SC adjourns Imran's bail pleas hearing
The Supreme Court adjourned on Monday the hearing of bail appeals filed by former prime minister Imran Khan until 12 August.
The PTI founder had approached the apex court after the dismissal of his bail applications in the May 9 rioting cases by the Lahore High Court (LHC).
The adjournment followed a request by Salman Safdar's legal representative, Salman Akram Raja, who asked the bench to reschedule the hearing for next week and issue notices accordingly.
The case was taken up by a two-member bench led by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi.
However, the bench declined the request to advance the hearing, opting to defer the proceedings for nearly two weeks. The bail petitions are now set to be heard on August 12.
The LHC, led by Justice Shahbaz Ali Rizvi, had previously rejected Imran's bail, citing his alleged involvement in planning attacks on military installations in anticipation of his arrest on May 9, 2023.
Imran appealed to the Supreme Court on July 26, arguing that the prosecution had presented three conflicting narratives linking him to the alleged conspiracy, all of which were rejected by various courts.
The first version involved two police officials, Hassam Afzal and Asmat Kamal, who reportedly overheard the conspiracy on May 7 and May 4, respectively.
This claim was dismissed by the ATC-III Lahore due to late disclosure and insufficient evidence, leading to bail in FIRs 366/23 and 1078/23.
The second version alleged incitement through media statements but failed due to a lack of incriminating material and was rejected by the LHC.
The third version relied on new witness statements, including from PTI leaders Sadaqat Abbasi and Wasiq Qayyum, but was also disbelieved by ATC-I Rawalpindi, which discharged co-accused Bushra Imran on August 20, 2024.
Despite the rejection of all three versions by competent courts, the LHC denied Imran's bail on June 24, based solely on statements from the two police officers.
Imran's petition argues that the case qualifies as one of further inquiry, entitling him to post-arrest bail under Section 497(2) CrPC 1898.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
12 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Imran's sons awaiting ‘interior ministry's approval' for visas: Aleema
Sons of incarcerated Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founding chairman Imran Khan — Sulaiman and Kasim — have applied for Pakistani visas, Imran's sister Aleema Khan said on Friday. In a post on X, Aleema said, 'A few days ago Suleiman and Kasim applied for their visas with the Pakistan high commission in London. The ambassador has intimated that he is awaiting approval from the ministry of interior in Islamabad.' In a statement last week, Aleema said that Kasim and Sulaiman held National Identity Cards for Overseas Pakistanis (NICOPs) and are expected to visit Pakistan soon to meet their imprisoned father. Imran Khan's sons coming to Pakistan, claims Aleema Khan Speaking to reporters outside Adiala Jail, she confirmed that both the sons of the ex-prime minister possessed valid travel documents and 'will come to see their father anytime soon.' However, she withheld specific dates, hinting at the fluidity and uncertainty surrounding their planned visits amid a politically charged environment. Government ministers have suggested the possibility that visa refusals might prevent the young men from entering the country. But Aleema dismissed such claims as a transparent ploy – a calculated attempt by authorities fearful that the presence of Imran's sons could galvanise public support and intensify demands for his release. 'This is nothing but political harassment and an infringement upon the rights of a Pakistani citizen,' she lamented. 'They want to isolate my brother, weaken his morale, and prevent the masses from seeing his condition. But we will not be intimidated.' She revealed that her sisters, Noreen Khan and Uzma Khan, were denied permission again to meet Imran. Previously, the Adiyala jail had allowed six visitors at a time; this was subsequently reduced to just two.
