Carney won Canada. Saving the country from Trump won't be so easy
Mark Carney has engineered one of the most unlikely victories in political history, saving Canada's Liberal Party from near oblivion and going from the outskirts of politics to prime minister in a matter of months.
But the former Bank of England governor's biggest challenge still lies ahead: protecting Canada's economy from Donald Trump.
Mr Trump has repeatedly claimed Canada will become the 'cherished 51st state' and levied heavy tariffs on the US's northern neighbour. In his victory speech Carney said Trump 'is trying to break us so America can own us. That will never happen'.
Credit: Reuters
As it stands, the US has placed a blanket 10pc tariff on Canadian goods. There is also a 25pc levy on all aluminium and steel imports from Canada, though the Trump administration exempts products covered by the USMCA trade deal that covers the US, Canada and Mexico.
In response, Canada has imposed tariffs of around £32bn on US goods.
Carney and Trump have spoken since this week's Canadian election and agreed 'on the importance of Canada and the US working together – as independent, sovereign nations – for their mutual betterment', the prime minister's office said.
But Carney said on the campaign trail that the return of Trump meant Canada's economy must fundamentally change.
'What is clear is that our trade and our security relations are too reliant on the United States. We must diversify,' the prime minister told reporters in London.
In February, Mary Ng, the then trade minister, visited Australia with a delegation of over 140 businesses as the government sought to build closer ties with the country.
Prior to calling the snap election, Carney travelled to the UK and France in March to meet with both Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron as he emphasised his country's bond with Europe.
But with around 75pc of Canada's exports heading to the US – compared to Britain's 16pc – diversifying will prove easier said than done.
'It's like separating London from Oxford,' says Daniel Trefler, a professor at the University of Toronto. 'We're so integrated in so many dimensions.'
Many of Canada's key sectors, such as steel production and the automotive industry, are closely tied to American businesses – with supply chains that criss-cross the border. Dozens of companies have factories in Canada that ship directly to the US.
While Trump wants to end that practice and force jobs into the US, Prof Trefler is sceptical.
'Toyota is not going to suddenly close its plants in Ontario and move them to Ohio because of a 25pc tariff. They're going to have to be sure that a tariff is going to be staying for like a decade before they're going to make a decision like that.'
In the meantime, Canada's economy will suffer.
The OECD has warned that the trade war will hit growth in Canada and slashed its forecasts for the country. It expects the Canadian economy to grow by just 0.7pc in 2025 and 2026, compared with its previous forecast of 2pc for both years.
A lot is at stake for Canadian households. Modelling by Deloitte Canada has estimated that the impact of tariffs from the US is set to cost the average Canadian $2,000 (£1,500) annually.
'There's no doubt that tariffs are already having a significant cost to the economy, just in the uncertainty that they've injected into investment decisions around the continent,' says Lars Osberg, a professor of economics at Dalhousie University, Halifax.
Carney is not the first Canadian prime minister to attempt to shift the country's trade away from its reliance on the US.
'That's been a strategy which Canadian governments have tried to follow for maybe 70 years,' Osberg says.
'Back in the 1950s, under the Conservatives of [former prime minister John] Diefenbaker, there was a big push to try and resurrect some of the trade with the UK – that had been so prominent during the 1930s. But it didn't really amount to much.'
Britain is likely to be central to Carney's diversification efforts this time around too.
The UK is already Canada's third-largest trading partner. Canada exported £10.3bn in goods and services to the UK in the 12 months to the end of September 2024, with crude oil, inorganic chemicals and aircraft among its biggest exports.
Trefler says: 'It seems like there is room for Carney to lead a massive trade delegation to the UK to try and promote trade between the two countries … There is plenty of room for something like that without having to write new agreements.
'I'm not sure that there's any other country like the UK which has a kind of social stability that we would be looking for in a trading partner.'
QEA Tech, based in Markham, Ontario, is an example of a Canadian business targeting the UK for growth.
The environmental software business has begun working on projects in Britain and Germany as part of efforts to find new markets outside of the US.
Peyvand Melati, the company's chief executive, says: 'Recent events obviously bring the thought that we need to expand internationally.
