Scammers using AI to dupe the lonely looking for love
"This is a new tool in the toolkit of scammers," Meta global threat disruption policy director David Agranovich told journalists during a briefing.
"These scammers evolve consistently; we have to evolve to keep things right."
Detection systems in Meta's family of apps including Instagram and WhatsApp rely heavily on behavior patterns and technical signals rather than on imagery, meaning it spies scammer activity despite the AI trickery, according to Agranovich.
"It makes our detection and enforcement somewhat more resilient to generative AI," Agranovich said.
He gave the example of a recently disrupted scheme that apparently originated in Cambodia and targeted people in Chinese and Japanese languages.
Researchers at OpenAI determined that the "scam compound" seemed to be using the San Francisco artificial intelligence company's tools to generate and translate content, according to Meta.
Generative AI technology has been around for more than a year, but in recent months its use by scammers has grown strong, "ethical hacker" and SocialProof Security chief executive Rachel Tobac said during the briefing.
GenAI tools available for free from major companies allow scammers to change their faces and voices on video calls as they pretend to be someone they are not.
"They can also use these deep fake bots that allow you to build a persona or place phone calls using a voice clone and a human actually doesn't even need to be involved," Tobac said.
"They call them agents, but they're not being used for customer support work. They're being used for scams in an automated fashion."
Tobac urged people to be "politely paranoid" when an online acquaintance encourages a romantic connection, particularly when it leads to a request for money to deal with a supposed emergency or business opportunity.
- Winter blues -
The isolation and glum spirits that can come with winter weather along with the Valentine's Day holiday is seen as a time of opportunity for scammers.
"We definitely see an influx of scammers preying on that loneliness in the heart of winter," Tobac said.
The scammer's main goal is money, with the tactic of building trust quickly and then contriving a reason for needing cash or personal data that could be used to access financial accounts, according to Tobac.
"Being politely paranoid goes a long way, and verifying people are who they say they are," Tobac said.
Scammers operate across the gamut of social apps, with Meta seeing only a portion of the activity, according to Agranovich.
Last year, Meta took down more than 408,000 accounts from West African countries being used by scammers to pose as military personnel or businessmen to romance people in Australia, Britain, Europe, the United States and elsewhere, according to the tech titan.
Along with taking down nefarious networks, Meta is testing facial recognition technology to check potential online imposters detected by its systems or reported by users.
gc/arp/dw
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
15 minutes ago
- Business Insider
OpenAI just won gold at the world's most prestigious math competition. Here's why that's a big deal.
OpenAI's latest experimental model is a math whiz, performing so well on an insanely difficult math exam that everyone's now talking about it. "I'm excited to share that our latest @OpenAI experimental reasoning LLM has achieved a longstanding grand challenge in AI: gold medal-level performance on the world's most prestigious math competition — the International Math Olympiad (IMO)," Alexander Wei, a member of OpenAI's technical staff, said on X. The International Math Olympiad is a global competition that began in 1959 in Romania and is now considered one of the hardest in the world. It's divided into two days, during which participants are given a four-and-a-half-hour exam, each with three questions. Some famous winners include Grigori Perelman, who helped advance geometry, and Terence Tao, recipient of the Fields Medal, the highest honor in mathematics. In June, Tao predicted on Lex Fridman's podcast that AI would not score high on the IMO. He suggested researchers shoot a bit lower. "There are smaller competitions. There are competitions where the answer is a number rather than a long-form proof," he said. Yet OpenAI's latest model solved five out of six of the problems correctly, working under the same testing conditions as humans, Wei said. Wei's colleague, Noam Brown, said the model displayed a new level of endurance during the exam. "IMO problems demand a new level of sustained creative thinking compared to past benchmarks," he said. "This model thinks for a long time." Wei said the model is an upgrade in general intelligence. The model's performance is "breaking new ground in general-purpose reinforcement learning," he said. DeepMind's AlphaGeometry, by contrast, is specifically designed just to do math. "This is an LLM doing math and not a specific formal math system; it is part of our main push towards general intelligence," Altman said on X. "When we first started openai, this was a dream but not one that felt very realistic to us; it is a significant marker of how far AI has come over the past decade," Altman wrote, referring to the model's performance at IOM. Altman added that a model with a "gold level of capability" will not be available to the public for "many months." The achievement is an example of how fast the technology is developing. Just last year, "AI labs were using grade school math" to evaluate models, Brown said. And tech billionaire Peter Thiel said last year it would take at least another three years before AI could solve US Math Olympiad problems. Still, there are always skeptics. Gary Marcus, a well-known critic of AI hype, called the model's performance "genuinely impressive" on X. But he also posed several questions about how the model was trained, the scope of its "general intelligence," the utility for the general population, and the cost per problem. Marcus also said that the IMO has not independently verified these results.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Quantum computing is so fire — No, seriously. BofA says it could be humanity's biggest breakthrough since the discovery of fire
