Narasimha Rao knew 17 languages, today we are asking — why learn Hindi: Naidu
During a lecture on 'The life and legacy of former PM Shri PV Narasimha Rao', Naidu termed him a 'great statesman' and 'visionary' who changed the future of India. Independent India, he said, is divided into two phases: pre-economic reforms and after it. Recalling the 1991 economic crisis, Naidu credited Rao for the economic reforms and called him 'one of the greatest sons of Bharat Mata'. 'P V Narasimha Rao was the Deng Xiaoping of India,' he said, likening the opening up of the economy in 1991 to Deng's transformation of the Chinese economy in 1978. 'He changed the future of India and we are enjoying the fruits of his reforms today,' Naidu said.
'… Rao was heading a minority government then. Yet, because of his political acumen he could build a consensus across parties and ideologies. This was his greatest achievement,' he said.
Naidu said it was because of the 1991 economic reforms that despite there being coalition governments between 1989 and 2014, 'the results produced were better than those in the previous decades with majority governments'. He commended ex-PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee for continuing the good work of Rao, recalling the road infra and telecom strides during his government (1998 to 2004).
Naidu pointed to what he saw as India's four strengths — economic reforms, demographic dividend, first-mover IT advantage and now the strong leadership of PM Narendra Modi. 'Under Modi-ji from 2014, there has been further progress. India will become the third largest economy in 2028,' he said.
Vikas Pathak is deputy associate editor with The Indian Express and writes on national politics. He has over 17 years of experience, and has worked earlier with The Hindustan Times and The Hindu, among other publications. He has covered the national BJP, some key central ministries and Parliament for years, and has covered the 2009 and 2019 Lok Sabha polls and many state assembly polls. He has interviewed many Union ministers and Chief Ministers.
Vikas has taught as a full-time faculty member at Asian College of Journalism, Chennai; Symbiosis International University, Pune; Jio Institute, Navi Mumbai; and as a guest professor at Indian Institute of Mass Communication, New Delhi.
Vikas has authored a book, Contesting Nationalisms: Hinduism, Secularism and Untouchability in Colonial Punjab (Primus, 2018), which has been widely reviewed by top academic journals and leading newspapers.
He did his PhD, M Phil and MA from JNU, New Delhi, was Student of the Year (2005-06) at ACJ and gold medalist from University Rajasthan College in Jaipur in graduation. He has been invited to top academic institutions like JNU, St Stephen's College, Delhi, and IIT Delhi as a guest speaker/panellist. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
29 minutes ago
- Hans India
FairPoint: It cannot be about 'patak patak-dubo dubo ke maarenge'
New Delhi: Imagine you are walking down the street in Mumbai or Bengaluru or Chennai, minding your own business, when a stranger approaches you and demands that you speak in Marathi, Tamil, Bengali, or Kannada -- languages you may not even understand. When you fail to respond in the local tongue, you are suddenly slapped, abused, and humiliated. Worse still, the entire incident is recorded on a mobile phone, and within minutes, the clip is shared widely on social media, turning your distress into viral content for public entertainment or political mileage. It may sound dystopian, but such scenarios are happening in cities like Mumbai and states like Karnataka. Language, a simple medium of communication, is fast turning into a volatile political weapon -- a trigger for outrage, violence, and social division. Language pride is an emotionally and deeply sensitive issue across many parts of India. Chief Ministers like M.K. Stalin in Tamil Nadu, Siddaramaiah in Karnataka, Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal, and the Thackeray cousins in Maharashtra are all acutely aware of its potency. For politicians like them, language is not just about culture or identity -- it is a political instrument capable of stirring mass sentiments, consolidating regional vote banks, and even polarising electorates. India has a long and complex history of language politics. From the anti-Hindi agitations in Tamil Nadu during the 1960s to contemporary protests against language imposition, linguistic identity has consistently been at the centre of regional political mobilisation. The emotional appeal of "mother tongue pride" is a tried and tested formula to whip up public support. The recent developments in Mumbai are a case in point. With the once-powerful Thackeray cousins -- Uddhav and Raj -- struggling to remain relevant in Maharashtra's political landscape, language pride is being resurrected as a lifeline. Their public reconciliation signals an attempt to regain political ground by becoming the self-appointed custodians of Marathi identity. However, the people of Maharashtra are not naive. They understand that this sudden display of unity is less about shared vision and more about shared desperation. The cousins have seen their influence wane considerably. Uddhav Thackeray, despite briefly serving as the Chief Minister, was largely perceived as a compromise candidate rather than a leader with mass appeal. The 2024 Assembly election results further underlined the shrinking support base for his faction. Now, with the crucial Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections looming -- a contest over a civic body with a staggering Rs 70,000 crore budget -- the stakes have never been higher. The Thackerays have held sway over the BMC for nearly three decades, barring a brief interruption between 1992 and 1996. Retaining control over this massive urban apparatus is central to their political survival. But they face formidable opposition: the BJP, in alliance with Eknath Shinde's breakaway Shiv Sena and Ajit Pawar's NCP faction, is aggressively eyeing the BMC. After suffering a humiliating defeat in the Assembly polls, Uddhav Thackeray cannot afford another loss. In this context, appealing to Marathi pride and painting themselves as the last guardians of the city's identity becomes a