logo
Lilly and Jack Sullivan face 'Unbelievable Conditions' Amid Search Review

Lilly and Jack Sullivan face 'Unbelievable Conditions' Amid Search Review

Newsweek20-05-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Missing children Lilly and Jack Sullivan and the people searching for them are facing "unbelievable conditions," according to the Nova Scotia Ground Search and Rescue Association (GSRA).
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) told the public they are assessing and reviewing their search from the weekend of May 17 and 18 in order to plan future steps.
Lilly, 6, and Jack, 4, went missing from their Nova Scotia home on May 2 and are believed to have wandered into the heavily wooded area surrounding their home.
Sherry Veinot, President of the Nova Scotia GSRA, told Newsweek that this area is "almost impassable" due to fallen trees from Hurricane Fiona in 2022.
Staff Sergeant Curtis MacKinnon, District Commander Pictou County District, RCMP, speaks to reporters about the search for Lily Sullivan and Jack Sullivan, Nova Scotia, Wednesday, May 7, 2025.
Staff Sergeant Curtis MacKinnon, District Commander Pictou County District, RCMP, speaks to reporters about the search for Lily Sullivan and Jack Sullivan, Nova Scotia, Wednesday, May 7, 2025.
Ron Ward/The Canadian Press via AP
The Context
The Nova Scotia GSRA has been assisting the RCMP alongside more than 115 people in their search for the missing children.
The search started as a wide search of the area, but was narrowed down on May 7. Despite the more localized focus, the children have still not been found.
One search manager, Amy Hansen, said she did not anticipate the RCMP would continue their search on Monday, May 19. It is unclear at this time whether a search party went out on the 19th. If one did, the RCMP has not publicized it.
The RCMP has been contacted via email for comment.
What To Know
According to police descriptions, Lilly has shoulder-length light brown hair with bangs. She might be wearing a pink sweater, pink pants, and pink boots.
Jack has short blondish hair. He was last seen wearing blue dinosaur boots, but no other clothing description is available.
They both attend Salt Springs Elementary. They were last seen at school on April 29. They did not have school on April 30, and were home sick on May 1 and 2.
They live on Gairloch Road in Nova Scotia, a rural and wooded area. "It is all deadfalls and trees on top of one another, meaning searchers [are] either having to climb over or crawl under them," explained Veinot to Newsweek.
Veniot also said that it is currently the height of Nova Scotia's tick season. Ticks can carry several infections with them, including Lyme Disease, Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis (HGA), Babesiosis, and Powassan virus.
Lyme Disease contraction is the highest risk faced from a tick bite. It can result in a rash, fever, and muscle pain, and if left untreated, can cause facial paralysis and nervous system disorders.
Veniot's team is looking for clues via prints, clothing, and any indication of objects carried by the missing children.
Amy Hansen, Search Manager, speaks to reporters about the search for Lily Sullivan, 6, and Jack Sullivan, 4, Lansdowne Station, Nova Scotia, Wednesday, May 7, 2025.
Amy Hansen, Search Manager, speaks to reporters about the search for Lily Sullivan, 6, and Jack Sullivan, 4, Lansdowne Station, Nova Scotia, Wednesday, May 7, 2025.
Ron Ward/The Canadian Press via AP
What People Are Saying
Sherry Veniot told Newsweek: "This search has taken a toll on searchers both physically and emotionally, and we are all hoping for a resolution."
Sergeant Curtis MacKinnon, Pictou County District RCMP, said in a press release: "We extend our sincere appreciation to the search and rescue volunteers who have selflessly given up over 10,000 hours of their time since this search began. Their tireless commitment in truly gruelling conditions is appreciated by both the RCMP and the greater community."
What Happens Next
The RCMP's latest search efforts are being reviewed and assessed for future planning.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Legal Analysts Weigh in on Trump's National Guard Deployment to California
Legal Analysts Weigh in on Trump's National Guard Deployment to California

Newsweek

time43 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Legal Analysts Weigh in on Trump's National Guard Deployment to California