The use of subatomic particles to process data could represent a breakthrough that's unmatched in modern human history, according to analysts at Bank of America, who compared it to the discovery of fire. 'A technology that can perform endless complex calculations in zero-time, warp-speeding human knowledge and development.' In a recent note on quantum computing, analysts at Bank of America had to reach way back—way, way back—for a comparable advancement in human history. That's because the use of subatomic particles to process data offers the potential to leap light year ahead of what's possible with traditional semiconductor-based electronics. 'This could be the biggest revolution for humanity since discovering fire,' they wrote on Wednesday. 'A technology that can perform endless complex calculations in zero-time, warp-speeding human knowledge and development.' Scientific evidence suggests early humans began using fire in a controlled way hundreds of thousands of years ago, and perhaps even 1 millions years ago. So how does quantum computing compare to that? Theoretically, there's no calculation a quantum computer can't do, BofA said, adding that it could 'change everything,' by creating new drugs and materials, increasing longevity, and enhancing encryption and logistics, to name just a few examples. At the same time, the artificial intelligence revolution that's also underway could get turbocharged by quantum computing, and vice versa. 'GenAI can help speed up the development and testing time of quantum systems, which could take AI model training to the level of Artificial Super Intelligence,' BofA said. There have already been major milestones in quantum computing. In 2023, Google said its Sycamore quantum processor completed a calculation in 6 seconds that would've taken the top supercomputer 47 years. And in December, Google said its Willow quantum chip solved a problem in less than five minutes that would've taken the world's fastest supercomputer 10 septillion years (or 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years). But a quantum computer has yet to solve a useful real-world problem faster than a classical computer could, BofA pointed out. That's because qubits, the fundamental units of quantum information, still suffer from too much 'noise,' or disturbances that can lead to computation errors. In January, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said the most exciting developments in quantum computing are more than a decade away. In March, he sought to temper expectations for quantum computing that somehow it's 'going to be better at spreadsheets.' Rob Schoelkopf, cofounder and chief scientist of Quantum Circuits, also said at the time that advances in quantum computing would come more gradually instead of in a sudden flip of a switch. 'We're going to be turning the volume steadily, and we can start to hear the music now, and eventually everyone will be able to hear the music,' he predicted. Meanwhile, BofA noted that quantum computing has geopolitical implications as well. The technology can level the playing field in overall processing power, which the U.S. currently leads the world in. 'Whoever wins the 'quantum race' will gain an unprecedented geopolitical, technological and economic advantage,' analysts said. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Quantum computing is so fire — No, seriously. BofA says it could be humanity's biggest breakthrough since the discovery of fire
The use of subatomic particles to process data could represent a breakthrough that's unmatched in modern human history, according to analysts at Bank of America, who compared it to the discovery of fire. 'A technology that can perform endless complex calculations in zero-time, warp-speeding human knowledge and development.' In a recent note on quantum computing, analysts at Bank of America had to reach way back—way, way back—for a comparable advancement in human history. That's because the use of subatomic particles to process data offers the potential to leap light year ahead of what's possible with traditional semiconductor-based electronics. 'This could be the biggest revolution for humanity since discovering fire,' they wrote on Wednesday. 'A technology that can perform endless complex calculations in zero-time, warp-speeding human knowledge and development.' Scientific evidence suggests early humans began using fire in a controlled way hundreds of thousands of years ago, and perhaps even 1 millions years ago. So how does quantum computing compare to that? Theoretically, there's no calculation a quantum computer can't do, BofA said, adding that it could 'change everything,' by creating new drugs and materials, increasing longevity, and enhancing encryption and logistics, to name just a few examples. At the same time, the artificial intelligence revolution that's also underway could get turbocharged by quantum computing, and vice versa. 'GenAI can help speed up the development and testing time of quantum systems, which could take AI model training to the level of Artificial Super Intelligence,' BofA said. There have already been major milestones in quantum computing. In 2023, Google said its Sycamore quantum processor completed a calculation in 6 seconds that would've taken the top supercomputer 47 years. And in December, Google said its Willow quantum chip solved a problem in less than five minutes that would've taken the world's fastest supercomputer 10 septillion years (or 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years). But a quantum computer has yet to solve a useful real-world problem faster than a classical computer could, BofA pointed out. That's because qubits, the fundamental units of quantum information, still suffer from too much 'noise,' or disturbances that can lead to computation errors. In January, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said the most exciting developments in quantum computing are more than a decade away. In March, he sought to temper expectations for quantum computing that somehow it's 'going to be better at spreadsheets.' Rob Schoelkopf, cofounder and chief scientist of Quantum Circuits, also said at the time that advances in quantum computing would come more gradually instead of in a sudden flip of a switch. 'We're going to be turning the volume steadily, and we can start to hear the music now, and eventually everyone will be able to hear the music,' he predicted. Meanwhile, BofA noted that quantum computing has geopolitical implications as well. The technology can level the playing field in overall processing power, which the U.S. currently leads the world in. 'Whoever wins the 'quantum race' will gain an unprecedented geopolitical, technological and economic advantage,' analysts said. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