convenient narrative to sell. It is purely political optics for Thackerays, and similarly, the language issue is an important tool for regional satraps like DMK's M.K. Stalin or Trinamool Congress supremo Mamata Banerjee. In Tamil Nadu, CM Stalin has taken the language issue to new heights, actively resisting the perceived imposition of Hindi through the National Education Policy's three-language formula. His party, the DMK, has historically opposed Hindi dominance, and Stalin continues this legacy. He has even popularised the hashtag 'StopHindiImposition', turning language resistance into a cultural movement that transcends party lines. Stalin's support for the Thackeray cousins' stance against Hindi imposition is not just symbolic -- it reflects a broader, pan-regional alliance of leaders to take on the Modi-led BJP and NDA at the Centre. For them, language is not just a cultural identity marker; it is a symbol of political autonomy and resistance to homogenisation. Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal has followed a similar playbook. She is driving the campaign as a protest against the alleged "harassment of Bengali speakers" in BJP-ruled states. She even took out a march in rain-soaked Kolkata in support of her so-called "cause." Her exact quote was: "What does the BJP think?... They will hurt Bengalis?... They are calling them Rohingya. Rohingya are in Myanmar, not here. 22 lakh poor migrant workers are being targeted. I appeal to them to return home. They will be safe here. The BJP is sending Bengali speakers to detention camps. Is West Bengal not in India?" Such statements are meant to create mass emotions, which she has successfully been doing. With the Bengal Assembly elections scheduled for next year, the language pride issue can prove to be very sensitive and decisive. Stalin, Mamata Banerjee, or the Thackeray brothers or all others -- what connects them is the understanding that language can rally masses, create emotional connections, and serve as a formidable shield during political crises. But the danger lies in crossing the line between pride and prejudice. When language is weaponised to provoke violence, intimidate non-locals, or suppress dissent, it ceases to be a cultural asset and becomes a social liability. Ask 48-year-old Babulal Choudhary, owner of an eatery in Mira Road, who was beaten by MNS workers for conversing in Hindi on July 1, and he will only talk about fear. Or ask anyone who does not know the local language and is thrashed for this, or ask anyone who is humiliated for not knowing the dialect or not having the right accent. It can be traumatic, but for the politicians, it is only about manipulating public opinion for power. India thrives on its pluralism -- its ability to accommodate multiple languages, religions, and cultures under one democratic framework. To exploit this diversity for short-term political gains is to endanger the very foundation of Indian unity. It's time for political leaders to understand that language should be a bridge, not a battleground. It cannot be "Tumko patak patak ke maarenge (you will be thrashed badly, again and again)" and "Mumbai ke samundar mein dubo dubo ke maarenge (We will thrash them by drowning them repeatedly in the Mumbai sea)."
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Smriti Irani interview: ‘My 10 years as minister so stamped on people's minds, they can't envision me as anyone else'
Former Union Minister Smriti Irani surprised many when she announced she was reprising her role as Tulsi Virani in the limited series reboot of popular TV drama Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi — a character that made her a household name. Speaking to The Indian Express, Irani discusses her return to acting, how the entertainment industry has changed, balancing her life — and reiterates that she is not out of politics. Excerpts: * Why did you decide to return to acting? It is a limited series. I was keen to have a partnership with a cohort led by Uday (JioHotstar vice chairman Uday Shankar), who has a background in news and has seen Delhi from up close, and of course, Ekta (Kapoor). She has undergone a huge creative journey… (I wanted to ) see how she would perceive things from today's perspective, issues that are relevant to today's youth, to today's times. Knowing that it is a limited series, how can you not work and enjoy the benefit of this combination coming together? I have never done OTT before. I am more in an observation mode with an expectation to act. * When you stepped onto the set, how did people respond? Was it any different from a decade ago? I was told that I had to sit with the younger generation to do a reading so that they get comfortable. I sat with them for one-and-a-half hours. A decade ago, when I used to do acting, there was never any preparation. Now, there is a lot of it. When I sat with them, they wanted to know the political discourse, state politics, how Parliament functions, how legislation is done, etc. Not just actors, but the writers, creative directors, too. I felt it became less of a media workshop, more of a political workshop. They are kids from different states, speaking different languages, with different ideologies. All of us come together, sit, and talk politics. That was surreal. I managed to keep both my lives separate. My political and acting life were far from each other. Those in the sets tell me we did not know that you knew how to legislate or administer. So, a lot of my old colleagues ask me how come we didn't know all these. Those people in politics with me for the last few decades had not seen the other side of me for a decade. I just went to Bijnor to visit a bereaved colleague. Suddenly, a karyakarta came up and said, 'Didi, my mother wanted me to get a picture with you'. They all came to know that the show was coming up. Now both worlds are coming together, which never happened earlier. * How will you balance these two roles? I always did. I had a break only when I became a Cabinet minister. But I am so glad that as a Cabinet minister, I became so prominent that people never envisioned me as anything but a minister. I had organisational responsibility even in 2003. When I was national secretary twice and national president of the (BJP) Mahila