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Legal experts weighed in about whether President Donald Trump has the legal authority to deploy the National Guard to Los Angeles as California Governor Gavin Newsom announced a lawsuit challenging the administration's latest move. Why It Matters Newsom, a Democrat, said on Monday the state will be suing the Trump administration after he ordered the National Guard to Los Angeles, where protests have erupted over U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in the city. While the raids are following legal directive from federal authorities, protests have erupted amid reports that detainees were being held in the basement of a federal building. ICE denied these allegations, with a spokesperson previously telling Newsweek the agency "categorically refutes the assertions made by immigration activists in Los Angeles." The clashes highlight deepening conflicts between sanctuary jurisdictions and federal immigration policy, as Trump has implemented sweeping changes through executive orders and utilized the wartime Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expand deportation authority. Critics have accused Trump of abusing his power by sending in National Guard troops, with Newsom casting the move as "unlawful" and a "serious breach of state sovereignty." What to Know Trump, over the weekend, federalized the California National Guard using Title 10 authority, which allows him to presume the top of the chain of command under certain circumstances. He sent 2,000 National Guard troops into downtown Los Angeles, where protests escalated over the weekend as groups shut down parts of the 101 Freeway and clashed with law enforcement officers who responded with tear gas and flash bangs. The White House wrote that Trump decided to do so because the protests "directly inhibit the execution of the laws" and "constitute a form of rebellion." Title 10 authority allows a president to federalize a state's national guard whenever there is a foreign invasion, a rebellion against the authority of the U.S., or when a president is unable to execute the laws of the U.S., former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek. California Highway Patrol officers attempt to control crowds in Los Angeles, California on June 7, 2025. California Highway Patrol officers attempt to control crowds in Los Angeles, California on June 7, 2025. BENJAMIN HANSON/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images The administration's case that there is a rebellion preventing ICE from executing law enforcement operations would likely hold up in court, Rahmani said. "I think it's clearly been met if he's unable to enforce the nation's immigration laws with the agents that he has, he can federalize the National Guard," he said. He said he "can't see a court wading into this political question" to say that Trump cannot enforce the immigration law and that "even the most liberal judge" would be unlikely to block legitimate law enforcement. He predicted the case could be quickly dismissed by a judge. There is historical precedence for a president to federalize the National Guard against a governor's wishes, though it is rare. It was used during the Civil Rights Era. The last time this occurred was in 1965 when President Lydon Johnson sent in the National Guard to protect civil rights protesters. Former federal prosecutor Gene Rossi told Newsweek he agreed that the lawsuit may face an uphill battle, as the president has "broad discretion" to invoke the National Guard. But he said his decision to defy Newsom indicates the move is an "indicator to me that this is more political than anything else." Still, he felt it was "ironic" because Trump did not call in the National Guard during the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol building, when protests from his supporters over the 2020 presidential election results grew violent. Michael McAuliffe, a former federal prosecutor and former elected state attorney, told Newsweek it's "too early to speculate" about the outcome of Newsom's lawsuit. "The president's general statutory authority to command the national guard will not be in dispute, but the circumstances supporting, or not supporting, such an order will almost certainly be challenged. The legal challenge also will likely contain both an immediate component––timely injunctive relief––and the underlying legal issue of whether the record facts support the mobilization. A different, and higher, legal standard applies for immediate injunctive relief," he said. He said Trump's decision should "give every American chills." "The mobilization of troops for domestic crowd control should remain the rarest of events and only in the most utterly extreme circumstances. The current protest in California against the ICE/federal immigration arrest spree is not one of those instances. The President's action likely will be counter-productive and actually raise tensions, instead of gaining better control of the situation," he said. What People Are Saying California Governor Newsom wrote on X on Sunday: "I have formally requested the Trump Administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles county and return them to my command. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California." President Donald Trump on Truth Social: "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Representative Kevin Kiley, a California Republican, told Newsweek on Monday: "The acts of violence, lawlessness, and obstruction we are seeing in Los Angeles pose an ongoing risk to public safety. The President has chosen to protect federal officers and LA citizens because Governor Newsom has refused to do so. I am praying for everyone's safety during this time." Former federal prosecutor Joyce White Vance wrote in a Substack post: "The role of California Governor Gavin Newsom isn't entirely clear. There is an inside baseball legal dispute over whether the law requires his consent to nationalize the Guard or not. There is little legal guidance on this point, and for now, it's sufficient to say we can expect this to be one of the issues included when California goes to court. The Trump administration is acting under Title 10 USC 12406, which provides that 'orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States.' That language is as clear as mud." What Happens Next Although Newsom has called for the National Guard troops to be returned to California control, the Trump administration has not said they plan to do so. It's unclear how long the National Guard will stay in Los Angeles.

LA Could Face Losing Millions for Police Using Nonlethal Bullets
LA Could Face Losing Millions for Police Using Nonlethal Bullets

