A Winter of Reckoning: Policing, Syndicates, and the Erosion of Command
Image: | DOCTOR NGCOBO Independent Newspapers
Clyde N.S. Ramalaine
South Africa's winter has long echoed historic burdens, most notably the 1976 student uprising and the July 2021 unrest. The latter, labelled an insurrection by the Ramaphosa-led state, served as a politically expedient move, deflecting accountability while exposing racist violence in Phoenix, state brutality, and broken democratic promises.
But July 2025 signals a new chapter, marked by exposures, high-level suspensions, and institutional decay, especially within the South African Police Service (SAPS). This 'Winter of Discontent' reveals not just negligence but a disturbing nexus of criminal syndicates, compromised police structures, and political interference. This is about more than corruption; it is about the erosion of command and a nation caught between exposure and accountability.
At the centre of this storm is KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. His explosive 6 July statement shifted public discourse, revealing forensic links between weapons used in several high-profile assassinations, pointing to a coordinated network within the state's security structures.
Mkhwanazi's disclosures are grounded in evidence: ballistic matches, arrests, and corroborated results. Weapons recovered in the murder of engineer Armand Swart matched those used in the 2022 assassination of DJ Sumbody and the attempted murder of Tebogo Thobejane. SAPS spokesperson Athlenda Mathe confirmed, 'All these three cases are linked somehow.' Four weapons, including the AK-47 used to kill DJ Sumbody, are now tied to at least 10 high-profile cases.
By July 21, four suspects were arrested, including alleged kingpin Katiso 'KT' Molefe and three suspected hitmen: Michael Pule Tau, Tiego Floyd Mabusela, and Musa Kekana. SAPS confirmed the ballistics-linked weapons to at least ten cases, giving credibility to Mkhwanazi's claims and undermining counter-narratives, particularly Minister Senzo Mchunu's initial denials, later followed by admissions.
Criticism of Mkhwanazi's motives came from UJ academic Steven Friedman, who suggested the disclosures reflected SAPS factionalism. But dismissing hard evidence as political theatre lacks integrity. Such scepticism risks masking the reality beneath elite commentary. The forensic backing and arrests demand honest reckoning, not theoretical dismissal.
Another twist came via former Hawks boss Godfrey Lebeya, who admitted to receiving a tip-off—allegedly from someone linked to Molefe- about a Hawks operation. Lebeya redirected the Hawks, leading to an almost confrontation with SAPS. He has refused to name the caller, citing the pending Madlanga Judicial Commission. But the question remains: why do criminal suspects have such access to top law enforcement, while citizens struggle to report crimes?
Equally disconcerting is the role of Brown Mogotsi, a politically connected figure who acted as a conduit between Mchunu and SAPS, despite having no formal position. Once active in North West politics and a vocal CR17 supporter, Mogotsi sent unsolicited WhatsApp directives to Mkhwanazi, claiming to speak for Mchunu. In a Checkpoint interview, he even claimed to be in Tanzania during the arrest of Thabo Bester and Nandipha Magudumana.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Mogotsi's ambiguous role, shadowy operative or media-seeking hero, underscores the breakdown of command in SAPS and the alarming closeness between politics and policing. His public activity illustrates political interference cloaked as operational engagement.
The allegations surrounding Mchunu and Sibiya suggest obstruction. Mchunu disbanded the Political Killings Task Team (PKTT) investigating political assassinations, while over 120 dockets stalled. Mkhwanazi linked Sibiya to controversial figures, including Mogotsi and murder-accused businessman Vusimusi 'Cat' Matlala, through data from Matlala's cellphone. In Parliament, Mchunu denied knowing Mogotsi, only to later call him 'a comrade.' This contradiction borders on perjury.
Moreover, critical dockets were reassigned to Sibiya without SAPS Commissioner Masemola's knowledge, suggesting an attempt to derail investigations. Sibiya has since taken legal action against SAPS for what he calls an unlawful suspension.
President Ramaphosa's suspension of Gauteng Director of Public Prosecutions Advocate Andrew Chauke added to the month's turmoil. Is this accountability, or political housekeeping? Does it reflect NDPP Shamila Batohi's past warnings about compromised individuals within the NPA?
July brought yet another subplot: Patriotic Alliance (PA) Deputy President Kenny Kunene, who was present at Molefe's arrest. Though uncharged, his presence drew attention. Kunene resigned from his City of Johannesburg post pending an internal party investigation. His background in media ownership, Weekly Xposé, Africa News 24-7, may explain his presence as a search for a scoop. Still, the PA's swift suspension of Kunene contrasts sharply with the ANC's inertia. Mchunu, shielded by executive privilege, remains untouched.
