the U.S. including Huawei, Tesla, and Amazon. The theme was 'Global Solidarity in the AI Era,' and Chinese Premier Li Qiang opened the conference with a sweeping proposal: the establishment of a global AI cooperation organization, potentially headquartered in Shanghai. The Chinese foreign ministry has since released an action plan calling for international collaboration in AI through open-source communities and joint research. While China's AI messaging is starting to sound like 'AI for all,' the United States is still split on its own battle tactic. The Trump administration has welded an isolationist trade approach globally, and particularly with China when it comes to AI and technology. But with recent policy changes, that hardline has seemed to soften as Washington is split between two camps on how to approach the battle for AI dominance with China: that is, whether to continue with a heavily protectionist approach or join China's calls for solidarity. Beijing's invitation to rally behind a Chinese vision of AI cooperation landed in the middle of a tense year in AI geopolitics. The United States has been the global leader in AI development, but domestic confidence in America's competitive edge was shaken earlier this year. Following the meteoric success of Chinese AI company Deepseek's low-cost yet high-performance model, the Trump administration took a hard line on advanced technology exports to China. The administration attempted to slam the brakes on Beijing's hardware access by further tightening existing export controls on advanced Nvidia chips to China, in an effort to curb the country's rapid innovation, starve its AI ecosystem, and preserve U.S. dominance. But the ban hasn't gone exactly to plan. A Financial Times report from last week revealed that roughly $1 billion worth of Nvidia's banned advanced B200 chips had been smuggled into China in the three months since the export controls went into effect. The administration changed course on the ban and quietly retreated from its hard-line stance earlier this month, when Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang announced that the company would resume selling its older H20 chips legally to China. Notably, the FT found that Chinese black market demand for the smuggled B200s faced a noticeable drop after the relaxation of the H20 ban, suggesting that Chinese companies would rather take legal access to older chips over the highest technology illegally (companies who buy smuggled chips can't take advantage of important Nvidia customer support when installing them in their own data centers). The implications of this finding could throw the logic of blanket export bans into question. China isn't proposing global solidarity in AI development out of the goodness of its heart. Open cooperation and joint research not only helps the development of AI technology in China, but it is also a soft power play by China. By centering this cooperation in Shanghai and under Chinese terms and values, Beijing is trying to cement its position in the global AI trade, potentially achieving global AI dominance over the U.S. But Trump has made it clear that he wants America to win that battle. 'America is the country that started the AI race, and as President of the United States, I'm here to declare that America is going to win it,' Trump said while announcing the measures last week. The U.S. government's fears are twofold when it comes to AI and China: losing economic edge and jeopardizing national security. Currently, the Chinese AI industry is dependent on American chipmakers like Nvidia. Skeptics of blanket export bans say that if China has no access to advanced American AI technology, it will have no choice but to develop its own. And if China builds a true rival to Nvidia and gains self-sufficiency in AI hardware, the U.S. may lose its grip on the global AI market. At the center of these concerns is Chinese tech giant Huawei, which is already developing AI computing systems that rival Nvidia's most advanced products. Advocates of this approach in Washington hope to have more control over the scale of innovation in China by flooding the market with American products. And especially by controlling what chips go into the country, the U.S. could help curb the proliferation of more advanced chip technology in China. The Trump administration's recent move to ease restrictions on older Nvidia chip models could be following this logic, and might be bearing its fruits already, at least according to the Financial Times' findings. It's two steps forward and one step back. Although the U.S. has seemed to relax the rules on chip exports into China, the Trump administration is eager to continue the government's hard line based on the President's AI Action Plan that was unveiled last week. 'Advanced AI compute is essential to the AI era, enabling both economic dynamism and novel military capabilities,' the administration wrote in the action plan. 'Denying our foreign adversaries access to this resource, then, is a matter of both geostrategic competition and national security. Therefore, we should pursue creative approaches to export control enforcement.' Proponents of stricter export controls have sizable national security concerns when it comes to China's AI development. Chinese AI companies proved that you don't need the latest hardware to make AI that outperforms benchmarks, with the release of both Deepseek and Alibaba-backed Kimi K2 this year. Even though newer chips are kept out of China while the older ones dominate chip sales, that does not necessarily mean that state-of-the-art AI models that rival or even exceed American ones can't be developed. Going even beyond just market competition, these models could pose security risks when deployed for use in the Chinese military. While China and the U.S. are not in direct military conflict, tensions are high between the two superpowers, particularly over China's territorial claims in Taiwan and the South China Sea and American involvement in the region. All of this comes as U.S. and China trade envoys are meeting in Stockholm this week to discuss what exactly the long game is here. The countries are expected to decide on a tariff agreement or opt for yet another extension of the previously granted truce that is set to expire on August 12. The outcome of these talks, no matter what, is likely to have implications going even beyond what's stated on paper. It could very well set the stage for the next phase of the war over global AI dominance.