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

LA Could Face Losing Millions for Police Using Nonlethal Bullets

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The City of Los Angeles could lose millions if it is sued over the Los Angeles Police Department's alleged use of rubber bullets, case history suggests. Over the past few days, there have been reports of police using rubber bullets during protests and riots in Los Angeles. If people allegedly shot by the police sue the city, they may receive payouts, as suggested by the damages awarded to plaintiffs in similar cases considered by California civil courts. There is no evidence that there has been any litigation at this point. Newsweek reached out to the LAPD and the City of Los Angeles via email for comment. Why It Matters A series of immigration raids on Friday sparked a large protest in Los Angeles over the weekend. In response to some incidents of violence and looting, President Donald Trump announced the deployment of 2,000 National Guard without California Governor Gavin Newsom's consent. The demonstrations are among the most intense wave of public opposition to federal immigration enforcement since Trump returned to office in January. What To Know As the protests have intensified, there have been reports that the LAPD is using rubber bullets against protesters. An Australian journalist was also struck. A British news photographer said that he had to undergo emergency surgery after a plastic bullet hit his thigh. In previous cases, court ordered payments to people who officers shot with rubber bullets. In March 2023, a federal jury awarded $375,000 to Deon Jones after he was shot in the face with a rubber bullet by an LAPD officer during a May 2020 protest. In May 2024, Benjamin Montemayor was awarded $1.5 million after being shot in the testicles with a foam projectile in a 2020 protest, an injury that required surgery. Protesters confront police on the 101 Freeway near the Metropolitan Detention Center of downtown Los Angeles, on June 8, 2025. Protesters confront police on the 101 Freeway near the Metropolitan Detention Center of downtown Los Angeles, on June 8, 2025. AP Photo/Jae C. Hong What People Are Saying Matthew Mangino, a former district attorney in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, told Newsweek: "A jury verdict in a California Federal Court found the LA police's use of non-lethal bullets during a protest was 'malicious, oppressive, or in reckless disregard of' plaintiff's rights. That opens the door to federal 1983 civil rights actions for the same conduct. "The continued use of non-lethal ammunition that cause bodily injury, and in some cases serious bodily injury, is going to open the City of Los Angeles to civil liability." Patrick Wilcken, Amnesty International's researcher on Military, Security and Policing issues previously said in a report about rubber bullets: "We believe that legally-binding global controls on the manufacture and trade in less lethal weapons, including KIPs [kinetic impact projectiles], along with effective guidelines on the use of force are urgently needed to combat an escalating cycle of abuses." What Happens Next Newsom has asked the Trump administration to withdraw federal troops from Los Angeles. During a press conference on Sunday, LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell said that multiple people had been arrested that day.

Greta Thunberg Mocked by Israeli Officials After Aid Vessel Seized
Greta Thunberg Mocked by Israeli Officials After Aid Vessel Seized

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Greta Thunberg Mocked by Israeli Officials After Aid Vessel Seized

Greta Thunberg became the focus of ridicule from Israeli officials and pro-government social media accounts after Israeli forces brought to an end a symbolic maritime mission aimed at delivering humanitarian aid to Gaza. The Madleen, a British-flagged yacht carrying Thunberg and other activists, was intercepted by Israeli naval forces in international waters and escorted to Ashdod port. Israeli authorities indicated the detained activists would be processed and repatriated; as of Monday, they were in custody. Officials dismissed the voyage as a publicity stunt, while activists accused Israel of unlawfully detaining them. Newsweek has reached out to Thunberg's representatives as well as Israel's foreign ministry for comment. The incident highlights Israel's strategy of publicly discrediting high-profile critics amid its Gaza campaign, and the global struggle over the narrative of the situation. While Israel says that it is letting aid into Gaza, foreign aid agences describe a humanitarian disaster that has intensified during the war waged by Israel since the Hamas attack in October 2023. The Israeli seizure and ensuing mockery of the activists came amid an already polarized debate over the fighting in the devastated territory, where the Hamas health authorities say over 54,000 Palestinians have been killed. About 1,200 Israelis were killed in the Hamas attack on Israel, according to official Israeli sources and more than 200 were taken hostage, some still in Hamas captivity in Gaza. Israel's Foreign Ministry derided the mission as a "selfie yacht," asserting that "the show is over" and circulating images of Thunberg being handed a sandwich aboard the vessel. Defense Minister Israel Katz labeled participants "Hamas propagandists" and saying they would be shown footage of the October 7 Hamas attacks during their detention "so they understand what Hamas is." Katz praised the Israeli military for maintaining security. A verified X account associated with FC Ashdod, an Israeli soccer club, posted a mock image announcing Thunberg's "signing" as a striker from Swedish club AIK Solna. The parody post celebrated an "excellent half-season". The Madleen set sail from Catania, Sicily, on June 1, carrying aid including baby formula, rice, medical kits, solar panels, and prosthetics. On Sunday, the Israeli navy intercepted the yacht in international waters about 115 miles (185 km) from Gaza. Shayetet 13 commandos and border units boarded the vessel. Twelve people were aboard, including Thunberg and French politician Rima Hassan, along with journalists, medics, and civil society members. Organizers say the seizure violated maritime law and constituted kidnapping. Israel Foreign Ministry on X: "The 'selfie yacht' of the 'celebrities' is safely making its way... The show is over." Defense Minister Israel Katz: "They will be shown the video of the Hamas massacre. Let them see what Hamas is." Greta Thunberg, in a pre-recorded video: "If you see this video, we have been intercepted and kidnapped in international waters by the Israeli occupational forces, or forces that support Israel." The activists are expected to be repatriated to their home countries in the coming days. Israeli authorities have said the aid onboard will be transferred through official humanitarian channels. Related Articles Iran Threatens to Reveal Secret Israel Nuclear Data: What We KnowGreta Thunberg Says She Has Been Kidnapped by Israeli Forces-What We KnowIsrael Will Block Greta Thunberg's Boat From Reaching Gaza: IDF ChiefTrump Changes Top Middle East General For Strong Iran Hawk 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store