In response to Mkhwanazi's disclosures, Ramaphosa announced three critical decisions on 13 July: the formation of a judicial commission, placing Mchunu on leave, and appointing Firoz Cachalia as acting minister. These moves are now under Constitutional Court review, with the uMkhonto we Sizwe Party (MKP) challenging their legality.
Should the court side with the MKP and strike down the announcements, the implications would be disruptive. Such a ruling would mark an institutional red card not just for executive overreach, but also against the President's ability to act in crisis.
It could provoke a constitutional crisis, weaken the presidency's authority under Section 84, embolden adversaries questioning the legitimacy of state efforts to combat law enforcement capture, and further erode SAPS's fragile command. Worse, it might encourage those implicated to delay accountability under the guise of procedural propriety.
The Madlanga Commission may not commence for three months and could take years to conclude. Meanwhile, overlapping investigations from Parliament, the Public Protector, and others have been launched.
But are these parallel probes strategically sound, or dangerously duplicative? Witnesses may feel compromised about testifying before the commission begins, fearing political fallout or legal complications. Without coordination, these overlapping inquiries could harm the integrity of the entire process. Justice demands urgency, but also coherence.
We've seen this before: Phala Phala produced more noise than resolution. Overlapping mandates, jurisdictional confusion, and political manoeuvring tactics create a fog that allows the guilty to vanish, locked in a sealed status. The more disjointed our accountability processes, the easier they become to manipulate.
As July ends, one wonders: Will the judiciary be next? If Mkhwanazi's revelations are accurate, the rot reaches further into the justice system. Is South Africa ready for that confrontation?
This winter may not deliver justice, but it has begun a reckoning, driven not by politicians but by a police commissioner with evidence. Mkhwanazi's bravery has shattered the silence. He's shown us a state entangled with criminality, protected by privilege, and nearing institutional collapse.
As the Madlanga Commission awaits commencement, the spread of unaligned investigations risks confusion over clarity. Without coherence, justice may again be buried under politics. July 2025 has not answered every question, but it's raised the ones we can no longer ignore.
Whether this moment becomes a turning point or deepens the national malaise will depend on what follows. South Africa stands at a precipice, its guardians exposed, its institutions tested, and its people impatient for action.
* Clyde N.S. Ramalaine is a theologian, political analyst, lifelong social and economic justice activist, published author, poet, and freelance writer.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
10 Gauteng cops arrested for theft have been granted bail
Six metro and four Saps officers face theft charges for not recording cash and goods seized during a raid. Ten police officers who were arrested on theft charges in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng, have been granted R1 500 bail each. FN Dlamini, 25; NF Sambane, 41; MH Mabasa, 29; EZ Dlalisa, 33; T Sidebi, 29; T Kgagara, 31; Sergeant M Mashala, 43; Constable T Mokhabukhi, 28; Constable MM Mongalo, 33; and Constable TN Matsane, 35, appeared before the Germiston Magistrate's Court on Wednesday, where their bail application was unopposed. Accused officers from metro police and SAPS units Six of them are members of the Ekurhuleni Metro Police Department officers, while four are members of the Tsakane South African Police Services (Saps). The officers were arrested after an Edenvale shop owner alleged that during a raid on his business premises on 4 June, the officers seized R35 000 in cash, cigarettes worth R150 000, and boxes of Panado tablets. Officers part of joint operation They were part of a joint law enforcement operation aimed at monitoring compliance at shops in the area. ALSO READ: Cops charged with kidnapping Chinese national out on bail National Prosecuting Authority Gauteng spokesperson Phindi Mjonondwane said the shop owner alleges he was not present during the raid but was later informed by his cashier that the police had confiscated the items. During the raid, the officers arrested the cashier for trading in illicit cigarettes and another employee for violating immigration rules. Missing cash never logged as evidence Mjonondwane said the seized goods were allegedly placed in several refuse bags to be submitted as exhibits. 'However, the complainant claims that upon his arrival at the police station, only one refuse bag had been registered,' she said. 'Furthermore, the cash was neither returned nor recorded in the SAP13 register – the official register used for documenting exhibits seized during criminal investigations.' The matter has been postponed to 8 September for further investigation. NOW READ: Police told crime victim to investigate their own case
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
State opposes bail of 'dangerous criminal' DJ Sumbody murder accused