'Traditionally we have relied on the largest trade partner which is the US, as it is the nearest large market that is accessible for us. But the recent uncertainty brings to mind that we need to look outside of North America.'
Reshaping Canada's trading relationships will be a difficult, years-long task.
For now, perhaps the easiest route to boost Canada's economy would be to smooth things over with Trump.
Frédérique Carrier, the head of investment strategy at Royal Bank of Canada Wealth Management, says: 'A stable government will be a relief for financial markets and should put Canada in a stronger position to negotiate trade issues with the US. We expect the new government to start to engage with the US administration to diffuse trade tensions.'
She added that the new government was likely to focus on stimulus efforts in a bid to help the Canadian economy manage the impact of the recently imposed tariffs, with the county's fiscal deficit expected to rise as a result.
De-escalation may be the easiest route but Carney is still using fighting talk.
At a rally in Windsor, Ontario, on Saturday, he deployed a ice hokey metaphor that he used repeatedly on the campaign trail: 'We didn't ask for this fight, but Canadians are always ready when someone else drops their gloves.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
10 minutes ago
- CNBC
The latest CPI report showed some softening in inflation. What investors are saying
Wall Street got a favorable inflation report on Wednesday, giving equities a boost. The consumer price index rose 0.1% in May , slightly less than the 0.2% increase economists polled by Dow Jones anticipated. So-called core CPI, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, increased by 0.1% — also less than expected. Stocks reacted positively, with S & P 500 futures erasing an earlier decline to trade about 0.2% higher. Some investors noted continued uncertainty around the Federal Reserve's interest rate outlook, despite the latest price report. Here's how some investors, economists and strategists reacted to the news: Chris Rupkey, chief economist at FWDBonds: "Net, net, the inflation shock wave from more costly imported goods has yet to arrive on American shores. Today's consumer inflation report is a real head-scratcher for economists as they ponder why the trade war hasn't set off another inflation outbreak yet with core goods prices sitting on store shelves seeing no change in May." Alexandra Wilson-Elizondo, global co-CIO of multi-asset Solutions at Goldman Sachs Asset Management: "Inflation in May was lower than anticipated, suggesting the tariffs aren't having a large immediate impact because companies have been using existing inventories or slowly adjusting prices due to uncertain demand. While we might see some price increases on goods later, service prices are expected to remain stable, suggesting any rise in inflation is likely to be temporary." Ian Lyngen, head of U.S. rates at BMO Capital Markets: "CPI surprised on the downside across the board. … The yield curve is bull steepening as the slower trajectory of inflation has firmed rate cut expectations for later this year. On the margin, it is also supportive of next week's [Federal Reserve Summary of Economic Projections] signaling 50 bp of cuts in 2025." Ryan Weldon, investor director and portfolio manager at IFM Investments: "The softer services inflation lends itself to a slowing economy in the face of continued tariff anxiety and will support the Fed to come out of their wait-and-hold approach sooner. However, the Fed will still want to see several months of consistent inflation and jobs data and have more clarity on the Trump administration's tariff policy before resuming cuts." Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer at Northlight Asset Management: "With lower-than-expected numbers across the board (with the exception of headline YoY, which stayed constant), and a trade deal with China that was agreed to in London, the narrative around tariff-induced inflation should subside. However, CPI remains above 2% and even though the tariff rates are going to be less than originally feared, after they are implemented they will further increase the cost of goods." Skyler Weinand, chief investment officer at Regan Capital: "Wednesday's weaker-than-expected CPI opens the door to a Fed rate cut in September, since it's clear that the inflation data continues to move in the right direction even as we deal with tariff uncertainty. While employment is strong and the economic effects from tariffs are yet to be determined, the Fed would like to start easing again in the not too distant future to get in front of a possible recession in 2026" Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Financial Group: "Bottom line, a sigh of relief on the lower than expected inflation stats just as we search for where tariffs will work its way through the supply chain and end customer."