Politico
13 minutes ago
- Politico
No extension of US-China tariff deadline, yet
President Donald Trump confirmed shortly afterward that he would review the state of the discussions and a possible extension on Wednesday, telling reporters traveling with him on Air Force One back from Scotland that he 'just had a phone call' with Bessent. 'They had a very good meeting with China, and it seems that they're going to brief me tomorrow.' 'We'll either approve it or not. But he felt very good about the meeting, better than he felt yesterday,' Trump added. Greer told reporters at the briefing that absent that extension, the tariff rate would snap back to around 80 percent, counting the duties that have been in place since Trump's first term, a 20 percent duty the president imposed earlier this year over fentanyl shipments, and an additional 34 percent 'reciprocal' tariff rate Trump first unveiled in early April. If Trump agrees to the extension, it will be for 'about 90 days,' Bessent said. That echoed comments by China's international trade negotiator Li Chenggang earlier on Tuesday. 'The two sides will continue to push for the continued extension of the pause,' Li told reporters. The Stockholm talks marked the third time since May that Bessent and Greer have met with Chinese negotiators led by Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng. Previous rounds of talks — in Geneva in May and London in June — focused on stabilizing the trade relationship after friction peaked in April. That included slamming the brakes on tit-for-tat tariff increases, easing Beijing's blockade on critical minerals exports and eliminating U.S. curbs on sales of ethane to Chinese manufacturers.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla's budget Model Y just leaked – and it could cut these 3 features for a cheaper price tag
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A lack of panoramic glass roof and rear screen help cut costs Chinese automotive blogger snapped the disguised vehicles Cheaper Model Y is expected to go on sale in China later this year Elon Musk let the cat out of the bag when he revealed that the company was readying a cheaper alternative to the Model Y during Tesla's quarterly earnings call, putting an end to the rumors that the company was working on a standalone 'affordable' Tesla. Instead, the upcoming, simplified Model Y was touted to hold back on some of the additional niceties in pursuit of a cheaper sticker price. It appears that a popular Chinese blogger, dubbed Garage 42, has photographed some of the first budget Model Ys, with images and videos surfacing on Chinese social media site Weibo. Although heavily disguised under black cloth, the images show that these cars lack the large panoramic sunroof that makes the current generation Model Y feel so bright and airy. There's also a lack of infotainment display for rear passengers and the mammoth, full-width LED light bar has been removed from the front and rear. Currently, the cheapest Model Y in China starts at 250,000 yuan (around $34,750) but it is facing increasingly stiff competition from home-grown talent, with the Xiaomi SU7 and YU7 proving runaway sales successes. Car News China also points out that Xpeng, Li Auto, and Nio are all readying keenly-priced Model Y rivals in China for the second half of this year, which will continue to eat into potential Tesla sales. It is not known whether this trimmed-down Model Y will be sold in other markets in this form, but Tesla's sales are suffering on a global scale, so we'd expect to see a Model Y slot in somewhere between the current cheapest Model Y and the most expensive Model 3. Tesla doubles-down on autonomous driving Despite stripping back the Model Y in an attempt to boost sales, Elon Musk announced that Tesla recently signed a $16.5 billion deal with Samsung, which will see the Korean tech giant provide chip technology for upcoming generations of Tesla's hardware array. With the latest cars running Tesla's Hardware 4 (or HW4, for short), this deal will ensure the company has the latest and fastest chipset when its vehicles move to HW6 – seeing as HW5 is already contractually covered by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). With each new generation of semiconductor, Software Defined Vehicles (SDV) become more intelligent and more capable, boasting the sort of processing power required for advanced levels of autonomous driving. However, the news has irked many long-standing Tesla owners, as Elon Musk promised back in 2016 that even on version 2 of its hardware, all vehicles would be capable of full unsupervised self-driving – something the brand has yet to crack. There have been multiple attempts by owners to demand refunds for Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) systems over false advertising claims, which cost up to $15,000 on top of a car's list price at points. Tesla continues to promise more from its FSD systems, recently stating that "unsupervised" versions will come later this year. But with the company still investing so heavily in the next generation of computing, it has a number of critics skeptical about the true capabilities of Tesla's technology. You might also like I've driven the Xpeng G6 and it doesn't hide its main ambition – stealing the Tesla Model Y's crown Xiaomi's new Tesla-rivaling SUV has a cockpit-style panoramic windshield display and can charge in just 12 minutes More bad news for Tesla – Xiaomi's new Model Y rival beats it on price and just smashed pre-order records