The state has described the Sandton businessman Katiso 'KT' Molefe, 61, as a dangerous criminal with no regard for human life. Molefe, who is accused of the murder of Pretoria club owner Oupa John Sefoka, better known as DJ Sumbody, and is also charged with the murder of Soweto DJ Vintos, appeared at the Alexandra magistrate's court on Wednesday. The state is opposing his bail application. An affidavit by the investigating officer read in court described Molefe as a flight risk. DJ Sumbody and his two bodyguards, Sibusiso Mokoena and Sandile Myeza, were shot dead in Woodmead, Johannesburg, in November 2022. Molefe is also charged with the murder of DJ Vintos, real name Hector Buthelezi, in March 2022 outside a nightclub in Orlando East, Soweto. 'The crimes that he is charged with are at this stage four counts of conspiracy to commit murder and four counts of murder, and if he is convicted, he will face long-term imprisonment,' read the affidavit. The court heard that the information indicates that Molefe is allegedly active in the illicit drug trade and that the killing of the DJs was connected to the trade. Investigators approached Sars using section 73 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act (Poca) notification. The preliminary investigation by Sars revealed that the business entities to which he attests in his affidavit during the bail application in February, on the matter of Armand Swart, in support of his bail application, didn't identify the source of the funds. 'The analysis of the bank statements obtained through the section 205 subpoena shows that the applicant predominantly receives cash deposits, with no identifiable source of these funds. 'This raises a strong suspicion that he has unidentified sources of income. What further needs to be brought to the court's attention is that there was a huge outcry on social media against the applicant's release on bail recently,' read the affidavit. The investigating officer's affidavit indicated that Molefe will intimidate and influence the witnesses. 'Witnesses have indicated that they fear for their lives. There is an imminent danger that if the applicant is released on bail, more witnesses will go into hiding and will refuse to come to court.' It was stated that putting more witnesses in witness protection has its own challenges and it's extremely disruptive to the lives of the witnesses. 'There is a likelihood that the applicant will destroy evidence when released on bail. One of the AK-47s used in the shooting of DJ Sumbody is still missing, and we are still looking for it.' To further support the assertion that the applicant has destroyed evidence, the investigating officer attached the statement which illustrates that Molefe had been consistently using same cellphone number across different five phones since April 2016. 'However, on 8 October 2024, the applicant abruptly ceased using both this number and the device associated with it. 'The timing of this change is highly significant, as it occurred one day after crucial evidence was presented in the Vereening court on 7 October 2024, during proceedings related to the rearrest of accused 1, Michael Pule Tau, for contravening bail conditions,' read the affidavit. The investigating officer indicated that the evidence against Molefe was overwhelming, and if released on bail, he has a strong motive to evade justice. He has the means to leave the country at any time, as his movement across the border over the years from 2004 until 2024 was more than 100 times. Molefe's co-accused, who were not in court as they did not apply for bail and are in prison for the murder of Armand Swart, are Michael Pule Tau, Tiego Floyd Mabusela and Musa Kekana. The matter was postponed to August 14 for the continuation of the bail application.
Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Murder-accused businessman Katiso 'KT' Molefe declares assets worth millions
JOHANNESBURG – Murder-accused Sandton businessman Katiso Molefe has declared assets worth millions, revealing a lavish lifestyle before the Alexandra Magistrates Court, where he is applying for bail. Molefe faces charges of murder and conspiracy to commit murder in connection with the killing of musicians Oupa Sefoka knowns as DJ Sumbody and DJ Vinto, whose real name is Hector Buthelezi. Sefoka and Buthelezi were both killed in a hail of bullets in the 2022, in separate incidents which the State believes Mofele orchestrated He has also been charged with the murders of Sefoka's bodyguards, who he was travelling with when he was shot in November 2022. ALSO READ: Court hears Molefe involved in illicit drug trade and murders of DJ Sumbody & DJ Vintos were linked to this In his bid for bail Molefe's lawyer Advocate Michael Hellens read his affidavit where he revealed that he is willing to sell some of his assets for bail as he must afford bail in his other murder case. ' In my personal capacity I'm the owner of a Mercedes Benz SL600 worth approximately R400, 000 and through my company I also owned a V Class Mercedes valued at R1.8 million and a Range Rover worth R1.2 million. I actually sold my V Class Mercedes to pay for legal fees and bail.' INVESTIGATORS ARGUE AGAINST MOLEFE'S BAIL BID At the same time, investigators have argued against the release of Molefe, saying he is a dangerous criminal with no regard for human life. Molefe is also on trial for another hit on Vereeniging engineer Armand Swart. On Wednesday, the police officers leading the investigation into Molefe sat in the Alexandra Magistrates Court surrounded by heavily armed guards. While Molefe was out on R100,000 bail for another murder case against him, the lead investigating officer in the current matter before court said there is an imminent danger should Molefe be released on bail. 'Witnesses have indicated that they fear for their lives since his release on bail. There is an imminent danger that if Molefe is released on bail once more, witnesses will go in hiding and will refuse to come to court.' Police also believe that if Molefe is granted bail, there is a likelihood that he will destroy evidence as one of the AK47 rifles used in the shooting of DJ Sumbody remains missing. Molefe's bail application was postponed to next Friday, and he will remain behind bars.
