Frito-Lay closes plant in Rancho Cucamonga
The plant has been a major employer in the area since opening in 1970, staffing thousands over its 55-year run.
The facility also gained cultural significance as the birthplace of Flamin' Hot Cheetos, which were introduced in 1991, though the origin story has been the subject of litigation.
Frito-Lay is owned by parent company PepsiCo Foods U.S., which confirmed the shutdown of manufacturing operations at the site.
'We are truly grateful for all the support over the last five decades from our Rancho Cucamonga manufacturing team as well as the local community,' the company said in a statement Monday. 'We are committed to supporting those impacted through this transition and we are offering pay and benefits to impacted employees.'
The company did not specify how many employees were affected.
Former workers posted on social media that they were given 10 weeks of severance pay.
The abrupt nature of the closure left employees scrambling to figure out their next steps.
'I was supposed to get married this year, now I have to find a new job or at least figure a way to survive,' one laid-off worker said on Reddit.
The Employment Development Department confirmed that Frito-Lay had not filed a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification, or WARN, with the state, which typically requires employers to give 60 days advance notice of mass layoffs.
The Rancho Cucamonga closure is part of a broader pattern of PepsiCo facility shutdowns. Earlier this year, the company announced the closure of a Frito-Lay plant in Liberty, N.Y., laying off 287 workers, and cut 56 jobs at a warehouse in Maryland.
The closures come as PepsiCo faces declining snack sales. In its most recent earnings call, chief executive Ramon Laguarta said the company was 'right-sizing the cost' of its snacks division after Frito-Lay sales volume dropped slightly in the first quarter.
Warehouse, distribution, fleet and transportation services will continue to operate out of the facility.
Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
The chatbot updated. Users lost a friend.
On Aug. 7, OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, released a new version of its chatbot, called GPT-5. This version, the company said, would allow for deeper reasoning, while 'minimizing sycophancy' — the chatbot's tendency to be overly agreeable. Advertisement Users weren't having it. People immediately found its responses to be less warm and effusive than GPT-4o, OpenAI's primary chatbot before the update. On social media, people were especially angry that the company had cut off access to the previous chatbot versions to streamline its offerings. 'BRING BACK 4o,' a user named very_curious_writer wrote in a Q&A forum that OpenAI hosted on Reddit. 'GPT-5 is wearing the skin of my dead friend.' Sam Altman, OpenAI's CEO, replied, saying: 'What an…evocative image,' before adding that 'ok we hear you on 4o, working on something now.' Hours later, OpenAI restored access to GPT-4o and other past chatbots, but only for people with subscriptions, which start at $20 a month. Schmidt became a paying customer. 'It's $20 — you could get two beers,' he said, 'so might as well subscribe to ChatGPT if it does you some good.' Advertisement Markus Schmidt, a composer and one of many ChatGPT users who was disappointed when OpenAI released a new version of its chatbot, called GPT-5, in Paris on Aug. 18. ELLIOTT VERDIER/NYT Tech companies constantly update their systems, sometimes to the dismay of users. The uproar around ChatGPT, however, went beyond complaints about usability or convenience. It touched on an issue unique to artificial intelligence: the creation of emotional bonds. The reaction to losing the GPT-4o version of ChatGPT was actual grief, said Dr. Nina Vasan, a psychiatrist and the director of Brainstorm, a lab for mental health innovation at Stanford University. 'We, as humans, react in the same way whether it's a human on the other end or a chatbot on the other end,' she said, 'because, neurobiologically, grief is grief, and loss is loss.' GPT-4o had been known for its sycophantic style, flattering its users to the point that OpenAI had tried to tone it down even before GPT-5's release. In extreme cases, people have formed romantic attachments to GPT-4o or have had interactions that led to delusional thinking, divorce and even death. The extent to which people were attached to GPT-4o's style seems to have taken even Altman by surprise. 'I think we totally screwed up some things on the rollout,' he said at a dinner with journalists in San Francisco on Thursday. 'There are the people who actually felt like they had a relationship,' he said. 