Morcha, I was in the media even then. But my role as a Cabinet minister became so prominent that people have forgotten my other roles. I may be the only one who has had a role in the multimedia age of politics, done legislation across five ministries, and created political history in Amethi. A whole generation has grown up in the last 10 years. They see me only as a politician, but before that too I played a fictional character. * There was speculation that you may be sent to the Rajya Sabha as a nominated MP… Why would I be? I am still an active politician. I am just 49 years old. There are people older than me who have done much for society and much for the organisation. If there is one person who can say that age is on my side, I am that person. I am a very patient human being who has served three terms as MP and has handled five ministries. The fact that I was the youngest minister in the first and second Modi governments is not lost on anyone. I am very proud of the fact that the 10 years as a minister are so stamped on people's minds that they cannot envision me as anyone else. * Do you feel you are missing out on anything since, at the moment, you are neither in the government nor in Parliament? I became an MP in 2011. I was not in Parliament before that. I do not miss anything, I make sure that I am missed. Everyone is in touch with me. Politics is not an easy field. I have seen the best people in politics because they come to serve. For most of my colleagues in the BJP, it was never about the pursuit of power. It was about creating something for the country. It was about being happy when your colleague becomes something. I was elated when Rekha (Gupta) became CM (of Delhi), when Devendra (Fadnavis) became (Maharashtra) CM, or the achievements of Bhupendra (Yadav) bhai and Dharmendra (Pradhan) bhai as a minister. We celebrate each other's achievements. That's a quintessential core BJP karyakarta behaviour. * Will the Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi reboot have any social or political message? It is an unreal, surreal, made-up story that can create an indication towards certain realities of our lives. There has to be relevance to today's generation, issues that are topical to them, which require reflection. It is very easy to do reality, but very difficult to convey realities through a made-up, fictional act. You need to create a balance. I am mindful of the channel itself, the platform itself. If you look at the first promo, it is not about the character but about Smriti Irani. It has never happened in the history of GEC (general entertainment channel) that you speak about an individual who has played a fictional character. There is a recognition that the crossroads are meeting. When they wrote the character, they were mindful that it had to be relevant to families today… Tulsi talks about the times that have changed, but the value system is consistent. * The serial is about a Gujarati family. How much has it helped in promoting Gujarati culture? If you watch this time, the new part you will see is an amalgamation of cultures. I don't want to give spoilers. I am married into a Parsi family, but for me to be quintessentially recognised as a Gujarati showcases the impact of what was written. * Will you ever play a negative role? I do not have the capacity to play one. Some may presume me to be one in politics, but I do not have it in me. I don't restrict myself in my political and media choices. I do not don the hat presuming what I can and what I cannot. But I am mindful that I am a responsible politician. I cannot afford to be irresponsible. It's a fine act of balancing because you are a part of a larger storytelling group. Whether what you say is of consequence or not should be a part of your decision. Let's say somebody's propagating a superstition. What should your character say? Your character should not propagate superstition. * Will you be following the Monsoon Session of Parliament while on set? Yes, I always follow the developments. I am not, and never was, out of politics.
Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
'Speak in Marathi or get out': Fight over seat in Mumbai local train turns into language row — Watch Viral video
Once again, an incident of language row has come to light in Maharashtra's capital, Mumbai, where an argument over a seat on a local train turned into a full-blown language war, with one woman telling the other to learn Marathi or 'get out'. The incident happened on Friday evening in the crowded ladies' compartment on the Central Line. The incident was also captured on camera and shared on social media platforms. The video that went viral on social media, showed six to seven women arguing over a seat. During the debate, one woman criticised another female passenger for not speaking in Marathi language. "If you want to stay in our Mumbai, speak Marathi, otherwise get out," she said. Soon after, other local women in the train joined the fight. This incident came amid ongoing language row in Maharashtra, with Raj Thackeray's Maharashtra Navnirman Sena party workers being condemned for targeting and abusing people for not speaking in Marathi. Earlier this month, a shopkeeper in Mumbai's Vikhroli area was assaulted by MNS workers over a WhatsApp status deemed offensive to Marathi people. The video of the incident showed the shopkeeper being forced to apologise publicly while being assaulted. Recently, Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray asserted that he would not accept any attempt by the Maharashtra government to implement a three-language policy in the state. Meanwhile, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray on Friday said if Hindi was made mandatory for Classes 1 to 5 in schools in Maharashtra, his party will "shut down schools". Speaking at a rally at Mira Bhayandar near Mumbai, he referred to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis's latest averment that Hindi will be taught in state schools at any costs. Thackerayalso hit back at BJP MP Nishikant Dubey's controversial "patak-patak ke maarenge" remarks. In a counter-attack, Raj Thackeray said, 'A BJP MP said, 'Marathi logon ko hum yahan pe patak patak ke maarenge'... You come to Mumbai. Mumbai ke samundar mein dubo dubo ke maarenge.'