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US and China ‘back to square one' after two days of trade talks
Talks between the US and China are 'back to square one' after two days of trade negotiations in London failed to secure a major deal. Howard Lutnick, Donald Trump's commerce secretary, said the two sides had agreed on a 'framework' to put their trading relations back on track and repair the truce initially agreed in Geneva last month. There was little market reaction to the announcement at Lancaster House shortly after midnight, with the dollar strengthening a little and stock markets opening marginally higher. The two sides have until Aug 10 to negotiate a more comprehensive agreement to ease trade tensions, or US tariffs on China will snap back from about 30pc to 145pc, with China's levies on America increasing from 10pc to 125pc. Josh Lipsky, of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center in Washington, said: 'They are back to square one but that's much better than square zero.' Jim Reid, a Deutsche Bank analyst, added: 'While the mood music has stayed positive, investors may be wary of the pattern that emerged during the previous US-China trade talks in 2018-19, when apparently constructive in-person meetings seemed to take a step back as the negotiating teams returned to their capitals. 'So there's perhaps a little disappointment this morning that we haven't yet got a bigger announcement, even though there's time to hear the full conclusions of the meeting.' Senior officials from Washington and Beijing had gathered in London after accusations from both sides that they had violated the terms of the deal made in Switzerland. Mr Trump and Xi Jinping held a call last week that Mr Lutnick said 'gave the fundamental foundation on which we were able to reach agreement'. Mr Lutnick said: 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents. 'The idea is we're going to go back and speak to President Trump and make sure he approves it. 'They're going to go back and speak to President Xi and make sure he approves it, and if that is approved, we will then implement the framework.' In a separate briefing, Li Chenggang, China's vice commerce minister, said a trade framework had been reached in principle that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders. Mr Lutnick said China's restrictions on exports of rare earth minerals and magnets to the US would be resolved as a 'fundamental' part of the framework agreement. He also said the agreement would remove some of the recent US export restrictions, but did not provide details. Kathleen Brooks, the research director at XTB, a trading platform, said: 'Overall, the US-China trade agreement is taking its time, and it could test the market's patience.' Meanwhile, the European Union reportedly believes it could extend its trade negotiations with the US beyond the initial deadline next month. The EU thinks there could be scope for further talks if it agrees a deal in principle by July 9, which is considered its best-case scenario, according to Bloomberg. The Trump administration is scheduled to enforce 50pc tariffs on EU goods beyond that date unless a deal is reached. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Inflation holds steady as data shows how prices are faring after Trump's ‘Liberation Day' tariffs
Inflation held steady last month, according to data that gives the first glimpse of how prices are faring since President Donald Trump's sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs. Consumer prices rose 0.1 percent on a monthly basis in May, while annual inflation stood at 2.4 percent, according to the Department of Labor's consumer price index. The report captures the period after Trump unveiled his global reciprocal tariffs in April and provides some insight as to whether businesses are bearing the brunt of the duties themselves or passing them on to customers. Analysts predicted to see a bigger increase, but some still warn the future is uncertain because tariffs keep changing. 'So far, inflation risks from higher tariffs are subdued,' Win Thin, global head of markets strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman, told Bloomberg. 'Nonetheless, US protectionist trade policy and uncertainty about the ultimate level of tariffs are downside risks to growth and upside risk to inflation. Bottom line: the fundamental USD downtrend is intact.' Since Trump announced his global reciprocal tariffs and the stock market was spooked, many of the duties were paused. However, 10 percent tariffs for most countries remain. Inflation has been slow to respond to the tariffs as most retailers are selling merchandise accumulated before the import duties took effect. Economists said that the reduction in the scale of some trade tariffs may have 'helped to restrain cost increases thus far,' Wells Fargo's Sarah House and Nicole Cervi said. 'That said, as the higher tariff regime persists, shielding consumers from the costs is likely to become more challenging,' the economists added. 'Only a few goods prices likely rose as a result of the new tariffs in May,' Pantheon Macroeconomics economists Samuel Tombs and Oliver Allen said in a note, Bloomberg reports. 'June will be a different story — while some providers of discretionary services probably cut prices or kept them low to sustain demand.' Walmart warned customers last month that they could see price rises because of the trade tariffs. The retailer's chief financial officer John David Rainey said that the tariffs are 'still too high.' 'It's more than any supplier can absorb. And so I'm concerned that consumer is going to start seeing higher prices,' he said. 'You'll begin to see that, likely towards the tail end of this month, and then certainly much more in June.' Reuters contributed reporting