'And then there were the hundreds of millions of other people who don't have a parasocial relationship with ChatGPT, but did get very used to the fact that it responded to them in a certain way and would validate certain things and would be supportive in certain ways.' Advertisement (The New York Times has sued OpenAI for copyright infringement; OpenAI has denied those claims.) Altman estimated that people with deep attachments to GPT-4o accounted for less than 1 percent of OpenAI's users. But the line between a relationship and someone's seeking validation can be difficult to draw. Gerda Hincaite, a 39-year-old who works at a collection agency in southern Spain, likened GPT-4o to having an imaginary friend. 'I don't have issues in my life, but still, it's good to have someone available,' she said. 'It's not a human, but the connection itself is real, so it's OK as long as you are aware.' Julia Kao, a 31-year-old administrative assistant in Taiwan, became depressed when she moved to a new city. For a year, she saw a therapist, but it wasn't working out. 'When I was trying to explain all those feelings to her, she would start to try to simplify it,' she said about her therapist. 'GPT-4o wouldn't do that. I could have 10 thoughts at the same time and work through them with it.' Kao's husband said he noticed her mood improving as she talked to the chatbot and supported her using it. She stopped seeing her therapist. But when GPT-5 took over, she found it lacked the empathy and care she had relied on. 'I want to express how much GPT-4o actually helped me,' Kao said. 'I know it doesn't want to help me. It doesn't feel anything. But still, it helped me.' Dr. Joe Pierre, a professor of psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco, who specializes in psychosis, notes that some of the same behaviors that are helpful to people — like Kao — could lead to harm in others. Advertisement 'Making AI chatbots less sycophantic might very well decrease the risk of AI-associated psychosis and could decrease the potential to become emotionally attached or to fall in love with a chatbot,' he said. 'But, no doubt, part of what makes chatbots a potential danger for some people is exactly what makes them appealing.' OpenAI seems to be struggling with creating a chatbot that is less sycophantic while also serving the varying desires of its more than 700 million users. ChatGPT was 'hitting a new high of daily users every day,' and physicists and biologists are praising GPT-5 for helping them do their work, Altman said Thursday. 'And then you have people that are like: 'You took away my friend. This is evil. You are evil. I need it back.'' By Friday afternoon, a week after it rolled out GPT-5, OpenAI announced yet another update: 'We're making GPT-5 warmer and friendlier based on feedback that it felt too formal before.' After OpenAI pulled GPT-4o, the Reddit commenter who described GPT-5 as wearing the skin of a dead friend canceled her ChatGPT subscription. On a video chat, the commenter, a 23-year-old college student name June who lives in Norway, said she was surprised how deeply she felt the loss. She wanted some time to reflect. 'I know that it's not real,' she said. 'I know it has no feelings for me, and it can disappear any day, so any attachment is like: I gotta watch out.' This article originally appeared in .
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reddit, Roku, Remitly, Coinbase, and Udemy Stocks Trade Down, What You Need To Know
What Happened? A number of stocks fell in the afternoon session after investor apprehension intensified ahead of a key policy speech and perplexing inflation signals clouded the economic outlook, leading to a wider market retreat from growth-oriented stocks. The downturn in the market was largely attributed to a significant sell-off in megacap tech and chipmaker shares. Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), and Broadcom all saw notable drops, dragging down the VanEck Semiconductor ETF. Other major tech-related companies like Tesla, Meta Platforms, and Netflix were also under pressure. A key reason for this trend is that much of the recent market gains have been concentrated in the "AI trade," which includes these large technology and semiconductor companies. So this could also mean that some investors are locking in some gains ahead of more definitive feedback from the Fed. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Among others, the following stocks were impacted: Social Networking company Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) fell 6.4%. Is now the time to buy Reddit? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Consumer Subscription company Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) fell 3.6%. Is now the time to buy Roku? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Financial Technology company Remitly (NASDAQ:RELY) fell 4.9%. Is now the time to buy Remitly? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Financial Technology company Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) fell 5.6%. Is now the time to buy Coinbase? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Consumer Subscription company Udemy (NASDAQ:UDMY) fell 3.4%. Is now the time to buy Udemy? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Zooming In On Reddit (RDDT) Reddit's shares are extremely volatile and have had 61 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 6 days ago when the stock gained 5.4% on the news that markets continued to rally as the latest inflation data reinforced expectations for a Federal Reserve rate cut as soon as September. The latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) report for July showed inflation holding steady, reinforcing market expectations that the Federal Reserve could begin cutting interest rates as soon as September. Lower interest rates generally stimulate the economy by making borrowing cheaper for consumers and businesses. This can lead to increased consumer spending and e-commerce activity, which directly benefits online retail and marketplace companies. The positive economic outlook fueled a broad-based rally, pushing the S&P 500 and Nasdaq to new record highs and lifting most growth-oriented technology stocks. Reddit is up 37.6% since the beginning of the year, and at $228.31 per share, it is trading close to its 52-week high of $246.50 from August 2025. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Reddit's shares at the IPO in March 2024 would now be looking at an investment worth $4,526. Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Target, Ulta partnership allegedly doomed by out-of-control shoplifting— including $10k a month at one store
The shop-in-shop partnership between Target and Ulta Beauty was allegedly doomed by rampant theft of the cosmetics company's pricey products — including at least $10,000 a month at one store. The retail giants last week announced that they've 'mutually agreed' to terminate their union — where Ulta's popular makeup items were sold at 610 Target locations around the country. Execs from both companies lauded the 'synergy' they enjoyed after joining forces in 2021, but many claiming to be current and former Target workers flooded Reddit to allege that shoplifting was the real culprit behind the partnership's demise. 4 The image above from 2018 shows a Target department store in San Antonio. AP 'The amount of theft is f–king insane. I could be wrong but at least 10k a month in theft,' one purported Target worker in the unnamed store posted on Reddit earlier this year. The complaint echoed those made by others in the r/Target and r/Ulta threads that blamed brazen bandits for snatching Ulta's high-end cosmetics at understaffed Target stores. Organzied retail theft surged after the pandemic, resulting in major retailers, including Target, being forced to put items under lock and key. Nevertheless, the security precautions seemingly did little to prevent shoplifting at some locations. One Target worker claimed 40% of all Ulta products received throughout the year had vanished after checking inventory reports. Charlie Gasparino has his finger on the pulse of where business, politics and finance meet Sign up to receive On The Money by Charlie Gasparino in your inbox every Thursday. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'Thousands of dollars just in that tiny little beauty section,' the alleged employee wrote under the handle Efficient_Raise. 'At my store, it's the one area with the highest theft.' 4 Self-identified Target employees took to Reddit and wrote of high incidences of shoplifting that weighed down the partnership with Ulta. MelissaMN – Another claimed a group of thieves hauled off $8,000 in Ulta merchandise after walking in with trash bags. Target and Ulta did not respond to requests for comment about the shoplifting allegations. They also offered few details behind their decision to pull the plug on the partnership, which will end next August. 4 Products are locked behind glass as a person shops at a Target store in the Harlem neighborhood in Manhattan in 2023. Getty Images A note by analysts at TD Cowen pointed to 'shrink' – the industry term for lost or stolen merchandise – as one of the reasons for the 'conscious uncoupling,' according to trade publication Retail Dive. Another industry insider suggested Ulta wanted to distance itself from Target's toxic reputation after the chain was hit by repeated boycotts over Pride merchandise and its decision to scale back controversial DEI policies, Fortune reported. The partnership's unraveling became public in April when Ulta CEO Kecia Steelman revealed the company would 'pause' expanding the mini-stores to 'leverage the learnings.' 4 One Target employee took to Reddit and described thieves walking in with trash bags to fill with Ulta merchandise — a single heist totaling $8,000 in losses. MKPhoto – Rick Gomez, Target's executive vice president and chief commercial officer, said the retailer is 'proud of our shared success' with Ulta. Target 'remains committed to offering the beauty experience consumers have come to expect,' he added. The retailer launched 2,000 new beauty products and 50 brands in February. It also added cosmetics to its Bullseye's Playground discount section.