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Sugar export scheme: PTI for formation of high-powered JV
ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Thursday called for the formation of a high-powered judicial commission to investigate what it described as one of the country's largest economic scandals – a sugar export scheme that allegedly cost the national treasury Rs287 billion. The scheme reportedly resulted in approximately Rs300 billion in unlawful profits to politically connected elites. The demand followed revelations presented to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), which PTI said exposed a well-orchestrated scheme of plunder carried out by members of the ruling coalition and shielded by state institutions. In a statement, PTI spokesman Sheikh Waqas Akram called for a transparent and comprehensive enquiry into the scandal. He named Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, his deputy Ishaq Dar, members of the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC), and the Federal Cabinet as those who should be investigated for their alleged roles in approving and executing the controversial sugar export policy. PTI characterised the crisis not as mismanagement, but as 'a premeditated economic crime.' It alleged that sugar was exported despite domestic shortages, then re-imported at higher prices. This, the party claimed, artificially inflated costs for consumers and profited a select few. According to PTI, the policy was led by Dar during his tenure as chair of both the Sugar Advisory Board and the ECC. Akram said these approvals, which later received Cabinet assent, created a 'chain of command' linking senior government officials to the financial losses. The PAC's report, cited by PTI, estimates the national loss at Rs287 billion and points to nearly Rs300 billion in illicit gains allegedly pocketed by politically connected families and business interests. Among those named are the Sharif family, President Asif Zardari and his associates, Suleman Shehbaz, and businessman Jahangir Tareen. PTI also accused the ruling elite of misleading the public by downplaying shortages, inflating prices, and manipulating trade to generate windfall profits. The party claimed that state institutions – including the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), and the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) – had remained silent spectators. The statement contrasted the current situation with former Prime Minister Imran Khan's tenure, when a Sugar Enquiry Commission was formed in 2020 to investigate similar profiteering. 'Back then, the report named culprits across party lines,' the spokesperson noted. 'Today, those same networks are in power.' The party also questioned the fairness of the accountability system, claiming that legal scrutiny disproportionately targets Imran Khan while 'real plunderers of public wealth' operate with impunity. PTI has called for sugar prices to be rolled back to 2022 levels as an emergency relief measure. It also urged the PAC to demand updates from the FIA on all pending sugar-related cases and called for criminal proceedings against those involved in alleged fake exports and hoarding. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
TTAP for dismantling of ‘hybrid power structure'
ISLAMABAD: The Tehreek Tahafuz-e-Ayin-e-Pakistan (TTAP), an alliance of opposition parties, on Thursday called for an end to what it described as a hybrid power structure – draped in democratic language, but increasingly governed by the establishment. With the district administration sealing the initially announced venue, TTAP participants shifted gears and held the APC at the residence of Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar. The gathering, a melting pot of opposition leaders, civil society members, lawyers, journalists, and activists from all walks of life, unanimously condemned the ongoing wave of convictions against Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) lawmakers. The alliance slammed the anti-terrorism courts' rulings as 'politically motivated vendettas' and 'flimsy legal pretences.' As news broke mid-moot of fresh sentences handed to opposition leaders in both the National Assembly and Senate, the mood turned grim. Participants said this would go down as one of Pakistan's darkest political chapters. 'There is no law left in the country. Injustice reigns,' thundered Allama Raja Nasir Abbas of Majlis-e-Wahdatul Muslimeen, capturing the gathering's fury. Hamid Raza of Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC), recently convicted himself, remarked bitterly, 'Our fight against terrorism and extremism has been rewarded with a decade-long jail sentence.' Veteran nationalist Mahmood Khan Achakzai didn't mince words either, warning of a 'creeping civilian dictatorship' masquerading as democracy. 'During military martial law, courts had courage. Today, under a civilian façade, shameful rulings dominate,' he said to nods of grim agreement. Former National Assembly Speaker Asad Qaiser slammed the court verdicts as 'illegal' and linked them to the controversial 26th Constitutional Amendment, which he said strips political workers of their fundamental rights. Echoing this sentiment, Lashkari Raisani called for a moment of reckoning: 'Will we continue to be spectators in a dummy parliament, or confront this crisis head-on beyond its walls.' The spotlight was not only on current abuses. Veteran journalist Hamid Mir invoked the 2016 Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PICA), enacted by the PML-N government. Originally framed to combat fake news, Mir explained how the law morphed into a tool to muzzle media, even those who passed it. Political dissident Javed Hashmi condemned the denial of PTI's electoral symbol in recent polls, emphasizing, 'Even without a symbol, people voted for Imran Khan. Now they want to keep him in jail as a spectacle.' 'Back when Imran Khan was in power, opposition rallies were held without fear or formalities,' recalled former Sindh governor Muhammad Zubair. 'We never asked for permission, and the police never blocked our path. Look at us now – this is not democracy, it is a lockdown.' Despite their ideological differences, the APC vowed to unite in restoring democratic norms, pushing for judicial independence, and ending selective, politically motivated accountability. 'Authoritarianism must die. Democracy will live,' declared Achakzai to rousing applause. The conference closed with a resolute call to uphold the rule of law, enforce the supremacy of the Constitution, and dismantle the 'ongoing de facto martial law' suffocating the country's democratic fabric. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
