Tennessee ICE operation sparks fear in immigrant communities as over 100 arrested under Trump deportation plan
AI image
A recent joint operation between US immigration department and the Tennessee highway patrol has resulted in the arrest of over 100 people, sparking concern and uncertainty within Nashville's immigrant community.
The operation, which began on May 3, saw the Highway Patrol making 588 stops, of which 103 individuals were detained under suspicion of immigration violations, reported news agency Associated Press. The operation, which officials say was intended to improve public safety, resulted in the recovery of illegal drugs and firearms.
The operation has raised alarm, especially in Nashville, where local officials were caught off guard.
Operation Sindoor
'Common sense prevailed': Trump on India-Pak ceasefire on Truth Social
'Pakistan initiated call; both nations agreed to stop military action after direct talks', says India
Ceasefire took effect at 5pm; top India, Pak military officials to talk again on May 12
Wally Dietz, Nashville's law director, said that the city was unaware of the operation's specifics. Republican governor Bill Lee, defend the initiative, citing a new law to bolster state immigration enforcement.
Lisa Sherman Luna, executive director of the Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition, labelled the operation as racial profiling, claiming the highway patrol has been stopping people for minor infractions like broken taillights or tinted windows in predominantly immigrant areas.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Complete protection with iPru All-in-one Term Plan
ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan
Get Quote
Undo
Luna argues that many individuals detained during the operation might have had a right to remain in the US if they had access to proper legal counsel. Instead, many are reportedly agreeing to deportation out of fear of prolonged detention.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Relationship is excellent': Trump confirms trade deal with China finalised
Trump says a trade deal with China has been finalised, with key agreements on rare earth supplies, tariffs, and student visas, pending final approval from both leaders after talks in London Prateek Shukla New Delhi US President Donald Trump on Wednesday claimed that a trade deal with China has been finalised, pending final approval from both him and Chinese President Xi Jinping. In a post on Truth Social, Trump stated, 'Our deal with China has been finalised, pending final approval from President Xi and myself. As part of the agreement, China will supply, upfront, full magnets and any necessary rare earth materials.' He added: 'We will be imposing a total of 55 per cent in tariffs, while China will impose 10 per cent. The relationship between our countries is excellent. Thank you for your attention to this matter. In return, the United States will provide what was agreed upon, including allowing Chinese students to study in our colleges and universities—something I've always supported.' Framework reached after London talks Trump's remarks come shortly after the United States and China reached an initial understanding on a new trade framework, following two days of high-level discussions in London involving senior officials from both governments. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed that the agreement is expected to resolve long-standing trade tensions, particularly over restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets, which are critical to defence and electronics industries. Officials said the framework will now be presented to Presidents Trump and Xi for formal approval. Further details on implementation timelines and the full scope of reciprocal commitments are expected following the final summit between the two leaders. The earlier Geneva talks had collapsed largely due to China's export restrictions on essential minerals. In response, the Trump administration introduced its own set of export bans, halting the shipment of semiconductor design tools, aircraft, and other critical goods to China. A crucial de-escalation A breakthrough between the two giant economies was much-needed. Following Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement on April 2, trade between the US and China had virtually frozen. The imposition of a 145 per cent tariff on most Chinese imports made it economically unviable for American companies to source goods from what had long been their second-largest trading partner. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who led the US delegation in the negotiations, described the previous tariff structure as 'unsustainable.' On May 12, both sides announced plans to scale back their record-high tariffs, marking a turning point in the talks. This is especially significant considering China's near-total dominance in the supply of rare earth elements — materials essential for producing everything from cars and jet engines to MRI contrast dyes and certain cancer medications.
Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Foreign minister Jaishankar asked if India can trust US President Donald Trump. His reply: ‘Meaning what?'
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar weighed in on India's foreign policy priorities and ties with major global players — including the United States under Donald Trump during his visit to Brussels this week. In a conversation with European media network Euractiv, he was asked whether India could trust Trump. Jaishankar replied: 'Meaning what?'. The interviewer then expanded on the question, asking, 'Is he (Trump) as good as his word? Is he a partner India is willing to deepen ties with?' 'I take the world as I find it,' was Jaishankar's reply. 'Our aim is to advance every relationship that serves our interests — and the US relationship is of immense importance to us. It's not about personality X or president Y.' Jaishankar's frank comments come as New Delhi and Washington have differed over US role in the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan. The US President has often reiterated his claim of mediating peace between New Delhi and Islamabad, while India has asserted that the decision was made strictly bilaterally. Speaking at a campaign event on May 31, Trump once again said he 'got India and Pakistan to stop fighting' by linking trade talks to de-escalation. 'We talk trade, and we say we can't trade with people who are shooting at each other and potentially using nuclear weapons… They understood and they agreed, and that all stopped,' he said. Earlier, on May 10, when the two nuclear-armed countries agreed to stop firing and military action, the United States claimed credit for brokering the ceasefire with Trump saying the two countries agreed on a full and immediate ceasefire 'after a long night of talks mediated by the United States'. New Delhi has dismissed such remarks in the past and maintains that the ceasefire following Operation Sindoor was the outcome of direct bilateral engagement with Pakistan. Indian officials have underlined that no foreign government, including the United States, was involved — and that trade negotiations with Washington were unrelated to any security decisions made in the region. Jaishankar, who is in Brussels to meet European Union (EU) leaders, also spoke about India's foreign policy priorities from counterterrorism and trade to multipolarity and global trust. On the recent clash with Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror attack, Jaishankar urged the West to see India's response under Operation Sindoor as an anti-terror operation—not a border spat. 'This isn't merely an India-Pakistan issue. It's about terrorism,' he said, adding: 'Let me remind you—Osama bin Laden lived in a Pakistani military town, right next to their equivalent of West Point. That very same terrorism will eventually come back to haunt you.' He also criticised the international media coverage for reducing the situation to 'tit-for-tat between two nuclear-armed neighbours.' Noting Europe's search for 'strategic autonomy,' Jaishankar said multipolarity is already here. 'Europe must now make decisions based on its own capabilities and interests… I hear terms like 'strategic autonomy' being used—these were once part of our vocabulary,' he remarked. Calling the EU a 'major pole' in the global order, Jaishankar said: 'That is precisely why I'm here: to deepen our relationship in this multipolar world.'
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Privilege motion against Suvendu Adhikari for remarks against Mamata Banerjee
Kolkata: West Bengal assembly speaker Biman Banerjee on Wednesday accepted a privilege motion moved by four Trinamool Congress (TMC) legislators against leader of the opposition Suvendu Adhikari for allegedly making defamatory remarks against chief minister Mamata Banerjee outside the assembly house on Tuesday. The speaker told the media that the motion has been sent to the assembly's privilege committee for review. 'The committee will submit its report by the next session,' he said. The next session is likely to be held in September, according to assembly officials. On Tuesday, Mamata Banerjee targeted the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) alleging that the Pahalgam terror attack had proved the Centre's failure to provide security to Indian citizens. She made the remarks during discussions on a resolution moved by the TMC government condemning the April 22 terror attack and hailing the subsequent action by the Indian armed forces against Pakistan. In the resolution, which was adopted unanimously, the name of the Indian action, Operation Sindoor, was, however, not mentioned. After the proceedings, Adhikari told reporters outside the assembly house that Banerjee batted for Pakistan throughout her speech. 'She batted for Pakistan all the way and also insulted our Prime Minister and Union home minister,' he said. Hours after this, TMC legislators submitted an application at the speaker's office seeking permission to move a privilege motion against Adhikari.
